/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

The site has updated and now the contents from '11 and '12 are freebies. the stuff was rip ages ago.

>>1149

Alright, I know nothing about this site (besides what I've read here), so I would like some questions answered:

1. When was the Cushy Pen launched?

2. Who are the founders? Do they still run the place?

3. Have there been any ex-TCP artists?

4. Have any TCP artists ever talked about their experience working for the site?

5. Does anyone know how much TCP artists are compensated for being a part of the site?

6. Is there a contract regarding their art, and if so, what are the details? Like are they not allowed to post art outside TCP until X years later?

>>4197

>1. When was the Cushy Pen launched?

2011

>2. Who are the founders? Do they still run the place?

MifMaf and possibly Rocketmanatee/JJOmutsu2, both still on site

>3. Have there been any ex-TCP artists?

None really

>4. Have any TCP artists ever talked about their experience working for the site?

Nope but Myoti, a former guest artist reposted the art he submitted there and I recall he wasn't in a good vibe about the site, will have to look deeper into that.

>5. Does anyone know how much TCP artists are compensated for being a part of the site?

Nope.

>6. Is there a contract regarding their art, and if so, what are the details? Like are they not allowed to post art outside TCP until X years later?

Supposedly they can repost their art one year after it was posted on sitte but so far Pink-Diapers has been the only person to do so.

One of the things about the site is the mysterious vibe about it since so little comes out.

Why did you wanted to know this?

>>4197

>>4203

>4. Have any TCP artists ever talked about their experience working for the site?

To add, i believe some artists there had a problem with the setup/programming of the website. It should be mentioned that some of the rips came from the holes in the site's programming.

>5. Does anyone know how much TCP artists are compensated for being a part of the site?

I believe it depends how many views that artist gets.

>One of the things about the site is the mysterious vibe about it since so little comes out.

It is largely quiet, but you do here from customers now and again. And usually it was about how shitty the website was (not sure how it is now). I do remember someone mentioning in the earlier days of the site that it was run like Deviant Art and Nazi Germany (site runners didn't take criticism well. People getting banned on forums). However, that was never really confirmed.

>>4213

>To add, i believe some artists there had a problem with the setup/programming of the website. It should be mentioned that some of the rips came from the holes in the site's programming.

Originally only the admin could post art that had been submitted to him, on the current site the artists can post by themselves.

I remember on omuchan somebody posting a video showing an exploit of the site but nothing has happen since then.

>you do here from customers now and again. And usually it was about how shitty the website was (not sure how it is now)

Now, I don't think we ever heard anybody ever say anything good about the site.

>in the earlier days of the site that it was run like Deviant Art and Nazi Germany (site runners didn't take criticism well. People getting banned on forums). However, that was never really confirmed.

Never heard of this before, may be related to an early leak on shanachan(?) and MifMaf making a post requesting the admins to take it down.

>>4203

>MifMaf and possibly Rocketmanatee/JJOmutsu2, both still on site

Did anyone know about them before TCP?

>One of the things about the site is the mysterious vibe about it since so little comes out.

That sounds pretty suspicious to me. People that keep a lot hidden about themselves tend to be rather untrustworthy.

>Why did you wanted to know this?

Because a lot of people seem to hate it to varying degrees, and I felt it was worth investigating.

Some more questions:

7. What are the known TCP artists, and which ones exclusively post their art there?

8. Has anyone really asked around regarding the particulars of the site? Given the site's questionable reputation, I would imagine that I'm not the first one to ask about the details.

9. Are there any customers that have enjoyed using TCP? I've only seen people badmouth it.

>>4228

>Did anyone know about them before TCP?

MifMaf had a presence on FurrAffinity and Rocketmanatee posted on Abkingdom and Fox Tales Times.

>What are the known TCP artists, and which ones exclusively post their art there?

Their About Page has a list

Ah-Bagels

Carnival-Tricks

Carotte

CrinkleKen

Immelmann

KKBunny

Mifmaf

Moophins

Pink Diapers

Rocket Manatee

Swabbs

Zee

of these Mif, Moophins, Rocket and Swabbs post exclusivly there, CrinckleKen posts Furry art elsewere and keeps the human art on TCP

>8. Has anyone really asked around regarding the particulars of the site? Given the site's questionable reputation, I would imagine that I'm not the first one to ask about the details.

The first I've ecountered, never heard of people asking if the site is worth it and if it happens every one will say it dosn't worth it.

>>4228

>9. Are there any customers that have enjoyed using TCP? I've only seen people badmouth it.

This guy did: http://www.reddit.com/r/ABDL/comments/362m55/the_cushy_pen_has_been_redesigned/

And so far seems like the only one that has done so.

>>4228

>Did anyone know about them before TCP?

Of course. They used to hang out at foxtalestimes in its hay day. I think mifmaf was a bro while RM was one of those "don't repost without my permission" kind of artist and i think he never took criticism very well.

7. What are the known TCP artists, and which ones exclusively post their art there?

You can check them out here: http://www.cushypen.com/cushypen/about. Most do art exclusively for the site, but some actually do stuff off site (Pink Diapers, Carotte, etc.)

9. Are there any customers that have enjoyed using TCP? I've only seen people badmouth it.

If there are, you wouldn't find them here, on /d/, or any other image board.

>>4229

>of these Mif, Moophins, Rocket and Swabbs post exclusivly there, CrinckleKen posts Furry art elsewere and keeps the human art on TCP

How much do you think I could find out about TCP if I were to ask, say, Carotte/The-Padded-Room, what it's like to contribute to the site? If I politely ask, would any of the artists be willing to talk?

>The first I've ecountered, never heard of people asking if the site is worth it and if it happens every one will say it dosn't worth it.

Is the site making enough money to stay afloat? Given all the negative buzz about it, it shouldn't last much longer. Then again, most people probably don't know about the bad experiences of others.

>>4237

>How much do you think I could find out about TCP if I were to ask, say, Carotte/The-Padded-Room, what it's like to contribute to the site? If I politely ask, would any of the artists be willing to talk?

Their job requrest them to be polite, you just need to ask questions subtlely. They will answer your questions but bet the answers will not be what you expect.

>Is the site making enough money to stay afloat? Given all the negative buzz about it, it shouldn't last much longer. Then again, most people probably don't know about the bad experiences of others.

Its unknown but I will gues it barely makes it. With so little buzz about them I imagine the subscribers aren't larger than two digits.

>>4239

>Their job requrest them to be polite, you just need to ask questions subtlely. They will answer your questions but bet the answers will not be what you expect.

Subtley how? Should I say something like this?

