/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

deeply retarded, just like any other pedo guide and i can't believe there's people who takes it seriously

>>23469

how so I just started reading it? Should I really bother finishing it?

>>23470

It's not a handbook, it's a big masturbatory fantasy…

like every other pedo guide

yeah there's nothing helpful in the paedophiles handbook, its NAMBLA bullshit.

Dumb unrealistic garbage with lots of rape tips from an author that sure does want to convince himself that he's a good guy.

>>23468

>finding children

>plural

>hunting season

Looks terrible. I'll stick to things like this.

http://www.asstr.org/files/Authors/englishperv/An A-Z of Gentle Paedophilia.txt

It's mostly bullshit

Either the guy(s) who wrote this are the most confident, sexy bastards on the face of the planet

Or it is mostly fiction

I mean I'll be honest. I was quite young when I first read it. I tried some of the advice/tips especially about finding kids at the park by themselves or going camping & just inviting yourself with a group of kids

I've had some fun experiments that I believe only possible because I took their advice but nothing of the sort they stated could happen. Never got a little girlfriend or a steady sex partner. It was mostly just all dares of getting girls to give in to peer pressure and suck me off one by one

But yeah telling a young girl she is beautiful and giving her attention goes a long way. Telling a little pudgy girl she is the most gorgeous girl you ever laid eyes on will have her following you to your car and her shirt will be off in minutes so you could play with her pudgy buds

>>23522

that link is disgusting.

>>23523

I followed quite a few of their advice and dated two 14yos. still talk to another 11 girls 12-18yo online that I met back when I was testing the book.

Like any sort of teaching tool, it CAN work for you. It all depends on your attitude, just like pick-up books. Some will read it and go

>no way this works, nuh-uh

while others will actually try and figure it out on the field.

>>23534

>>23523

so its basically a rape manual? I half-expected it to be about how to deal with being a non-offending paedophile.

Oh well.

>>23535

>so its basically a rape manual?

The more I'm reading it, the more it seems that way. Kids are described as "insane pleasures and rushes". The whole thing is like a chad or PUA guide for pedophiles. The thing's structured something like this:

1)You're a pedo, deal with it

2)Now get out there and slay some seriously dank little girl pussy

>>23532

I'm sorry you didn't like it, I liked it and thought other people would too.

>>23523

>It was mostly just all dares of getting girls to give in to peer pressure and suck me off one by one

That's terrible.

>>23531

>immoral

For you probably. Not me nor my dick

>risk jail

I honestly didn't risk anything. I was barely 20 and drove to a park way far from where I lived (As the book states. Never go to an area multiple times and plan an exit strategy)

I saw a girl feeding some ducks with some bread. Asked her if she had anymore so I could feed them too and we talked for a bit. She was very sweet but shy and said her Mommy didn't get off work for another couple hours and before she goes home she likes to play outside. She doesn't tell her Mommy so she doesn't get in trouble

After feeding the ducks I…

You know you aren't going to like what I did with her but long story short I didn't risk anything because if she had said anything she would have gotten in trouble from her Mom by not staying inside her house. There

>>23535

I mean I guess you could call it a rape manual just as you would call any "How To" book on how to pick up chicks are

It just states places a pedophile should frequent if he wants good access to children who are unhibited and unsupervised

"Free range kids" are really good for this. So are loners and neglected kids

But I mean it is pretty common sense stuff. Just like how any guide on how to pick up women will say go to a bar, find a girl that is alone, buy her a drink….

If you think the Pedo Guide is a rape guide then so are those websites

>>23543

>That's terrible

Sure didn't feel terrible as it was happening I tell you what

>>23473

This is a rapists fantasy and I doubt even Nambla would support that.

>>23522

>Gentle Paedophilia

Literally the first point he makes is that it's okay to fuck lolis in the ass.

Another example of how every "guide" is nothing more than some retards fantasy.

I'm sorry for the victims of people who wanted to try out the advice of these kind of "guides"

>>23564

You seem to be proud of what you did, please go die in a fire.

I feel lost between all those wanna be girl lovers who only think with their penis.

>>23572

>Literally the first point he makes is that it's okay to fuck lolis in the ass.

Well, if he goes slow and easy enough it won't hurt her.

>Another example of how every "guide" is nothing more than some retards fantasy.

Yeah, it's not supposed to be any sort of guide to doing things, just a fun little list, like one of those "A is for arangatangs" type things.

>>23564

>You know you aren't going to like what I did with her

p-please tell

>>23564

Of course I'm gonna like what you did to her, I frequent pedo boards.

Please greentext the whole thing, fuck the moral fags, unless you're retaining it for caution, then you don't need to say anything.

