Well anon there are vary many conspiracy's surrounding the sinking of this great ship. But,,,
While the story of the "Titan" is indeed true and very uncanny there are a few myths that need to be dispelled surrounding the Titanic and some basic history around her construction people need to understand.
For a start she was never called "Unsinkable" until after she sank, she was "considered" practically unsinkable up to certain conditions but not promoted as unsinkable.
The Lack of lifeboats while seen as a major design safety flaw to modern eyes was in fact above code at the time. Her sinking changed this by the way.
The water tight system on her while state of the art was compromised by the addition of certain design changes made late in her construction.
But the real problems with a ship this size at this time in history was the construction material.
Edwardian period iron contained far more inclusions than modern iron, basically impurities that made it brittle in extremely cold temperatures. While the hull plates themselves were very unlikely to have been ripped open by the iceberg the rivets used to secure them would have been sheared off as they were under spec for the size of the ship being built (this was a cost cutting decision). More or less they never expected her to run into an iceberg.
But her biggest design flaw is possibly her most iconic feature coupled with here center turbine driven four blade screw … Her stern was designed along the lines of a clipper ship and it looks very ascetically pleasing… but considering the size of the ship the rudder was in fact in the wrong place.
If you take ships from say the Cunard Line such as the RMS Mauretania she ran with four screws in line on port and starboard driving either side of a deep set rudder. This design in a large ship of the time meant that very little prop turbulence interfered with the rudder function.
On the Titanic she ran with only three screws with one centered right in front of the Clipper stern rudder, this screw could not be put into reverse so if the ship had to hard break the middle screw was not used.
What this did was disrupt the ability for the stern rudder to turn the ship and explains why she was so slow to respond on the night she hit the iceberg.
While the Titanic was a stunningly beautiful ship she was flawed in many design aspects that even the designers of the time knew about.
Now I am sure the Jew would turn such a tragic event to their favor.. so see the result as opportunistic and not premeditated.
And no the Olympic was not swapped with the Titanic, anyone who has done any basic study of the two ships can tell the easy to see differences.