>"Being a contributor of the Cushy Pen must be quite an honor."

I'm not expecting them to spill everything, but I'd like to know their thoughts on it. Plus, if I communicate via DA notes, they might reveal more than if I publicly left a comment.

>Its unknown but I will gues it barely makes it. With so little buzz about them I imagine the subscribers aren't larger than two digits.

It's $20 per subscriber, so perhaps it balances out the low subscriber count. However, it can't be cheap running that site. I'm not a financial or technical expert, but off the top of my head…

>Maintaining the server(s)

>Paying the artists

>Paying anyone else that works for TCP (programmers, admins, etc.)

Again, I'm no expert, but if you ask me, the only way I can see this site continuing past the next few years is if the people running that site partially pay these monthly costs with their own funds. And that might not be feasible, depending on their financial situation.

Anyone know if MifMaf/RocketManatee are well off? Have they ever complained about being poor?

>>4241

Forget about that, its just me being me. Because if I was you I will try to have a friendly conversation before bringing up TCP.

I suppose the subs money goes to a pool and then it gets distributed as clicks go.

The site runs on wordpres and its hosted by host gator so I suppose they don't have technical personel.

Dunno about the admins pockets but the site has run pretty long like it is.

>>4243

>Because if I was you I will try to have a friendly conversation before bringing up TCP.

Yeah, I don't think I'm good at that. I don't know how to slowly ease into talking about TCP without just bringing it up out of the blue.

>I suppose the subs money goes to a pool and then it gets distributed as clicks go.

Yeah, I guess it's something like that. MifMaf, being the runner of TCP, probably distributes the money himself.

>The site runs on wordpres and its hosted by host gator so I suppose they don't have technical personel.

But someone had to create that super-complicated anti-piracy method that makes art incredibly difficult to steal. Did MifMaf do that himself, or did he hire an expert programmer to write that code?

>Dunno about the admins pockets but the site has run pretty long like it is.

All the secrecy makes it hard to determine just how well they're doing, but since been around for 4 years, they've been doing okay. Again, though, how long can this really last? Will it really be around in the next decade or two, with the incredibly few new images it releases per month and all the bad word-of-mouth?

>>4244

>But someone had to create that super-complicated anti-piracy method that makes art incredibly difficult to steal

That is something I've wandered, probably he uses some commercial softwere that watermarks stuff.

The lifespan of a paysite is an interesting topic but we know very little to tackle it.

>>4245

That is something I've wandered, probably he uses some commercial softwere that watermarks stuff.

That's interesting…do other paysites have this exact anti-piracy method, or was the code created specifically for TCP?

>The lifespan of a paysite is an interesting topic but we know very little to tackle it.

Yeah, without enough information, we have no clue how well TCP's doing. Even a few details would be very revealing - MifMaf and RocketManatee's personal financial situations, monthly subscriber counts, graphs, etc.

All this secrecy tells me that they don't want you to know the details, which, in my opinion, means one of two things (or both, even):

1. They're incredibly incompetent and/or want to prevent anything embarrassing from being revealed.

2. They're secretly profiting greatly from barely doing any work (I.E. only a tiny number of images released per month).

#2 reminds me, though: Given the variety of artists working on the site, you would think they would all contribute at least 1 image per month. But, if OP's "1 image per two weeks" is true, then that means artists are lazy/too busy with real life stuff.

If the admins took their responsibilities seriously, they'd message the artists, saying something like:

>You're not pulling your weight. If you keep slacking off, we might just have to let you go.

Am I wrong?

>>4246

>That's interesting…do other paysites have this exact anti-piracy method, or was the code created specifically for TCP?

There are probably other sites that do that but none that I know of.

Now that I think about it it could also be a softwer they use on companies to keep track of internal documents in case of a leak.

Somebody should look up into this, what is TCP using for its security.

>Yeah, without enough information, we have no clue how well TCP's doing. Even a few details would be very revealing

No paysite is this transparent.

>Am I wrong?

According to Carnival Tricks, I think it was answering to a comment on FA, artists are required at least one image per month now,

The "1 image each two weeks" was an estimate I made out of the last rip (2014) compared to the one from 2012, very little had been added from one to the other.

I'm off to bed.

>>4248

>No paysite is this transparent.

It does seem silly, now that I think about it.

>According to Carnival Tricks, I think it was answering to a comment on FA, artists are required at least one image per month now,

Ah, well, at least now you're paying $20 per month for a dozen images instead of 2. But the lack of communication is still a problem, if that's still happening.

From what I can tell, the art produced by TCP artists aren't so special that they need to be locked behind a paywall. I've heard suggestions that it should instead be a per-artist subscription, where you pay to only see the work made by artists that you like, That does sound preferable to $20 for differing art styles and possibly end up being a mixed bag.

I would try subscribing for 3 months and see if I could get any images, but I really don't want to spend $60 for a gallery whose work I can't easily save. Plus, I don't know how to use the script shown here: >>1344

>>4246

Its clearly 2. If they weren't making money, they'd have switched tactics by now

>>4249

>I've heard suggestions that it should instead be a per-artist subscription, where you pay to only see the work made by artists that you like

But it also could be more expensive than 20 for 12

From what I understand you copypaste the script into notepad and save it as an .exe file but if the guy who write it is still around I hope he can help you.

I will not rec you to suscribe unless you want to feel a hole in your pockets.

>>4255

They may have switched schemes in secrecy.

>>4257

>But it also could be more expensive than 20 for 12

I kind of see the per-artist subscription like this: You could spend a few bucks here and there for the ones you want, or pay a fairly large sum for all of it. The large sum for everything would be cheaper than individually subscribing to all of them.

For instance, you could subscribe to individual artists for, say, $3 per month, per artist. Or, you could pay $20 per month for all the artists, which is cheaper than individually subscribing to everyone ($36 for a dozen artists).

That, I think, would be a far easier pill to swallow for a lot of people.

>From what I understand you copypaste the script into notepad and save it as an .exe file but if the guy who write it is still around I hope he can help you.

I see. If the anon that made that script is reading this, please, explain it in greater detail.

>I will not rec you to suscribe unless you want to feel a hole in your pockets.

I won't do it, don't worry. TCP art raiding sounds like a group effort:

>Programmer that creates and explains the script

>Subscriber that has access to the archive and uses the script to get the images

>Anyone else with useful advice

>>4266

Mif may be reading this so it isn't a good idea to continue tlking about that plan here

>>4266

I wrote that as a C# source file, you could get its corresponding exe file from pasting it in something like Visual Studio and compiling it.

Once it's compiled into a .exe you basically just put all your images into a folder and run the program from command line or a batch file with the directory as its command line argument.

