No.19531
Hi folks where I live there are boys and girls homeless and a bunch of them not have any parenting so i summon your sinister knowledge to ask this:
¿why take the risk of "do it" with common child?
why not "extract" them(cuz you cant kidnapped from the "streets") give it a hot soup a shelter and in gratitude you can "bond" to her/he
(obviously after a cleanup and some test for any sickness. and a sterilization of course)
and this kind of persons literally not have any morals/education or will be painfully raped and drugged anyway by the other homeless people so, you can work with them in a closed and controlled environment and nobody will miss them
so….WHY NOT?
No.19532
After reading that, I can't help but feel that you view these children as less than human.
No.19534
The thought crossed my mind, sure. I even had some elaborate fantasies on "how it would be". It ended in self-loathing, mostly because:
You take a girl from the streets. She lives under cruel circumstances. You offer her food and shelter, but only for sexual favors. That will give you and your streetkid bad feelings because you see your pocket loli as a fleshy cunt, instead of a little, suffering human being who is about to get more shit shoveled unto her: although the initial gesture is one of altruism and nobility it's only a lure where you bait your victim and trick her into reciprocating: i.e. you give her food and she gives you sexual favors.. The streets might treat her bad, but by doing this, you will inflict a much greater damage on her by giving hope to her and taking it away again.. and all this just to please your primal urges.
Now I know this stuff happens irregardless of what I say or think about it. Just ask yourself whether you're really that rotten of a person to do this.
No harm in thinking it though. Just don't do it.
No.19539
If you just wanted to help them, give them a better life, unofficially adopt them and be a parent to them, and let them grow to love you because of that, I don't see anything wrong with that.
But if you're asking why we don't do something like what
>>19534 said, we don't because it's inhumane and heartless. Pedophiles aren't monsters. If I was going to help a child, I'd do it for free, expecting nothing in return, because asking for anything from someone who has nothing is wrong in so many ways.
No.19540
the question is "why not" ? everyday the law catch some stupid what tries to rape his niece, you not will harm her, you will educate for adore you( pocket loli thats a good one) like a cult but NOT in the religious way, just enough to make dependant of you and she will come out when can behave at public, you will get someone what can trust, someone what really do everything for you with a high mortality and a deep knowledge: the society is blunt you can trust me for not being alone or in pain for nothing
you only will use sex as a tool for bonding
No.19541
I think you already know it would be wrong, OP.
Otherwise you wouldn't be here asking. You just want validation. Fuck you.
You just want to use LGs and I don't think you love them at all. You probably wouldn't even care if they enjoy it or not.
Also
>¿
You're a disgrace for Hispanics everywhere. Que te jodan.
No.19542
is that all? that is the answer? i see people (childs) dying FOR NOTHING every day i DON'T accept the lineaments of "normal society" with hunger war and cruelty i just ask why you are so….sloppy? if you try to do something with a random child that only be a trauma for him why not educate the forsaken? why not help the helpless? i have worked in orphanages and only see a obsolete system what ends in prostitutes and criminals
Why…not….an….well educated generation from the scraps of society?
No.19543
>>19541wrong? I dont kill childs,I don't throw them to the criminal organizations I will dispose his entire life? YES but for good…..and sex it's the only harmless way to make a REAL bond
No.19544
I think you are AFRAID of Thinking Big YES will take a LOT of money, YES will need a full-time organization, and yes….that human beings will be happy in the simplest way of psychological conditioning
No.19545
>>19543>I dont kill childs,I don't throw them to the criminal organizationsAnd you feel great about yourself because you're not using the "childs" for crimes.
But you want to use them. I don't oppose sex with children, you you don't seem to love them.
Sure, other people may kill them or use them to push drugs. They're bad people. That fact that some people are bad doesn't make you good by default.
The bottom line is you should be thinking about them. About doing something to help them have decent lives. You're thinking about yourself first.
News for you, THEY come first, so I repeat: que te jodan.
No.19548
>>19545So…use them is worst than have sex with them for "love"? C'mon the army use the soldiers, the government use the people, YOU use other people
I can't use pain, that just not works so well than "sexing"
I will love every one of them equally and also take care of all
but they are childs, they can't chose a path and will suffer anyway I just give something for live
BUT you're right…perhaps when the time comes i let them go
No.19549
>>19547i have explored the other ways…..JUST DONT WORK the fear only makes weak minds the trust is VERY inexact sex makes a bond because feels good
and i don't use drugs ….to bad for the brains…
No.19550
>>19541
>You're a disgrace for Hispanics everywhereFucking conjugation, make me sound like a drunk russian
No.19551
I think I understand now, you love the child's but only that, like a dog, just don't take their potential seriously
just want a kiss and nothing more…
and advise? Midgets a boob job a good haircut and you will be fine (remember babyj rca? that was a teenager midged)
No.19552
>>19549Have you tried cuddling and having fun together?
