recently encountered two reasonable arguments against the theory of evolution.
The first was the idea that DNA is simply too complex to have simply occurred. I don't have the biochemistry education to properly understand this,, but I think I can dismiss it as the "god of gaps" argument.
"I don't know" therefore god line of thinking.
The second was more challenging. It acknowledges that natural selection can account for considerable variation within a species, but cannot account for the development of a completely new species.
For example,, Humans have been selectively breeding dogs for centuries and have produced all kinds of different results.. but they remain the same species. They can still interbreed and they still have the same number of chromosomes.
We have been making mutant fruit flies for decades.. generation after generation of fruit flies but they remain fruit flies,, they are different but they remain the same species.
According to this criticism of evolution,, evolution fails to describe a process through which an organism can lose or gain chromosomes and change it's DNA to become a new species.
Anyone have something to counter this criticism?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.