>>23865

Edgy. I just want to say that I also know how hard it is to be a teenage pedophile. You'll grow out of this ``fuck the world, fuck morals, I'll give 'em a reason to vilify me!" stage eventually.

>>23564

I hope someone cuts off your cock and you get raped by HIV infected dicks in the ass, mouth, eyes and ears. Next i hope you kill yourself. Kill yourself.

>>23986

Why are you THIS mad over an anonymous post?

>>23997

I don't want to know how this guy abused a little girl either.

This board went to shit because of people like that.

>>24026

he's probably lying, just ignore him

There seem to actually be multiple pedophile Hanbooks / guides. I read one, which focused explicitly on how to ease a child into sexual activity (it only covered oral sex). It was pretty sloppy and useless. What are some other good ones that have a broader focus and are more useful?

>>24052

It seems to be they're exclusively some retards fantasy or way of convincing himself its ok to fuck children.

>>25690

The way you say it with the -fuck children- is the classic asexual hater. It's like the pedo wants to go to kinergarten and rape and molest every kid. Sex = violence.

>>25691

Aww, did the word choice microagress you? I'm sorry the mean underageb& nazi pedo violated your safe space. Lets go talk to TFW to make a new rule to include trigger warnings.

>>25692

Okay. Come back when you're sober (if ever). Have a nice day.

>>25691

I only used fuck because its shorter than have sex with.

And even if you're on of those kinds of pedos that are ok with adult-child sexual relationships read the handbook he's clearly a manipulative predator that just wants to stick his dick in something.

>>25698

Not only ok but all hurrah and life is short and let's get on with it…

>>23564

So you fucked her cunt hard, and came on her face and then slap the shit out of her. Nice. You basically mind fucked her too because her mom would have been mad if she found out she was a slut, I've played that game before. By the time they wise up the statute of limitations is up.

>>25916

Die.

>>25940

You first. I bet that guy fucked her tight cunt raw and came all in it. Probably called her a slut, whore and slapped her. He smiled and made her keep that cum in her cunt. I bet she loved it because she is a filthy slutty cunt who wanted some guy to use her up. >>25940

lolol@ all the pedos who get pissed at the ones of us that actually have done stuff with kids. u jelly bros?

>>25948

So people can say they have gotten loli cunt on here (there is a thread that asks if anyone has done anything lewd and most said yes btw) but to discuss it i detail (or fantasy because idk what the guy did) i get banned .

>>25957

They are not us so they lash out. I have told guys get some loli cunt and you will feel better.

>>25972

because your autistic fantasy commentary makes everyone else cringe

>>25972

You got banned for being a cringey faggot.

>>25972

You earned the rope. Sadly, the ban was the most that could be done.

Abusing and beating lolies makes you a subhuman. You make all of us look bad, even if you didn't voice it. Please reconsider my advice in >>25940.

>>25973

Whiny and weak. So one can admit to breaking law but not give his explanation? Feminist cunt.

>>25975

Go to stormfront you stupid cunt. I hope niggers fuck all the girls you like.

>>25976

So people who admit to "committing crimes" don't make you look bad? Where did i say abuse? It is rough sex you fucking idiot. Shit you make us pedophiles who are kid fuckers look bad. We aren't sensitive, whiny, scared, dumb assholes like you all. So now pedophiles are subhuman for liking rough sex? Wow. I guess you are a self hater.

>>25976

Abuse and beating? Just because you grew up in a home where you were abused thus weakening you doesn't mean a slap, choking during oral, cum on the face, etc is abuse. Feminism must be your friend.

>>25981

Really? Man this place is heavily censored. Nothing i said was abusive or wrong. I'm thinking the FBI and antis run this bitch.

>>25981

Did you ban anyone who said they have done anything lewd with a loli? Hmmmmmm.

>>25981

>>25981

So posting the pedophile handbook is okay but talking about sex with kids is wrong. Antis are thw fucking worse.

>>25981

>doesn't mean a slap, choking during oral, cum on the face, etc is abuse

It makes you a degenerate. And it lends the idea that you don't care about other people, you just want to use them.

But I agree with you on the point that it isn't ban worthy, and it's akin to censorship.

Edit: Although, now that I think about, TFW probably didn't ban you for the content of that post. He might have banned you for ban evasion. >>25948

>>25981

>>25985

ban too short

>>26003

autistic porn comments have always been ban worthy, tfw is just inconsistent and lazy

>>25986

we ban worthless shitposters like you

>>25988

the OP was intending to start some sort of conversation, even if it was a poor one. posting your pathetic little jerk off fantasies is a zero content shitpost that no one wants on this board

>>26003

Absolutely ban worthy, and if you don't think so, fuck you. He's the type of pedo who actually deserves to be hated.

