[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/8diamonds/ - /pol/ Intelligence Agency

Ordos Imagos Affinis

Catalog

Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 3 per post.


File: 1443199751101.jpg (13.11 KB, 465x240, 31:16, 1424973541074.jpg)

25a584 No.652

ATTENTION

There's a massive narrative shift right now. They're trying to change the discussion from harassment to "online violence," and the UN is seeking to force search engines, hosts, and ISPs to censor results of people that they feel aren't feminist enough for them.

If this goes through, this will have disastrous implications for the internet. The US law they're seeking to overturn in the process is pretty much the only thing that allows for online communication, rather than the dissemination of information.

In other words, social media, message boards, even free email services might end up going by the wayside.

Even radfem WaPo shill Caitlin Dewey's showing cracks in her willingness to continue the narrative.

https://archive.is/cCscf

Wikileaks is on it and fingers Sweden (naturally) as the source of the problem

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/647410648079577090

https://tweetsave.com/wikileaks/status/647410648079577090

The Swedish convention where they sought to redefine the "harassment" narrative as "online violence" was kind enough to leave us a list of names, however, there are no biographies, credentials, or lists of who exactly these people are.

https://archive.is/cF0Sg

These are not pseudonyms, interestingly enough, but there aren't many Swedish names on the list as far as I know.

cc26a3 No.653

Why do liberals, those who claim to value freedom the strongest, constantly try to take it away?


83773c No.656

TOR still remains, no worries.


25a584 No.659

>>656

Tor's run by SJWs and has exit nodes occupied by various alphabet agencies. It's been compromised for some time now.


318e19 No.662

>>652

Brush up on your real life tradecraft, anon. Build up a CONTROL cell in your area; take the fight to RL if they ban the chans.

Ave Emperator.


fa7bf1 No.664

>>662

>CONTROL

Never heard of it, what is it?


83773c No.671

>>659

VPNs then, if you get out on the internet from an actual free country (Venezuela, Japan, China, Russa etc) it shouldn't be a problem.


f691f9 No.672

bump


112a3a No.675

>>639

is a good start for tor alternatives. if anyone has any more, you should post them in that thread


a068c4 No.687


8636ca No.821

>>653

Because they are left-wing puritans, not liberals ?


112a3a No.836


a10d04 No.1043

Cross posting

>>>/gamergatehq/287347

>The part about increasing the supply of female tech workers - there's nothing wrong with that.

But why are they increasing the supply, and how is the UN doing it?

Why: Without restating the obvious points, let me once again point out that Google and Disney were directly involved in helping with the report, Disney quite substantially, even writing certain sections. [1] Why are these companies so invested in the tech fields? What about the Ed Tech field specifically (i.e. Serious Games, DiGRA, Microsoft Research, etc) - are corporations trying to expand into Ed Tech related to the IGF in any way? Would corporate and government interests stand to gain from an influx of tech workers?

>The NY Times' Eric Lipton was just awarded a 2015 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting that shed light on how foreign powers buy influence at think tanks. So, it probably bears mentioning that Microsoft's 'two-pronged' National Talent Strategy (PDF) to increase K-12 CS education and the number of H-1B visas — which is on the verge of being codified into laws — was hatched at an influential Microsoft and Gates Foundation-backed think tank mentioned in Lipton's reporting, the Brookings Institution. In 2012, the Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings hosted a forum on STEM education and immigration reforms, where fabricating a crisis was discussed as a strategy to succeed with Microsoft's agenda after earlier lobbying attempts by Bill Gates and Microsoft had failed. "So, Brad [Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith]," asked the Brookings Institution's Darrell West at the event, "you're the only [one] who mentioned this topic of making the problem bigger. So, we galvanize action by really producing a crisis, I take it?" "Yeah," Smith replied (video). And, with the help of nonprofit organizations like Code.org and FWD.us that were founded shortly thereafter, a national K-12 CS and tech immigration crisis was indeed created.

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/04/25/2219209/think-tanks-how-a-bill-gates-agenda-becomes-a-law

https://archive.is/K9CcB

>Disney Replaces Longtime IT Staff With H-1B Workers

>Use of visa workers in a layoff is a public policy issue, particularly for Disney. Ten U.S. senators are currently seeking a federal investigation into displacement of IT workers by H-1B-using contractors.

http://it.slashdot.org/story/15/04/29/2146247/disney-replaces-longtime-it-staff-with-h-1b-workers

https://archive.is/O4pjG

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Basically: Create a need to educate the next generation in order to produce more tech workers. Make it easier to bring lower-cost tech workers from other countries. Once a path for lower-cost tech workers into American tech is secured, displace American tech labor with the cheaper tech labor, resulting in lower salary expenses. The displaced workers flood the market with a higher supply of tech workers, joining the next generation-in-training, who also flood the market with tech workers. Create the desire for more women to enter tech fields. Once they bite, more American female tech workers flood the market. And so on and so forth. High supply of tech workers, low demand for employers. Low demand = lower pay.