I didn't post a link to a compiled version since I doubted anyone would trust an exe from a random internet stranger though I guess I can later.

It literally just goes through each file in the folder you specify, opens it as an image file (will crash if you have non-images in there probably), and then increments every even pixel value by one (i.e. 254 becomes 255, 14->15, etc). This makes the least significant bit plane pure white which is the same as erasing all of the information hidden in the LSB plane.

If cushypen wanted though they could change up the watermarking like simply moving it to the LSB plane of the red channel and anyone using the program would be fucked anyway.

I might make a fancier version that creates a subfolder containing all of the least significant bit planes for each image so you can check to see if your images were dirty to begin with and also to check if your converted images are clean after.

>>4268

Alright. Is he one of those people that love to Google themselves?

>>4272

I can't understand half of what you said, even though I know a little bit about coding. LSB? Channels? This is all stuff I'm completely ignorant about.

I kind of get what it does, though: It gets around the distortion caused by TCP's anti-piracy methods. So, based on my limited knowledge, what someone has to do is:

>Save TCP's distorted gallery images

>Compile the images into a folder

>Run them through that program to restore the images to their original form

Am I right?

>>4274

>Alright. Is he one of those people that love to Google themselves?

No, he used and probably still does hang around the halfchan diaper thread, omuchan so is not surprising he may be around here.

>>4274

>Am I right?

Pretty much.

>>4274

LSB is just a quick way to say Least Significant Bit.

In color images you have 3 channels: Red, Green, and Blue. Each channel is a greyscale image that when multiplied by its color and then combined with the other channels creates your full color image.

Each channel is basically a big matrix of values where each value corresponds to how intense the value of pixel is (0 for full black, 255 for full white and then you have everything in between for various shades of grey).

Now if you know how binary numbers work you know that for an arbitrary number like 123 you can convert it to its binary representation (01111011). What this means for an image is that each pixel value of the greyscale image can be converted to binary as well, which converts your one image of values 0-255 to 8 images of value 0 to 1.

Just like in binary each image contributes to the final value in powers of 2, like for the previous value of 123 (01111011) its 0*2^7 + 1*2^6 + 1*2^5 + … + 1*2^0. So the rightmost bit in this case is the Least Significant Bit and it only contributes a max value of 1 to the number while the leftmost in this case can contribute 128.

What cushy pen did was make it so that the LSB plane of the blue channel contains your IP/username by making it full white and then writing down the info in black. You don't notice anything since just like with a binary number, the least significant bit can only change the final number by 1 at most, which out of 255 is not noticable.

My previous image shows a bit plane decomposition of the blue channel of a cushypen image.

>>1344

To really understand it though it may help to read up on binary representation and bit planes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bit_plane

>>4284

Talking about this, what sofwere is used to creature such watermarks?

>>4284

That was a really good explanation, thanks.

>>4290

There would be a very large number of methods that would work, it's quite a simple watermarking method, though if I were to do it I would probably have the program open the image, grab its blue channel, make every pixel value odd (full white LSB) and then subtract a black/white image containing the user's info.

The user info image can easily be generated by the program as well.

The thing about this watermarking method is that it is heavily unreliable. Due to the fact that the LSB contributes so little to the final image, it immediately gets destroyed during the lossy portion of JPG's file creation. Even at max JPG quality the LSB gets modified a lot.

With this in mind the only reason people have gotten banned so far is their love of .png or they've gotten unlucky with their full quality JPGs.

>>4292

Interesting.

But I was asking because Mif could be reading this conversation and probably had changed the security method after reading all of this.

>>4297

Well there aren't many options and I guess it's kind of useless since the only people with access to the program that removes the watermarks would also have access to the program that removes whatever new watermarking method he decides on since I find it fun to sort of reverse-engineer them.

Like if he switches to wavelet or fourier domain watermarking it may be a bit more complex to remove though basically any watermark that's impossible to see with the human eye gets demolished by jpg compression anyway.

>>4305

That sounds terribly insecure, lets see if the other anon subs and deleivers.

>>4311

I have no account, and as stated in the OP, you need to subscribe for 3 months in a row to have access to the archive. I'm not entirely sure if I want to spend $60 just yet, but that might change.

If I do it, I'll use non-reloadable gift cards. I have a question about that, though: Can I switch cards if I run out of money for the next month. or do I need to get a $100+ gift card?

>>4323

I dunno but I don't see why their paying system will not allow you that.

>>2042

>>2042

autism

I recently been wandering what other security measures could Mif use…

With a drunken state of mind, I've signed up. Guess I can't turn back now. At some point in the future, I may or may not state my thoughts. Probably will, at least if I remember to. In the meantime, ask whatever. If there's any questions, the answers will range from "I've got no fucking clue" to " here's how it is."

>>4755

Might post a few unsolicited thoughts/observations when sobered up after work tomorrow. Depends on how loose my mouth is when the alcohol's out of me. Either way, ask whatever the fuck you want. I'll see how well I can answer.

>>4756

1.) How long do you plan on being a member?

2.) What exactly drove you to sign up?

>>4756

I heard RocketManatee's running a 17 page comic. Is that true and, if so, what is it about?

>>4757

Drunk, and I'm hungry for some quality art. In particular, RM, Crinkleken, and KK Bunny's shit interests me quite a bit. I guess some other artists have shit on there, like Carotte and Pink Diapers, but I don't expect much from them. The first three's siteripped shit really makes me think the potential's there for some art that gets me going, and I just spent the money while I'm inebriated.

Bottom line: I'm fucking drunk, feeling good, and have that defeatist attitude that the fucking site is apparently doing well enough that it's not fucking going away so the only way to see those artists' work is to wait 2-5 years or whatever for a rip, or to just pay some money I can realistically afford for hopeful access to the archive and new stuff. In the morning I may regret it, but whatever. What's done is done.

>>4759

It's that airplane flight shit from the rip. It keeps going. When I sober up, I may quickly summarize, but I may want to read up on site terms or whatever to see if there's stupid shit I can get in trouble for before I post any details.

What I will say is, from first impressions (by which I mean FIRST FIRST FIRST glance impressions) it seems like it's an improvement over what I've read on this and halfchan in the past. At a glance, it seems like I've got access to a bunch of shit. At the end of the day, I could do without all the furry shit, and of course I'm only getting whatever the artists choose to put out, rather than a commission, but whatever. Rant over, I may or may not update you anons in the very near future. Probably will.

Also, at a FIRST glance, there seems to be shit for you male fans out there. I fucking hate padded male shit, so it doesn't work out for me, but there seems to be more male shit than I personally like, so yeah.