>>26025

>1. All global rules apply. That means no child pornography.

>2. Only post “clean” photographs. This means fully clothed (no underwear or swim suits), no nudity and no erotic poses.

>3. No flooding or commercial spam.

>4. Do not post real world identification (aka dox).

Unless it was a one minute joke ban, bans should be determined by rule violations, not how odious you are.

>>26014

Still supporting illegal activities which is against the rules no? So i can post how to have sex with kids which is illegal but not post fantasy? Hmmmm hypocritical.

Odd what is allowed. Censorship much?

Besides i was not banned.

Some of you have serious anger at me. I'm not the problem.

>>26025

>Absolutely ban worthy, and if you don't think so, fuck you

So, censoring what he's saying is ok, because you don't like what he's saying? No, fuck you. If we went along with that, it would mean all the anti-pedos who censor the truth about pedos in the media would be justified, because they sure as hell don't like the stuff we say.

>He's the type of pedo who actually deserves to be hated.

Regardless of whether that's true or not, he should be allowed to say what he wants, so long as it isn't inciting criminal activity. And what he was saying is just a statement of his opinion.

A quote from Evelyn Beatrice Hall's biography of Voltaire on his stance regarding free speech comes to mind, "I don’t agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

>>26013

And it wasn't an autistic porn comment. He was questioning someone else's reasoning, followed by insulting them, and then finishing with a statement of his opinion.

>>26051

>it would mean all the anti-pedos who censor the truth about pedos in the media would be justified, because they sure as hell don't like the stuff we say.

Media censorship doesn't need to be justified. You own your media, you have every last right to censor it however the fuck you please. *chan wasn't made so that censorship couldn't happen, 8chan was made specifically so that board owners could police their boards however the fuck they and their mods want.

>And it wasn't an autistic porn comment.

Sure, it was whining about being banned for his autistic porn comment.

Posting the same worthless disgusting bullshit over and over and over and over gets you banned, and whinging about getting banned for it like the pathetic subhuman faggot you are gets you banned too.

So no, he doesn't get to say what he wants, he gets to get banned.

>>26051

I don't get why fantasy was bad but we can post that we have done illegal activities? My fantasy was consensual too.

Next why direct hate towards pedophiles we get enough hate from the world. I didn't say i was killing or abusing. Just like with hetrosexual guys they get tired of women too. We police ourselves too much shit.

Nice assessment, all logical no emotion. Some guys get WAY into their feelings.

>>26056

Actually wasn't banned. Your post is just angry,whiny, butt hurt and hate filled. Get help nigga. Poor thing.

>>26051

>So, censoring what he's saying is ok, because you don't like what he's saying?

Yes, censoring him is okay because he's a violent piece of garbage who should feel ashamed for posting and for being alive.

>If we went along with that, it would mean all the anti-pedos who censor the truth about pedos in the media would be justified, because they sure as hell don't like the stuff we say.

So what? It would be even more hypocritical to allow rapists to post on a board about young love. Besides that, not all ideas are equal. His is obvious garbage. There are no merits what so ever to anything he has posted. He's here to flood garbage, compare us to child rapists like him, take some screencaps, and leave. He absolutely should be banned and ostracized. The fact that normies hate us does not obligate us yo accept every other loathed outcast that stumbles our way.

>Regardless of whether that's true or not, he should be allowed to say what he wants, so long as it isn't inciting criminal activity. And what he was saying is just a statement of his opinion.

He can go start a board, /beatingkids/, and you and him can post there and beat off to your free speech god. There, a solution everyone can feel happy with.

>A quote from Evelyn Beatrice Hall's biography of Voltaire on his stance regarding free speech comes to mind,

Oh god, I sense a tired cliche incoming…

>"I don’t agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Good, you go do that, but do it on another board. Kicking him put of our internet clubhouse is basically sentencing him to death, so he does need defenders.

And honestly, if we have to let his ilk post, I won't stick around. I'm sure there are tons of users besides me who are put off by being on a board with sadistic child abusers. Let him run wild and watch the child lover users leave.

This is why we can't have nice things.

>>26059

Actually not violent, i deal with lolis who come from abusive homes. I'd never beat them, that is vile behavior. You actually sound violent you display much more anger than I. I'm not a rapist you sound like a feminist. I'm guessing you are a self hating pedophile or non exclusive.

Actually kicking me off the internet would kill me probably you though you sound depressed IRL.

So much hate. You self hating pedophiles are the worst. You direct all your anger, hate, frustration and sensitivity to other pedosexuals instead of art the actual enemy. We can't get equal rights if you just attack other pedosexuals. You sound just like any pedophile hating troll out there.