Seems to work for me with everyloli.
Lolis loooove cuddles and playtime.
:3
No.19553
>>19552Attention Is the Most Basic Form of Love
No.19555
It's only wrong if you mistreat them. The only real problem otherwise is their future, as when they get older, they will pretty much have no legal identity if you move them out of their home country. Plus, if you're male you can't really go to the government to resolve that issue since you'll undoubtedly be subjected to intense securitization and your loli given to CPS. I'm all for giving children familial homes though.
No.19598
Part of the problem when talking about sex with children is the assumption that all pedos want children only for sex and when their done with them they put them back in their pokeballs.
No.19600
>>19553>Attention Is the Most Basic Form of LoveThat shows how much antis love pedos because they pay them so much attention that they are willing to spend many minutes/hours of their life spamming a thread.
No.19639
>>19531
>you can work with them in a closed and controlled environment and nobody will miss themSee, I was with you up until this part. What do you mean about "closed and controlled environment"? Locking the poor girl in a basement? Obviously that's not better than living on the streets. It's probably worse.
On the other hand, taking a girl whose destiny is a miserable life on the street followed by an early death and turning her into a loli companion is something I've often dreamed about. I have the means to provide a girl with a nice home, pretty clothes, travel, and an education. Getting those things and mutually pleasurable, developmentally appropriate sexual activity would be a pretty good deal for her.
To do it ethically, however, you'd have to be sure not to damage her psychologically or physically. That means no basement loli, OP. Also no sterilization, if you meant destroying her ability to get pregnant. And no rape.
And you'd have to accept that, at some point, she'd probably move on. If you're 40 and you pick up a girl that's 8, by the time she's legally an adult, you'll be past middle age. She would probably want someone closer to her own age and to have a "normal" life at some point. I think about that kind of thing because I'm non-exclusive, so I'd be happy to stay with her forever if I loved her. I suppose an exclusive would lose interest as she got older anyway.
No.19643
>>19639The "closed "part it's because they dont know other ways, with education, manners a full understanding of his choices and a deep knowledge when the time comes up, she will be free to do whatever she want the sex part is only a tool for a fresh start,because they only know pain….
No.19665
>>19531What country do you live in?
No.19690
Why the fuck would you want to sterilize them?
Why not actually make the institution of marriage mean something and create a family with the unfortunate one?
If she's good enough to fuck then she's good enough to have a genuine loving relationship with.
No.19691
>>19690>implying there's any genuine love in exploiting a tremendously vulnerable child for the express purpose of getting pussyseriously read what the fucking op said. there is NO love for children in people like that.
No.19718
File: 1428047668782.jpg (30.69 KB, 267x400, 267:400, homeless little girl 7-6-2….jpg)
Shoot son, that's how I get all my girlfriends.
No.19758
No.19765
Acquire a homeless orphan loli from the brutal streets of some godforsaken city. Ask her if she wants to be clean, and get new clothes and food. Take her to a hotel with one of those big baths, have her take her old clothes off, and get her in the bath. Scrub her until she's cleaner than she's been in years. Get her in some clean clothes. Buy her some nourishing food. If you're in a country where no questions will be asked, it will be easy at this point to take her to a doctor to get checked out. Blood tests, physical exam. She will have been raped repeatedly on the streets. If she's free of disease (and if you are) take her back to the hotel and show her lovemaking. But, above all, show her kindness.
If she wants to stay after that, she can stay. Protip: she will stay.
No.19769
>>19765>She will have been raped repeatedly on the streets.Let us not make such terrible assumptions.
No.19773
>>19769assumptions? Facts, children living on the streets are more likely to engage in “survival sex” – trading sex to gain food, clothing, drugs, money, or just for a safe place to sleep at night.
No.19774
>>19773Sure, but that doesn't happen all the time.
No.19777
>>19773That's prostitution, not rape.
No.19778
>>19769>>19773>>19774>>19777Shit, it's something I had to do as a kid, and I'm a guy in a first-world country. Still had to take my share of dicks to eat or to just not have my few things taken.
