[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / htg / hwndu / kc / newbrit / polk / qq / say / wai ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)

Catalog

/qq/ - Got a personal issue?
Try these Embeds:
soundcloud, fontvid.me, xhamster, pornhub, redtube, tube8, xvideos, youjizz, vimeo, twitch.tv, dailymotion, vaughnlive, liveleak, nicovideo, streamable, soundcloud
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


A recognized Safe Space for liberty - if you're triggered and you know it, clap your hands!

File: 1427062517692.png (231.6 KB, 500x296, 125:74, b_frank_words_of_wisdom.png)

 No.2[Reply]

Help to compile a list of resources (preferably free) about non-authoritarian political thought. If you want to see something added, make a thread to discuss adding things to this list and I'll edit it in here if it's good.

Our list so far:
Please note that inclusion on this list is not an endorsement of a work. What you do with this information is your choice.

The Online Library of Liberty
http://oll.libertyfund.org/
Find hundreds of writings, books, essays, etc. on classical liberal thought.

Mises Institute
http://mises.org/
Find dozens of free books, audiobooks, and lectures on libertarian thought from an Austrian school perspective.

The Anarchist Library
http://theanarchistlibrary.org
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
Post last edited at

 No.709

Organizations of Interest
Inclusion on the list is not endorsement. Organizations are listed in no particular order.

The Fire - Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
These people are your friends - they fight for freedom! FIRE is a non-partisan individual rights advocacy group that seeks to defend freedom of speech, legal equality, due process, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience on American college and university campuses.
Website: http://www.thefire.org/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheFIREorg

American Enterprise Institute
The AEI is a nonpartisan public policy research institute. Everything from American politics to international events and beyond.
Website: https://www.aei.org/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/AEIVideos

Learn Liberty
A project of the Institute for Humane Studies, a libertarian non-profit. Learn about economics, public policy, and more.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1427061139157.png (111.83 KB, 500x500, 1:1, political_compass_liberty.png)

 No.1[Reply]

Welcome to /liberty/, your board for the discussion of politics, society, news, and the human condition without authoritarianism (fascism, full-on communism, etc). The board's philosophy is simple - welcome all discussion from non-authoritarian viewpoints, light moderation, and most importantly of all fun.

We've seen SJWs, we've seen the far right, and we've seen the far left and we've said no, stop this madness - the moralizing authoritarians who seek to control society and shape it to their whims and test out their vague theories would enslave us just to feel that society was better. At /liberty/ we believe we would be best served by sticking to the path we've been on for so long, that of personal liberty.

WELCOME

See the image - if you make the cut, you'll be right at home on /liberty/. Even if you are an authoritarian (far left or far right), you're welcome to join us - just don't expect to be taken seriously.

Rules

1. Global Rules uber alles.

2. Spamming can result in a short ban. In the event of raids, discussion threads will be stickied to weather the storm.

3. Rules are lame, don't make me make more and don't whine for more moderation unless it is absolutely necessary.

4. This board has an actual topic and it's not fetish porn. Content that is clearly beyond the pale of the board's topic (fetish porn, clop, gore, etc) will be removed. If you need these things, they are a mere three clicks away; you can even get there one-handed.

Board Policy Vis-a-vis…

1. "Shitposting"

There is no such thing as shitposting. It's a vague and subjective concept that boils down to "irreverent posts or things I don't like," and therefore makes a bad yardstick for moderation. If you want discussion without fun, may I suggest another board?

2. "Shills"

While shills may exist, the intense pPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Post last edited at


File: 0f182650f520611⋯.jpeg (106.93 KB, 510x680, 3:4, the moon is a harsh mistr….jpeg)

 No.52268[Reply]

/liberty/'s first reading month is over: >>49811.

From here on, spoilers are no longer required. Just talk openly about what you thought of the book. I'll start:

- The book was fucking awesome, the best sci-fi novel I've read since Blindsight.

- Luna was closer to ancapistan before its independence. The revolutionary government is libertarian as fuck, but before it, they essentially didn't have a government.

- The loonies have a remarkable culture and mindset. They're a bit too savage and unrefined, but other than that very noble.

- I find Mannies comment that rudeness sometimes warrants a death warrant weirdly intriguing.

- Holy shit that ending was sad, but my sister pointed out that at least Mike led a great, happy life. Still, I'm sorry that his friends lost him.

