No.10390
Drawfags get in here and start drawing. I don't want to keep making my own fap material.
All the diaper art as of late is pissing me off so much I have begun drawing it myself.
Lets get the hell out of this drought.
No.10391
Draw me enough to fap for a week and maybe I will make something myself. Also, draw something with squid kids in it.
No.10392
>>10391
That splatoon game?
That actually doesn't sound like a bad idea, let me see if I can do something fappable with that.
No.10393
Alright here is the WIP I'll get the rest done by tomorrow.
No.10394
>>10390
I was wondering if you could draw Nico Robin in her toy form, with a very puffing diaper poking out of her skirt, and rubbing her diaper?
Is this a good request, or do you want something else?
No.10400
>>10394
Aren't there sexier looking dolls available? Maybe ones with a face that don't make me scared? Maybe you got lucky and OP likes this kind of thing.
No.10402
>>10400
That's fine, I can shoot for something different.
Can you draw Nico Robin being babied/hypnotized in a very full diaper by Sugar, who also has a puffy diaper on.
I hope I'm not being rude about all of this.
No.10403
>>10402
Btw the one on the left is Sugar, and Nico Robin is on the right. I forgot to put that part in.
No.10405
Imma link this thread, if anyone is feeling low on inspo, it's got tons of ideas in it:
https://8ch.net/abdl/res/3248.html
No.10407
>>10405
You know there is an old saying, "Quality over Quantity."
No.10414
>>10407
you saying that it's only got bad ideas?
No.10418
No.10419
>>10418
>>10407
For the record then, what constitutes as a good request?
No.10420
>>10419
Hmm something new…
something original…
something never done before…
unlike your mom.
No.10421
>>10420
Will you draw a Equestria Girls oc having diaper sex with Applejack?
No.10423
>>10394
Not OP, but here you go. :^)
No.10424
>>10421
People actually come up with EQG OCs? I suppose I shouldn't be surprised by anything in that fandom any more.
Also, AJ is a terrible background pony.
No.10425
>>10423
Not the requester, doesn't mean I didn't cum.
No.10426
>>10423
Thanks man, I hope my request wasn't too weird for you.
No.10428
>>10425
>>10426
It was my, uh, pleasure. Any more drawfags in here? Damnit OP post that squid. And somebody else draw some porn.
No.10436
>>10428
>>10392
>>10393
>>10428
Alright it's done. I decided to mix it up with some wetting this time.
Now if you faggots need me I'll be hiding out in the new diaper IRC room.
I am currently working on a diapered request someone there asked for, I'll post a WIP later right now I need some sleep. (Hopefully those other faggot don't finish their diaperporns before I get back.)
No.10438
>>10428
I will like to contribute to this thread but my art is still pretty ulgy.
How did you (other drafags) archived your style?
No.10446
>>10438
Find somebody's art you like and analyze it. Figure out HOW they did it. Try to imitate it as closely as possible. The line style, shading style, etc. Repeat for like 10 other artists. By then you will know how to use your art program and hopefully have realized what you like and don't like. Bam, you have a style. Oh, and don't be afraid to just damn near trace like 10 pics and fuse them together. Imitation is a great way to learn. Oh, and even if it is unoriginal we sick fucks can still fap.
No.10447
>>10436
Post more porn and give me the irc room. Also, draw me something with a messy diaper and I will draw somebody else some porn.
No.10448
>>10447
The irc room is in the corner of that image.
No.10450
>>10448
God damnit, My fap goggles are so thick I didn't even see it. Also, #diaper at Rizon? How did you get that channel? Sounds like something a bunch of RP fags would have been jizzing all over for a decade. Anyway, I'll join it since I am on that network anyway.
No.10451
>>10436
cute as heck, amazing work.
No.10524
More art incoming, now seriously will some new artfags jump on board and start producing shit.
Diaperart has been getting rater dull with repeats lately.
No.10528
>>10524
New and improved because you faggots aren't doing anything new.
No.10573
>>10446
That is something I've done already and I think I can archive a satisfying style soon.
My other worry is what if people dosn't like my art.
