>>2500>Why is it that 1234567 is a GET, and not 7654321?Agreed, if consecutives are a GET, so are reverse/descending consecutives.
>What about GETing palindromes like 123454321 or 1928291?Palindromes are novel if they're ascending/descending, eg 1234321 or 4321234, but the rest of the time they're not very notable, somewhere between 122222 and 11773322, which aren't really special GETs.
>Or date GETs, like GETting 10012013 on October 1st, 2013?Date GETs are very special, but are too unique to quantify. They belong on a quilt, but can't really be assigned a comparative value.
Like
>>2504 says. They're the equivalent of a one-off tournament instead of a victory in a regular event.
Worth considering is the fact that dates can be written several ways. Today, for example, can be any of the following: 25022015, 250215, 02252015, 021515, 20150225, 150225. The fact that whether you're American or British changes whether it's a GET is all the more reason not to count them as normal GETs.
>>2525Nice GET. Even if a date GET isn't very special, it's still very unusual to have a date GET on the same date (or with some weird connection, like your pic). Not quantifiable, but very notable.