No.18925
What other online pedophile communities are there?
Looking for somewhere a little more active and open
No.18937
I haven't searched too thoroughly but every community I've found has been garbage. IME we get a choice between reading pseudo-intellectual rambling/literal schizophrenia on Annabelleigh + Alice, conversation with people who can't think critically on VirPed et al and then imageboards, which have the least delusional circlejerking of the lot but approximately three posters each.
Look at us versus LGBTQ. I wouldn't be surprised if valid research in the coming years shows the pedo population to be the retarded little subhumans everyone thinks we are.
No.18940
Try girl- and boychat
No.18948
>>18937What does the gay community have? Art colleges?
No.18971
No.18976
>>18971A school for forty people total is nothing compared to something like Akihabara which has multiple shops catering to pedophiles.
No.18985
>>18976I Googled Akihabara and it's a real place.
Is it actually a shopping market for pedos?
No.18986
>>18985Probably more for lolicons than true pedos I believe.
No.18988
>>18985It's the electronic district of Tokyo, so it's more of a shopping market for geeks, which just happen to include a lot of pedophiles.
No.19036
>>1897640 now, next the world.
No.19115
>>18985I have been there and the other poster is greatly exaggerating. Pedophilia is not the primary theme or even one of the major themes.
No.19146
>>18986What's the difference between a lolicon and a pedophile in Japan and elsewhere?
I don't like lolicon and I think the people who do are just closet pedos lying to themselves.
No.19150
>>19146>I think the people who do are just closet pedos lying to themselves.I think this is true partially.
For some they are the paedo-equivalent of the anime community who have 2D waifus and think 3D is pig disgusting.
No.19155
>>19150So you can think a little drawn girl is sexy and stuff, but a real girl isn't? I call bullshit on this.
No.19156
>>19155Well yeah, it comes from over-fantasizing to the point they have unrealistic standards.
Imagined stuff gets to remove any imperfections as well as add on any other fantasy elements that real humans can't replicate. So they'd rather fall in love with their thoughts than a real person.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/12/16/japan.virtual.wedding/ No.19162
>>19156>So they'd rather fall in love with their thoughts than a real personWell, that's just being realistic since you probably aren't going to be in a healthy relationship with a real little girl, but that doesn't mean that they aren't attractive.
No.19164
>>19156The difference is that while those waifu-obsessed otakus are shamed for not going after real women, lolicon are praised for sticking to drawings and not approaching real children.
No.19176
What? Like 7axxn? If you can find their server… and they're not being ddos'd…
No.19184
>>19164No, lolicon are shamed for being attracted to children instead of adults.
No.19574
>>18925How and who managed to make them pose like this? What's the story behind the picture?
No.19585
>>19574Thats amber and ella, I've only ever seen them together but they've done quite a few different sets.
I don't think they were part of a modelling agency or anything though, this is one of the few pictures I've seen in their sets that has a watermark for "FReasternproductions"
I haven't seen that watermark on any other girls pictures but them though so it might've just been a one off thing with just those two.
I used to have all their sets but that harddrive got corrupt and I haven't managed to get much back, if anyone has some sets they'd be willing to share I'd be grateful if you'd upload it over on /cutegirls/ where it'd last longer.
No.19586
>>19585I meant… were they just posing or…?
No.19587
>>19586Yeah it was all just posing.
I'm guessing they were told to do it but one of them always seemed a bit more keen in the more touchy-feely pictures so I don't know.
No.19588
>>19585>FReasternproductionsThis watermark is on some of Sarah's sets.
No.19589
>>19587I find that's almost always the case when two girls get kissy or touchy-feely. One girl always seems a little hesitant and the other seems into it. Except for those rare instances when they're both into it–like Mona and Mia
No.19590
>>19589>Mona and MiaI've never seen them before, but now I want to.
No.19595
>>19589what`s the name of the huge-titted blonde in Vlad… Karina or something?
it was funny how in her topless videos with much younger girls, she, who was much older and had huge tits, was always the shy one, being groped and kissed by girls 4 or 5 years younger that were flat and cutesy.
shit made me diamonds. some of the little girls were like sexual predators on her tits and kissing her non-stop.
No.19632
No.19866
No.19867
No.19868
>>/hebe/30651
No.19869
>>19590>>19632okay, well, go to /hebe/ and find the kissing thread with this pic on it, and there is a comment (currently the last) referencing two posts which are Mia and Mona.
No.19876
>>19866
>>19867
>>19868
FUCK DID I GODDAM MISS GOOD SHIT AGAIN?! WHAT WAS >>>/hebe/30651?
