>>846>>856Yeah, I don't get it. I thought "gentleman" were observers of the underlying form of things, you know, irony. You guys seriously can't sit here and say you don't understand these things, can you? There's no way you can tell me you can't see the cliches?
It's within the context of those things that the irony in comment resides, and if you either can't see that, or just refuse too, than I don't know what kind of "gentleman" you are outside of someone who just uses the word and acts as though it's a platitude.