>>4761

If you decide to pay long enough to gain access to the archive, would you be willing to use the image-restoring program (>>1344) and share anything that hasn't been ripped yet? I know that you-know-who might stumble upon this thread, but I'm too damn curious not to ask.

>>4757

Oh yeah, and length. No clue. Probably not too long unless this shit proves itself. I've started to actually commission shit recently and that's been promising, so if this fucking site doesn't prove itself, then I'm out. I guess as a disclaimer, I'm into this art, CP and non-CP, like 80% for fapping purposes. Full disclosure for any of you folk that enjoy this shit on a different level. Your experience would probably vary at least a bit from mine.

>>4764

I'll say this much at the moment. At some point, someone will rip it, and if it happens, that shit will probably be at least attempted. Can't say if it would be me or not since I've got no confidence in myself to do that shit correctly. No matter what, the shit will come out at some point, either through the site's will or some anon's.

>>4766

I'm not expecting you to do this, but I can try to help walk you through it. Plus, the anon that made that code probably still reads this thread, so you could always ask if you're confused.

I don't quite get it myself, but I think what you have to do is copy the code in this link: http://pastebin.com/kLGM9qD6

From there…

>Paste the code into Notepad

>Save file as .exe

>Compile all Cushy Pen images into a folder

>Run .exe file on that folder

The thing I don't understand is what the comments mean when it says "give it that folder's filepath". I'd like to know what that means exactly.

>>4757

Fuck, sorry. One more clarification. Recently I've been figuring that I'd give it a try eventually, so I just decided tonight with lowered inhibitions.

>>4767

As a paranoid fuck, if I were to inquire about and do that stuff, I'd wait a decent amount of time first. Obviously, an immediate rip, even if I did the procedure, would reveal who did it. I'll just say this: no plans to rip the sit right now. I'm paying right now, and not, to my knowledge, breaking any rules. Read into all of that however you will.

>>4768

Of course. Waiting long enough before sharing the ripped images would be wise.

Is there a forum on that site, or a list of registered users?

>>4769

Could be fun to screencap the forum, it could be full of bootlickers and drama plus there may be a thread about this thread.

>>4772

Okay, I think I'm beginning to understand. Although, I have no idea how to use the .exe file with a folder. Should I change the "Start in" property to the folder's filepath?

Also, I should clarify that I do not have a Cushy Pen account, so I have no rips to test this on. I could just copy some other art into a folder and see what happens, although I don't know if that's a good idea.

>>4777

Testing it on art that has already been leaked seems rational

>>4767

>>4767

I wrote that file, to compile it you actually need to use a compiler for C# like Visual Studio or your own preferred IDE, I could compile it though who would trust a random .exe from an internet stranger.

Pasting it into notepad and saving as .exe will do nothing, it actually has to be compiled.

From there using it is fairly simple, you just make a batch file that contains whatever the .exe is named (in my case it was CushyPatch.exe) and then a space and then the directory path in quotes.

e.g. CushyPatch.exe "C:\AllMyWeirdPorno"

This will take every file in that directory and attempt to patch it, if there are subfolders or non-image files it will most likely crash since I didn't add error checking.

If it really improves my odds of getting better fap material I may write a GUI version of this so anyone can figure it out.

Overall though my program is unnecessary unless you REALLY want lossless images. If you're okay with jpg then just save it as quality 11 in Photoshop and boom no watermark, the lossy compression removes the watermark's bit plane since it's not noticable by the human eye.

>>4779

Who would've thought adult baby porn could justify such dangerous and invasive security measures.

Oh wait. It doesn't

>>5279

Everything about TCP sounds so fucking greedy. I know artists need money for the hard work they do, but not like this.

>>4755

I'm still waiting for an update. Do you regret your $20 purchase? Have you saved any new images we haven't seen before?

>>4272

Programmer anon, if you're still here, would it be too much to ask if you made a compiled version of that code you wrote? If you're worried about sharing it publicly, I'll make a new DA account and you can send me a note.

>>5273

In theory, sufficiently sophisticated steganography could be used to hide small amounts of data in a very reliable and lossy-compression-resistant way without any way to detect it.

The fact they're using such shitty countermeasures suggests they don't have the technical competence to do that though.

>>5295

Want me to write a python version? Then you could just install a couple of binaries and run the code directly.

>>5304

I'm not the anon that bumped the thread, but could you go into more detail?

>>5305

Sure. What do you mean by installing binaries?

>>5318

>I'm not the anon that bumped the thread, but could you go into more detail?

I'm not sure on the details myself, but I know that the major movie studios have the technology to embed watermarks in the audio and video which can survive lossy re-encoding and even recording in the cinema using a camera. At the most basic level the trick is to duplicate the information enough times that some copies will always survive, although that redundancy may be created using fancy maths (as is done with RAID).

>Sure. What do you mean by installing binaries?

Well, if it was a python script you'd need to install the python interpreter and Python Imaging Library. If you're on linux those were probably bundled with your OS, but on mac/windows you'll need to install them separately.

>>5295

Drunk anon here. Sorry about blueballing, but haven't paid much attention to the site so not too much to say. Perhaps that says something about how much it's worth it.

Anyway, did a three-month stint. I'll find out in a couple of months if it was money well-spent.

It doesn't look like there's any pics that are being held off from me, so if everything is available, I can say I expected more to be here since the last leak. In total, I guess there's a decent amount, but unless you're into furry, male, AND female, all three, it doesn't seem like it's worth it. If you're in it for a few artists, or a specific subset of art, there's not much.

I remember looking at the update archive. From what I can recall, in the past there have been as few as 7 new pics in a month, and as many as 21 or so in one month.

In the forums I saw a member list. I think there were around 300 members, some of which were recognizable names around DA and FTT. Don't know if they are all current subscribers, since I imagine it's possible that they could have stopped paying but still have their names there.

I've saved some images that I haven't seen here, halfchan, or anywhere else. There's one image that was posted in a recent /d/ thread that I could have sworn was not in the last leak, but I may have been mistaken.

>>5355

Oh and when I checked the forums shortly after I signed up, they were completely dead, but the members list also showed hardly anybody. So I'll check that again soon.

>>5322

I think you might have to tell me exactly what I need in order to do this. I have no idea what I'm doing, and I could use the help. Should I go set up that DA account?

>>5355

>Drunk anon here. Sorry about blueballing, but haven't paid much attention to the site so not too much to say. Perhaps that says something about how much it's worth it.

Don't worry about it; I forgot until I saw the thread was bumped.