No.10602
>>10573
The guys wearing 6" fap goggles will fap, the autists will ask for OC requests, and the faggots will ask for more. The sensible people will give you suggestions and tell you to keep working on it. If people give you advice it is a sign they think you're good enough to keep going. Even if they don't like your art they see potential, so keep working. If everybody tells you to kill yourself, well, maybe you just suck that bad.
But at the end of the day… just draw me some new fucking diaper pics!
No.10608
>>10528
That's pretty damn nice, anon. There can never be enough diapered lolis.
No.10643
heres an older wip of mine
No.11155
>>10643
Well, I guess a couple is better than none. Here, I'll post one of the first humanoid ones I made (which are scraping the bottom of the barrel, mind you.) if it summons some more drawfags. And you're all invited to #diaper on the rizon irc network.
No.11217
File: 1445024967420.gif (117.16 KB, 500x534, 250:267, tumblr_n0qt4w0LGd1tstr4uo1….gif)
made some gifs in my time. they're dropped here:
babybrained.tumblr.com
No.11218
>>11217
We know its you Shmorky
No.11219
File: 1445032406921.jpg (182.67 KB, 883x711, 883:711, tumblr_nwby6sAl4Q1tstr4uo1….jpg)
No.11222
No.11250
>>11222
Checked.
Also, here is the second to last pic. I am saving the most absurd one for last.
No.11410
>>11250
Ugh. Y'all are so ded. Anyway, here you fags go, my first and as of now final humanoid pic. Please come raid us at #diaper. I am really bored.
No.11422
>>11410
I'll probably stop by this weekend. Not familiar with IRCs though. What do you guys talk about usually?
No.11430
I have a request that I already know none of you will accept.
A dude. Literally just a male character of any kind, doing anything.
:^)
No.11435
>>11410
Isn't this like your fourth or fifth attempt at a channel? Why would it work out this time?
No.11437
>>11435
Who do you even think we are?
No.11446
>>11430
Sounds kinda gay, anon.
No.11473
>>11422
Everything except RP in chat.
>>11430
I'll do it but it will be REALLY gay.
>>11435
Who do you think we are?
No.12193
There has been a distinct lack of diaper art featuring Yotsuba, so I'll do my bit to fix that travesty.
This definitely isn't as good as some of the art in this thread, but I hope someone will enjoy fapping to it none the less. If people like it, I'll add shading at some point.
No.14082
>>12193
Now with shading and more visible wetness.
No.14340
>>14082
God bless, Anon. Make more since I gave up on arting again.
No.14398
Oh, sweet. Thought this thread had saged beyond page 3 (which is apparently archive town.) Too bad I forgot what I wanted to comment on when I read it the other night.
>>14082
Not bad anon, though here's a tip: resize the picture, not canvas, when you're done with it or you've reached a stage you want to show off. It's nice to have high-res like that for working on art, but when showing it off rarely does a piece need to be larger than a few thousand pixels. Generally, keep it under the size of a computer monitor resolution.
No.14401
No.14406
can you guys share any resources for digital painting, specifically painting in sai.
No.14413
>>14406
You mean, like, tutorials? Nah. But if you wanna learn to art with a program I recommend finding pics that you like and seem easy, and try to copy the style. Google search how to use certain tools and shit. Youtube is your friend even if it is a 14 year old sparkle dog artist. Learning to imitate is the first step to learning to create. Kinda like how kids learn language then go on to be award winning poets and shit.
No.14414
>>14413
That is what I'm doing right now, I've copied some paintings but I feel like I'm not learning fast enough.
I have read tutorials I've found on DA but they feel so dumb and arid, No matter how hard or difficult I want to paint
No.14416
>>14414
Mastery of something takes what? 10,000 hours?
I'm sure your progress is in line with that. Keep going and you'll reach it.
No.14422
>>14416
Fine but do you have anything to offer beside telling me to practice?
No.14429
Hi, new drawfag here !
The only advice is to practice, saddly that's the best way to progress x)
No.14517
>>14422
>>14416
It's like a video game. Rank up and level up after so many milestones - a 1,000 gamerpoint achievement for each of draw 10,000 total hours and draw over 1,000 colored-in, shaded drawings.
