/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

What is a white knight pedophile? Do you stand up for little girls on the Internet when they camwhore?

>>22479

Yeah, I was kinda wondering about that too…

I didn't want to respond because I was pretty sure he was trolling, but if he is, it's too complex for me to fully understand…

Me too, do you know a real chan with real child and preteens porn?

>>22482

Well, there's your problem. You're looking for porn, and this board isn't for porn of any kind.

I know, but you can help me?

I'm also a preteen but man. I have 15years, and I love these girls, I can't find it anywhere.

>>22479

>>22481

I wish I was trolling. Let's say the baby fucking autists are on one side of the scale and I thought most of other are on the other end.

I appreciate the beauty of little girls but I don't want to read anons retarded sex fantasies.

>>22490

neither does anyone else

there are maybe 2 posters tops who for some reason younglove is for porn comments

>>22491

for some reason think*

>>22495

your trip fits well :v

not only that, but >>22508 is a good example for what does not fit in here.

>yeah but shes clothed

fuck your shit

>>22539

>>22542

I've been on younow lately and I really stood up for the "camwhores". Telling them to not give anyone their number or details while having a nice conversation. I don't need no rewards from them as I have contact to real lolis.

I am that nice guy and I couldn't care less if you believe me or not.

The posts you quoted are a good example of retards identifiying themselves as pedophiles on this board who are clearly not. Or I'm just not one of "them".

It makes me sick to read shit like that.

>>22477

>Babyfucker

Hi /phile/ BO

>>22590

Everyone hates babyfuckers except babyfuckers themselves, you dumb babyfucker. You are a disgrace to all pedodom.

>>22594

My AoA is 6+ but still don't hate people attracted to toddlers. Actually I think they are the only pedophiles that nowadays can have sexual contacts without harming their partner. I believe in that because babies are mentally not capable of understanding the stigmatization of adult-child-love in today's society and therefore can't directly suffer from it.

>>22650

1-5 are the most important years for forming who you are as a person. a baby will absolutely retain the effects of abuse or neglect.

they won't consciously remember, and they won't be effected by the social ramifications, but if you be a dick to them it'll mess them up for life.

>>22650

You are fucking stupid

>>22680

>but if you be a dick to them it'll mess them up for life.

Of course. But my point is that some actions have to be judged differently depending on the age of the children. Today in western societies, when I orally stimulate the vulva of a 10 year old girl it means being a dick, since the kid will most likely have a hard time to not connect what has happened with the ruling narrative of damaging child adult contacts. Still, a 2 year old has no idea about this stigma and also won't remember later in her life. So, what harm is done, I ask?

>>22693

because youre giving the green light for other people to do the same. and they might take it further and hurt the child.

plenty of people can handle speeding, speeding is still illegal because even though its beneficial for some, overall it's still a net negative to society.

people can live without speeding, and babies can survive without getting eaten out.

>>22693

Scientists aren't entirely sure about the no memories before age four thing.

Want to munch on a lil girls peach so bad today

Years ago when my sister had her daughters my life was in Heaven

Changing diapers and having a mid-day snack of flesh was so thrilling

Wish I could go back or have taken videos for my viewing pleasure in my later years

>>22715

babyfuckers are so astronomically deluded

Every time I hold a baby I lean them up against me at a 70 degree angle and place my full hand on their bottoms

parents dont see anything wrong with this and I have a free hand for roaming when possible. Usually, as they are only in diapers, I'll caress my finger along the edges of the. diaper and lean the beautiful darling my way. In this way I can lean her more if need be and it opens up the diaper for side viewing of vulva/mons. This technique also works on toddlers just have to try and slip the lining of the panties back before you hand her over to Mommy/Daddy or else. Your pinky or pointer finger has access to rub her outer lips and circle her anus of careful

With daughters under 2-3 dont need to worry as much since they squirm so much in their sleep or playing their bottoms always get mis-aligned anyway.