It would be tinfoil if we didn't already see them manufacture crises before through think tanks, which is supported by the 2015 Pullitzer Prize-winning investigation cited above.


a10d04 No.1044

>>>/gamergatehq/287348

How: How are the UN / IGF, APC, Microsoft Research, DiGRA, Fem Freq, etc etc increasing the supply of female tech workers? Are they reaching out to young girls through tech-related outreach programs, designed to foster an interest in tech at an early age, and provide resources to truly cultivate an interest in a tech career as they grow older? They very well might do that, but I personally have not seen these programs highlighted. The predominant method seems to instead be:

- Cyberviolence narrative

- Fear-mongering

- Identity politics

- Gender wars

You know the drill by now. They're doing it in a way which makes me question their intentions, even without considering the theory above! It's in-your-face. It's effective, it's efficient, and it's one way of *ensuring* that the intended outcome they want is embraced by the oh-so-concerned public.

For years and years, while everyone just nodded their heads, they've slipped this narrative in where ever they could. And we did nothing.

>UN pdf document DATING BACK to March of 2001 that describes the development of "Social Justice" and "Social Justice Warriors"

https://archive.is/3Z0TZ

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3ojs4q/un_pdf_document_dating_back_to_march_of_2001_that/

But anyway, may the dankness of our memes sustain you in the coming battle.

[1] Source is the IGF's publicly available conference calls and meeting notes; link in the Sources of OP

Sauce:

https://archive.is/nusRo

https://www.red*dit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3oa04u/goal_op_take_back_the_truth_phase_ii_the_apc_has/cvxy3vn]


a10d04 No.1045

>>>/gamergatehq/287358

>"IGF Best Practices Forum"

>U.N. report

>"online VAW" shenanigans

>another chapter (section? dunno)

>"Creating an Enabling Environment for IPv6 Adoption"

>The 2015 BPFs focus on six different areas:

>5) countering the abuse of women online,

They want this capability built right into the hardware if not the protocol, and with the massive upgrade of networking devices necessary to move to ipv6, the iron will never be hotter to strangle anonymity on the internet.

https://archive.is/tVKzF#selection-3761.0-3797.1


a10d04 No.1046

>>>/gamergatehq/287546

https://archive.is/ku2Qp

MORE NARRATIVE SHIFTING

>UN / IGF / APC dindu nuffin!

Are you gonna let them whitewash what they've been doing behind the scenes?


4cbf30 No.1050

>>671

>venezuela

>free

You fucking kidding me? Or you're just being retarded?

Fyi venezuela is what happens when sjws run a fucking country


4cbf30 No.1051

>>1043

Its ironic since the lack of coders was a direct consequence of lower coder wages and shitty job security during the 90s that drove students to other careers

I remember an engineer friend of my dad telling him back how his job sucked and that at 40 they were going to "take me behind the bar and shot me"

Who wants a career with those prospects? And now its gonna get even worse


4cbf30 No.1052

>>1044

Social justice goes a long way back, I'm talking early to mid 20th century

It was basically diet comunism, the "give us your money you capitalist pig" but sans the violence

Look up peronism in Argentina, ironically the one thing that fucked that country foreverno, really, they were like the 10th richest before that


112a3a No.1081

>>1046

>>1043

>>1045

>>1044

Good reads, thanks for bringing this over


b836f1 No.1103

–→ 8ch.net/gamergatehq/res/282383.html


905458 No.1335

Random name pulled off the list:

Sheniece Linderboom

Head of Law Clinic (Attorney) at Freedom of Expression Institute

Johannesburg Area, South Africa

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/sheniece-linderboom/a1/b39/502

The subject is worth a bump. Has anybody been digging these people?


000000 No.2621

Didn't UN always work as the International's more officious and cautious backup?

They just began to drop "cautious" part around the time of the last "global warming".

>>1050

>Fyi venezuela is what happens when sjws run a fucking country

They get an ability to kick out American invasion under paper-thin masks and then catch infiltrators?

I doubt this can possibly happen under SJWs.


91af02 No.2638

>>>/n/326856

> Sweden, Iran, and Hillary Clinton

So apparently there's this Swedish lottery that makes a fuckton of money, pays off Hillary Clinton, may be involved in breaking sanctions on Iran, and is run by a relative of a South African ANC co-founder. We have Big Money, White Genocide, Dirka Jihad, and the Clinton Foundation in one place in Sweden. It looks suspicious.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]