Time is the limiting factor for all of us.
No.14525
>>14422
You can always trace
No.14532
>>14422
Well… no. I mean, unless you want to post some of you work? Maybe we could suggest areas you're weak in.
Also I am making more diapered squibs so fuk me I guess I am out of retirement again.
No.14533
Would anyone want to take a shot on drawing this?
Chihiro Fujisaki and Mukuro Ikusaba from Danganronpa. Both of them diapered, Chihiro's diaper would be messy and sagging, while Mukuro's diaper would be wet. Chihiro is getting a diaper check by Mukuro.
No.14535
>>14533
As much as I like grils with guns, I'll pass on this one. Unless somebody wants Kino no Tabi. Kino is mai waifu.
No.14536
>>14535
I wasn't asking you specifically. It was a request for someone that was interested.
No.14540
>>14532
Well, nobody on /ic/ gave me the crits I wanted so may as well bring it here even if I'm kind of nervous.
The first pic is a study of the second, I'm aware of the bad proportions but my focus wasn't on that, my biggest issue is how muddled the skin looks and how I can't properly render the eyes or hair.
The third picture is a study of the fourth. I also wasn't trying to copy the proportions. Again the skin is muddled and I really don't know what tools to use to get that crispy rendering other people does. I know the leather looks bad but I really think that one is a matter of practice and not of theory.
Anyway, the 3 pics I've posted here are all I've made digitally so far.
>Also I am making more diapered squibs so fuk me I guess I am out of retirement again.
What?
No.14553
>>14398
Yeah, I guess that is somewhat excessively large. I'm just reluctant to scale images down because whenever I'm downloading other people's art I always want the maximum possible resolution. Once you down-sample, those pixels are almost unrecoverable.
In future I'll try to resist the temptation to post 30 megapixel images.
No.14575
>>14540
Could you post a picture of the layers you are using in your drawing software? It was SAI, right? I have a theory but I'd need to see your layers. Also, what resolution is your canvas?
No.14576
>>14540
Oh, and squib = squid = splatoon
I never really draw anymore but I am determined to make a splatoon piece again because this faggot I know refuses to stop making ponies and switch to the superior squid kid.
No.14582
>>14575
Yes, I'm using SAI.
My canvases are the double or one third larger of what we see on the final.
I still have the .sai files but I already marged down several layers however I still remember my process:
On the first pic the head and the body were separated folders. Almost every element were just 3 layers, one base color, one shadow layers and one highlight layer.
In the second pic the hair, face, gear and body were separated layers but the base, shadows and highlight were on the same layer.
What am I doing wrong with layers?
>>14576
Can we see your art?
No.14585
>>14582
Try drawing at 5k x 5k pixels or something thereabouts. Also, The girl pictures you tried probably had ~layers for each type of shadow and used a lot of diffusion. It looks like something I'd need photoshop to imitate. I am not sure SAI has quite those capabilities. That's why yours is mushy and theirs is soft, you couldn't imitate it just using brush strokes. As for the second one, check your brush hardnesses/brush tip. You pretty much were copying the style just fine but your brushes seemed a bit too soft around the edges. Also, for shading, consider having a LOT of layers with small opacities that add up together. That adds fineness and kinda smooths everything out.
No.14590
No.14595
>>14576
>superior
That's just, like, your opinion, man.
No.14597
>>14585
I don't think my computer can handle canvases that large much less handling them in phtoshop but I will try with larger canvases. I have seen people do smooth paintings on sai, I have to look up tutorials for that.
I don't remember what brush settings I used on the b&w picture but maybe I overused the blending tool.
The idea of using many tranparent layers to paint isn't foreign to me, in traditional painting its called glazing but I didn't concider using it digitally until this conversation, now digital and traditional may not be that different if I can apply such techniques
No.14686
So why does nobody really seem to combine spanking and diaper art well these days?
No.14695
>>14686
When you say "well", do you mean by the quality of the art or the content of the image? I only ask this because I've seen debates about how spanking is only good or bad if the diaper is pulled up or down.
If it's just about art quality, you don't have to elaborate if you don't want to.
No.14705
>>14695
Generally quality of the art.