>>22719

you have literally zero idea what you are talking about, but that's ok because no one cares and this is not up for debate.

oh, and either do your fucking job for once in your fucking life and get rid of pics that break the board rules or kill yourself and let someone else do it

>>20883

yep babyfuckers 'love' babies so much they encourage them wallowing in their own filth to get perpetual diseases and urinary tract infections so they can satisfy their disgusting fetishes

wow such care so love

>2. Only post “clean” photographs. This means fully clothed (no underwear or swim suits), no nudity and no erotic poses.

>>22714

>>22694

you are so fucking disgustingly stupid. it doesn't matter what the faggot fuck a pathetically worthless subhuman's opinion what a swimsuit is when the latter pic objectively is and the first pic the girl is clearly naked or in underwear. but of course you dont give a shit because they're your precious toddlers so fuck the rules, right?

fuck you and fuck everything about you. step down from volunteering and give it to someone else now.

>>22722

>I believe that's the guy who shitposts about his fantasies, so it's kind of irrelevant, as it never happened

>i dont like it so he doesnt count

LITERALLY

DELUSIONAL

>>22724

Just to point something out here: The greentext rule you pointed out was made by Suika, the former board owner who is no longer here (dunno what happened, just vanished one day) and since then, tfw has taken over. I remember seeing a post from tfw in another thread saying that he wasn't going to be super strict about that particular rule, so long as everyone was following the general spirit and intention behind it. He would crack down on it if it started to get out-of-hand.

>>22725

>hurr durr let me take a snippet of tfw's text and then apply an out of context meaning to it that makes him look bad

Tfw isn't saying, "i dont like it so he doesn't count," and you know it.

He's saying 22721 is quoting the fantasy of someone, not what actually happens in reality. In reality, people like tfw wouldn't do anything harmful like that, and he then goes on to explain that he, personally, does the exact opposite of the fantasy.

>>22726

>Just to point something out here: The greentext rule you pointed out was made by Suika, the former board owner who is no longer here (dunno what happened, just vanished one day) and since then, tfw has taken over. I remember seeing a post from tfw in another thread saying that he wasn't going to be super strict about that particular rule, so long as everyone was following the general spirit and intention behind it. He would crack down on it if it started to get out-of-hand.

so literally fuck the rules. just literally fuck the rules.

>Tfw isn't saying, "i dont like it so he doesn't count," and you know it

every single post tfw has EVER made when the subject comes up is EXACTLY that. every single post. every single sentence he's written on the topic can be explicitly summarized as what I just quoted 100%.

tfw has explicitly stated that the people who make him look bad "aren't actually pedos/babyfuckers and doesnt count."

any other namefag on this board can back me up on that. any of them.

nowhere in that guys post is he saying its just a fantasy (infact he directly said it's reality) and fuck you and kill yourself for being such a disgusting subhuman that you resort to something as utterly pathetic as "oh thats the thing that proves me fucking wrong so ill just say he lying."

so yes that is EXACTLY what he's saying and now YOU know it.

i dont even give a jackshit about other babyfuckers as at least they dont live in a fucking delusional fantasy land but TFW is straight up less than human and you're pathetic for supporting him even slightly. faggot.

>>22747

yes i am upset that something as despicable as you hasnt died gurgling in his own blood

>I don't remove the rule because it still does it's job, keeping people from posting excessive bikini/underwear/topless/lewd pics.

except for the part where it fucking doesnt as ive just shown. but once again you dont give even the slightest fuck because they happen to be the toddlers that you love so much. and yes they both are toddlers you shitforbrains.

>As far as I know no one else really actively uses it and checks on it multiple times a day, well, aside from you and maybe one other, but I'd rather not let some insanitybot be a volunteer.

>We have other volunteers as well.

which one is it, retard? how adorable it is that you constantly show what a massive fucking liar you are.

