[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/satanic/ - The Hole in the Wall

A board dedicated towards the damned, the esoteric and the unknown. Open to all types and philosophies, outside religions and the non-religious are welcome to join.

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.

Welcome, all ye who know curiosity. Enjoy, take a seat, explore, blaspheme.
Linked Boards: /satanworship/ /eris/ /satan/ /randomthoughts/

File: 1426221170935.png (58.72 KB, 487x303, 487:303, ResourceCenter.png)

 No.43[Reply]

This thread will feature recommended literature, resources, and other sites of interest. Additional information is always appreciated and information will continue to be built within this thread.

> Literature :
Albert Camus, The Rebel; Postmodern Satanism by Jason King; The Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey; The Satanic Witch by Anton LaVey; Necronomicon; The Ego and His Own by Max Stirner; Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky; Very little, Almost Nothing by Simon Critchley; The Network of Domination by Wolfi Landstreicher; The Black Book by Meshaf i Resh, Chaos Theory by Phil Hine

>Resources:
http://www.dougmesner.com/library/
[A collection of related Satanic literature and other subjects, covering everything from the Satanic panic to mental illness.]

http://theisticsatanism.com/other.html
[Traditionalist/Theistic Satanism; includes links towards multiple demonological, Luciferian and Satanic sources]

http://www.satanservice.org/wiki/Satan_Service:Community_portal
[A plethora of resources and information upon religious and philosophical Satanism]

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
Post last edited at

File: 1423279588034.jpg (116.95 KB, 453x860, 453:860, Bringer-of-Light.jpg)

 No.1[Reply]

Welcome to what is intended to be a cozy spot and a relaxing getaway for Satanists and all other spiritualists belonging to whichever philosophy and orientation. Upon this board, no specific perspective is defined as dominant or wholly authentic. /satanic/ exists as a platform for all beliefs, offering an area of conversation and debate, aiming towards a comfortable online lounge, and open towards all pursuits within any subject.

We are denizens of the dark, outcasts of society, strangers to the artificial, mechanized world, familiars with the spirits and ourselves; and there's rules?

This is a lounge for Satanists and all other spiritualists. Conduct yourselves appropriately.
No needless shitposting.
This board respects and understands the need for anonymity and privacy.
All porn must have spoilers.

> Linked Boards of Interest :
>>>/satanworship/
A blasphemous cyber sanctuary

>>>/satan/
This board focuses upon Satanism from a spiritual standpoint and features theistic conversation and resources.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
Post last edited at

File: 1432104369293.jpg (617.35 KB, 1024x1024, 1:1, 1430714986045-1.jpg)

 No.164[Reply]

Hello, /satanic/. I just wanted to let you know that I'm the new board owner of >>>/kind/, and I'd appreciate it if you'd take the time to drop in and say hello. It's not really devoted to the discussion of topics pertaining to religion/philosophy, but I think kindness is or should be a virtue valued by all, irrespective of our world views!

 No.165

File: 1432498184963.jpg (413.45 KB, 590x674, 295:337, 1b-.jpg)

Kindness is an interesting concept. At what point do the notions of apathy/empathy justify social participation? To allow too much kindness within ensures an easily modified platform, while complete apathy equally creates an externally modifiable social platform. A person who is too kind can be easily taken advantage over, while a person who has total apathy can be easily manipulated against via implementations of rumors and false histories to present social structures.

This world around us is composed of so much artificiality, where the multitude of existing personas reflect the commodification and systemic redesigning by commercialized representations of power and sophistication. Humanity undergoes a constant social breeding of a supposed perfection, but these compositions are simply stimulated cultural effigies. 1000 years ago, what's decent for you and I was radically different from any number of given civilizations.

I do not believe in isolating kindness but I am usually cold and indifferent to many of the people whom I meet. I value kindness as an extremely important psychological resource and its expenditures are equally as valued.

That being said, the board is a thought-provoking one.


 No.167

I am of the mind that kindness, like so many other "virtues" espoused by western culture, can only be weakness.