No.14743
There is an issue that twists my mind.
I on't know what style to adopt.
Should I draw manga because that is what is popular?
Realism because that is how people measures quality?
I'm sure people will not like my personal style, people dosn't want to see cubo-expressionist porn.
No.14745
>>14743
If you're trying to produce fappable erotic art, you should really go for either manga or realist style. Just try and make it look as sexy as possible for you, and then hope that other people feel the same way.
No.14746
>>14743
>cube-expressionist porn
please do this
No.14753
>>14743
Why not just produce a mix and see what you are most comfortable with? Then post it here and we'll tell you what we like to fap to the most?
No.14756
>>14746
second. i don't know if it'll be hot or not but it sounds novel
No.14771
>>14745
>>14753
I will try to imitate the popular porn artists like the people from sinnergate but I don't feel I can make it just as good.
I will return with some sketches and see what to do after it.
>>14746
>>14756
I will do this as soon as I have painting supplies, pinky promise.
No.14803
>>14743
If you want to not be shit then don't worry about adopting a style.
You can have artists who inspire you and try to mimic them to learn, but trying to cram all of your art into a certain way of doing things is going to hurt you and make stuff harder to learn.
There are no rules, just tools. Draw all the animu grills you like, but the sooner you internalize this mantra the sooner you'll see fast improvement :^)
No.14859
Long time lurker, first time poster here. I'm running low on character ideas to draw as practice. Anyone want to share some suggestions (with character's name and reference pics pls). The only qualification really is that I'm looking for strong women characters to put in diapers. Make of that what you will :)
No.14878
>>14803
I already know that but as I said I don't expect people to like what I do by myself.
No.14879
>>14859
Ramlethal Valentine.
No.14880
File: 1452372503502.png (984.67 KB, 900x2123, 900:2123, claire_redfield_renders_by….png)
No.14885
>>14880
Seconding this one.
No.14897
>>14803
Protip: Avoid drawing anime at all costs.
No.14906
>>14897
The "anime style" (a terrible descriptor, tbh) is no worse than any other for producing bad habits. There are untold hordes of awful artists on DA who've never done anything in an "anime style". The important thing is to practice drawing real people as well.
As a general rule, your best stylised rendering of a thing will never be significantly better than your best realistic rendering of that same thing.
No.16101
Can I get an anon to draw some stuff of Hiro-tan here?
No.16103
>>16101
Huh… I am tempted. Hiro-tan is certainly 2cute
No.16105
>>16103
If you did, you would have the privilege of "firsts" since no one else has made a diapered Hiro-tan
No.16113
>>16112
Hmm actually I was thinking of hording this one, but I might as well save that one faggot from making a shitty edit.
Complements of #diaper at http://qchat.rizon.net/
No.16114
>>16113
>>16112
Well done. Now make me one of an inkling girl diaper face humping an inkling boy.
No.16124
>>16113
That's nice and all but how about his waifu?
She's way more diaperable
No.16133
>>16112
Ooooh!~ *squeeeeee*
No.16170
So I decided to adapt a couple of paragraphs from AmataurCopycat's Wakfu story and later ink and color them digitally. I tried sketching digitally but it is super stiff, like missing an elbow or a wrist, seems I'm going to be one of those persons who sketches analogically and then scans and finish digital. Sadly my current scans are like white sheets on thick fog, I need to look on better ways to scan them for the next time.
Each page has individual issues but across all of them perspective and rendering are problems.
1.3 I'm quit sure Eva is out of perspective here giving her a strange projection.
1.5 Dextro and Sinestro have very lame desings but that isn't much of an issue for such an small project.
2.2 That foot is out of proportion
2.3 the arms are kind of out of proportion, I'm unsure.
2.5 Perspective is off
3.1-3 there is no issue here I'm just very happy with this sequence
3.4 anatomy is a little clunky and some lines are pretty messy
3.6 perpective is very off, I was looking for a dramatic and forgot to set a vanishing point
4.3 Eva's head is weird but i think that's the way the scanner picked it up
4.5 Next morning after I finished this page I released I didn't reference Eva's bow, later today I hope to fix that and re scan the page. I tried to do two point perspective, its good enough but the vanishing point is kind of fuzzy since it was intuitive.
