>>15189
Well, they seem like they have a shared opinion that they'll bounce between each other for conformation any time they get doubts, so you're one fucked man. You can't just go, "See, its fun" or "Look, its gorgeous" when people go in with wanting to justify their purchase habits. Especially with meme run being a thing, that is one hell of a go to for shitting on the Wii U. I honestly can't defend amiibos either, those things are pure marketing.
I dunno man, if we're talking that they're xbox/ps4 fans, then PC eventually gets their "exclusives" and middle range - high end expensive stuff will usually have much better graphics. I'm honestly not sure if its worth comparing them to the Wii U directly, but hell, I keep seeing ps4 games where so much is wasted on those fucking horrible camera effects. They can't say, "Well the companies will work their engines for the specific hardware" because they really don't. I can't remember a time when an E3 "gameplay" trailer wasn't pre-rendered or on PC. Even games I think look nice on the consoles at launch are guilty of this.
If they're on the PC already and shitting on your Wii U/3ds, Nintendo does still manage to get actual exclusives worth playing on their systems, not timed exclusive crap that any patient person with a PC can expect to eventually get. Smash/Bayonetta and potentially the Zelda made the Wii U worth it to me. You're not winning the graphics debate with a PC, those things are wild cards with people running systems that might be able to run doom in winter to people running at max-ultra-super fuck you, ignore that fire coming from your PC graphics. Chances are if they have a PC and are shitting on the Wii U, its because they do indeed have good systems.
But you know what? Who cares, only faggots think graphics > gameplay anyway. They ought to just go stare at some good art if they just wanted something purely visually pleasing.