>It doesn't look like there's any pics that are being held off from me, so if everything is available, I can say I expected more to be here since the last leak.

The full archive could just be hidden until you've been subscribed for long enough. I can't really say for sure, though.

>In the forums I saw a member list. I think there were around 300 members, some of which were recognizable names around DA and FTT.

Would it be okay if you gave us some names?

>>5356

Are there any interesting topics or posts?

>>5375

It's names you figure would be there at some point. A quick glance showed people from across deviantart, furaffinity, and the like. A few of the names I recognized were CS Fox, thelonegrunt, Kaijumorpher, and hiradontel or whatever the name is. There's more, like I'm pretty sure robbie's name is in there from when I skimmed through a month ago, but you get the picture.

Anyway, the forum looks like it might have been reset or something when the site rebooted, since the few threads that are there all seem to be from 2015. No clue how active they were previously, but with this few posts currently, my guess is it wasn't the liveliest place.

>>5408

Another possibility is that you can't see old threads unless you can see the archived content.

That just makes the place even more awful

>>5408

Would it be accurate to say that most of the posts are about site updates?

>>5429

I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.

>>5429

Who knows for sure? I'll admit I would be surprised if that was the case because that's such a ridiculous idea. I mean a fucking forum? That's just too much to believe. We'll see, though.

>>5432

Oh yeah it was mostly site stuff. I think there were a few about upcoming livestreams.

That's something to note, actually. A number of the artists do livestreams will do requests during them, presumably at random and only if the request is the kind of art they normally do. You can commission them to finish the piece after the fact and discuss the price then. It remains a sketch otherwise. I guess this isn't new info as the previous leaks listed some pics as stream requests or whatever they were called. I don't know if that means most of the finished art by certain artists such as RM or KK Bunny are simply commissions or what, but if that's the case then I'm not sure how I feel about that. Unless it really is worth it in a couple of months, I feel like a chump paying just to access other people's commissioned works/paying for the opportunity to commission an artist. That concept just has "scam" written all over it. Again, we'll see.

>>5435

im staying out of this thread for the most part but i wanted to add that the requests that are colored are free. when i was a member rocket did a request for everyone who showed up in his stream and would color a few random sketches after. if he didnt pick yours to be colored you could give him some money to get it colored. it was pretty cheap because of a discount. i doubt every artist could handle that work load tho.

>>5445

That's good news, then. Anything I say should be taken with a grain of salt because I'm not getting myself too involved in the site. I'm just basing everything off of what I see initially.

>>5453

> I'm not getting myself too involved in the site

How so?

>>5867

I just mean I'm not too interested in the streams and requests, nor paying for finishing sketches.

bump

I don't understand your technobabble. Just do an image dump.

Chocolatekit jsut posted some art on FA, citing that cushypen had him idle for the last few months.

Messaged him for more info on it, so I'll see if there's any more to the story

>>6691

no, chocolatekit said life had him idle from posting art everywhere. i just read the post. he stopped for awhile because of the uk laws and other shit.

>>6692

Alright, I probably jumped to conclusions a bit on that, but I left that conclusion out of the message I sent, so hopefully he'll provide some information

I don't get it. Why dies it cost this much to fap to cartoon porn?

>>7856

try drawing some.

Even if you don't take into account how long it takes you to git gud, you'll still be spending more than a couple of hours to make a decent looking piece.

>>7856

>>7857

**unless you mean cushypen.

That place is cancer and hides all the art behind a paywall, so you're not paying to have art created, you're paying to look at art that already exists, with enough variation that more than half will probably be useless to you.

>>7858

That's what's happening to me with my sub so far. The majority of the art there turns me right the fuck off. Even for non-fap aesthetic appeal, I'm disappointed. The money is better spent on a commission if you want art you actually enjoy, unless you enjoy seeing just about anything with a diaper on. Even then, just fucking commission an artist. Or fuck, wait for other people to commission the artists. Just don't fucking give that site money.

>>7857

Digital images are not scarce. It takes the same time to give an image to one person as it takes to give the same image to every person on Earth. From an economics perspective, it should cost almost nothing.

Also, I've seen the stuff on Cushy Pen, and "decent looking" isn't how I'd describe it.

>>7864

I'd write a proper reply, but you probably wouldn't comprehend that one either

>>7866

Look, if you condone copyright you really came to the wrong place. You're not going to convince me that artificial scarcity is a good (or even neutral) thing.

There is an abundance of free porn out there, much of which is better than what is available on Cushy Pen. They are trying to sell sand in the Sahara desert.

If you want a specific bit of art made, then expect to pay for it, but if your only criteria is "cartoon porn" then there is already more available than any man could ever fap to.

>>7867

3/10. nobody could be this illiterate. Here's your reply, though.

>>7857

Yeah, If I was going to pay for a commission to draw someone porno for them. But I don't get that otherwise.Oh well.

One of my favorite artists Remmylyne are there. I really wish I could see all her art but too bad she sold out. That's capitalism.

>>8071

You haven't actually refuted anything. You've just made vague accusations of ignorance without specifying why any of what I wrote was wrong. In fact, every response I have received has been entirely lacking in substance.

>>7857 was implying that because a single image takes a long time to draw, it should cost a lot of money to look at it. That is "economically ignorant" as you put it because it ignores the fact that an arbitrarily large number of people can view an image without depleting it in any way. His argument would be valid if he was talking about the price of physical paintings on canvas, but pixels are fundamentally different. I also pointed out that commissions for specific pieces are different, and that you should expect to pay more for those because you are effectively the only customer.

I never actually accused you of being a troll before, >>7875 was someone else, but at this point I think I agree with him that you are an ignorant troll.

>>8075

> >>7857 was implying that because a single image takes a long time to draw, it should cost a lot of money to look at it.

At no point was that implied and at no point should it have been inferred.

A single image takes time and skill to make, therefore it should cost money to have it made as time is a finite resource belonging to the artist. The key here is that you are paying for its creation, not its viewing.

This is further clarified and expanded on in the followup post >>7858

>>8076

Let's look at the question and response:

>Why dies it cost this much to fap to cartoon porn?

>try drawing some. Even if you don't take into account how long it takes you to git gud, you'll still be spending more than a couple of hours to make a decent looking piece.

If the question had been

>Why does it cost this much to commission cartoon porn?

then your objections would be valid.

As it stands, I had every reason to infer that he was saying that it should cost a lot to view, since the thread is about Cushy Pen and you don't need to commission a new piece every time you want to fap.

You're right that I missed >>7858 though. I didn't realize that was the same person, so I apologize for that particular misunderstanding.

