No.1764[Last 50 Posts]
dunno who this tidux bloke is
but whenever someone says shit like "break the internet" that means it's overhyped to hell and back.
keep caution this week, troops.
http://attackofthefanboy.com/news/someone-has-seen-the-star-wars-battlefront-gameplay-trailer-already/ No.1766
>inb4 it's just Battlefront 2 gameplay and EA briefly says
"sorry, but due to approaching deadlines we had to adjust it to just be a content mod for the massively successful Battlefront 2. However, if you owned the old version, you'll still need to purchase Battlefront 3 so that you can get access to the code that allows you to play online."
No.1767
>>17669.5/10 IGN
4.5/5 Metacritic
9/10 Gamespot
5/5 Gamesradar
No.1771
>>1767Fuck IGN and all its whiny circlejerking faggots. Still hope Battlefront proves not to be total fail. The original took up so many wonderful hours of my life.
No.1776
this pic was posted
only a few days troopers
No.1790
>>1776>that high resolution No.1796
>>1790it appears this is the full picture
No.1799
>>1796I'm such a sucker for armor attachments
No.1806
>>1796What type of Stormtrooper is that meant to be?
Something new?
No.1812
>>1806Well, since most other stormtrooper helmets are just attachments on the original,I'd guess it's just an extended air tank for hostile planets, perhaps Felucia…
No.1814
>>1806pretty much what
>>1812 said, it probably acts like an oxygen tank
No.1820
>>1812>>1814You'd think the armor would already do that.
No.1821
>>1820it can only do that for a small amount of time in space or a non-oxidized environment
No.1834
hey guys i lied, this is the actual full picture, they've been teasing this fucker because star wars celebration starts tomorrow and i believe we're getting both the new episode 7 trailer and the battlefront reveal. also that's a DLT-19 he's holding.
No.1835
>>1834my bad again, the battlefront reveal is on friday. tomorrow should be the new episode 7 trailer for sure.
No.1849
my guess is this is the cover art
so far it doesn't feel entirely battlefield but we'll know when we see the gameplay
No.1850
>>1849remove rebels walker stronk
No.1908
No.1913
official banner
also i will post the stream video once it gets put up
No.1914
ap article that got posted a little early
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/b92adeca75b7425a84fe4bb02b115db0/star-wars-battlefront-unleashed-fan-conventionthe desert planet that we've been seeing in the trailers is called Jakku, and the reason for those star destroyers is there was a big fucking battle that took place approx 30 years before ep 7
also hero units confirmed
the article writes "up to 40 players" but i've seen earlier reports of 64 player servers, so idk wait until the reveal for confirmation on that.
No.1919
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
STREAM HERE
No.1920
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>1919BATTLEFRONT TRAILER HERE
No.1921
>>1920It's going to be terrible but people will still buy it.
No.1922
>>1920>no in game footage worry
No.1923
>>1920No in-game footage… I'm sweating and wiping like a Kiughfid here bastard over here. This is gonna be shit! FUCKING DAMN IT DISNEY!
No.1925
>>1920This trailer is useless. I want to see gameplay, nothing else matters.
No.1929
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>1922>>1923>>1925apparently a gameplay demo was at the convention, but there is no current recording of it available, however these guys detail their experience of it
it sounds incredibly limited in what you can do, what the actual fuck DICE? you went to the locations, were given complete access to lucasfilm archives, and yet we get this hammered shit? we ought to start a petition to bring battlefront 2 back online at this point.
No.1931
ahahahahahaha pre-order is already up on origin
i feel bad for the shmucks who have already clicked
No.1938
>>1929>it sounds incredibly limited in what you can dono space battles.
just a reskinned Battlefield 4.
No.1939
>>1931EA needs the big titles to push Origin.
I have a feeling the more this game is shown off the less it will be liked.
No.1941
>>1929>we ought to start a petition to bring battlefront 2 back online at this point.Seriously I would be fine with an updated BFII.
Add bigger maps, improve the graphics and tweak the gameplay.
No need for OMFG TEH GRAFIX type games which end up being more limited than the older releases.
No.1948
>it's not Republic Commando 2 or even Bountyhunter 2
Yea there will never be another good SW game.
No.1963
>>1948rumor has it visceral games is going to do a bounty hunter 2 that borrows from 1313
>>1941ditto on that, although someone attempted to make ground-to-space maps
>>1939i can very much agree with this.
