>>33
>no embed
Fuck I knew I was forgetting something. And yeah, why not do a board ring?
>>34
>Did it really? I don't actually remember any such bans.
The BO made a statement to the effect of "bitching about SJWs isn't video games, keep that off /svidya/" a month or so after /svidya/ cracked the top boards list.
>People don't want to write theses at all times. They don't want to have a serious business debate at all times. When you ban people for playful one-liners you have the effect of intimidating them into not wanting to post at all. This is what killed /svidya/, it's what killed 7chan's (and others') /vg/, and I hope you don't make the same mistake on this board. You are really kidding yourself if you think you can make those sorts of demands for "high quality posting" and still maintain a community. There just aren't enough autists around with the same mindset.
I understand exactly what you're talking about. Don't get me wrong, here. I fucking love board culture and funposting. I'm just tired of endless bait, dubspam (though people finally bullied Mark into banning spamming dubs because "shit game check em" so that's something) and pants-on-head retarded kids. The rules aren't intended to mean "you must write perfectly at all times," they're meant to mean "do whatever, just don't be a complete faggot." The rules are a massive wall of text because people on other boards love to do things like use "shitpost" to mean "post I don't like" and take that as an excuse to abuse the rules. Shit like that triggers my autism hard.
Post last edited at