I don't know who should I replay to in this conversation but its pretty obvious that the problem with TCP are their draconian practices against pirates and their inflated prices (and egos)

Artificial scarcity is only a consequence of the first point.

>>8147

I'd say that's accurate. $20 a month is far too much for what little they apparently have to offer, especially since their art really isn't worth that high price. You can find art that's just as good (and arguably even better) on DA and FurAffinity for free.

Drunk anon, how much new stuff has there been since you signed up for TCP?

>>8148

I'll sift through everything from the date I joined and I'll put out the amount of pieces released and what kind of piece it is, e.g. female, male, furry, etc. If I feel up to it, I'll also add the shit between the last siterip and the date I joined. I'll do this tonight or tomorrow.

>>8150

Can you acess the archives?

>>8171

As far as I'm aware, nothing is being held off from me. Unless I'm mistaken, I can access everything from the siterips, the shit between them and my joining the site, and everything since I've joined.

Honestly, I hope there's still shit being held off, but it really doesn't seem to be the case.

>>8182

how long did you sign up for? its been awhile. are you going to give us new shit before you leave or not?

Drunk anon here. This site is throwing me off a bit. Looking through the previous posts, I swear I'm seeing shit I didn't see before, which is bittersweet. I'm happy to get more shit, but I'm also irritated that they're still holding off shit from me. Furthermore, I've not been notified in any way whatsoever what new shit's been released to me. It could just be that I didn't remember any of it, but it really seems more likely that there are pics being held off. For example, according to the site, there are pics that were published and included in the last siterip, yet pages of that RM flight comic which were released earlier were not in the rip. I'm just not getting how it works.

But anyway since I've joined there's been a roughly even mix between female, male, and furry shit. It seems like female has been the least, but that might be because that's the only shit I like. According to the archives, 29 submissions in June, 27 in July, and 7 so far in August.

One quick note is that it seems that if there are previous submissions that are gradually being revealed to me, they don't include certain artists. For example, while looking through past submissions I haven't noticed any new Rocket Manatee or KK Bunny pics. Whether they're being held off even longer or they're just exempted from the gradual-release thing, I don't know.

Apologies for being lazy with this. For the time being, that's it. For what it's worth, the gradually-released shit, assuming it was actually gradually-released, hasn't made me much happier with the site.

>>8241

when are you giving us the new stuff?

>>8241

Be careful about releasing screenshots like that. If each person sees a different set of content depending on account age, then those numbers next to the months may be enough to uniquely identify you. Also they could easily embed almost invisible images in the background of the page in the same way they watermark their images. It would be extremely crazy for them to do, but I wouldn't put it past them.

>>8251

You never know, but at this point I don't care too much. They'd be pretty anal if they went that far, not even allowing screenshots of their own fucking page. But whatever. If they ban me because of that screenshot, that would look worse on the site's part, anyway.

>>8243

The site will get ripped when it gets ripped. It's more likely to be someone that's not me, but whoever does it, it will be done at some point.

>>8240

>>8241

That's just worse than anything we've imagined.

So if you click on those archives, lets say May '15 are you really getting the 21 pics it says?

>>8255

I checked. There are 21 pics, currently.

>>8258

Is this a new image just saved from the site or from the old leak?

>>8256

That so wicked, so you have no way of knowing what are you missing and there is no way to unblock it.

That's so fucking bullshit it hurts.

Are the forums still empty for you?

>>8306

That pic is misleading also. From what I can see, there are 13 topics up across the different boards (General Discussion, Site Support, etc.). There are 49 posts up as well. Maybe the slate got wiped clean when they relaunched I don't know. You don't even need an account to view that statistic image, apparently. http://www.cushypen.com/cushypen/new_forums/

>>8258

>>8259

If you want to do it properly, use this python script:

http://pastebin.com/0G2tBkUR

It can't do bulk processing on its own, but I could easily add that feature if you like.

>>8309

I installed the python stuff. You're talking to someone completely illiterate in all that jargon, though. Can you break it down in a way where I'll understand what to do?

>>8314

Not that anon but: copy paste the script into notepad and save it as "All files" with the filename ending on .py

>>8309

>>8314

I mean, with all this script stuff, programming and whatnot, it's all beyond me.

>>8314

Okay, I assume you're on Windows, right? It has been a while since I used a windows machine, so a bit of googling may be necessary.

If you don't understand any of these steps, just google "how to [x] in windows" or something.

First, open up a terminal window. You can usually find this in Start->accessories->command prompt or something similar. You should see a black box with blinking cursor in it.

Now, there are a few commands which let you navigate around your system.

cd some_directory takes you into that folder.

dir lists the files and folder in the current folder.

cd .. takes you up to the folder above the current one.

You should see the current directory next to your cursor in the terminal window, like

C:\some\directory>_

Use these commands to navigate to the place where you saved the script. It probably helps to save the image in the same folder.

Now type:

python lsb_cleaner.py imagename.png

substituting the filenames for whatever you saved stuff as.

Let me know if that works, or if you need more detailed explanation.

>>8318

Actually, I found a much better explanation:

http://effbot.org/pyfaq/how-do-i-run-a-python-program-under-windows.htm

>>8324

>>8325

>>8326

Great, that all seems to be working as intended. It's good to see that the jpg method does remove the watermark, although it's better to do so without introducing ugly jpg artefacts.

Do you want me to write a version which can process an entire folder full of images?

>>8327

You can if you feel like doing it. It won't make much of a difference unless some subscriber out there wants to efficiently rip the site.

>>8329

Or, for that matter, if I or someone else here decides to drop some money on the site.

>>8329

>>8330

Well, I wrote it anyway so if anyone wants it, they can have it. It has some error checking, so it won't try to clean anything which isn't a valid image file.

http://pastebin.com/3YYPAgKQ

>>8333

You done good, anon. Could you explain the input/directory output/directory thing?

>>8335

Let's say you have a bunch of images in C:\data\cushypenrip and you want to clean them.

If you give it the command

>python batch_lsb_cleaner.py C:\data\cushypenrip

then it will create clean copies of each image in that folder called "clean_xxx.png" where "xxx.png" was the original filename and extension.

If you create a new folder, C:\data\cushypenrip_clean, and give it the command

>python batch_lsb_cleaner.py C:\data\cushypenrip C:\data\cushypenrip_clean

then it will put those copies into the new folder instead of the old one.

https://mega.nz/#!CxJVWYyJ!zVMJcxo8NusrsOjda_Mc4ll_RmzsAIoRLLj9i51IO-U

This was posted on halfchan

Our god is an awesome god

>>8473

Nice. It's a shame the only good pics are the kk bunny and immelman comics. They're not enough to justify such a high subscription.