I'm happy how this come out, I'm polishing a personal style and getting a hold on perspective hopefully the inks will do justice.
No.16172
>>16170
In all honesty I'd say you're at that point where you are talented enough to make great rough sketches that are quality and wise enough to know that you could always do better.
At this stage, I don't think over analyzing the sketch too much would actually help you. I think going to a finished product once you reach a happy level would, in the long run, be superior practice. I've seen a lot of artists that just need as much experience as possible getting hung up on some specific things too much, losing that opportunity.
Also: Increase contrast -> Decrease Brightness x Until Happy
No.16185
I'm doing fine but I have to admit that per much I like cross hatching I feel is making my work seem messy, beside that I don't see any other issue with this linework.
I will continue on monday.
>>16172
Yes, raw experience is what I need the most most right now, I plan to take requests once I can do painted work but right now taking a hold of this is the most important.
>Increase contrast -> Decrease Brightness x Until Happy
This helped me a lot, I also should use darker pencils.
No.16193
>>16185
Which drawing program do you use? Your inking is currently, uh… nightmarefuel-tier. Like she is a dried up mummy or something. If you use SAI use the stabilization features. If you use PS use the line tool. Maybe before you do free-hand inking you should just use the line and curve tools that these programs offer. Your sketches seem well enough that I doubt you'd have any problem getting a quality ink if you had the help of the stabilization or software.
No.16201
>>16193
I'm using sai, I'm aware of the nightmereish quality of my inks, that is my regular style and one of the reasons I'm so insecure about my art since I know it is ugly but I can't help it.
I'm aware of sai's stabilizers, I mostly use 8 and 15 but I forget to change them depending on the subject. I'm also aware of the curve and line tools, that is how I made the frames for the panels.
I should twerk my tools for a more plesant crosshatching.
No.16205
>>16201
My own inking isn't very good so I might not be able to offer the best advice, but you could try using a brush which varies size with pressure. Part of the problem with your inking is that there's no variation in line strength. Ideally the borders of an object should be much stronger than shading lines which only serve to show the 3D shape of the surface.
No.16206
>>16201
Do you use a drawing pad like a wacom or a mouse? If you use a tablet the pressure sensing might be nice. Try the S stabilizer settings. Use a thicker line. Small lines show up the jiggle and scribble way too much. I am pretty sure I could get WAY better lines than this using my old as fuck bamboo, a high stabilizer setting, and thicker lines, and I can't hand draw in the least. The technology SHOULD be able to help you a lot.
No.16208
File: 1454822395560.png (1.11 MB, 1700x1781, 1700:1781, abdl___carpet_critters_by_….png)
I feel like my diaper art hits and misses sometimes.
No.16220
>>16208
That turns me on. Well done.
>>11218
Nah, I think it's someone else trying to take credit for Shmorky's work. I'd object, but since Shmorky doesn't want to take credit for it, it's fair game, like the Star Wars Holiday Special.
No.16226
>>16205
I will take that in mind when changing my tools
>>16206
I have an intous art, I know about the S stabilizers but I didn't like them. I will experiment with thicker lines but quiet contrary I was thinking thinner lines will make for better crosshatching.
No.16227
>>16226
You can increase the resolution so that the lines are more pixels wide but still appear thinner relative to the image.
That might help, but I'm not sure.
No.16239
>>16226
>>16227
I was thinking the same thing, but some people's computers choke to death at the right resolution. For a multi-panel comic page it should be something like 8k lines on a side on the low end.
Also, as for his crosshatching, he uses like 1/5th of the lines he needs to, doesn't make them go all the way to the line, and doesn't actually CROSS the hatching, so it would be normal hatching but that is hard to do.
Also if you're looking for some real time feedback and problem solving come to the #diaper channel on Rizon irc network. I don't check here that often.
>>16208
Make some Timantha trap and maybe I'll fap. Hahahah
No.16252
>>16239
An alternative to manually doing crosshatching is to let a computer generate the desired gradients and just copy-and-paste them in. It's a technique which is used a lot in Japanese manga, but it is a trade-off between speed and quality.