>you're still overlooking the reality that that's an extremely small minority

YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT

NO

FUCKING

CLUE

>Your argument is that I am the same as them, or that babylovers in general are, thus we're bad.

I never said that you contemptible fuckstain, I said you sweep every single babyfucker under the rug that happens to also be a disgusting monster (which funnily enough describes every single babyfucker that has ever happened to post on this board), because if theyre disgusting monsters they apparently dont count. how fucking convenient.

and what's disgusting is you are the same utterly unworthy of life non human routinely screeching that normalfags treat children as pets. of course you dont like normalfags so no "extremely small minority" of bad apples there huh? just fuck them all right?

kill yourself. you do not deserve life.

Babyfuckers will be the first lined up against the wall after the pedo revolution.

http://www.theonion.com/article/man-who-encourages-childs-destructive-id-referred--27367

I don't think tfw understood the onion is a satire site.

>>22758

>Kind of like you have about everything you claim about me.

Die in extreme fucking agony subhuman. Any namefag can completely back up the disgusting shit you spew.

>>14058

this whole thread is proof of your deserving of being tortured to death

>>22758

>As I said in the post you're quoting, I did, and that is where my findings were backed up, to further become my opinion.

Post it. Post it right now.

>>22756

>between babyfucker and the good guy

I hate to say it, but to me, I'm confused by who is who.

1. tfw doesn't fuck babies. He has no sexual contact with his lgf

2. The Anon arguing with tfw is quite clearly psycho. I don't know if that disqualifies him as a good guy, but certainly calls it into question.

3. tfw is fine and rational to me. He's a better contender for "the good guy" than the anon, in my eyes.

4. This is where the actual quandary pops up, because the anon probably isn't a "babyfucker"; there's nothing to support that.

But sure, I'll have some of that popcorn, she can take the bowl and sit right next to me.

>>22771

> tfw is fine and rational

ahaha oh fucking god

tfw is an insane freak that brings this entire board down and the rest of the board is pretty much entirely in solidarity with this.

you live in a different world from reality if anything about that despicable non human animal is rational to you. or maybe you're just a gullible retard with the attention span of a goldfish that has totally fallen for his absolute lies.

oh now i remember zed, i see you're just invested in defending tfw's insanity no matter what

>>16670

>>22775

>tfw is an insane freak that brings this entire board down

I don't see how? His arguments in this thread are better than yours and I haven't ever heard him say something that would "bring this board down".

>you live in a different world from reality if anything about that despicable non human animal is rational to you

Now who's acting irrational? Just because you don't agree with what he believes or some of the things he does doesn't make him a "despicable non human". He's not breaking any laws and he's not hurting anyone, so your mindset just makes you out to be an intolerant bigot.

>>22777

>Either you are tfw pathetically trying to shill for himself

I can assure you I'm not. I've been here for quite a while, I just lurk alot.

>or you are simply insane as well

No, I'm just sticking up for someone who's being unjustly discriminated against because he believes differently than you. Have I done anything insane other than rooting for the underdog here?

>>22780

>I don't see how?

Because you refuse to. You're a pathetic imbecile that that is embarrassingly desperate to ignore reality and even the shit tfw has said himself. I have no reason to explain anything to mental invalids, and I'm already satisfied with the worthless disgusting subhuman faggot's current approval rating here.

I pity your worthlessness as a human, but I and I figure no one else is going to waste our time on someone who refuses to acknowledge the truth. What a waste.

A CP producing NAMbLA donator babysitter and convicted sex offender was teaching a class on tfwqtp2tlgf;^3, known nepiophile.

"Before this class begins, you must get on your knees and worship tfwqtp2tlgf;^3 and accept that he was the most noble pedophile the world has ever known, even greater than Lewis Carroll!"

At this moment, a brave, friendly, well-adjusted girllove champion who was attracted to girls in the 4-11 age range and understood that a lack of tears does not mean consent and fully supported waiting for verbal consent stood up and held up some CP.

