/younglove/ - Pedophilia Discussion

Parents give their kids permission to play dangerous sports. Would antis allow parents to decide if their child is ready for sex?

I'll add this:

Adults and kids play sports together. I remember parents joining soccer practices or even having parents scrimmage with the kids…

Did kids enjoy soccer less fun because the parents were older, bigger, more experienced and more developed?

Or did kids have fun with adults, learned new skills, weren't hurt, and didn't regret it?

Adults and kids are allowed to do other risky, dangerous activities with each other. Why is sex not a part of that? If anything sex would be safer.

Why the fuck do you two keep posting the same shit in almost every single thread?

Can't you stop making new threads on the same topics and posting nearly the same things?

No one fucking cares, we've not only discussed this multiple times, including with y'all, but everyone either doesn't care, or won't change their mind.

If you want to argue about the same shit over and over and repeat yourself for no reason, go to /pol/ and start an AoC thread.

Boohoo, you can't go fug some kid but they can go play football.

Well, I agree.

Our collective view on sex has tainted sex and turned it into something dangerous and dirty. Then we've decided to freak the hell out when kids come into contact with it. We've made sex into a giant trap that unleashes all kinds of bullshit if you trigger it. Sex isn't inherently harmful to children, but it has been made harmful, and that sucks.

>>26738

I'm sorry you are so offended by this. Us pedophiles are evil monsters/sarcasm.

Is it against the rules?

Why do you seem angry all the time?

Unless it violates a rule or we post illegal content we are allowed to post no? This is a message board not your Facebook wall. You just seem to want to pick fights like a middle school mean girl.

>>26738

I remember this being the same discussion over and over again back when I was actually active on forums trying to change people's minds. Except here it feels like it's just preaching to the choir. Don't we all mostly agree that sex could be harmless?

>>26739

Sex IS dangerous, and it's not just because of social bullshit. It's incredibly easy for a child to misunderstand an adult or for an adult to misunderstand a child, and misunderstandings in intimate relationships can be incredibly painful and traumatic, especially for children.

Most child abuse isn't perpetrated by pedophiles, people who care about children, but by predatory normies who don't care at all and just want to dig their dicks into whatever pussy they can get. ANY change in society that allows pedos to fuck kids would inherently make it easier for predators to prey on children. You can't say "b-but abuse would still be illegal!!" because there's simply nothing you could do that wouldn't make abuser easier to get away with than it is already.

Children don't gain benefit from sex they couldn't get from legal cuddling and platonic friendship, but they do stand to lose a lot from it.

>>26741

It literally is preaching to the choir, these obnoxious fucking namefags are both delirious cowards.

>>26745

Sex isn't inherently dangerous. Additionally most pro contacts just want to lick, touch and rub. Even a webcam would be nice.I think full penetration could be illegal. I also think parents should decide.

Additionally do you at least want the stigma of pedophilia to lessen? Or are you safe because not only are you not exclusive but you probably only like adult women.

>>26738

Did your lgf not let you lick her toddler tinky today and you're butthurt?

If any of the anti' contact people could give a good argument other than saying it's wrong, well, just because it is, or bitching because they can't come up with a good answer, maybe it would get dropped.

I guess I expect too much from y'all.

>>26745

>It literally is preaching to the choir, these obnoxious fucking namefags are both delirious cowards.

I lol'ed. insecure much? I think you are 24/7/365

>>26745

Sex isn't inherently dangerous. Additionally most pro contacts just want to lick, touch and rub. Even a webcam would be nice.I think full penetration could be illegal. I also think parents should decide.

Additionally do you at least want the stigma of pedophilia to lessen? Or are you safe because not only are you not exclusive but you probably only like adult women.

>>26745

>ANY change in society that allows pedos to fuck kids would inherently make it easier for predators to prey on children. You can't say "b-but abuse would still be illegal!!" because there's simply nothing you could do that wouldn't make abuser easier to get away with than it is already.

Well, this is a good point.

*withdraws from train wreck*

>>26757

I suppose what I'd say to that is that while legalizing sex with children wouldn't prevent abuse; a more open approach toward sex in general would. If society was better at just talking about sex as if it was a normal thing in the world, children might be better equipped to realize it when abuse is happening or is about to happen - as it stands, a lot of children have no clue at all what any of it is, which is why adults can do ridiculous shit like say it's just a 'little game' that is their 'little secret' or whatever.

We might not want to legalize it, but we sure as shit want to get rid of all the dirt we've placed on sex in general. It would be better for everyone.

>>26758

There will always be abusers in any society regardless of how people feel about sex. You can close certain pathways of abuse by changing society, but other pathways will open up as a result.

If you become more permissive about sex, you're encouraging those abusers to think that they can get away with abusing. The vast majority of abusers aren't even aware they are abusers, they think what they want to do is justified (see: half the posters on this board).

So if society says "well, let's allow some people to have sex with kids while being really careful about it." and the abusers will think "Sweet! All I have to do is be careful, whatever that means!" and then they proceed to hurt a child and totally blow it for everyone, because that's just the way they are.

The best way I can personally think of to reducing as much abuse as possible is giving children better education (most important part), encourage pedos to openly integrate into a more tolerant society, and at least getting them to attempt to have sex with other adults as an alternative to children. None of those three things I listed involve allowing adults to have sex with children.

Also, I might add that there's a very clear limit to how well you can prepare a child to defend against abuse, and how well that preparation can stick. You can tell a child not to fall for the "our secret little game" trick, but when they're actually face to face with it, what guarantee do you have that they'll remember what you said and not fall for it anyways?

Even adults make stupid mistakes where they knew better not to do something and still did it anyways.

>>26762

None of what I said includes adults having sex with children either. At this point we're more or less saying the same thing. A more open approach and lighter attitude toward sex will not solve all abuse, but it will help.

>>26764

Yea, it does seem that way.

Except I'm not a violent misogynistic lunatic that wants to brutally dismember and consume all adult women you rabid monster, Tick.