No.19173
What is your opinion on pedophilia?
Personally, I would hate pedophiles, but I am a logical thinker. Don't get me wrong, I am against child molestors, but being a pedophile does not make one a molestor.
Also, many anti pedos believe that child molestation is worse than murder, why do they continue to hold on to these falsehoods, I have never seen more anger than antis in a pedo thread.
What is your opinion?
–
We just had an insightful thread on this at
>>>/atheism/5409 and I would like to start the same thread in a hug box and see where it goes.
No.19175
"hug box"
nigga holy shit, do you have any idea how much time we spend practically threatening to cut each other
No.19177
Thought crimes are victimless crimes. There is nothing wrong with liking those under age, but those that take advantage of someone's youth, inexperience and naivety are those that I condemn.
No.19179
>hug box
Everyone hates everyone else. We cannot agree on anything, and because we all think that anyone who doesn't align with our beliefs is a monster. The 7-12 age range look down on the 4-10 range, who get to look down on the nepis. The girl lovers hate the boyfuckers and vice versa, and call each other disgusting. The lolicons hate the pedos, who resent the lolicons. The only thing that even approaches majority support is slander against tfwqt3.14lgf or whatever the fuck his name is. It seems like most posts are just telling others to kill themselves.
No.19188
My opinion on it is that it is a sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
Anything else you wish to know?
No.19191
No.19192
>>19191we can certainly hope so
No.19193
>>19192"Hurr, I don't want to have a discussion on the paedo discussion board."
No.19194
>paedo
>a
No.19195
No.19197
no
No.19210
>>19195Lrn2conjugate. Paidos becomes pedo.
No.19211
>>19210It's literally just that "color vs colour" bullshit all over again. Like, can you not? Pretty please?
No.19212
>What is your opinion on pedophilia?
>on a pedo board
WHAT DO YOU THINK?!
No.19214
>>19179The first part of this almost sounds like copypasta at this point.
No.19216
>>19193>>19195>>19210now do you understand?
No.19221
The reason why this board has so much trouble is because it is so dead. There is only so much discussion that can be done about the topic and it's been done over and over again here. So all that remains is the same people from /hebe/ coming here once in a while to see what's new and using this board to troll every once in a while.
If you want the deadest of these boards to also post this question on then there's
>>>/phile/ a board that the admin keeps advertising everywhere on here and
>>>/hebe/ so I thought I'd save him the trouble of plugging it this once.
No.19222
>>19173>hug boxCan't say I didn't warn you.
>>19175>>19179 No.19229
>>19221>>>/phile/ isn't dead, it's up-and-coming.
No.19231
>>19229>board that the admin keeps advertising everywhere on here Do you have to be so blatant about it?
No.19232
>>19231i called it out when he first started and you guys didn't listen
now its every other thread with this guy
No.19233
>>19232Not nearly. But so what? It's fun.
No.19234
>>19222i'll fucking cut you for stealing credit for my post, nigger
No.19235
>>19233no it isnt faggot. its annoying and reeks of desperation. get out.
No.19237
>>19235You're the only one bothered by it.
No.19240
No.19241
>>19240I really don't plug it as often as you think I do.
No.19242
We don't care how often, dickhead, we don't want you doing it at all. Although your avatarfagging is arguably worse.
No.19243
>>19242Only 'cause you're bitching about it. 😉
No.19249
Also, having sex with children doesn't make you a child molester just like having sex with women doesn't make you a rapist.
No.19250
>>19243No he isn't, faggot. Kill yourself.
No.19251
>>19249It's been awhile but if you're that boylover that didn't see anything wrong with a man intimidating a young boy with his back against the wall into giving the man a blowjob, then fuck you.
No.19252
>>19249If women couldn't legally give consent, then sex with women would be rape. So when you take into account modern culture is you will see how any sex with children is molestation.
No.19254
>>19251>if you're … then fuck you.ad hominem almost.
No.19255
Just feel I should preemptively make the comment before things derail into a pointless "I win" argument on whether it is molestation or not.
No need to beat around the bush
According to the law any sex with children is molestation. The topic at hand is whether it should remain defined as such.
No.19256
>>19254you should probably research what an ad hominem is
No.19257
>>19256'Tis why I said
almost No.19258
>>19257you should probably research what an ad hominem is if you think that was even "almost" an ad hominem
No.19259
>>19256Well, it sort of is, specifically it's poisoning the well.
>It's been awhile but if you're that boylover that didn't see anything wrong with a man intimidating a young boy with his back against the wall into giving the man See, you are trying to discredit him by bringing up something he said in the past and that's clearly an ad hominem. Of course, he simply could have posted anonymously and not had that problem.
No.19260
>>19259>See, you are trying to discredit him by bringing up something he said in the past and that's clearly an ad hominem. No, I think I was trying to insult him, but I suppose you know better than me about what I was trying to do.
I'm not responsible for how you incorrectly infer things.
>Well, it sort of is, specifically it's poisoning the well.I would suggest harboring people who support legitimate child sexual assault, in the literal definition of the term, does massively more to harm the community.
No.19261
>>19260Couldn't you just insult him based on what he just said instead of some sort of hypothetical post you aren't even sure he posted?
>I would suggest harboring people who support legitimate child sexual assault, in the literal definition of the term, does massively more to harm the community.Unless you are planning on reporting him to the mods/cops, it doesn't really matter how hostile you are to him.
No.19262
>>19261Because I wanted to, just like I want to be hostile to people who I perceive as supporting child rape.
Now that this is as cleared up as it can possibly be, I don't know why you would want to respond any further, but if you do, go ahead.