Oxford defines "kindness" as "the quality of being friendly, generous, and considerate"

If one is deserving of an action that is friendly, generous, or considerate, then the concept of kindness is not needed; performing such an act falls under the category of justice.

If one is undeserving, then the act of kindness is a show of weakness and mush-mindedness.


 No.182

I see kindness as a utility, a personal good to be expressed as I please.

Society teaches humanity "civilized" living, taking away from them true individual action. In our modesty, we forget about the wilderness and embrace Man and Woman as they are packaged.

I think of kindness as a tool, a device that we use, a physical and psychological module towards affecting desirous change.



File: 1423363797364.jpg (66.82 KB, 256x468, 64:117, 1z34x84z34234zxdf4.jpg)

 No.5[Reply]

We Satanists are a marginalized group. Our kind are often disparaged, ostracized, and heavily propagandized against by associates and strangers alike. The media is infused with nonsense pertaining towards seekers of darkness. Legends often paint the narrative of normalized justice as a condition not capable of occurring by the antics or strategies of those who stray too far from the mainstream. Games reflect this, as do movies, and folklore is often no different. As such, the concept of the Satanist is subaltern.

In relation to this systemic isolation, the concept of the Satanist is not solely regulated to just the agent. The Satanist, as a regular recipient of disinformation and historical/present propagandizing, exists in the same nature as other exiled, previously persecuted, presently demonized orientations. Thus, the spectacle of the Satanist is one also shared by the bastardized, the outcast, the alienated.

This lounge represents but a small marking upon the matrix which exists around us: it is a statement, a phrase uttered into the cybersphere, stepped into and occupied but for a moment by curious explorers. The marginalized have a home here; the disciple and guide both find a union in their shared lust for the shadow.

 No.163

Thought for the day:

What does it mean to become marginalized?


 No.176

The subaltern must continually refresh the cycles of resistance or else become assimilated within the stratum of populist consciousness.


 No.181

>>163

I think marginalizing is mostly a public action that occurs when people are least involved with some one else. This could be psychically, physically, emotionally.

>the spectacle of the Satanist is one also shared by the bastardized, the outcast, the alienated

I'm not certain what you mean by this. What does spectacle mean in this context?



 No.23[Reply]

I love to read. What books do/are you reading?

I'm currently starting upon Camus, The Rebel.

 No.24

Foucault has been a dedicated subject of mine for quite some time. Recently coming across a collection of letters, essays and presentations, this gem was instantly saved. I am a firm believer in the fluid and open exchange of ideas, and pdfs and other sources are greatly appreciated tools of smooth transferability.

http://zinelibrary.info/files/Foucault%20-%20The%20Essential%20Works%20of%20Foucault%201954-1984%20Volume%202%20-%20Aesthetics,%20Method,%20and%20Epistemology.pdf

 No.70

I really like Henry David Thoreau. I picked up another copy of Walden at the bookstore last weekend.

 No.76

File: 1427474621964.pdf (114.2 KB, self.pdf)

>>70

Walden is a very good read. I had looked through him the other day. At the moment, I am browsing upon Emerson, Self-Reliance.

 No.81

>>23
Erik Davis, Calling Cthulhu

 No.180

File: 1438713560024-0.pdf (2.03 MB, uncut_ strangerstrangeland.pdf)

File: 1438713560027-1.pdf (1.38 MB, strangers in a strange lan….pdf)

Stranger in a strange land, by Robert Heinlein. Here are both versions, uncut and cut. Heinlein preferred the original.



File: 1426210920668.png (3.39 KB, 149x222, 149:222, 8792375908342759023.png)

 No.39[Reply]

I have a few sigils with me. One of them, I carry inside my wallet. Another one, I have stored with my supplies. Another one lays upon my ritual table. There was once a time that I constantly used my runes, tarot and did sigil work. Those times are no longer continual, they have been minimized for some time.