5 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52487

File: 9cbba1834ec5cc1⋯.png (1.45 MB, 1050x903, 50:43, 9cb.png)

>>52477

>Implying Heinlein isn't a quality author

>Implying Stirner is "heavy academic stuff" and not just obtuse shit


 No.52492

File: cf2fb8d4685a201⋯.jpg (141.11 KB, 803x688, 803:688, 3bniMcR - Imgur.jpg)

>>52477

>implying Marxist writers are not considered academic because their writing is horrible and dismissing


 No.52596

>>52477

they can barely make it past basic economics


 No.52604

File: 729aa556eb942c6⋯.jpg (57.85 KB, 658x523, 658:523, 729aa556eb942c696a0c0399fd….jpg)

>tfw no Mannie co-husband


 No.52629

File: 3fbd0531aff904f⋯.png (8.9 KB, 365x378, 365:378, CP269nyU8AA7HbW.png)

>>52604

>Tfw not Mikes male best friend




File: 2086adc1c16dd9a⋯.jpg (160.22 KB, 1200x1200, 1:1, Thomas Hobbes - Academic, ….jpg)

 No.52505[Reply]

Let's have a little debate, shall we? Today's topic - the emergence of government. Do you agree with classical liberals on social contract or maybe you're an adherent of Oppenheimer's anarchist theory of government as an entity which per definitionem must be coercive? Starting… Now.

7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52611

Government first appeared with the emergence of private property (first in the form of land) and its function was to enforce property relations and inheritance.


 No.52615

>>52607

>So your idea that we can have a society without capitalism has no historical evidence whatsoever to back it up?

Again, this is the problem with "an"caps.

They don't even understand that society is based on more than government.

Government was essentially always non-democratic and authoritarian as hell till recently, what's your point?


 No.52621

>>52615

>Again, this is the problem with "an"caps.

They don't even understand that society is based on more than government.

False. Read the literature, then come back.

>Government was essentially always non-democratic and authoritarian as hell till recently, what's your point?

Actually, it got more authoritarian with the French Revolution. That's when the occasional brutality of tyrants was replaced with the constant oppression of democratic regimes, even in countries that supposedly got more free.

My point was that you claimed that every government was protecting a capitalist class. That implies that there was never a more than primitive society that had a government but wasn't capitalist. As there weren't many stateless and remotely socialist societies, you pretty much have to do away with a historical methodology.

I had to type all this out because you are a stupid person that cannot answer a simple question, but still insists on the correctness of his vulgar special snowflake marxism.


 No.52625

File: 4c73b3cbb1da396⋯.jpeg (112.84 KB, 720x960, 3:4, 4c73b3cbb1da3962d07af2f58….jpeg)

>>52621

>Read the literature, then come back.

No argument, as per typical.

>Actually, it got more authoritarian with

>more authoritarian

>it was authoritarian beforehand

As I said, idiot.

>That implies that there was never a more than primitive society that had a government but wasn't capitalist.

>M-m-muh GOVERNMENT!

kys

>As there weren't many stateless and remotely socialist societies

>many

>you pretty much have to do away with a historical methodology.

>many

You really dismantle yourself, idiot.

Regardless, this begs the knife in your throat to be twisted as your entire "argument" is based off "it didn't happen tons in history so it's baaaad!"

As if everything didn't have a first, be it feudalism, mercantalism, "capitalism," corporatism, fascism, etc.

>I had to type all this out because you are a stupid person

Kill yourself.


 No.52628

>>52625

>As I said, idiot.

No, what you said was this:

>Government was essentially always non-democratic and authoritarian as hell till recently, what's your point?

Fucking retard.

>As if everything didn't have a first, be it feudalism, mercantalism, "capitalism," corporatism, fascism, etc.

I don't give a fuck, I don't follow a historical methodology. Do you? That's what I wanted to know, but you were too busy telling me that you're a master in gorilla warfare with 300 confirmed kills to answer a simple question, you pathetic Internet tough guy.




YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.52598[Reply]

I keep hearing "a small government will never stay small"

But how would an ancap society stay, well, ancap?

Moreover, how would private national defense work to prevent invasion?

Vid not strictly related.