No.2008
>>2000I like how there isn't any gameplay footage yet
No.2046
>>1929>wut is pre-alphaterrible anon, git gud
>>2008Here's hoping that some glorious person at celebration snuck some phone recording out.
No.2048
>>2007Let me fix that last rating for you.
>40/10 So sleek and progressive! I wanna suck the cocks of everyone involved! - IGN No.2050
Hi, I'm from /v/.
I'm here to wish you guys luck and to say I love you all and fuck Disney and EA.
Bye!
No.2052
>>2046Tested the alpha of Titanfall/Destiny. Literally no difference between the builds except bug fixes. All gameplay is usually set by now, its just 'polish' left.
No.2053
No.2061
/v/ here, games going to suck. Fuck EA. RIP Lucasarts.
Ill greatly miss playing Star Wars games set in the prequels and being a Clone Trooper.
No.2065
>>2061I miss being a droideka. Rolling and shooting. Cheap as fuck but it was fun.
No.2068
No.2069
No space battles, no campaign, no clone wars, no space battles, only 4 planets, mountains of DLC, exclusivity, and other bullshit.
Basically took Battlefield, slapped a Star Wars skin on it, and called it different because "maps are now 40 players instead of 64".
https://archive.today/gI84SI hope it fails but it will still sell over a million copies, that is for sure.
No.2072
Another anon from /v/ here
The moment DICE laid their dirty hands on Battlefront was the moment it was gonna suck.
I have to congratulate EA for proving me right & making some people question if they should really be making Star Wars games for a decade.
I still can't believe that bEAttlefront, a game thats coming out soon has less features than Battlefront II, a game that was made 2 generations/a decade ago.
Let that sink in to your head
BEATTLEFRONT, A GAME THAT IS IN DEVELOPMENT WITH ALL THE LEAPS & BOUND OF TODAY'S TECHNOLOGY HAS LESS FEATURES & IS GETTING MORE CUTS THAN A GAME RELEASED 10 YEARS AGO
FUCK YOU EA, & FUCK YOU DISNEY, CAN'T BELIEVE THEY'VE GIVEN YOU THE KEY TO MAKE SW GAMES FOR 10 YEARS
No.2073
No.2074
>>2069What pisses me off more is that Battlefront had more of a cult following. Everyone else was off playing Halo. That was the 'cool' space shoter. We were the ones that kept Battlefront alive.
And now its a huge fucking spit in the face
No.2076
File: 1429354726232.jpg (44.74 KB, 499x451, 499:451, 24470d4b6e0be599835454b59f….jpg)
>>2072
>BEATTLEFRONT, A GAME THAT IS IN DEVELOPMENT WITH ALL THE LEAPS & BOUND OF TODAY'S TECHNOLOGY HAS LESS FEATURES & IS GETTING MORE CUTS THAN A GAME RELEASED 10 YEARS AGO>>FUCK YOU EA, & FUCK YOU DISNEY, CAN'T BELIEVE THEY'VE GIVEN YOU THE KEY TO MAKE SW GAMES FOR 10 YEARS No.2079
>>2076We had splitscreen back then so we could play with friends/siblings.
I mean, with next gen tech they HAVE to have that at least right?
No.2083
>>2079Games these days almost never have splitscreen on consoles anymore.
>>2072Racer.. what a classic. Though PC version is better.
No.2084
>>2079Unfortunately, you'd have to be delusional to think companies are gonna pay attention to splitscreen or local play because games these days want to be connected online to the internet
And in the words of Crytek "The concept Single Player is a thing of the past & should be removed"
Never have I've been so angry at the hobby that I grew up with become this travesty.
No.2086
File: 1429355204556.jpg (29.19 KB, 500x281, 500:281, Darth-Vader_Mickey-Mouse-E….jpg)
>>2079Unlikely. I bet my ass on it. In fact. I'll make it official! If this game does have any of that and more, I'll tattoo "Disney Rules" with an empire logo that has Mickey Mouse ears on my ass and post the pic here. I'll even make a thread about it if you think I'm joshing.
No.2087
>>2008I'm just amazed they managed to fuck up the pre-rendered trailer….
No.2088
>>2087I'm amazed they spent all that time and money into a pre rendered trailer instead of investing in some fucking gameplay
No.2089
>>2088That's how games have been sold since the last generation of consoles.
