No.19626
The other day, I was looking for lolicon and came across a survey of sorts where somebody was trying to find a correlation between personality and an interest in lolicon, and I quickly became intrigued. To keep things brief, I want insight on what personality types are common amongst pedophiles. This test is particularly good and I'd recommend taking it to find out more about yourself whether you're a pedophile or not:
http://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-testI got INTJ-A, which was shared with about 90% of the other people on the lolicon site I mentioned. (For the record, I'm a pedophile). Don't forget to share your results.
No.19627
>>19626We already did this. I think the majority was exclusive INTP
No.19628
ENFP. Get on my level.
No.19629
Myers-Briggs is masturbatory pap, barely above personality evaluation by star sign. Real psychologists started laughing at it years ago.
No.19633
Yeah, I already made a thread about this before the board wipe erased it. Most of the results were INTP and ENTP, with a few INTJs, but I think that _NT_ personalities are just really common for internet users that frequent forums and image-boards. So that probably skewed the results and didn't give an accurate representation of pedophiles or lolicons.
Image related: my test results in the original thread.
>>19629That's not because the test is a bad categorization method for personalities, but because certain personality types tend to take the test differently based on the mood they're in, giving different results. So the test is only accurate for about half of the personality types; those who always take the test with the same mind-set regardless of the mood they're in.
No.19634
>>19633>100% introvertedYou need help.
No.19635
>>19634Well, I am sort of a hermit. I live alone, and seclude myself as much as possible.
No.19636
>19629
This. The MBTI is garbage.
No.19641
>>19635Why? Why do that to yourself?
No.19645
No.19648
I'm pretty sure one of the types is massively over-represented on the internet in the first place, so it's not really very useful for gauging typical personality traits in pedophiles…
That said, personality tests are fun enough, I got INFP(-T), which I think is one of the types I always get when taking these sorts of tests so there's probably some truth to it.
No.19654
No.19659
I got the same as you OP
No.19661
>>19641He probably has autism
No.19662
It's funny considering I got INTP last time. Either I changed dramatically over the past two years or this test isn't that accurate.
No.19676
>>19633I took into consideration that some factors aren't just part of pedophilia, but I still thought it would be interesting to see as long as I didn't take everything as fact. Another part is what you said about your mood skewing results. Frankly, I'm always in the same mood, but I knew that the results wouldn't be 100% accurate thanks to that.
No.19749
This:
YOUR PERSONALITY TYPE IS:
LOGISTICIAN (ISTJ-T)
Am I pedo???
No.19833
INTP-T here. I also get a different result each time I take these fucking tests.
For the record, I'm an ephebophile, but also perfectly happy in a relationship with someone my own age.
No.19841
I think the last time I did one of these, I was INTP, but hey. Close enough.
No.20023
Took it not too long ago and got ENTP. Most pedos on the internet probably get NT personalities because those are the ones that are generally filled with bright people. To be a pedo on the internet you have to have some knowledge and know how to do some research on how to stay somewhat anonymous.
No.20281
Only ESTP in the thread. I guess I'm a special paedophile.
No.20282
>>20281Would've used the bigger picture, but I took this test about 5 minutes before I even found this thread.
No.20310
The truth when you was bullied in middle school for many years..
AOI: 4-11
No.20352
No.20368
>>20352I keked despite the fact that it's complete horseshit.
No.20379
Apart from the fact that these personality tests are bullshit, you're hardly going to get an accurate picture from a *chan site.
These places skew towards introversion, especially "INTP/J", regardless of their interests or fetishes, mostly because they value the anonymity for its own sake.
No.20381
No.20389
>>19626Yes, sir. I appear to be
No.20390
>>19633If that's so, it's still a sign of laughably poor question design.