There has been a lot of adjustments lately, and my reading pursuits have taken me back onto Grant Morrison, Spare, Peter Carroll. I used to do some studying on chaosmatrix.org, but they've shut down. Luckily, I found an excellent archive of it.

As such, enjoy the link. Any thoughts on sigilization?

http://web.archive.org/web/20140223052314/http://www.chaosmatrix.org/library/chaos_all.php
5 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.56

File: 1426622961516.pdf (777.19 KB, ctcbclmno.pdf)

I am having difficulties uploading both of the versions of principia discordia and the Illuminatus trilogy. Therefore, I will instead upload the Chao Te Ching.

 No.57

File: 1426623052491.pdf (2.35 MB, 01 Illtlgy(1).pdf)

Here is the illuminatus trilogy:

 No.66

>>39
Do you think chaos magic is satanic?

 No.96


>>66

No, I don't. I believe that Chaos Magic is outside of any religion. It is a sacrilegious set of principles, kept up by practical and undermining psychological anarchy.

 No.178

File: 1438025125464.pdf (486.98 KB, Condensed Chaos.pdf)

Through magic, will and possibility, freedom can be wholly examined.



File: 1434748632057.png (5.31 KB, 465x296, 465:296, National_Socialist_Black_M….png)

 No.174[Reply]

A collection of interviews regarding Satanism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvRP_jCJoXQ


File: 1434654549598.jpg (89.59 KB, 360x362, 180:181, Dark Imperivm O9A.jpg)

 No.173[Reply]

The Satanic Temple to Erect a New Statue of Baphomet Next Month

http://www.metrotimes.com/Blogs/archives/2015/06/18/the-satanic-temple-to-unveil-baphomet-monument-in-detroit

>inb4 Baphomet is Mohammad

Also, what's the difference between The Satanic Temple and LaVeyan Satanism?


File: 1433635371185.png (249.24 KB, 491x509, 491:509, ~~~The Banana.png)

 No.168[Reply]

I have never actually won a single one of these threads. Everytime I see that comically anthropomorphized banana holding his peel in a suggestive manner, likening the peel to clothes and his peel-less nature to human nudity, I bust up laughing. This happens every time, no matter where I am, be it the house or the bus or in class. Sometimes I laugh just thinking about it. This is a dark memory but a few months back I had just gotten done with a fit of laughter caused by one of these hilarious threads. Suddenly my mom walks in and she's crying. I attempted to suppress the growing urge to laugh but it was getting more difficult. Face red, tears running down her aging face, mom grabs my shoulders and says "Your father's dead."

It was at that moment that I couldn't hold back anymore. I burst into a banana-induced fit of laughter, but the horrible news drew tears to my eyes. I laughed while I cried, tears streaming down my wide open grin, memories of daddy resurfacing and being melded and combined with the naked banana.

I lost two things that night.

What did you lose that night, anon?


File: 1433391977754.jpg (50.62 KB, 640x500, 32:25, ang897p12412-8.jpg)

 No.166[Reply]

BO here. My stance on spoilers has been redacted. Previously, spoilers were in place due to the location of my logging.

The flesh is always to be celebrated with great pride and joy.


File: 1429733903056.jpg (10.81 KB, 299x249, 299:249, 2spooky4me.jpg)

 No.157[Reply]

Any experiences with demons or other spirits?

 No.159

>>157

When i was a kid, I woke up in the middle of the night. To my right was a black and shady dog. It's eyes were glowing, but not brightly. They were grey lights upon a fuzzy and shadowy face.

I froze as I stared at the dog. My upper body started raising into the air, as i struggled to even breathe. Fear gripped my heart, I cried out to nothing, "help!"

The next moment, a silent roar shook me. The dog leaped over me and disappeared into the wall. Instantly, my body relaxed and I fell back asleep.