No.2091
>>2087You know, because of that shit alone, I'm upping the ante. I'll tattoo "Disney Rules" and "I love Lucas cock in my ass" if this actually does prove to be as good as Battlefront I or II.
No.2092
>>2091Lucas cock? More like Abrams cock
No.2093
>>2092You can get a lens flare cock?
No.2094
>>2092Even better. But I'm not worried since this shit will bomb critically even if it somehow sells well.
No.2096
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
REMINDER THAT THIS GAME WAS 99% DONE YET IT GOT CANNED
;_;
No.2097
>>2093That'd be quite interesting if it happened.
No.2098
>>2096Dont do this anon. DAMNIT!
No.2099
>>2096Now this is Battlefront… This is gameplay… What we're getting… is shit. Fuck you Disney. Fuck you.
No.2100
>>2096from planet to space its a cut with a fancy transition animation. A fucking teleport basically. How is this hard to implement? Its beautiful
No.2101
>>2099Not just shit.
Not just bullshit.
BUT LENS FLARE BULLSHIT IN THE SHAPE OF MICKEY'S HEAD!The worst part is the kiddos that are new to Star Wars & will be taught to like Episode VII because 'its not the prequels' , 'Its not 1977 anymore', or whatever bullshit the marketing department thinks up of like merchandising that robot.
Jar Jar Binks is smiling again & wished he could get this amount of infamy
No.2113
>Jakku
>A planet NEVER ONCE FUCKING MENTIONED UNTIL THIS NEW SHITTY MOVIE
OUT OF ALL THE FUCKING DESERT PLANETS, YOU JUST MAKE A NEW ONE?
YOU COULD HAVE USED:
>Dantooine
>Ryloth
>Eriadu
>fucking FONDOR
THEY COULD HAVE EVEN GONE TO FUCKING GEONOSIS FOR ALL I CARE.
But noooo…
"WE NEED MORE DESERT PLANETS." SAYS THE MARKETER, WHO'S ONLY KNOWLEDGE OF STAR WARS COMES FROM EPISODE I AND COMMERCIALS.
No.2115
>>2113Considering EAfront is shipping with just 4 planets I think there are bigger issues than that.
No.2116
>>2096Shit I didn't know this til now.
I have no idea how gaming has fallen so far, but is generating more money.
No.2153
>>2113>"WE NEED MORE DESERT PLANETS." SAYS THE MARKETER, WHO'S ONLY KNOWLEDGE OF STAR WARS COMES FROM EPISODE I AND COMMERCIALS.http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/JakkuI cant believe this… I thought the new movie took place on Tatooine… This is just… I can't… Fuck you Abrams. Just keep taking a shit on everything why dont ya? Jar Jar was an adorable blessing compared to this horror.
No.2162
>>2116Its all about getting money now, not quality.
No.2245
>>2087Wow. I can't believe they didn't fix that…
No.2296
>>2079yes, it's confirmed to have splitscreen.
No.2567
No.2788
>>2083
i'd love to find a good torrent of pc racer, only ever played the gameboy and n64 versions.
No.2810
>>2787
There is no hope for this game is there? Sigh…
No.2836
>>2787
i'm not hyping up, but apparently some of the devs have been doing little amas on reddit, and what they've revealed is that there will be more than 8 maps (most likely still across those 4 planets which is stupid), AT-STs are confirmed fully playable, there will be more heroes (all going to be OT/ST based though), space battle dlc is not happening, and apparently the on-rails AT-AT is only because of a specific gamemode
link related https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsBattlefront/comments/334za5/shoutout_to_udice_thebikingviking_youre_doing_a/cqjtzoy
No.2837
>>2836
oh and let's not forget that disney killed battlefront 3 for good
>inb4 kotaku
http://kotaku.com/the-last-months-of-lucasarts-472038151
No.2856
>>2096
At least we got Elite Squadron out of it.
No.2885
hey guys i got a leaked picture of the new battlefront cover art
No.2886
>>2885
Which is better BF1 or BF2?
No.2893
No.2896
>>2886
I liked 1's maps more.
No.2909
>>2886
1 is much more of a battlefield clone
both are great
No.2913
>>2885
Would contain too much content and effort for EA.