 No.52608

>>52598

>I keep hearing "a small government will never stay small"

I'd take that argument with a grain of salt. It's good against the social engineers who believe they can fine-tune a political system and remove the possibility of power abuse forever, or against legal students who see constitutional safeguards as insurmountable, but it doesn't debunk the notion that constitutions are generally effective. Worse, it can give the impression that we regard a system as a failure if it fails within two-hundred years. That's a standard that can only bite us in the ass because we can't predict that ancapism would hold out that long.

>But how would an ancap society stay, well, ancap?

There's no guarantee that it would, also because there's an ideological component to it. Coercive elements can always sneak in, but an abolition of the libertarian order as a whole would get very unlikely if people valued their independence and freedom enough. That would make a takeover, both from inside and outside, extremely hard to achieve, and then the only real danger would be an ideological shift towards statism.

>Moreover, how would private national defense work to prevent invasion?

Hard to predict the details, but I think a lot like current national defense, just with more agencies each on a smaller scale competing with each other. They'd have tanks, helicopters and so on, but all purely for defensive purposes, because offensive weapons would largely be a useless expense. So no carpet bombing capacity for them.

I'm pretty confident in the defensive ability of an ancap nation. The public goods problem doesn't apply to national defense, as military defense is a rivalrous and excludable good. We'd also have even more wealth to draw military resources from than nowadays, because fewer resources would be wasted by the government and capital accumulation would go undisturbed. So given the right demand (which would rise in the face of imminent danger), we could raise a military force that could engage a statist military head-on. None of the overhyped gPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


 No.52609

>>52608

AnCaps are less likely to go to war or be attacked thanks to free trade and non-intervention. We'd have more allies and more money to defend with. The costs of going to war with us will greatly outweigh any benefit from plunder. Presenting us as the bad guys won't work on anyone that isn't a Socialist. "Unjust" wars either don't happen or don't last long.

We don't have to defend ourselves all alone. Reminder that other nations will also need us to be safe and economically stable. When our economy goes bad thanks to the sudden shock of war, or even the speculation we might be in one, everyone trading with us will directly suffer.


 No.52610

An actually free market inevitably turns into FULL COMMUNISM


 No.52616

File: b002a81e0832d74⋯.webm (1.27 MB, 484x478, 242:239, ___.webm)

>Moreover how would private national defense work

It wouldn't.

It's retarded, it'd just work so the biggest corporate ends up taking over and installing a fascist regime, or they refuse to defend anyone else unless they pay ridiculous reparations, etc.

It's a fucking shitfest like you idiots always are in every aspect of politics.

>>52608

>because fewer resources would be wasted

HHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>Hard to predict the details

In other words in "an"capistan just like with everything, who gives a fuck, we don't need a plan, THE MARKET WILL SOLVE IT.

Thank fuck for that, we could dismantle your horseshit the second it arrives without no corporate government to intervene.

>then the only real danger would be an ideological shift towards statism.

What are: blackcat strikes?

>>52609

>AnCaps are less likely to go to war or be attacked thanks to free trade and non-intervention.

[Insert exaggerated laugh track]

>Reminder that other nations will also need us to be safe and economically stable.

Who says some miserable wild-west hellhole country is going to be all that relevant in the international economy?

Sorry but China isn't going ancap, nor is the USA, ever.


 No.52627

>>52616

>In other words in "an"capistan just like with everything, who gives a fuck, we don't need a plan, THE MARKET WILL SOLVE IT.

So you think that unless you have a full, detailed blueprint of how people in a fictional society will behave, you cannot say whether their economic order will function? Then how can you be a commie? Or did you sit down and make detailed plans on how to distribute wholesome food to allergic and diabetic people?

>What are: blackcat strikes?

Shit that'll cost you a few days of wages or even your job and future employment, and rightly so. Now stop threatening us, it's getting pathetic.




File: 17e867d628303ec⋯.jpg (28.11 KB, 497x474, 497:474, 1489889678458.jpg)

 No.52365[Reply]

Anyone else completely repulsed by wastefulness and inefficiency, to the point of disgust? I despise it more than anything in the world.

2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52462

Yes, my state government is a good example.


 No.52464

The concept of "inefficiency" is at odds with the concept of "subjective value" in free market economics. I can think of much worse things, like the many murders that governments commit, how they extort people out of their own earnings or how imperious bureaucrats substitute their own values for those expressed freely by individuals in the market.