File: 1428277970659.jpg (76.81 KB, 640x512, 5:4, image.jpg)

 No.83[Reply]

I'm curious,what is satanism?do you believe in Jesus? And what of God?do you believe he's a tyrant?what do you think lucifers motives were for rebelling?(I'm not Christian though I was raised catholic)
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.102

File: 1428620882761.jpg (703.28 KB, 2948x1238, 1474:619, council_of_nicea.jpg)

>>95

The historic demonization of a field of ethical behaviors seems to be a byproduct from controlled social mechanics belonging to a monopolized legal and moral authority.

Christianity's massive popularization underwent a radical adaption of local customs and traditions. The implications from the Council of Nicea are much larger than what is usually discussed. At that time, a highly elite order of bishops essentially determined the truth of "what is real and what is a lie" within a religious artifact that ended up spreading its influence throughout the entire world. But not even this compilation of papers could remain intact, despite religious authorities trying to grant it a supposed holiness.

This so-called holy relic caused the further splintering of several dozen sects and oversaw the development of dozens of religious civil wars concerning theological conversion and domination. For example, gnosticism was greatly despised and even hunted by the orthodoxy. That the church proclaimed salvation was only acceptable vis a vis their methods throws much of our history confined to a systemic ignorance.

This stipulates a few things, the most significant of which is that the ideas of magic, rituals and religious artifacts were once popularized and publicly embraced as actually existing.

I think that the dogmatism with which sin is attested to exist is particularly a byproduct of Christianity's sociopolitical attempts to merge widely similar dislikes (a lot of people dislike losing things which belong to them, so therefore let us call it a sin to steal) into populist mantras.

The thing is, I don't think that the concept of evilness is largely inspired by Christianity, in fact, I think the exact opposite. I believe that Christianity is largely an assimilated religion, itself having undergone a radical elitist collectivizing of knowledge and truth. This suggests that its concepts of 'evil' and 'sin' are therefore older social relationships and conditions that surpass the definitions given underneath orthodoxy.

 No.132

>>102
Very interesting information and an even more interesting point of view, thank you.

By the way, is a site like sacred-texts a good resource for information about religions, old knowledge? Or is it more like the very bold statements in for ex. the JoS site, stating that old knowledge is "corupted"/"erased"?

Or should I look into more recent book releases?

 No.133

>>132
JoS Satanist here and I browse sacred-texts a lot. The thing with corrupted information is, you really have to know the intention and meaning of the original text, otherwise, you're not going to understand shit.

For example right now I'm reading the Rig Veda. Thanks to Christianity and the RHP, it's corrupted beyond anything we know. Understanding that Sanatana Dharma or Eternal Law was originally about advancing the soul and raising the serpent(kundalini) we have to read texts like these from a satanic perspective.

>TLDR nothing we read about ancienct religion or true spirituality is going to be free of christian dross, try to sift it out as much as possible. Don't take anything at face value. Study and read as much as you can, then compare and contrast.

 No.156

>>132
There is power which dominates over society, existing within symbols of its own, surrounding ourselves with mirages and staged personality complexes, infusing itself within psychosocial discourse. This suggests that there does exist old knowledge, utilized to constrain society within aesthetic puppetry, mobilized in degrees to suppress collective potential.

I think sites and research centers, such as sacred-texts, hold useful data and information, ideas from which you can draw conclusions and interesting studies. I do not think that true knowledge is ultimately unattainable. However, it is my belief that absolute truthful knowledge exists within a mirage of its own, a representation of truth that makes sense to us given other conditions of governing knowledge- e.g. the notions of moral justification, our conceptions of linguistic structure, the dominating social themes within our culture, etc.

I would suggest that any modern book can be dived into and research will produce beneficial information. To what purpose it exists and sustains itself ultimately decides its wide-spread utility. I do think that historical interests have restrained knowledge before, see: Library of Alexandria. Its tale is a strange tale indeed, with many alternating stories and approaches to its destruction. This suggests that it was used as a pinnacle of information and was controlled by dominating powers in order to create a presentable dilemma- centralize all "world knowledge" within one locality, and then spread stories of its eventual attacking and systemic burning while preserving the desired narrative. To me, this theoretical scenario doesn't differ too much from the systemic reconditioning undergone vis a vis the Council of Nicea, and other manipulating paradigms, such as Mao's structural engineering. Society tends to reconstruct truth using standardizations upheld by dominating institutions. In many ways, our Internet is our Library of Alexandria.