No.2925
>>2913
i don't mean to be an asshole or anything but that is partially nostalgia goggles
the maps are all just conquest, and only certain maps have flying vehicles (2 per team).
No.2935
>>2886
1 had better maps
2 had better gameplay if you turned heroes off
No.2940
>>2925
Son did you even play Battlefront?
There were more than one map with 2+ flying vehicles a team. Especially on PC.
No.2946
No.2961
>>2940
i know there's more than one map with flying vehicles, i'm actually playing battlefront at this moment because i nostalgia'd and felt like not pirating it.
i'm just saying it's only limited to 2 per side
dune sea, kashyyyk islands, bespin platforms, geonosis, hoth only has snowspeeders since it was a ground invasion. it would have been neat if they included vehicles on land maps in swbf2 besides whichever ones they did. my hope is that the new bfront has flyers on every map.
No.3105
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>2961
Honestly your best hope is to either play the earlier Battlefront or hope that there is a good Star Wars mod for another game.
No.3107
>>3105
First Strike mod for BF2142 is pretty good
No.3128
>>3107
this and galactic warfare for cod 4 are great mods
which nobody plays anymore
No.3154
>>3107
>>3128
Sad that most people will turn their nose up at those mods these days, buy into the EAfront and then bitch about how bad it is?
No.3206
>>3203
>clear sky on Sullust
This just triggered my autism
No.3208
>>3203
>>3206
Wait that's Sullust? I thought it was a kool aid advert!
No.3213
>>3208
Nope they said awhile back that they would be maps people would recognize and know. One was sullust. I don't know many normalfags who even know what sullust is, hell I DM Star Wars tabletop and I don't even think my players fully know what sullust looks like
No.3220
>>3213
if normalfags paid attention to dialogue, they would remember that sullust was mentioned in rotj but that's it. however the old eu had it depicted as a lava world not all too different from mustafar, so nice to see some of it transfer over into the new canon.
No.3223
>>3206
Fucking this. Even Mustafar didn't have clear skies, what the fuck is this bullshit?
No.3247
>>3223
Hopefully it's mostly inside and you lose health slowly the longer you are outside similar to Polis Masa in Battlefront 2. But it won't be like that. At least they got it somewhat right in renegade squadron.
No.3257
>>3247
a lava planet is a little different from outer space
No.3281
>>3257
The first pic is sullust from space according to the essential atlas. Then sullust from renegade squadron. Then sullust from rogue squadron. I get disney can say fuck to geology of the old eu, but as someone who actually like geology, no way in hell would a lava planet have clear blue fucking skies. It would be filled with ash and smoke. Sorry if I'm being a condensending asshole about this.
No.3293
BEEP BEEP
PLEBTROOPER COMMING THROUGH
Are you nerf-herders really complaining about a volcanic planet having a clear atmosphere in a universe where there's SOUND IN SPACE ?
No.3297
>>3293
yes. yes I am. If you want to keep coming you could say The Millennium Falcon and the X-wing have terrible designs because the cockpit is on the side of YT-1300 freighter and you would have to re-calibrate the X-Wings blasters every time there is a change in distance from the target
No.3306
>>3297
It's actually not that hard if you install a range-finder in the nose of the craft and add a small system that automatically adjusts the angle of the blasters to the distance indicated by the range-finder.
No.3318
>>3306
Hence Targetting Computers.
No.3321
>>3318
though, I'd prefer an A-wing or B-wing.
No.3323
>>3281
fair enough, i have zero knowledge of geology apart from the types of rocks
No.3349
So apparently no Ironsights in EAfront.
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/no-ironsights-in-star-wars-battlefront-playable-at/1100-6427156/
People seem to be happy about this until you realise that pretty much nearly every Blaster has a scope on it. So no ironsights but most like aiming down sights.
>In other news, grass is apparently green?
No.3350
>>3349
i imagine we'll get something like what they did in the original games, where you just get a scoped zoom in first person and zoomed-in cam in 3rd, it will be interesting to see what they do for non-scoped weapons.
No.3353
>>3349
how do blasters really reload anyways? I don't remember them ever doing it in the movies
No.3357
>>3353
apparently they use gas cartridges
No.3362
>>3357
hm interesting
what do people prefer gameplay wise? reloading or weapon overheating?
No.3372
>>3362
i'm fine with either, pwn't noobs will still be pwn't noobs.
