>>49
I see your point and can concede that the language in the OP was inappropriate. It's difficult to describe SJWism as a political movement because of how little substance is behind it. I can also concede that their association with the Left/liberalism is entirely based on image and not any thought out principles (or even principles which haven't been thought out). More simply I'm used to writing with /pol/ as my audience, and have grown accustomed to playing off of their biases. I'll try to browse /leftypol/ more frequently to better acquaint myself with that side of the coin. I could stand to take a break from /pol/'s perpetual outrage anyways.
Moving forward, it should not be difficult to paint our mutual enemy as being a pack of hypocrites and useful idiots.
A shortlist of common traits could be drawn up and presented to provide a humorous way of publicly identifying these individuals:
Narcissism
The belief that yelling strengthens one's argument
Greater concern for the treatment of fictional comic book heroes than that of actual women in Saudi Arabia
A frightening lack of respect for freedom of speech
Purchasing a t-shirt depicting a communist ideologue from a multinational corporation
Falsified rape threats
Equating the obnoxious with rape
Decrying "Hate Speech" while primarily expressing hatred
Dismissing something as a "social construct" without understanding the logical consequences
/gg/ had digging threads to discover links behind journalists; /revolt/ could have similar threads meant to tease out the corporate beneficiaries of the SJW movement (of which I'm sure there are plenty). This could go a long ways to expose their hypocrisy, or, at the very least, keep them on their toes as they are forced to abandon certain products as problematic. It could also serve to increase infighting by ensuring that some individuals are always behinPost too long. Click here to view the full text.