No.19888
>>19876NEVER MIND, THESE NIGGAS DON'T KNOW HOW TO CROSS BOARD QUOTE.
No.19908
>>18925 OP's pic are sisters Sage & Sarah.
Akihabara caters to the Otaku world, Pedos aren't usually interested in big breasts.
>>19585 Doubtful you had them all since you seems to know nothing about the agencies they worked for. There's over 100 individual & paired sets and around 20 videos.
Mona & Mia is a one-time amateur set of 100+ pics of them making out. A Google search will find you most of them. Mona shows up again a couple years later paired with new gf Chloe.
No.20022
>>19146>What's the difference between a lolicon and a pedophile in Japan and elsewhere?In Japanese the terms are synonymous. Outside of Japan you would have to ask the person using it.
No.20026
No.20027
No.20028
>>19146I'm a lolicon. Ask me anything.
No.20030
>>19146From the wikipedia article on Lolicon: "Studies of lolicon fans state that they are attracted to an aesthetic of cuteness rather than the age of the characters, and that collecting lolicon represents a disconnect from society."
That right there is the main difference I see between Lolicons and Pedophiles. Pedophiles are attracted to young prepubescent girls, but lolicons are just attracted to the aesthetic of cuteness, not necessarily the girls themselves.
No.20032
>>20030Then why can't a mature woman be cute?
No.20035
>>20030>but lolicons are just attracted to the aesthetic of cutenessSo in other words they are attracted to young prepubescent girls.
Lolicon is really just a vaguer way of saying pedophile, there's really not much way around it.
Even if the age was irrelevant, being attracted to a 30 year old woman with some condition that made her look like a prepubescent girl would still make you a pedophile.
No.20074
>>20032I didn't say they couldn't, and that fact plays into the difference between a real pedophile and lolicon.
>>20035>So in other words they are attracted to young prepubescent girls.They are attracted to what young prepubescent girls are, not to the girls themselves (at least, not in every case). Conceivably, a lolicon could be attracted in the same way to a woman of the age of consent, if that woman could weave and maintain an illusion of cuteness and naivete that a little girl doesn't have to pretend to exhibit.
>being attracted to a 30 year old woman with some condition that made her look like a prepubescent girl would still make you a pedophile.What? No it wouldn't. Not unless she also acted like a little girl, had the personality of a little girl, and somehow didn't have the knowledge and experience of a grown woman.
No.20075
>>20074>No it wouldn't. Not unless she also acted like a little girl, had the personality of a little girl, and somehow didn't have the knowledge and experience of a grown woman.Of course it would. Don't act like pedophilia is somehow purer than normies. You are not physically attracted to the knowledge a girl has. Do not be retarded.
No.20079
>>20075>You are not physically attracted to the knowledge a girl has.Not physically attracted, no. But emotionally attracted? Quite so.
Being a pedophile isn't purely physical. Being a pedophile is attraction to prepubescent children, both physical attraction and emotional attraction.
No.20080
>>20027>Lolicon (ロリコン), also romanised as lolikon or rorikon, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. The term lolicon is a portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex";[1] it describes an attraction to young or prepubescent girls, an individual with such an attraction, or lolicon manga or lolicon anime, a genre of manga and anime wherein childlike female characters are often depicted in an "erotic-cute" manner (also known as ero kawaii), in an art style reminiscent of the shōjo manga (girls' comics) style.[2][3][4][5]Lolicon is intrinsically related to pedophilia.
No.20083
>>20074>I didn't say they couldn't, and that fact plays into the difference between a real pedophile and lolicon.If you look at lolicon manga, they are all drawn as young children or, at the oldest, teenagers.
No.20084
>>20079>Being a pedophile is attraction to prepubescent children, both physical attraction and emotional attraction.Completely false.
All that matters is that you are sexually attracted to prepubescents. That is literally not a single recorded definition for pedophilia on the face of the earth that requires an emotional attraction to count.
If you are attracted to the physical form of prepubescent child, you are a pedophile. It doesn't matter if it's a real child or a depiction in a drawing, and it doesn't matter whether you are emotionally attracted or not.
No.20172
>>20084It should.
>stop arguing No.20176
There is something I think would be interesting to discuss. But I think more private first. Does anyone have a suggestion?
No.20177
>>20172Why?
Does being heterosexual require an emotional attraction?
No.20202
>>20177According to my expert Opinions, It should.
>stoking the flames No.20215
>>19876>that image>that threadYoung girls doing it with other young girls is my favorite thing now.