>>133
>nothing we read about ancienct religion or true spirituality is going to be free of christian dross, try to sift it out as much as possible. Don't take anything at face value.
I agree with you to a degree, but disagree with you to another. I think Christianity, largely composed of pPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.158

im a hard polytheist

i believe most gods are real, but creation stories are just stories to enforce belief in a particular god/pantheon

i believe that gods are just a form of life that science has not yet reached the sophistication to prove

i believe that deities with specific "jobs" are not literally holding those duties. individual interpretation is needed to determine the meaning of each gods association

i believe that the abrahamic god is merely a stronger god or "fathergod" to the angels, yhwh is a tyrannical space kike encouraging humans (as the dominant species in the area) to starve other deities of influence in meatspace, and "satan" had enough of the shit and got slandered to hell (get it?)



File: 1428948763924.jpg (130.39 KB, 1024x768, 4:3, UBF_Eagle.jpg)

 No.117[Reply]

This is an official invitation from the United Boards for Freedom >>>/ubf/ to join our loose federation of freedom.

>What is the UBF?
The UBF is a loose confederation of boards centred around the concept of freedom from moderation.

>What is the purpose of the UBF?
The purpose of the UBF is two-fold. 1. To encourage posting on a UBF member board instead of their larger, no-fun-allowed counterpart for example posting on /vvv/ or /am/ instead of /v/ or /a/, and 2. to encourage the posting of related content between boards to encourage user interaction, increasing the number of UIDs and posts per hour on boards posting a 2nd Amendment thread on both /liberty/ and on /k/

Well /satanic/, what do you think?

 No.124

The only rule is that pornography must have spoilers. The board is marked as sfw. Everything else is hands-off, as all perspectives and discussions are welcomed here. As to why it's marked as sfw, I am a parent, and alas there cannot be an array of nakedness and sensuality without spoilers.

/satanic/ is aimed at being a lounge for Satanists, for all types of spiritualists and spiritualities, for the (a)religious and non-believer, for forbidden arts and hidden topics, for subjects relative towards the occult, mysteries, and other esoteric pursuits, including psychosocial, theoretical, practical and religious aspects. There are no positions which are alienated, as all are encouraged to engage in debate or discussion. While what you believe is important, it is equally important to inspect and inquire ones considerations.

This invitation sounds enticing, but if freedom from moderation means that I must witness the board become ridden with spam, or behold the devolution of this board into incoherence, I must decline. If freedom from moderation implies that there would be no thread containment threads, word filters, random banning of posters for their beliefs, random deletion of threads, or anything similarly beyond what is necessary, then I accept. Besides dealing with the css, raiding, spammers, and other future potentially damaging activities, I think that all ideas, topics and subjects should be examined and openly permitted in some form or another. This is a Satanic board, after all, and each of us seek after emancipation.

 No.125

>>123
>>124
When you say "incoherence", does that mean freedom posting?

 No.130

>>125
>Meaning of incoherence
I see an 'incoherent board' as a three-fold thing:

1) /b/-tier commentary: postings that have nothing to do with topics provided
2) A circle-jerk presence that pushes out other beliefs and creates an echo chamber (I will delete threads attempting to tell others to get out of /satanic/. Everyone is allowed here, including all dissenting opinions- there are no exceptions to this rule, excluding pedos, spammers and raiders.)
3) pedophilia

If there is nothing which can be done about those things, /satanic/ cannot experience "freedom from moderation". If it is understood that I can help protect the board from such things, including the css and anti-spam/raid mechanics, then "freedom from moderation" is a stance /satanic/ expresses.

 No.134

>>130
This is a fairly common comment from board owners. I am considering including a second-tier in the UBF of boards that allow free discussion but retain the right to keep the board on topic. I know that particularly for small boards this is important because 10 off-topic threads can essentially ruin the board.