 No.52613

So are you a technocrat or what? Capitalism is wasteful and inefficient.


 No.52617

Go commie then.

It's the only way.

>>52464

>I can think of much worse things, like the many murders that governments commit, how they extort people out of their own earnings or how imperious bureaucrats substitute their own values for those expressed freely by individuals in the market.

You can't just say "well (X) is okay because (Z) happens" and then go to blame those things as if they happen because of government.

No it's the shitty capitalism you want.

They kill or threaten their opposition.

Welcome to capitalism idiot.

>>52366

>then I can live with it.

Then how can you live with capitalism?

Most food in the west goes in the trash, even before it's purchased (around 30-60%) while people literally starve in the very same cities.

That's not a bad decision, nor small, etc, that's intentional murder and suffocation of the working class and the impoverished class.


 No.52626

>>52617

>Most food in the west goes in the trash, even before it's purchased (around 30-60%) while people literally starve in the very same cities.

Never heard of anyone starving in the west, not within the last decades. Unless you can give me a source, I'm gonna call bullshit on this.




File: a4181977a975949⋯.jpg (74.93 KB, 500x750, 2:3, cute-husky-puppy-photo.jpg)

 No.52416[Reply]

Can someone explain how you don't see a large corporation with armed security as a state?

How do you guys define a state anyway?

not trying to start a fight here, just curious

15 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52602

File: a1fa90af01679c0⋯.jpg (221.33 KB, 700x525, 4:3, 4GcvLc9.jpg)

>>52591

>autism


 No.52605

File: 8ae65cfb2b16aad⋯.png (120.67 KB, 316x362, 158:181, 3e201d775bae138c4fc425f050….png)

>>52449

That picture physically hurt to view.

>>52591

Says the guy who lurks 24/7 on a board just to post empty quips about people he disagrees with in every thread.


 No.52618

File: 17a75061931a2ac⋯.jpg (351.21 KB, 1280x776, 160:97, 17a75061931a2ac1aec8b189f9….jpg)

Can you explain to me why such a corporation wouldn't act just as a government and threaten or even downright violate others nearby, covertly or directly?

This is one of the issues with "an"caps, as they fail to provide a solution to this. They just whine about "muh NAP" as if that ever stops the big capitalist with more power from absolutely fucking everyone else, be it on a country-level or on a smaller business-level.

As if these corporates wouldn't violently assassinate opposition or simply purchase everything in regions and impose their force on them? That they wouldn't buy property surrounding an area, put in a gate, and force a toll?

Dangle from a bridge, scumbags.


 No.52624

>>52618

Cool beans.


 No.52630

>>52618

Haven't read the post, but I wanted to comment on how people post that monopoly image without realizing virtually all the food on it is junk food or absolute shit on the market compared to commonly bought brands.

It's like, even within the shitty junk food market you have 10 options to get your absolute shit from.




File: 771d4e433bf5fb0⋯.png (133.64 KB, 580x405, 116:81, IMG_0478.PNG)

 No.52474[Reply]

>socialized medicine doesn't wo-

37 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52589

File: 001899190d42cd8⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 370.48 KB, 2026x1433, 2026:1433, porked.png)

>>52510

Mother of fuck, leftypol memes are stale.


 No.52592

>>52496

Because on a free'd market there is no private property so we can decide to occupy hospitals with medic and doctor coops that don't charge exhorbitant amounts


 No.52601

>>52589

I think the original was by /leftypol/ though.


 No.52620

File: 20e96dc217eb933⋯.jpg (201.14 KB, 1080x1349, 1080:1349, GoVegan.jpg)

>>52592

>Go to a hospital you can afford

>It's a big corporate hellhole with shit care and questonable practices

>Go to a hospital you can't afford

>Good quality care, friendly attentive staff, local, etc.

>Only the business owner of the corporate can go here since you can't afford it

How does "liberty" not get this?

>>52586

>every macronutrient required for mammals to thrive.

AHAHAHAHAHHAHAA

You do realize milk is FROM A DIFFERENT ANIMAL and different animals require different nutrients, right?

It has no fiber, essentially no iron or manganese, etc.

You're literally retarded. Kill yourself.

>humans aren't omnivorous.

Omnivores can eat meat and other animal products and not become diseased.

Herbivores can often eat them too, but become diseased.

We become diseased.

You tell me, idiot.

