ITT: Political candidates we should support.

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 1 per post.

File: 1423944087836.png (147.39 KB, 599x292, 599:292, 1654245_869092543109519_63….png)

Anonymous 02/14/15 (Sat) 20:01:27 No.16491

ITT: Political candidates we should support.

Anonymous 02/14/15 (Sat) 21:42:01 No.16492

>>16491
Well, it looks like this brings the total up to 1.

Anonymous 02/18/15 (Wed) 16:59:09 No.16834

>>16491
>>16492

Outside the USA, nobody would dare propose such things. Even in countries with comparable shares in crackbraineds, this would be political suicide.

Anonymous 02/18/15 (Wed) 17:51:02 No.16835

>>16834
It is political suicide. I don't think she was ever nominated for election a single time in her entire life.

Anonymous 02/18/15 (Wed) 18:47:24 No.16843

>>16835
Well, she was nominated, but not elected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Ruwart

Anonymous 02/18/15 (Wed) 18:59:20 No.16844

>>16843
>Ruwart was the Libertarian Party of Texas's nominee for U.S. Senate in 2000, where she faced incumbent Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison; Ruwart polled 1.16% of the popular vote (72,798 votes), finishing fourth of four candidates behind Green Party candidate Douglas Sandage.[3]

So the only time where she was nominated it was before she made that statement in 2008? Interesting.

Anonymous 02/18/15 (Wed) 19:06:13 No.16847

>>16844
>>16843
So does that mean she disappeared into unimportance already shortly after 2000 or as recently as 2008?

Anonymous 02/23/15 (Mon) 03:05:52 No.17218

File: 1424660752836.jpg (23.3 KB, 499x333, 499:333, 06d.jpg)

>>16491
Libertarians for the win!

Anonymous 02/23/15 (Mon) 19:35:17 No.17262

>Basing politics on your sexuality

Anonymous 02/23/15 (Mon) 19:40:54 No.17265

>>17262
Pretty much everyone bases their politics in self-interest, and for pedos calming the pedo hysteria is very much in their self interest

Anonymous 02/23/15 (Mon) 19:52:34 No.17268

>>17265
But there is more about this bitch than just "CP is awwwwwright"
domestic policy? foreign policy? doctrines? ideologie? financal plans? (neoliberals just need to kill themselfes)
CEOs and Bankmanagers ruined "democracy", but at least we can still choose how the puppet is going to dance.

Anonymous 03/15/15 (Sun) 19:23:25 No.18580

File: 1426447405263.jpg (105.18 KB, 690x388, 345:194, rand-paul.si[1].jpg)

Breaking news, Rand Paul arrested for grooming.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8212647/rand-paul-snapchat-teens-presidential-election

Anonymous 03/15/15 (Sun) 22:17:02 No.18597

>>18580
Arrested where?

TheOneAndOnly 03/16/15 (Mon) 00:47:32 No.18603

I prefer libertarianism because it is the one political philosophy that is not about forcing people to do certain things. As you can see from this woman, they are generally more open minded to free choice and understand people make decisions we may not like. Child or adult.

Anonymous 03/16/15 (Mon) 03:50:02 No.18652

>>18603
I don't think I'll ever understand people who think that absolute freedom is a good idea. What's wrong with the government doing their job and governing how people live? I mean, sure, I don't get to sleep with children or freely look at CP, but that's a small price to pay for having a safe society where people don't poison themselves with laudanum believing it's headache medicine or make you work for 50 hours without compensation.

Anonymous 03/16/15 (Mon) 03:53:54 No.18653

>>18652
It's because he's a lying autistic fool. Which is the main demographic of libertarianism.

Anonymous 03/16/15 (Mon) 04:02:32 No.18656

>>18652
Imagine a world where you could sleep with children and freely look at CP while still living in a society where people don't poison themselves with laudanum believing it's headache medicine or make you work for 50 hours without compensation.

Anonymous 03/16/15 (Mon) 04:06:09 No.18657

>>18656
So imagine living in a country who's non-libertarian government has better laws.

Anonymous 03/16/15 (Mon) 04:06:17 No.18659

>>18656
I'm not optimistic enough to believe that people aren't going to take advantage of each other if they are given the allowance to do so.

Anonymous 03/16/15 (Mon) 15:19:59 No.18678

>>18657
Yep.

>>18659
I agree, though I'm also not optimistic enough to believe that people aren't going to take advantage of each other even if they are not given the allowance to do so.

Anonymous 03/17/15 (Tue) 05:04:07 No.18696

>>18678
You can sue people that wrong you if they do something that's an offense.

Anonymous 05/03/15 (Sun) 20:08:47 No.21173

File: 1430683727696.jpg (32.92 KB, 186x186, 1:1, 9781851171354_tn[1].jpg)

http://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/473/our-programme

The abolition of age-of-consent laws. We recognise the right of individuals to enter into the sexual relations they choose, provided this does not conflict with the rights of others. Alternative legislation to protect children from sexual abuse.

Anonymous 05/03/15 (Sun) 23:48:03 No.21176

>>21173

Nobody wants to support commies, even if they let you sleep with kids.

Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 15:30:35 No.21223

>>21176

It's interesting that most pedos – at least of those using this board – are rather right-wing, while it's usually the left-wings who are in favour of what most pedos want.

Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 16:04:20 No.21226

>>21223

The only thing I care about is free speech and feminists and their left-wing lackeys create a chilling effect on that.

Zed 05/05/15 (Tue) 16:14:36 No.21227

>>21223

I'm not really politically affiliated at all and I have no idea what the difference between right-wing and left-wing is in relation to pedophiles. What is it that lefties are in favor of, that pedos want?

Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 17:50:02 No.21236

>>21227

> What is it that lefties are in favor of, that pedos want?

What I meant was that in my experience, if there's someone agitating for the legalization of child-adult sexual relationships etc., it's always a left-wing one.

On the other hand, all centre-right to far-right parties I can think of tend to promote laws that I believe to make life harder for pedos, specifically 'stricter control of people having to do with children', 'more bans on what could the faintest be considered child porn', and so on.

>>21226

> feminists and their left-wing lackeys create a chilling effect

Yes, unfortunately there are (at least) two faces of left-wing parties (anarchy+pedo movement / feminism), which one cannot get one of without getting the other. However, if rejecting one position a party promotes means rejecting the whole party, there is probably no party to vote for for many people.

In that respect, I wondered why pedos on this board tend to condemn lefties as a whole. I wouldn't support communists either (because they have shown in the past to be successful at creating dictatorships in the name of freedom), but that's no reason not to face the advantages they provide.

Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 18:10:50 No.21238

>>21236

I don't want a job involving children and I live in the US, so I don't need to worry about government censorship. The only time something doesn't get published is when left wingers complain about it being discriminatory or demeaning to women and the publisher caves into the complaining.

Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 20:02:54 No.21244

>>21238

Of course one could argue that what's considered left-wing in the US is considered central in certain other countries, Scandinavian ones for instance.

Anonymous 05/06/15 (Wed) 01:14:15 No.21264

>>21236

you get some right wingers who support child marriage but they're just as fringe as the leftists that support child adult sexual relationships.