No.3373
>>3362
Doesn't matter to me I'm not getting it. Nor do I suspect many people here are unless they pirate it.
>>3353
They also tend to never have to reload often since pretty much the magazine capacity for a standard stormtrooper blaster is around 500 shots.
No.4042
new pics
>this is the fucking deluxe cover art
>quarren
>in my rebellion
No.4043
>>4042
>asian woman
>alien
They were all white men in the movie.
No.4058
Battlefield 4 with a Star Wars skin.
I still play BFII to this day, doubt that this will have that kind of staying power.
No.4060
>>4058
anything released by ea won't have any staying power to it
why? no mods. to this day you can still find mp servers for mysteries of the sith, jedi knight and jedi outcast/academy because the modding communities brought in so much content.
this sounds terrible of me to say it but star wars games were better off in the hands of activision than electronic farts.
No.4064
>>4042
wow that cover looks like shit
No.4081
Cover for the original game was a bit awkward.
No.4085
>>4081
you spelled dynamic and awesome wrong
No.4088
>>4085
>crossed legs
>pointing gun in weird direction
>not looking at what he's shooting at
No.4090
>>4088
Result? Average Stormtrooper.
No.4098
>>4088
as opposed to rebels in jungle gear on top of a snow speeder. Cause fuck it when EA couldn't give less of a shit
No.4101
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
ok, color me interested all right. now dice just needs to make rotj luke into esb pilot luke and all will be fine.
No.4102
>>4101
after further analysis i have come up with some pros and cons
pros
- looks great
- plays like battlefront
- on-rails at-at doesn't seem that bad considering at-at can call in orbital strikes
- first person view isnt cod shenanigans, third person mode looks great as well
cons
- rotj luke on hoth
- blue squadron? the fuck is that, it's rogue squadron
- regenerating health
- game still seriously needs balancing, it looked like the dh-17 was fucking up that tie fighter good, and the guy survived a direct shot from the at-st and then proceeds to kill it with one rocket?
No.4103
>>4102
> plays like battlefront
you high?
No.4105
>>4102
>implying Rogue Squadron was the only group using Speeders on Hoth
>>4103
nigga stop nostalgiafagging
No.4106
>>2787
First picture is not accurate
12 maps confirmed, not including Jakku
No.4108
>>4103
the weapons are practically the same, as in no aiming down the sights bullshit but instead a scoped/zoomed in view and a hip-fire view. even heroes look to be quite similar to swbf2's mechanics/animations. so yeah, it plays like battlefront should.
also forgot to add to the list of pros in >>4102
the flyers have cockpit views, thank fuck.
>>4105
considering there was only a small amount of snowspeeders, yeah i find it hard to believe the rebellion had any other squads there.
No.4109
>>4108
oh my bad, blue group is a part of rogue squadron. dice fucking trumped me this time.
No.4110
>>4108
it looks like battlefield pretending to be battlefront
No.4111
>>4108
>the weapons are practically the same,
you pick up weapons, no classes. Not even close to the same
>>4108
> even heroes look to be quite similar to swbf2's mechanics/animations
if you mean made it into quicktime events instead?
No.4112
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
"missions" co-op/solo reveal
No.4114
>>4101
Don't like TIEs and X-Wings on Hoth but with some polish the game might be ok.
Bit weird seeing all those alien rebels on Hoth when in the movie they were all human.
No.4115
Why does everyone forget that they couldn't use the speeders on Hoth until they were adapted to the cold?
This is also seems to be why they couldn't use TIEs or X-Wings in the Battle of Hoth.
No.4116
>>4112
The more the graphics improve the more this one man army stuff in video games seems wrong.
No.4121
>>4116
>That picture
So Kyle Katarn and Dash Rendar are featured in shitty games for bringing down almost single handedly major Imperial/Baddies shenanigans.
Plus BFII was pretty much the same thing because of the braindead friendly A.I.
Still have problem doing that Naboo level up to this day in story mode
[/shilling]
No.4127
>>4121
Story mode in BFII was excellent, I liked how it filled in gaps between the movies instead of just rehashing the movie battles.
No.4128
>>4127
bf1 did a good job of that as well
http://imgur.com/a/oGvIV#51
all promotional images released so far are in that gallery
No.4129
>>4128
>bf1 did a good job of that as well
Never really got to play the first one since it's not on Steam for some reason.