>MMMMUUHHH PROTEIN

You can eat literally white rice all day and get your protein in you fucking idiot

Unless you drink olive oil and powdered sugar all day you will get your protein.

>m-muh veganism is too hard :((((

Just eat plants you dumb nigger

It's easier, less messy, takes less time, etc.


 No.52623

File: 0000b894722c6d1⋯.jpg (28.77 KB, 600x600, 1:1, viper-god-has-no-luv-4-u.jpg)

>>52620

Didn't even read your post. If you're not willing to eat bacon, you can just as well stop eating at all, in preparation for your communist shitshow.




File: 02e48f8b947c142⋯.jpg (271.82 KB, 900x675, 4:3, PJZ3oi.jpg)

 No.52117[Reply]

What the fuck makes you think that you can have a free society without mercilessly executing communists and Islamists by throwing them out of helicopters?

19 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52293

>>52288

>a state is when you use force to make someone do something, for example forcing them at gunpoint into a cage

>defending yourself (property is an extension) is not aggression.

Sorry to say it, but that's a blatant contradiction.


 No.52316

>>52288

No, that has nothing to do with the state. Read a dictionary and stop redefining words to suit your agenda.


 No.52599

for a free society we unironically also have to kill all retarded americans tbh


 No.52619

File: d7dba9d99bd0e81⋯.jpg (199.23 KB, 670x1005, 2:3, 26608b9eb86583b7a39206f456….jpg)

>>52197

>Ancapism guarantees that communists and welfare leeches will either abandon their ways of fucking starve.

huh???

Do you even know what squatting is, shoplifting, or how much violent crime we're willing to do against the opposition?

We'd easily live on.

>misallocation of resources

So you should love it, that's what you idiots are all about, throwing away resources.

>>52277

>voluntary hierarchies

They aren't voluntary in capitalism though.

It's a constant ask of

>Work for me, or go live on the streets (and die)

regardless of where you go.

That's not voluntary, it's non-consensual by nature either way.


 No.52622

>>52619

>Do you even know what squatting is, shoplifting, or how much violent crime we're willing to do against the opposition?

So you're, like, parasites? :^)




File: ffac3d2a7f0c924⋯.jpg (57.9 KB, 500x387, 500:387, the call that saved.jpg)

 No.50230[Reply]

Why is pol such a safe space? Every ancap BTFOs racism and they just ban them.

41 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52122

>>52022

> I'm allowed to prefer polycentric legal systems while also hating sub-100 iq niggers y

I'm not saying anyone will stop you; I'm saying that the likely market trends will make your position unpopular.


 No.52600

>>52122

This is exactly why I hate Rothbardian NAPfags.

The greatest part about ancapsitan is you can live in an area that has laws you like.

Rather than there being some monolithic legal system, like Rothbard wants, there should be a market for law. Why am I not allowed to live in an area where like minded people gathered and said, "no more niggers raping our wives and daughters and stealing/destroying our property" so naturally the private security and arbitration of that area tend towards laws against allowing niggers to live there under most circumstances.

What are you going to do, throw a hissy fit because we don't subscribe to your libshit "everyone is equal" cuckery? It doesn't matter if it's not "popular", there are plenty of examples in america today of towns where a majority HATE niggers but can do nothing about them because of "democracy" and the federal government preventing it. If those towns exist in the american political environment you better believe they'll exist in ancapistan.

Also, basing laws on popularity rather than freedom to choose is called democracy.


 No.52603

>>52600

Why are you getting so buttmad over people with slightly differing opinion? What part of a Rothbardian ancap society is stopping you from having a town or community that has a policy of mutually excluding people you don't like? Obviously using force against people or their property is wrong and violates the NAP, but you can just refuse to sell them property, or if they do own property, otracise them economically and socially until they're forced to emigrate. You can create your own community in which the terms for living their is not to support [undesired persons], and anyone who violates these terms can be kicked out.


 No.52606

>>52600

There's no real difference between hoppean and rothbardian ethics, not in its conclusions, and yet Hoppe outlined how segregation would be lawful and desirable in a stateless society. So what makes you think the same wouldn't be true for rothbardian ancaps?

Also, Rothbard did not believe everyone is equal. He wrote an essay praising The Bell Curve, among other things. He didn't go all the way, as Hoppe did, but to say he was a cucked champion of equality and tolerance is just wrong. If he came across that way, then probably during his earlier career, when he was still trying to strike an alliance with the largely left anti-war movement.