>>8478

>Can anyone run the watermark script and see if our here was from this thread?

I can't tell for sure if he used the script from this thread, but the images have been de-watermarked in a way which is consistent with that script. All three channels have had the least significant bit set to zero for all pixels.

So was RFSwitched kicked off the site? There wasn't any thing from him in this leak and his name is absent in the profile page.

>>8507

Lets hope our hero updates soon.

>>8566

We don't know what could happen beatween him and the site, I didn't even notice his art was absent until you pointed it out.

>>8604

When people were inevitably arguing about the leak and the site on halfchan, someone said that that RFSwitched was given the boot due to his laziness in producing art for the site. The fact that there wasn't anything new from him in this leak and his name is gone from the profile page confirms at the very least that he's not part of the site anymore. Whether he's gone because he was booted, decided to leave, or some other reason is up in the air until mifmaf or someone else on the site confirms it.

So since the leak he site has run into an advertisement campaign, they have a Tumblr now that is posting already leaked pics and the artists reblog them and say something to promote the site.

Also from Carnival Tricks FA

http://www.furaffinity.net/view/17594737/

>35% discount if I can make it a Cushy Pen exclusive

>The CushyPen is an awesome pay for diaper site! Now I know that sounds scary and unappealing. Why pay for a mix bag of diaper art? Well I assure you it's more than that! It's quality art, a place to be yourself, and somewhere you can go to chat with like minded people. We also provide livestreams, free requests, discounted commissions and more! Actually you can read more about the CushyPen here:

http://www.cushypen.com/cushypen/about

>What does a CushyPen exclusive mean? Basically it means it would be featured on the site's front page! That being said, the down side of it being a CushyPen exclusive means you wouldn't be able to repost it, anywhere, Not here, twitter, chan sites, anywhere. You're free to show a friend over IM, but please let them know that this image cannot be shared! But if you're not really in the market to show off an item you bought, you might want to consider the discount!

They are either desperated or they know that piracy is free advertisement.

>>9635

My question is do they take a hit whenever a leak happens? I mean, these leaks largely happen on /d/, which largely isn't interested in buying a sub in the first place. Not to mention, the leaked pics rarely go beyond imageboards, so someone who hangs out on da or tumblr or whatever wouldn't see those pics normally.

>>9635

It looks like there's no shortage of furries willing to throw vast sums of money at artists. That commission went for $162. I doubt CushyPen are going to have any real problems.

>>9639

Well on their tumblr their posts get up to 500 notes. So I don't think they take a hit.

>>9640

The most popular furry artists get up to 1000 on auctions like these.

>>9640

It seems like it's mostly furries/babyfurs that allow that site to exist. That would explain why at least half the site is furry, and why some artists do both.

What I hate about most porn sites is that the models don't actually have diaper fetishes.

I have a diaper and age regression ferish and make my very own indie porn. It's very reasonably priced and I'm actually turned on by being padded.

>>9675

most abdreams models are actual abdls. dunno about any other sites, though.

>>9687

I was thinking of contacting them at one point. Their sets are so dreamy. I just don't like the idea of being with anyone other than my daddy.

>>9703

how about you post more pictures of yourself here? with a timestamp/card so we know its you.

>>9675

>>9703

ABdreams models are massive bitches.

Some of them lurk here so they probably took the chance of blacklisting you.

Does cushypen store a unique copy of each image for every member of the site ? Or does it create a temp copy of the image, alter it with the unique ID of the member and display it when a user clicks on said image ?

>>9917

The later is the best explaination

>>9936

That's an awful lot of overhead. How does this guy expect to scale up past a few hundred users ?

>>10056

scams are rarely designed for that many marks

>>9936

An image is actually very small and hard drive space is much cheaper than CPU power. If I was designing it I'd almost certainly make it cache watermarked images after they were generated the first time when a user viewed an image.

>>10095

Plus not all users can access the same content so the cache is smaller than the total content.

That is an issue that arose on the latest rip, the site is aware of what content you prefer and blacks out what the site think you don't like, probably without telling the user or allowing them to change those settings.

>>10098

>That is an issue that arose on the latest rip, the site is aware of what content you prefer and blacks out what the site think you don't like, probably without telling the user or allowing them to change those settings.

What the fuck? Why would anyone design a site like that? If I didn't know better I'd say that nobody could possibly be that stupid.

Are you sure that actually happens?

>>10099

I'm not sure, I think I heard it from a guy defending the site on half chan's /d/.

I do think it is real because the last rip had very little furry and a lot of focus on F/m, like if the tastes of the guy who ripped it could be felt throught it.

>>10100

I'll need to see some slightly stronger evidence before I'm convinced. I just cannot fathom what could possibly make them think it's a good idea to put in a hidden content filter which tries to guess which sort of images each user prefers and only shows them those images. I don't know what they'd hope to gain from it, unless it was intended to help them catch sharers, but there are better ways to do that.

>>10106

If you read the rest of the thread such a system dosn't sound far fetch for them.

The biggest issue that people have with the site is the fact that most people don't want to pay for content they don't like therefore they won't see so blacking it out could work as a sedative but still is a terrible idea to not give people a choice on what they want to see.

>>10106

…that isn't how the site's filter works at all, though? There's an option to black-list specific content tags, like "furry" or whatever, but you have to set that up yourself.

Seriously, no one would go through the coding effort to make a system just to *not* show people the content that they're paying for.

>>10115

What this guy said.

The rest of you spergs need to wake up and quit the master detective shit. It's a paysite. Either buy an account and leak, or sit around and wait for someone else to leak.

>>10123

Good try Mif!

>>10126

>Uh oh. Anyone who calls out my bullshit is obviously the dastardly cartoon villain Miffmaff!!

Yeah, okay. Speaking as a previous leaker, just saying you might wanna loosen up the ol' tinfoil hat there, buddy. I think its cutting off circulation to your brain.

>>10130

That is cool mate but really none defending the site can be taken seriously.

>>10131

How is me telling paranoid retards to quit dwelling on stupid shit defending their site? Its literally me telling you to leak or get out.

>>10133

Because this thread is centrated on hating the site.

Unless you have evidence that such system dosn't exist we are going to keep talking about it.

>>10135

A thread should be for leaking content and talking shit, not discussing spooky conspiracy theories that just waste peoples time. You are having people clicking on the thread for no good reason at all you massive autist.

>>10137

So you're butthurt by the lack of new content?

>>10138

>>10150

lol you samefags are so funny

>>10115

>Seriously, no one would go through the coding effort to make a system just to *not* show people the content that they're paying for.