No.16256
>>16208
I enjoy this picture. A few paragraphs of a story to go with it, or a sequence would make me diamonds though.
No.16263
>>16256
Indeed. A good story can make a picture a thousand times better. I usually end up coming up with my own stories or scenarios in my head when I fap to pictures anyway.
Sadly I haven't seen the source material that those characters are from.
No.16264
>>16263
Fairly Odd Parents. It's a nickelodeon cartoon.
The boy is the main character and he's got fairy god parents that grant his wishes. The girl is someone who has an obsessive crush on him that he doesn't reciprocate.
The show itself actually had more than a few scenes involving diapers/age regression, so this scene would actually fit.
No.16266
>>16227
I know, the canvas I'm using is the double of what I posted here.
>>16239
I'm planning to buy some more RAM for my computer and in the far future have a computer just to paint. 8k does sound beyond what my machine can handle.
I know my crosshatching is kind of poor, time to do studies out of Gustave Dore
>>16252
That dosn't sound fun.
No.16271
>>16208
Nice, I like when the diapers fit within the logic of the source material. Good work
>>16239
There is a severe lack of Timantha in diapers >>16208 could fix that, he's got that art style down
No.16286
>>16271
>>16264
>>16263
>>16256
>>16239
>>16220
Glad you guys like it! Its one of my favorite pictures too. Hits on so many different things, not just diapers… Mainly, being "trapped", nerdy girl, and the messiness is more subtle. I don't normally like drawing under detailed Mickey Mouse diapers, but they seemed fitting for that picture.
I did draw Timantha before… but the picture isn't super great… ugh those legs. It was more of a practice different poses/angles thing. I'll definitely revisit Timantha in the future though, its one of my favorite plots from this cartoon.
No.16299
>>16286
I've been looking over your art and something has been really bothering me about it. It is always well produced with well done lines and shading. the faces are always like straight outta the show.
I think that's exactly what is bothering me. Despite all the faces having expressions and the poses seeming dynamic and new, it just comes out like a bunch of vectors stuck together in a predesigned comic strip setup.
Your Marceline and Frankie Foster one seemed like there was something different about them, so those stood out to me as the most interesting.
This might be an odd suggestion, but perhaps try using a style you aren't actually very good at or try a rougher hand-drawn style and maybe trying to make the faces and what-not with a little bit of uniqueness. Perhaps stay away from that "everybody in a 3/4 pose mirrored across the center line".
tl;dr I think your art has body but no heart, like a really nice premium chicken sammich from McDonalds.
No.16300
>>16286
Yeah, the legs look kinda weird. But I really like how Timantha looks more little than the other girls.
>>16299
>tl;dr I think your art has body but no heart, like a really nice premium chicken sammich from McDonalds.
The source material is chicken sandwich tier, he's keeping it grounded to the show.
>it just comes out like a bunch of vectors stuck together
That's literally what that animation style is
No.16305
>>16299
>>16300
Agreed, I've felt my art often falls into that 3/4 "too on-model" trap. There are a few pictures I've made that break out of it, usually stuff I don't normally draw, the Gwen picture is still one of my favorites.
I don't have a tablet and my hand drawing skills are pretty crude. Everything I do is mostly mouse, pen-tool, and prayer. A lot of what I've learned from drawing is from watching other artists in streams. I'll certainly take what you said in mind.
Right now, I was working on an Emma and Kitty (from Total Drama Island) picture. I've hit a bit of a case of artist's block on what to do, I was planning it as a three panel age regression sequence, normal clothes, adult diapered, then turned into toddlers. Here is what I have so far, the thing in the center is supposed to have some sort of artifact or object that initiates the regression.
No.16319
>>16300
That's all true, but is it so much for a man to hope and dream for a better future for all diaperfag artists? Maybe I just have PTSD from so many fucking pony vector diaper edits popping up all the time or something.
>>16305
Yeah, I know the feeling of being skilled with the software tools but having no hand drawing skills to speak of. Kinda frustrates me since I generally dislike machine perfect stuff and really like sketchy styles. But you've made a market for yourself, so keep at it.