"Is this child consenting, babyfucker?"

The arrogant babysitter smirked quite degenerately and smugly replied "Oh course she is, she's not even bleeding, you stupid normalfag!"

"Wrong. It's been five months since she was born. If she were consenting, as you say… then she should just tell you that."

The babysitter was so visibly shaken that he dropped his crayon and complete archive of all the Babyshii videos. He stormed out of the room crying those babyfucker crocodile tears. The same tears babyfuckers cry when parents call the cops on them when they get caught ejaculating in the baby food. There is no doubt that at this point our professor, Candy Finklestein, whished he had enjoyed the company of little girls who were capable of loving him back instead of victimizing the ones who couldn't reject him. He wished so much that he had enough sleeping pills to kill himself with over the embarrassment, but he himself had used it all on small children!

The students applauded and all applied to become elementary school teachers that very day, and accepted Lewis Carroll as their role model. An eagle named "Young Love" flew into the room and perched atop the spiral heart banner and shed a tear on the chalk.

The babyfucker forgot to register with the sheriff's office and was arrested the next day. His babyfucking ways disgusted the wise pedophile warden and was tossed into the general population for all of eternity.

Semper Benigna.

(Gas the boyfaggots too).

>>22793

More asian loli please.

>>22794

lmao

>>22811

That would be extremely painful

>>22813

You're a big guy.

>>22822

4 u

>>22847

FFFFFUUUUUUcuuuuuuuuuuuuuukkkkkkkkk

What I wouldn't do to spend an hour with her. Cum all over her inner thighs & make sure her legs are massaged with my cream

Suck those beautiful toes and kiss her gorgeous DSL

>>22848

Sure, not all babyfuckers are this stupid, but the majority of them are babyfuckers (see: almost every site that allows loli but bans toddlercon). Why keep them around at all when it just attracts these subhumans?

>>22849

What site allows loli, but disallows toddler?

Rule34? No (http://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/466423)

exhentai? Certainly not (http://exhentai.org/g/818739/1f824c5731/)

danbooru? If you can see loli, you can see toddler. (http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/82621)

>>22865

Gelbooru, 7chan, and Rule 34 did the last time I had looked.

http://rule34.paheal.net/wiki/Notes

>Toddlercon/Babykon: I really shouldn't have to explain this. Content like this is strictly forbidden to post on Paheal and posters will be warned followed by a site ban if the posting doesn't stop. UPDATE: We have decided to only remove toddlerkon that violates DA's definition of porn (link) so that we can allow some images that potentially hold a level of "artistic merit". Also, non-human, extremely stylized, and "chibi" drawings are exempt.

Which basically seems to include almost all the toddlercon I've ever seen.

>>22848

God damn, you're so fucking autistic.

>>22874

At least I am TRUE to myself

Unlike all you fake pedo cry babies always talking about how cute a girl is but being a little bitch and not having the balls to do anything.

Girls are to be loved and treasured - this is true

But they also are here to pleasure a man. You PC liberals never understand the concept that females are born TO PLEASE a man

One gender gets FUCKED

the other DOES THE FUCKING

You little boy

>>22882

You should follow the law even if you don't agree with it.

>>22849

You seem pretty booty bothered these days, /phile/ owner. Is it because even the wizardchan lifeboat has twice the active users you do?

>>22882

I remember a post almost exactly like this with the "you don't have balls to do anything"

Reminds me of the days back on /pol/ with Art Admirer arguing with the normies who went absolutely off their nut.

I dont come here so its surprising how mad you guys get.

I dont really have a problem with it if it the baby enjoys it.

>>22988

Art Admirer was a faggot whos argument relied on "BUT U CANT KNOW1!!!" whenever someone brings up consent.

>>22991

why are you so utterly retarded you cant tell the difference between an individual paedophile and all paedophiles?

>>22991

>Babies don't have feelings/Can't like things

Why do psychopaths project on babies like this?