Actually, a lot of effort goes into ways to prevent people from viewing content they've paid for. That's the main function of DRM. It's easier to torrent videos than it is to get them playing off legally purchased DVDs or blue-ray disks.

You're right that it seems illogical in this case though.

>>10642

padded Calamity Jane when?

>>10642

Everything about this is a conspiracy now

Cushy Pen Illuminati, site is run by lizard-people, baby powder can't melt steel beams

>>10645

Jane is very diaperable, in the episode of vid related is very easy to imagine her as a diapered sub for a daddy dom.

No surprise by the lack of art, most artists are cartoon plebs.

>>10650

Conspiracy is anything done at closed doors.

>>11058

All of those artists act like kikes.

We could organize a boycott but boycotts don't work. Easier is telling people to go to lesser know artists.

here's a rip collection of Cushypen images

http://www.mediafire.com/download/lg59c41693jp749/T45465655FG3C45565454P6565545GR5345I53534P43453.rar

password is

IGJFIGJFIGRTT60RDFKDdjifjdigdrjifOREIT4506333594232356

>>11058

>>11060

Kikes and uptight douchebags for sure, but Wen's human art, especially her sissy stuff, is hot as fuck. I want that god-damn jumper.

>>11495

Nothing new but good effort.

>>11534

Probably but with that artist all of his girls look alike.

>>11538

Yeah, that and immelmann's comic are literally the only two things I care about from cushy pen.

This as the case last time and it's still the case this time and if it weren't for the fact that to get to them a pile of worthless shit(not to mention the cut the kike running the site) has to be funded too, I might consider paying for the comics.

I miss when mifmaf was as benign as spamming those horrible latex-orca diaper pics everywhere.

>>11545

Immemlmann is the worst artist on there.

>>11548

He is and i'm still surprised he was brought in, and yet his comic is probably the most memorable thing from the site. Largely due to the tone shift but still.

>>11545

Mifmaf will insist that if you don't want to get rob you are not the site's audience.

>>11548

Technically correct, but he's also one of the very few producing something other than 'standalone single-panel adult in babyish clothes/situation'. He may not be the best artist on the site, but he may well be the best writer

Bump to keep the hatred alive

>>12774

I imagine Mifmaf crying and saying " i was a meme in japan, a bloo bloo bloo, why can't the japanese draw more of my retarded OC?"

Every comission he does is to stroke his ego.

>>12779

If i was an artist and i made something that inspired not just western niche artists but eastern ones as well, i would have an ego problem, too.

>Every comission he does is to stroke his ego.

To be fair, commissions are done either to stroke someone's ego or make someone stroke their dick.

Check out who got a tumblr.

http://mrswabbs.tumblr.com/

>>13027

http://rocketmanateeab.tumblr.com/

RM also got a tumblr… it feels like they know they have a shitty PR but I don't see how getting their artists into tumblr is going to fix anything.

>>13179

She really got turned into showing up only as a pony now? I can understand if bronyfags want to pony a character, but to make a character exclusively pony…? Not cool.

I suppose that orcadiaper suit DOES look inviting… wonder how it'd look on a girl now

>>14412

Wll, no art of the humanized form has come about in while. and since Mif's most recent piece is a pony sure he's deep into the shit right now.

>>14412

>but to make a character exclusively pony…? Not cool.

How does that work? I very much doubt the ponyfags are preventing anyone else from drawing pictures of her as a human.

>>15691

>people still use the term "art theft" to describe digital copying with attribution

Every day life seems a little less worth living.

>>15718

Some time ago Carnival Tricks started a lot of drama because a SU porn blog reposted an image he made and even if it had a massive watermark he tought it was art thieft because the blog reposted the image instead of roblogging it from his blog.

34Quicker also had a massive victim complex because of a tumblr reposting art so he reblogged every repsted with some rant atached to it.

I really makes you wonder what provocates this mentality

>>15720

>thieft

>tought

>repsted

>I really makes you wonder

If you're going to call people out for being idiots at least take the time to either proof read or not type like a total retard in said call out.

>>15730

>People is calling me on my shit

>better call them out on their grammar.

>>15733

Sorry I hurt your feefees, tard. I just wanted to agree with you without you sounding like a fucking autismo in the process.

>>15734

the faggot is ban happy with me now so they deserve whatever shit they get

>>15734

I remeber watching CT's stream, he was on a voice chat with a bunch of people and there was somebody who called CT fat dyke as a joke so I'm sure the person who went bersek on that thread was the same as in the stream and the posts were ironic.

>>15741

Fucking hate furries

>>15720

I dunno probably the fact that they're hoping to make money off of their work.

>>15744

But reposting art means free advertisement

>>15744

But then reposting is good because they get free advertisement

>>15744

If they were hoping to make money off their work they'd charge for commissions. What they're actually hoping to do is make passive income by simply owning the rights to things they created in the past. It's a subtle but important difference. I have no issue with commissions, but copyright is bullshit.

>>15770

>copyright is bullshit

YOU READ IT HERE FIRST GUYS

>>15874

Explain how reposting art harms the artist.

Does anyone have the latest site rip?

I've got half a comic by Immelmann that I really want to see more of.

Does anyone have a new site rip?

I have a half finished comic by Immelmann that I really wanna see more of.

>>15874

Explain how reposting art affects the business

>>15879

explain how being harmed has anything to do with owning stuff

>>1609

File's no longer available.

>>8478

No seeders.

Someone just put this shit on Tumblr or something.

>>15992

What do you mean no seeds? I'm seeding it

Use this magnet, is the one that come out of my client

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:UDJ37Z6HFMOHEGND3VBX7MJNYPVBAUJY&dn=Cushypen%20-%20Rip%20v8

I also wanted to talk with the guy who made the latest rip to make a torrent with all of the leaks so far.

>>16006

I got it now. Thanks!

Has there been any new leaks on the Immelmann comic? I've got up to like page 42.

>>16223

Nothing new and that is suspicious.

>>16006

No peers currently, Are you still seeding?

>>16616

Yes but my client tells me nobody is downloading

what messages are you getting on your side?

>>16629

Its not telling me any messages. just that its always trying to find peers at 0.0%

http://puu.sh/nhV1t/137c7363fd.jpg

>>16892

Shit, Dunno what to do now.

>>16892

If you want an specific artist I can dump the folder.

>>16897

Not the same person, but are there any new pages for the Blake and Wilson comic by Immelmann? I've got up to page 45 where Blake is being dragged off.

>>16899

45 is all that has been leaked.

>>16893

I figured it out, My firewall had a "special instance" that decided utorrent is not allowed to pass through the firewall.