/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

I don't do anything in particular

Been coasting the past 15-18 years depending on how young you take it I started collecting

I just rely on karma/good will I guess. I mean I don't do anything out of the ordinary but I don't do a tenth of the precautions the guys all over 8chan say you should

I have a shit life anyway so if something happens - it happens. If not, better for me

I doubt that it's only pedos who tried to to download CP. Human nature and curiosity… I bet the pedophiles are those who stayed most away from it because of sexuality and a fear of being exposed. Others think that they just want to take a look.

>>24719

The secret is to live in a third world shithole where there are laws against child pornography, but neither the manpower nor the infrastructure to have a cybercrime division, hopefully also plagued with petty crime and enough corruption that the pigs will never waste resources on you

Simple: Don't look at, search for or download CP. Maybe it's easier since i'm not a pedo, but i'm fine talking to you guys all day and offering you advice without risking throwing my life away. Thank god for the first amendment.

>>24719

>How does /hebe/ go about staying anonymous and

I don't know. Perhaps you should ask /hebe/.

>how often do you worry about being caught or having feds kicking in your door?

Being caught doing what? Having feds kicking in my door for what? I don't do anything illegal.

>I know I can google this, but I'll trust you all more since we're all in the same boat and the information will be more relevant.

There are law enforcement agents on /younglove/, and they do shill in tech threads. I don't know if the one about Windows is still in the catalog, but that one had a lot of shilling and bad advice from people who acted like they hadn't read the Snowden documents.

Of course, they probably weren't allowed to, since they're government employees :)

>Maybe it's just because I'm a little under the influence but even thinking about using tor makes me feel very uneasy and paranoid.

It is not a crime to use Tor.

If you're feeling uneasy about using Tor to commit a crime, perhaps you shouldn't.

Most of what's considered CP are really incest, very often between father and daughter. If you are a regular pedophile I can't see that there is much to enjoy, except if you have fetishes and like very obsucre things, bad filming, ugly men and their ugly penis…

It's not pedophile sex. It's for people with an "ugly fetish". Much of it is even so old that it's filmed in black and white. I can't believe that the law bother with it, it's just crap. It doesn't give you a hard-on, you look at it like in the same way as you stare at a car accident when you drive by.

>>24786

*Also reasonably certain that her father is the photographer.

>>24786

No, I think she's nice. But I think CP was disappointing when I a few years ago looked through a bunch of torrents. I never look at it, I prefer models. It's more stimulating to me than a father and daughter hiding in a dark cellar with masks and.. whatever. It's not for me. I'm just a pedo, I like litle girls.

>>24795

>>24774

Yeah most CP is unfappable and pretty disgusting. You very rarely get people who can actually make good videos with attractive girls like Mastadon and SM. Most of it is fathers abusing their 5/10 daughters.

>>24795

>>24933

That's why you go for the webcam/phone vids. CP created by the girls themselves

>>24977

webcam vids are usually shit. either no sound/shitty sound and sketchy quality where the video looks like there is a time lapse between every second

Phone vids are usually vertical which pisses me off to no end and looks annoying because they are usually too close up

Nah i'll stick to my Daddy filming daughter while she sleeps by pulling down her panties and spreading her as she sleepily coughs and farts while he finishes the video by squirting yogurt in her face

those are better (plus i'm not into solo videos too much)

>>24978

ill stick to legal media

>>24719

>> How does /hebe/ go about staying anonymous and how often do you worry about being caught or having feds kicking in your door?

VPNs, full harddisk encryption, TOR / freenet / i2p, using your head.

>> So I come to you guys, have you taken the plunge and if you have, do you ever worry about being caught? Or are you completely confident in your l337 computer knowledge and know you're rock solid?

Yeah, I'm good.

Three ways I can be caught, DMA-attack on a running computer, physical keylogger, weaponized trojan / rootkit.

All of which requiers me to be defined as a target, in which case, the coppers have way too much free time.

>> If so, can you help out a tech illiterate dummy or point me towards guides or information so I can also be sure I'm secure. I know I can google this, but I'll trust you all more since we're all in the same boat and the information will be more relevant.

/baphomet/ has some info, you should start there and define your threat model.

Depends on how paranoid you want to be, but a decent VPN is good (non-us one, cryptostørm / trilightzone have servers in the right places), next veracrypt is good for strengthening truecrypt, and if you want to go full retard you chain VPNs in a virtual machine, but then we are talking producer-level security, non-windows setups, and deadman-switches like USBKill, and that's going abit over the top.

I'd say take it easy, the coppers are never going to have capacity to even bother catching everybody, just don't be obvious about it.

And stay away from sharing things on the open net.

>>25221

Any tips on freenet? Just jump right in or is freenet not safe unless you do something first?

>>25251

Given that the authorities have tens of thousand of people who they know share stuff on the clearnet… I don't think they have the capacity to crack freenet, even if they wanted to.

And besides, what can they do?

All of the CP is already on that net, it's stored on everybody's harddisks, fully encrypted.

I'd say just go for it, although, be aware that it is pretty slow.

You'll need weeks to get things down.

That said, linkageddon -> hidden wiki -> hard candy -> congratulations, you found candy mountain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuwY8U1AY7k

>>25270

Also, of course, VPN also masks your freenet-traffick, so that's good too.

>>25270

they don't have to crack freenet, they already have more than enough tards using it with compromised browsers (like firefox) that think incognito mode is actually protecting them

but yea, freenet could be cracked, if they're watching a specific key that you happen to be accessing.