I will keep you posted ITT if you don't delete it

 No.154

>>134
This is a thread discussing, primarily, unity and empowerment. I would not delete such a concept nor conversation. If anything, I would ask that subjects such as diets, my feels threads, or "Christ/Satan(ism) iz teh dumbz!" threads be kept to a minimum. Different things happen to different people every day, and so I feel that trying to monitor a certain sense of "serious discussions" is fruitlessly suffocating. People should be free to express themselves. Different types of conversation are bound to happen, and discourse tends towards many ways.

On that note, the overall direction for this place is intended to be a cozy board for esoteric, philosophical, occult and religious perspectives. /satanic/ portrays itself as a comfortable but relaxed online Satanic lounge, where all are welcomed to engage in discussion, debate, or inspection. Every perspective is appreciated. In a world of thought-control, seekers of truth or empowerment must be willing to step into differing waters, and so it would be unbecoming of myself to advocate complete alienation or to not welcome someone simply by reason of their beliefs.

I am interested in establishing unions with other arcane boards, perhaps sustaining a distinct board ring, as well. I think being part of an arcane board ring would help facilitate participation between both the freedom-orientated boards and the boards inclined within occult-inspired materials. We are surrounded with symbols and I think that freedom prospers existing within imagery of its own.


File: 1428467279533.gif (2.64 MB, 264x240, 11:10, 155745470-313451155.gif)

 No.93[Reply]

So do Satanists actually believe in this stuff?

Pardon my newfaggotry, but does Satanism condone sacrificing animals?

 No.103

Yes. Most people don't want to mention it, but the Dark Gods are very blood hungry.

 No.116

Animals? Are babies next?

I satisfy myself with my own sweat and energy. If we are to reach Godhead, then I don't believe that killing is going to do it.

 No.118

Overall, Satanism does not condone sacrificing. Some perspectives do, such as the Order of Nine Angels.

The way I view blood magic is as a transmissive fluid of focused spell-work. There is both life and death within blood, intrusive viruses and white cells, and it is only one aspect of magical facilitation. Blood magic is particularly powerful, as a versatile piercing object or as a willful self-mutilation. The shedding of the self by the self is an extremely powerful psychosocial motivator, brought on by embracing willful pain and the removal of fear in order to further desire, and its focusing power to spear-head spell-work is an aspect that I think requires delicate meditation and self-control.

Since Satanism is a religion of holistic liberation, one can argue that sacrificing animals within ritual-work can be undertaken vis a vis outdoors hunting, as opposed to specifically acquiring store-bought animals. However, since I do not bother with nor believe in the power of using unnecessary blood, I do not find it convincing that animal sacrifice contains strength which you cannot manifest nor conjure yourself.

 No.131

>>118
I think that living organisms can be sacrificed, but it isn't essential. I think it shows extra dedication and trust, though.


File: 1428738122334.jpg (55.31 KB, 500x382, 250:191, 154534523512.jpg)

 No.108[Reply]

What attracts you to the left/right hand path?

 No.110

File: 1428778344003.png (753.5 KB, 819x574, 117:82, 567478956895691242-518.png)

I think the 'left'/'right' hand path dichotomy is a primarily arbitrary one, which further relies upon historical methods of discourse control. Helena Blavatsky echoes the sentiment of the dominating tendency to criticize its great other which, in her time, was the rejection of tradition and engagement within social behaviors discerned as unpopular and backwards. Hence, how once she left Tibet, she referred to tendencies to break apart from domination as "left", or as a Vamachara, a heterodox practice of expression. In other words, she broadly tossed a title onto all practices which deviated from orthodoxy in some way or another, and typically attributed anecdotal hysteria towards the same practitioners.

Personally, the pathways are really just dualist methods of perceiving magic and ritual. I think of them as tools, mere toys within your own path, to be utilized by the magician as it decides in its seeking of self-empowerment.


Delete Post [ ]
[]
Previous [1] [2]
| Catalog
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]