Some of you are alright but most of you seem a bit paranoid.
>>4885210
Its a completely normal commercial
>notice that the doctor's office is drab, with that matrix-like green tinge to it
…So? Thats like saying that they want to make it obvious that the commercial is fake or something, i don't see any propaganda in that.
>the entire commercial has no music
Yeah, that's because adding shitty music would have ruined the atmosphere for the commercial, it would have ruined the joke.
>the white father is portrayed as a drooling, tactless idiot
Clearly he is just messing around with the kid, he isn't being a retarded idiot because the baby IS reacting to what he is doing(again, its part of the joke). This point would have been valid only if he was waving the dorito despite nothing happening.
>with an obviously dysfunctional relationship.
Sure, it is suggested by his wive that the relationship is dysfunctional, but once again, that is probably just part of the joke.
>>4885268
Sure, you could say that is a pro-furry commercial but i need to point out that the animal itself refuses to do weird shit, so you could easily interpret that as a anti-furry commercial.
>>4885428
Yes, this clearly promotes nihilist behavior.
>>4885464
Nothing really bad about it, it tells you to try and be the best at what you want to do. The only reason its tied into pokemon at the end is because its made by the guys who own it and apparently its a commercial for the 20th anniversary.
>>4885697
You're just interpreting the lines as leftist propaganda when they could be interpreted as right wing if you look at it in a different way.
>There is a revolution coming
It could be talking about us vs the leftists
>The future is staring back at us
Maybe its trying to say that its hoping that we will save the future
>The future must be protected
Again, its telling us to protect the future from the muslims, zionists and marxists.
>It will change everything, that's why they want to stop it
The rightwing revolution is change how the world/country works and thus the marxists want to stop it because that kind of future is not what they have been aiming for.
>They will come after you, without cease
That could easily be connected to how the marxists want to censor you everywhere you go if you say even a single thing that goes against their ideals.
Basically what i am trying to say is that the entire thing is too vague for you to make any connections
>>4892169
Yeah, that commercial is leftist propaganda but what you say is fucking retarded.
>promoting a reduction in masculinity in the usual ways
Having a guy say that a car is cute doesn't mean its trying to reduce masculinity. Just because the guy isn't acting all super masculine all the time doesn't mean its leftist propaganda, but because of everything else in the commercial, you are right about it being leftist propaganda.
>One could argue that they might have just included the dyke, and rapper, "and Serina williams" just so the speakers weren't all white men, but given the pitch of the commercial (that "Minis aren't gay little matchbox cars"), they really could have gone with all male speakers
No, the message is that the car isn't a gay car and that everyone, of all paths of life, should not be ashamed to use it. So it makes sense that they included speakers that were not white men.
>>4892522
tbh, that really doesn't seem like propaganda, seems more like apple trying to attract people who want to use something 'New and different"
>>4893409
Now that is OBVIOUS leftist propaganda
>>4908119
Eh, seems like just a commercial about a guy wanting to follow his purpose…his way. The entire commercial is shit tbh, it doesn't make much sense.
>>4908152
Oh yeah, fuck this commercial. Its basically telling you to not watch your hygiene and instead buy their chemical shit and spray it everywhere.
>>4909604
Only like 2 of those could even be considered leftist crap, all the others seemed normal.
>>4909791
I guess they want to make more jobs and have the USA more dependent on its own businesses? I am not quite sure where the propaganda in that is but you do mention 2008 and since i am not american i don't quite get what you're trying to say with that so you may be right about whatever you're talking about.