/pact/ - Pedophile Activism

>>2319

It was never about making it cool.

When being gay was illegal what happened was they met up in secret and did things in private.

It was probably just as risky for a gay person of that time to find another gay person as it is nowadays for paedophiles to find a child who is willing to participate in sexual interactions with the paedophile.

If they got caught they went to jail (or could opt for chemical castration, e.g. Alan Turing) I'm glad "The Imitation Game" painted chemical castration in such a negative light.

It goes back to why homosexuality was deemed illegal. Because it was a sin.

Where the illegality of homosexuality was challenged is in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Offences_Act_1967

>"unless a deliberate attempt be made by society through the agency of the law to equate the sphere of crime with that of sin, there must remain a realm of private that is in brief, not the law's business”

They established that just because it was a sin does not mean that it is a crime.

And once it was no longer a crime this allowed homosexuals to be a bit more open about it.

The problem is, that homosexuality being legalised may have made things a lot harder for paedophiles in some ways too.

Take this quote:

>"I ask those [homosexuals] to show their thanks by comporting themselves quietly and with dignity… any form of ostentatious behaviour now or in the future or any form of public flaunting would be utterly distasteful… [And] make the sponsors of this bill regret that they had done what they had done"

And look at the behaviour of homosexuals today. Gay Pride parades, forcing modified school curriculums and politically correct terminology, fighting job discrimination based on sexual orientation, becoming basically a feminism equivalent for homosexuals. The backlash of this leaves a bad impression in the minds of the homophobic heterosexuals who are now being forced to tolerate them.

>>2382

It shows the precedent for the path paedophiles must take, They already have a start. It is already not illegal to be sexually attracted to children (only to actually do something sexual with a child) so each and every non-offending paedophile could come out of the closet and there's nothing anyone could do to lock them up. And once they come out of the closet they can work on fighting for their "tolerance" as well. Sure there will be a lot of discrimination to tear down, but if they are so committed to not offending, then they are untouchable by the law, in fact the law is even on their side. But then why don't paedophiles do that? Especially the ones who are so proud to speak here about they would never do anything sexual with a child? Maybe because secretly, they know that's not true.

So we get back to the point of paedophiles (all the ones who truly want to do something sexual with children) wanting to do something that is currently illegal.

So we have to look at why it is illegal. Because

1) Consent (The legal definition) is required for sex,

2) The Age of Consent must be reached in order to consent,

3) A child has not reached the Age of Consent.

To challenge this it requires striking down any of those propositions.

Some paedophiles (particularly hebephiles) target proposition (3) and desire a lowering of Age of Consent such that a child within their Age of Attraction has reached the Age of Consent.

Other paedophiles target proposition (1) and though they may agree that permission is required for sex, they challenge the legal definition of consent being a requirement for sex.

While there is leeway to be made with these two approaches, challenging it at the consent level does not truly address the core purpose of Consent (to protect children). And as such these efforts almost always appear as paedophiles selfishly fighting for the rights to be able to do something sexual with a child. For this approach to work the challenge must be coming primarily from the perspective of the children.

So we must now look at it from the point of view of a crime.

It's a crime because the child has been victimised by engaging in something sexual with an adult. Some Paedophiles are focusing on this area to show statistically that a substantial amount of children are not actually victimised due to the fact they do something sexual with an adult. If they are capable of finding that distinction between what does cause the victimisation and extract that it fragments the cases into some that are currently victimless crimes and crimes with a victim.

However, merely identifying it as a victimless crime is not enough. There are already other victimless crimes which remain illegal (e.g prostitution, gambling, drug use) In order to challenge the illegality of it then, it requires showing that there are some benefits to performing this victimless crime and that those benefits are valuable enough to justify decriminalisation (e.g Marijuana).

tl;dr - Push for sex-positivity and eventually things will get there.

>>2383

Dr. Kinsy already showed that sex between adults and minors doesn't harm them and can be beneficial to them, and it didn't help society progress past their bigotries.

“In many instances,the experiences were repeated because the children had become interested in the sexual activity and had more or less actively sought repetitions of their sexual experiences.”

p 118 (Sexual Behavior in the Human Female)

“… the older females in the sample felt that their pre-adolescent experience had contributed favorably to their later socio-sexual development.”

p 121 (Sexual Behavior in the Human Female)

“The exceedingly small number of cases in which physical harm is ever done the child is to be measured by the fact that among he 4441 females on which we have data, we have only one clear-cut case of serious injury done to the child, and very few instances of vaginal bleeding which, however, did not appear to do any appreciable damage.”

p 122 (Sexual Behavior in the Human Female)

We're dealing with bigots here, not confused people that need convincing.

Big money will solve the problem. It's something women will never have. All it will take are a few more like Margo Caplin, Barbara Hewson to get pedophilia covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Once that happens, People will be pretending to be pedophiles so they can sue. Before you know it, there will be so many pedo coming out, they will become part of most tv shows and movies like homos are.

it won't take long to classify pedos as normal after that.

And if the recession gets worse, pedophilia and other victim-less crimes will become legalized just the same. Until then we have the sex trade which is growing and no one can stop it.

>>2384

>Sexual Behavior in the Human Female

I can't seem to find a copy of that Book in pdf form anywhere.

>>2385

I wasn't able to find a copy either. I have to buy a paperback.

I will digitize the entire book eventually, but it's not an easy task.

>>2382

>>"I ask those [homosexuals] to show their thanks by comporting themselves quietly and with dignity… any form of ostentatious behaviour now or in the future or any form of public flaunting would be utterly distasteful… [And] make the sponsors of this bill regret that they had done what they had done"

oh boy, they must be literally rolling in their graves

>>2384

Stupid Angelo fag. First off he wasn't a gyno so he can't assess the reason for the bleeding. Additionally he didn't test for stds some of which are recently discovered .

Women already have access to money just your mom didn't so you wasn't aborted.

Pedophilia is not a disability that makes no sense you nigger faggot. You didn't come out as one though. Homos aren't like y'all. Get kids to complain how they can't fuck adults. Kids fuck other kids a small percentage want adults. Kids that do want adults don't want 40 something fags who dye their hair blond and bitch about feminism. You were never a worthy while male just a fag who makes websites to other oblivious fags. Stupid cunt faggot.