 No.52614

>>52606

He also wrote Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature which is probably the most rigorous attack on the concept out there. Painting Rothbard as a champion of "equality" shows he just mouths off without having the faintest clue what he's on about, that being a frequent attribute of the /pol/tard.




File: dedda9fa81116a6⋯.jpg (43.1 KB, 718x499, 718:499, dedda9fa81116a630f11896e60….jpg)

 No.52469[Reply]

explain this

13 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52561

>>52548

>Actually liking that non argument

Anon, what are your other favorite philosophical standpoints?


 No.52576

I am not sure but I THINK he means when someone cheats in a relationship and still wants to maintain it as a relationship then they have all the power, a monopoly if you will.


 No.52581

>>52469

marriage/sentimental relationship is contract,it should be enforced as such,it's unfair to compare it with enterprises


 No.52583

I'm pretty sure it's been statistically proven that sluts who sleep around are far worse in all areas of life. Chastity and modesty are some of the highest virtues women can have. And of course there is a double standard in this area due to vast biological differences, not that I don't think men who sleep around aren't degenerate, but due to the reality of childbirth it's the imperative of women to choose the best partner possible, while men can spread their seed with impunity. Women who are sluts show a critical lack of integrity.


 No.52612

>>52583

where are the proofs




File: 6fe565b0d909756⋯.jpg (1.12 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 1411683326199561922.jpg)

 No.51832[Reply]

how to convince my family into ancap? they are not even libertarians now

my mother is ENFJ

25 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52384

>>51832

My general strategy:

First you convince them that free market solutions work, and why we ought to have civil libertarian policies.

Then talk about the non-aggression principle and why arbitrary political authority is invalid (e.g. refutation of social contract, fair play theory)

Finally, introduce them to ancapism, and how it might work in practice.


 No.52385

>>52384

Also if your parents are marxists, you won't be able to convince them of anything.


 No.52480

>>52385

some people grew up from marxism


 No.52546

>>52480

Thomas Sowell was one of them


 No.52597

>into ancap

first you have to indulge them into engaging in cognitive dissonance all the time, then they will reach ancap by themselves




YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.51554[Reply]

Is his work still relevant for today or is it terribly outdated?

9 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.51642

File: bf261fcaed829f9⋯.png (25.84 KB, 424x213, 424:213, memes are dank.png)

>>51636

Well at least you two have something in common.


 No.51644

>>51630

It was never really a personal contest to begin with. Every economist considered him a joke. It didn't take Bastiat for that to happen.


 No.51773

>>51644

To be fair, the Islamic World had a system very similar to mutualism and it lasted for centuries.


 No.52519

>>51554

It's core concepts are true but his examples and parables are highly outdated.


 No.52595

>>51641

>mathematics can be applied in real life

k lol




File: e6165ff74f0fa75⋯.jpg (236.36 KB, 840x550, 84:55, IMG_0310.JPG)

 No.51999[Reply]

>AnCaps will defend this

33 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.52520


 No.52524

>>52054

>shitskins are retarded

>never build up a proper society because they are too low IQ

>it's colonialism's fault

>>>/leftypol/


 No.52529

>>51999

Don't be silly Antifa. There's no need for the sweatshops. Machines will be doing that.


 No.52532

>>52499

You done saying absolutely nothing?


 No.52594

File: 929eac6f72ebaa2⋯.jpg (156.33 KB, 900x1125, 4:5, 1489608478412.jpg)

>ancoms

as retarded as ancaps tbh, take your shitty ideologies off my black flag




File: 342eae6fc72cd0e⋯.png (19.35 KB, 898x778, 449:389, portrait.png)

 No.52523[Reply]

Ban this poster.

>muh freedumz

Incorrect, liberal scum

 No.52535

There is no negative right to shitpost on a Taiwanese imageboard. Banning is perfectly acceptable


 No.52538

>>52523

This is old. There are almost no newfags here. Why try the same bait again?


 No.52540

>>52538

How is this bait?


 No.52577

>>52535

this.


 No.52593

Is OP autistic?




Delete Post [ ]
[]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
| Catalog
[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / htg / hwndu / kc / newbrit / polk / qq / say / wai ]