I have maybe one suggestion. Use a series of shorter lines to make a long line, making them not mesh up perfectly. I don't think SAI can do this, but in PS I would make the pen that traced the vector lines give a kinda crayony edge rough effect. It kinda emulates a hand drawn style and adds a bit of life.
OH, and I looked at your backgrounds. Some of them use colored outlines, the shading has bluring, or really no lines at all. I suggest that you make the art match the background. So maybe color your outlines or add black lines to the background. Or perhaps add a bit of bluring to your shading layer to match it. It might help to tie your art to the scene, making it seem more like a real whole.
No.16325
So I was unable to make a study out of anything so I had to conform to look at some Basil Wolverton drawings and make the best out of them and I think I did.
This was an intense work but it was worth it, before picking up digital media I was skeptic because I never saw anyne do crosshatching this rich, but now I'm sure I would had never done something like this on paper. I'm worry it maybe too intense now.
Also 1.3 still sucks.
No.16326
>>16305
I've always wondered what would happen if Owen was diapered. We know what he does in the outhouse, so what he'd do in a diaper would probably be pretty severe.
No.16334
Do you guys know any good free resources for an amateur? Pic is current level of work but I had to use another image as reference. I'm looking for guides or tutorials akin to Khan academy.
No.16335
>>16334
Start wth Keys to Drawing by Bert Dodson
No.16337
>>16325
Hey, looking good. Once you figure out how to get smooth lines you'll be in a good position for some black and white pieces. The #1 cure to wavy lines is making them thicker. I just kinda traced yours in 2 minutes and I think it already looks a bit better.
No.16340
>>16337
I don't like thick lines, I rather turn up the resolution.
No.16345
>>16340
Thin lines are acceptable, but unless they are perfectly lain out they just look shite. Every little wave and imperfection stands out like a 2nd grade art class still life. Thin lines done poor look really horrible and amateur, but those same lines with thickness added become much more passable.
If you want to try this out, find a really simple cartoony pic with thickish lines and trace it with a thin line using a mouse without your line going out of the original lines. Then remove the original pic and you'll see. Redo it using thick lines and it will look much better.
No.16358
>>16345
I see what you mean now, when I'm zoomed in the lines may look thick enough but now the lines used on Destro and Sinestro look more appealing and defining plus the thin ones used on Eva add to the depth.
Sadly I don't know how to do lettering digitally, I will look up that later.
I'm also sad I only made a panel, I don't want these comics to eat my time from other projects.
No.16359
>>16358
Yup, you got it. Also, don't be afraid to use multiple line thicknesses for certain artistic situations.
As for eating time, just power through it and release it. It will get you some fan base and give you the practice you need. Just gotta promise that you learn from any mistakes and don't let any compliments get you big headed!
No.16366
>>16359
I know about line weight.
I've decide the next page will be like an ink wash, the third like a water color and the fourth a full painting.
I promise fumes will not get on my head, I hate my art and thi fetish too much to ever feel satisfied.
No.16378
Done.
No new issues with the art beside the ones I've already mentioned.
I was a little confused on the last panel on how to make it look wet without color and I think I didn't do it right.
Off to read tutorials.
No.16423
Now with the ink wash. the paper texure is just something 'm experimenting with, totally reversible.
The first two panels had awful proportians because of the sketchy drawing but the Eva on the third panel is rather mellow, It came out better than I expected but still looks kind of messy.
Dunno what else to say.
No.16426
i try drawing 'the right way' but i get so fucking bored.
draw 250 boxes, draw boxes in perspective, draw random shapes, draw trees and cars and shit.
i don't wanna draw any of that crap, especially the boxes, i get so bored and give up. is it a bad idea to just draw what i want shittily and then using that to see what i should improve on?
No.16431
>>16426
I think there is some famous quote out there, but I can't remember it so I'll just improvise: Doing what you are expected to, well, is work. Doing what you want to, poorly, is practice.
>>16423
Dump the paper texture. Use a brush setting that is way more transparent(fuzzy) around the edges for the lighter colors and medium grays, but keep the blacks sharp like you're doing. In inkwash the darks are sharp, the midtones are soft, and the whiter tones are very very soft with ill-defined edges.