>>25273

Maybe.

It's all just politics anyway, in Britain alone the coppers have identified 50k consumers - there simply isn't the will to pay for all of them to be jailed.

And for what purpose?

Putting consumers together in jail so that they can educate themselves on IT OP-sec?

Destroying their lives, breaking up their families, ending their careers?

Yeah, that's probably going to help them stay out of trouble in the future.

It's all bullshit anyway, recently they caught a guy with a million files, and seriously, compared to somebody with a dozen files who gets three months or thereabouts in jail?

That's scientology-level thinking / Dr. Evil right there, "let's put him away for… one trillion billion lifetimes!".

>>25273

Oh and BTW, there's layers of plausible deniability in freenet, where 1) you don't have control over what ends up on your HD, 2) nor of what others download through you, and 3) it's all encrypted anyway.

>>25280

somehow the thought of willingly turning your pc into a botnet relay for cp isn't a very comforting one

>>25284

Well, "pomfer's gonna pomf" and all that jazz.

Besides, what's the alternative?

As the freenet-developers themselves say:

https://freenetproject.org/faq.html#childporn

—

What about child porn, offensive content or terrorism?

While most people wish that child pornography and terrorism did not exist, humanity should not be deprived of their freedom to communicate just because of how a very small number of people might use that freedom.

I don't want my node to be used to harbor child porn, offensive content or terrorism. What can I do?

The true test of someone who claims to believe in Freedom of Speech is whether they tolerate speech which they disagree with, or even find disgusting. If this is not acceptable to you, you should not run a Freenet node. Also, content in Freenet is available only as long as it is popular, so it will go away if people lose interest. However, it should persist for some time, and if enough people are interested, it will persist forever. Note that other people's file are encrypted and split into pieces. They are not stored on your machine in their entirety. Your instance of Freenet will likely have a very small number of encrypted pieces from a given file. A file can only be assembled when all its pieces are combined with the decryption key.

—

>>25286

Child porn and terrorism. In the same breath… What's next, the danger of gay sex and animal rights?

>>25287

Actually, there's probably quite a bit of gay sex content on both freenet and TOR.

Especially considering that they are both used for worldwide social activism, particularly in oppressive African and muslim countries.

Then again, yes on such networks there will be a substantial amount of content that is offensive to some sour puss out there who thinks that thoughtcrime should be prosecuted for moralistic reasons alone.

Not very constructive, that, and the sad irony of it all is that CP has a substitutionary effect, which basically means that to be against CP, is to be for the sexual abuse of children.

>>25288

I hate men, boys, i think they're disgusting but I have nothing against gay sex. Why should I? I don't paritcipate in it. it's none of my business.

The same with pedo. if it's under safe conditions and kid and grown up want, i don't think it's anyones buisness.

And it isn't. They will keep it to themselves. A wonderful secret… But if you try to be smart and trick or force it, that's something else.

>>25270

> compromised browsers (like firefox)

Can someone explain?

>>25354

many browsers like chrome automatically record and send back all the addresses you visit to google, which totally invalidates the point of having a VPN. many browsers like firefox work directly with microsoft and the fbi to compromise people looking for cp.

>>25355

What browser should I use?

I don't know, I don't use freent or look at cp.

I would presume you would use a browser specifically designed to be used with freenet.

>>25356

A non-nigger one who doesn't leak your unique info all over the place.

https://panopticlick.eff.org/

>>25360

Even Tor only has a 1 in 30k uniqueness, and 15 bits of identification, is that supposed to be good?

Chrome results in your shit being completely unique, with over 23 bits of identification, Google drones are fucking fucked

>>25363

I'm getting ~9 bits and unique fingerprint in 773 browsers, which of course means my fingerprint is very much non-unique.

The less uniqueness, the better.

In fact, this means that those 773 browsers are TOR-exit node identifiable connections only, having the same OS as I.

In other words, good luck hunting me down G-men.

Rice your TOR abit and you'll get the same uniqueness, start by setting security to strong and then hunt down /baph/ or /tech/ guides.

Good luck and stay safe!

>>25355

So Aviator, SeaMonkey, or Chromodo… what do you think about those?

>>25385

You'll cowards don't even look at cp on chrome!

>>25385

Irony. Didn't know that guy had it in him.

http://geekslop.com/2015/catching-pedophiles-running-secret-dark-web-tor-honeypot

Your safety, WHERE IS IT NOW?

>>25401

> Admittedly, after introducing the security scanner, traffic patterns changed. Scans on the server dropped and some of the users who opted to run the software

> security scanner

> run the software

> software

That's where using your head comes in.

Not all do.

But thanks for the link, it's a nice reminder that only the dumbest users get caught. :)

>>25404

So basically they ran an exe?

>>25405

Most likely javascript.

Reminder: Disable javascript in TOR. :)

>>25458

Think I'll stick to 8chan. It's still alive for me. I wonder why… ;)

>>25406

It's kind of annoying that TOR's javascript is not default off.

What's the best way to wipe your PC of deleted files?

>>25493

Whichever, you only need a single pass anyway.

CCleaner is okay I guess.

I'm pretty comfy in tor atm. I'm trying to find a specific literary peice(a specific kind of person's guide to love etc) that I think you guys would know how to find. Know where to look?

>>25686

The Paedophile's Handbook? I wouldnt recommend it the guy who wrote it is a tool.

>>25689

He is a tool. Does anybody use the tool? Is it a pedophile-ring from an unknown planet that threatens to take over earth?