>>23005

Now that's what I call an strawman

>>23004

Between him, the fags like !Q and Based at /b/ and tfw its hard not to, hell, sometimes I hope we never get accepted just so they can't act on their retardness

>>22991

>>23004

>>23007

hmm

im not into babies myself but ive reached a point where i dont really ostracize people for their sexual preferences

tfw doesnt strike me as someone who wants to hurt babies or anyone really

Bump

>>22776

Hey Zed, you said you take your responsibility for and don't delete your posts, so what happened to this quoted post in this one?

>>22794

oh my, great turn on that copypasta

>>26874

This is the problem with the internet as a meeting space. Arguments break out easily and are hard to de-escalate because of the lack of normal body language and tone cues. People who should be allies end up at each other's throats.

Also, I'd be very, very surprised if there weren't at least a few antis here using social engineering tactics to fracture this community.

The main thing this board needs is a moderator who is willing to delete/ban stupid arguments.

>>26882

You got that right. Whether we like babies, toddlers, little girls/boys, tween girls/boys, or teen girls/boys, we're all MAP's and should stand together rather than arguing.

>>26885

I'm not going to support someone who wants to do things I don't agree with.

>>26886

Who others are attracted to or not attracted to isn't your business. What's your business is that we are all MAP's in one way or another. Just because your morals are different doesn't mean they're better.

"You like girls that are 4-7? You sick fuck! I like girls from 8-11, I'm better cuz the girls I like are older."

Yeah, um, okay……..

>>26888

What others want to do is definitely my business.

And yes, my morals are superior to an extent I don't want to waste the time describing to blithering retarded subhumans.

>>26889

I lol'ed

Subhuman berates subhumans. Get a life moralfag.

I just fucked your 6yo sister now what bitch?

>>26882

It's something specific to 8chan., due to the radicalization from gamergate and people bitching about SJW. when 2chan still existed, and even some of the old /b/ theads (i.e. before 2008) were pretty decent

>>26893

It's also probably due to a more concerted effort by normies to disrupt and fracture communities such as this one.

Think about it from their perspective. They just have to come on here, make a few posts under the guise of hebephiles condemning "babyfuckers" in the harshest terms possible, make a few angry, irrational retaliatory posts under the guise of pedophiles, and suddenly there's an all-out flame war where there should have been cooperation. They'd be stupid not to do it.

The only ways to limit the effectiveness of such tactics are strict moderation (deleting arguments before they can escalate) and teaching legitimate users to ignore stupid inflammatory arguments.

>>26900

Shalom, >>>/phile/ admin!

>>26909

Go home JTRIG. Don't you have some pro-TPP propaganda to write?

>>26890

>I just made an embarrassingly pathetic shitpost, now what?!??!

You've certainly made me cringe, if that was what you were hoping for.

>>26900

Normies do not need to waste their time shitposting in an ocean of shit. Do you think this "community" actually accomplishes anything normies give a shit about?

>>26929

Unfortunately it's impossible to tell whether the community being shit is its own fault or the fault of an outside force.

The hypothesis that it is an outside force encourages unity, so that is the conclusion I'm going with.

>>26929

Also my advice of stricter moderation and thicker skin is still valid regardless of who's causing the community to be shit.

>>26929

I remember……there were normie shitposers on wizardchan when I hung out there…

>>26944

It's way too hopeful to assume all the insane shitposts and cringey porn comments here are just the work of bored antis. There's just too much of it, too often. Normie shilling comes and goes in spats, not like what you see on this board.

Either way, I do not want to unite with the sort of people who make those posts.

>>26987

Wizardchan existed solely as a cesspool of delirious shitposting, the fact that posters here "hung out there" does not fill me with any confidence that there aren't legitimate weirdos on this board that have no business being around children.

>>26992

well, this is a *chan, that's everyone here to be honest (yes, I am reaching back to the mythical days of when everyone on /b/ was crazy motherfuckers and whatnot)