No.4133
>>4129
think of battlefield 2 singleplayer
that's battlefront 1's campaign mode
No.4173
So does it trigger anyones autism when they have Imperial Class Star Destroyers in the planet's atmosphere in pretty much all Battlefront games even though they are not atmospheric capable?
No.4184
>>4173
Where has it ever been said that they aren't capable of atmospheric flight?
No.4185
>>4173
they were built to land as well as orbit
motherfuckers are more than capable for atmospheric flight
No.4186
>>4173
It'd probably have them make more sense that way - if the ship goes into like an ocean or crawls along in the outer layers of a gas giant or something, the tower doesn't seem quite such a poor design. It'd get a better view topside while the lower half is submerged, regardless of any tech providing a way to see through pretty cosmic bs.
Still I'd be more concerned about how orbital bombardments got translated into a lot of small blasts instead of one huge blast. I love lots and lots of lasers but those are still better. It's just like "yeah, we only need one blast to knock you out". I wouldn't mind if the kill zone was larger and more explodey (at least with, an additional even specialer but less available orbital attack that way) at the very least.
>>4101
I hope that means that you could change a hero's style regardless of which battle they're in.
Also thread should have been named EAffront.
No.4187
>>4184
>>4185
Old EU. The Victory Class SD was the largest rated for Atmospheric flight.
No.4191
>>4173
Well the Rebels were supposed to have shield generators and the ion cannon to keep them away, but EA was like fuck that.
No.4194
>>4173
In the new canon Star Destroyers can fly close to the surface.
>>4191
Star Destroyers should be able to fly through the shield, I think it only stops weapons fire.
Due to the effects of the time I don't think how it works was communicated very well in ESB.
No.4195
>>4191
there's clearly an ion cannon on the hoth map, the tie fighter blows it up.
No.4197
>>4195
also someone correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't the reason for the ground invasion because they couldn't do an orbital bombardment thanks to the rebel's shield generator?
No.4198
>>4187
Yet there were tons of EU stories where Star Destroyers could be seen flying in atmosphere.
No.4200
>>4198
Yeah there is a lot of contradicting lore in EU.
No.4201
>>3105
Looks like they are getting serious about making that a full mod now.
http://blueharvest.wix.com/imperialassault
No.4219
>>4195
Tie fighter should not have enough firepower to destroy it. They needed ATATs for that
No.4232
>>4114
I believe that there was no actual problem with the X-wings on Hoth. It was only ever the snow speeders that had to be adapted for the cold weather.
And going into it more, TIEs and X-wings fight in the vacuum of space, which is likely far colder than Hoth
:^)
>>4198
Imp SD has been seen in atmosphere but supposedly the VicStar can land and offload
>>4219
AT-AT was needed to blow up the shield generator, once it was down there's no reason that a TIE Fighter couldn't do a good job on assaulting the Ion Cannon
No.4233
>>4232
Should note that Shield Generator was still up in trailer.
No.4315
I bet 500 credits that the game will be nothing like the demo or the trailers.
No.4498
so it seems that hero assault was confirmed via some spanish website
now what i'm guessing is, since this is ea, we'll be getting character dlc out the ass, which would most certainly mean clone wars map packs, or EU characters.
No.5016
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Well fighter Squadron Mode has been revealed. Still looks unimpressive.
No.5017
>>4315
>I bet 500 credits that the game will be nothing like the demo or the trailers.
no shit, they never do
>>5016
at least it looks somewhat fun, and I enjoy that they brought back good first-person for vehicles
No.5021
>>5016
the constant cutting makes it seem very scripted
No.5022
>>5016
Mite b cool. I'm pretty surprised they even included the Millennium Falcon and Slave I.
No.5023
>>5021
of course it's scripted, they're not fooling anyone with their "real gameplay"
No.5025
>>5021
>2015
>being surprised anymore
every gameplay video you see released from a developer is scripted to hell and back.
No.5028
>>5016
shit or not, this game has cockpits
I'm not saying BFII was shit, it's a wonderful game, but holy shit, why the fuck does this game had space battles, but no cockpits
No.5033
>>5028
mods added cockpits back in
not that it excuses the developers or anything, you're absolutely right that cockpits should have been in from the start, and dicefront certainly gets brownie points for adding that in.
No.5058
>>5016
From what I've read, you just spawn inside the ship, right? So no flying out from a hangar?