No.16522
If people isn't going to give me much critsism I may as well stop posting and I don't want to go to #diaper.
I'm happy that I made 3 panels even if they have obvious mistakes.
On 4 I don't have may issues excepting that maybe Eva looks wonky.
5 is terrible, Dextro looks flat
I like the effect with Dextro on 6 but Eva has a really wonky anatomy and some details don't work as expected.
All of this could have been solved with better defined pencil drawings.
No.16658
Not original art per se, but here are some edits I've done.
No.16659
Can anybody draw Tomoko Kuroki messing a diaper?
No.16664
>>16658
Hey, pretty good edits. Matches the original style well. I've done a shit ton of edits in my time and seen a lot of pixels so I can tell.
No.16693
>>16659
I would just like to see diapered Tomoko.
No.16972
Do black hanekawa from monogatari.
No.17120
>>14746
>>14756
>>14771
Pinky promise fullfilled.
This dosn't look like what I normally paint but I'm sad that if I take this to a gallery it will be the only one of my works that will sell.
This was fun to do but I thin it looks like shit.
No.17136
File: 1456833611789.jpg (501.54 KB, 1024x1550, 512:775, mokocchi_and_komi___comm_b….jpg)
No.17142
>>17135
I like the first pic
No.17171
>>16208
Made this for practicing since I've been out of the loop for a while. Tootie's mom regressed. Messy diapers aren't really my expertise, theres only a few ways I even like them in pictures, but I sort of like how it looked in these pictures.
Also, has anyone played the game Stardew Valley? It's like a Harvest Moon for the PC. Its from the same people who made Starbound, which I know for a fact has moddable diaper clothing in it. If I knew how, I'd do it.
No.17173
>>17171
Haven't played that game, but let me just say I love your art.
No.17184
>>17171
This pic seems pretty lively. Well done, even if stink-lines are autism-tier. Although I AM sick of making my diaper messes look like somebody puked up brown sludge into a plastic bag. So in the grand scheme of things, stink lines make more sense that a brown colored diaper seat.
You know, I put way too much time into drawn diaper theory.
No.17186
>>17184
>>17173
Thanks! I know what you mean about stink lines, they can sometimes take from the art. I honestly think they look cute though. I don't really like to discolor the diaper brown like some mess artists do either. It crosses a little too far into the scat territory.
No.17251
Would someone like to draw Chiaki Nanami from Danganronpa, having a long gaming session, wearing a bloated and heavily used diaper?
No.17275
File: 1457241684008.png (191.46 KB, 812x824, 203:206, tumblr_o3lf24XkGV1s5qurao7….png)
>>17251
If you have the money to be a patron supporter of a dickbag like Zack don't go requesting it for free.
No.17279
>>17275
>patron supporter of a dickbag like Zack
Care to elaborate?
No.17283
>>17275
Where the fuck do you think we are?
No.17290
You know what needs to be a thing?
Diapered Yonaka Kurai.
No.17292
>>17290
Why? She's not even sexy at all.
No.17295
>>17292
I thought it would've been cute if anything….
No.17302
Do you guys know where I should start if I want to learn to draw better anatomy? Any books, resources, or video series?
Overall, I think I can draw decent portraiture, so heads and faces aren't much of a problem. But bodies always leave me bewildered, and frankly I never learned to draw proportions properly with geometric aids, etc.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
No.17303
>>17302
Vilppu's videos and Burne Hogarth's books
Loomis for more general art knowledge.
Plus visit a fucking museum or go to wikipaintings.
No.17325
>>17303
Call me naive, but with such solid advice, I'm already eager to know what kind of artist you are. Of course, I'm assuming that you follow your own advice. Could you maybe post some of your own work? It'd be nice to see more original content on this thread.
No.17342
>>17330
Anon on a thread on half/d/ before the split, he said he will have a deviantart soon and start taking comissions but nothing more has been heard since he posted those pic of Vivian.
>>17325
Some of my art is on this thread
>>16522
>>16378
>>14540
You cought me on a bad moment since I'm just getting hold of digital media.