No.19785
File: 1428193199975.jpg (82.11 KB, 400x341, 400:341, tumblr_inline_mgdssgKY7Q1q….jpg)
No.21355
>>19552
have I tried cuddling with lolis?
Why did you ask the ugly guy
If i looked like a supermodel then sure, it wouls be easy
when you're me, you look like a burn victim
No.21369
>>19531
sterilization.. Why?
No.21525
>>19531
I would take them in to take care of them with no strings attached, and nothing more. I wouldn't take advantage of their misfortune for my sexual gratification. Life on the streets is hard as hell, and I couldn't imagine forcing them to go through that after they've already been through so much. If she falls in love with me and she's more than ready to consent, and I know that I won't be taking advantage of her? Maybe. It's a rally hard question to answer.
>>19691
Fucking this. Fuck you, op. You're the reason people think we're fucking monsters.
No.21535
first you get the money, then you get the power, then you get the wom//child, then you care About them later make them love you more than his own life then you fuck them,later training,education, basic moral standards,then make a well equipped army then CONQUER A COUNTRY….any of that latin shitholes what' lives in stone age XD
No.21537
>>19531
>WHY NOT?
Because you are exploiting their defenselessness. Because your whole text shows that you see them as objects, not humans.
>i want to exploit a homeless child which is okay because they will be exploited anyway.
Please die, OP.
No.21539
>>19531
>and a sterilization of course
>of course
Of course! Why should anyone assume you would not have the right to put a persons ability to get pregnant away?
No.21577
>>21537
> you are exploiting their defenselessness
If I don't, others will do.
> you see them as objects, not humans
I'd give them the opportunity of being useful for something (even if that something is anything but glorious) instead of throwing their lives away for nothing.
> i want to exploit a homeless child which is okay because they will be exploited anyway.
The question is who exploits them and what for. There are different levels of exploitation, not all are that great you seem to consider the other exploitations to be.
>>21539
> Why should anyone assume you would not have the right to put a persons ability to get pregnant away?
Because them getting involuntarily pregnant would be even worse than not being able to get pregnant, wouldn't it? Also, if you choose the right method of sterilization, it's fully reversible at any time.
No.21578
>>21577
>If I don't, others will do.
Silly idea, how about taking care of them without the exploitation part? You scumbag.
>Because them getting involuntarily pregnant
You are even unable to use protection? The fuck?
No.21587
>>21577
>If I don't, others will do.
The POTENTIAL that other people MIGHT do something does not excuse you for doing it, you disgusting subhuman animal.
Jesus christ is your post a joke?
No.21591
>>21587
> Silly idea, how about taking care of them without the exploitation part?
Silly idea, who am I? Social welfare? I'm a filthy pedo scumbag who'd do anything to fuck children!
> You are even unable to use protection?
Why bother using protection if the whole point of the operation is building up a harem of children for the sole purpose of raping them on the rim?
>>21587
> The POTENTIAL that other people MIGHT do something does not excuse you for doing it
The POTENTIAL that other people MIGHT not do something does not excuse you for not doing anything, you disgusting moralfag subanimal.
No.21593
>>21591
Oh, so you're just some faggot pretending to be a disgusting subhuman animal. For what purpose I do not know.
Good job, you really got me.
No.21635
>>21593
> Oh, so you're just some faggot pretending to be a disgusting subhuman animal.
You're only partly right. If I were living in a country like the one described by OP, I would definitely think about how these children on the streets could be given at least a faint use to the world. (If they stay there, they'll be useless, living in vain.) Serving as sex service providers is just one possibility one could think of. And I would say not a bad one; for them, of course, it's not so good, but living on the street isn't either, so if it's an improvement, honestly why not?
No.21640
aprox age : 7yo living in the streets caused :
hunger->Solvent addiction:->sex exchange to sustain long-term addiction ->SEX aids->death
or eventually will become criminals
No.21683
>>21640
???
Please use a grammar of English a normal person can understand. Or at least write in a way others can understand what the intention behind what you write is.
No.21734
>>21683
I want to believe those random words and arrows somehow connect with that gif;only connection I can find is that they're both batshit crazy.
No.21738
>>21640
please let me:
The children will become addicts later criminals,and will end in jail, crazy or dead
No.21739
>>21734
"At this festive season of the year, Mr Scrooge, … it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir."
"Are there no prisons?"
"Plenty of prisons…"
"And the Union workhouses." demanded Scrooge. "Are they still in operation?"
"Both very busy, sir…"
"Those who are badly off must go there."
"Many can't go there; and many would rather die."
"If they would rather die," said Scrooge, "they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."