No.15008
Old one got bumped locked >>13156
Damned furfags got me interested in this comic
First page in case you are interested
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/13064945
No.15010
Dangit i thought there were two new pages
No.15088
>>15079
Sounds like someone is going to be pressing the "wrong" button.
No.15090
>>15079
is this the beginning of a new disappointment?
No.15091
>>15090
Hope is the first step to disappointment.
No.15092
>>15090
>>15091
Damn right it is. Also, new page coming today according to Gem's twitter. And judging from this screenshot, it might not suck that bad.
No.15093
>>15092
Probably the panties are coming off and/or a sissy dress.
No.15109
>>15092
Hope its not a cheesy public humiliation blackmail thing
No.15110
File: 1452809795634.png (995.46 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1452808826.babystar_pg123s.png)
>>15093
DING DING DING, WHAT DO HAVE FOR HER JOHNNY?
No.15111
>>15110
Also, finally a page with no nightmare faces!
No.15131
>>15110
You know, I've always wondered: Why don't they just make the safeword "safeword"? It's easy to remember, and I can't imagine it ever coming up in normal conversation unless you're doing some kind of meta-roleplay.
No.15140
>>15131
most people use the green, yellow, red combo
No.15141
>>15131
Some people do, but a lot of people like to have fun with their safeword. It's a good deescalation if things get to heavy to yell something silly.
No.15199
>>15141
also if you need to use your safeword in public because for some reason saying safeword sorta sticks out
No.15200
>>15131
>Why don't they just make the safeword "safeword"?
That's precisely what I do.
Some people just gotta be elaborate, though.
No.15202
A safeword is only needed for BDSM, right? Like, normal ABDLs dont need a safeword, right?
No.15204
>>15202
Part of BDSM is D/S, dominance/submission. It's something that figures in heavily to nearly all (like, 90%) ABDL relationships and can easily be taken far enough to need a safeword. Think about it, you have someone that's a baby (submissive) and a caretaker (dominant) and generally one person cedes most or all control to the other. That can be some pretty heavy territory at times.
That's not even including the large amounts of ABDLS that include bondage(think pacifier gags, mittens, cuffs/collars, locking plastic pants/garments, etc.) and sadomasochism(forced wetting/messing, restricted changes, spankings, being fed gross stuff, etc.) in their play. The page before last where Star and Teca are enjoying the spanking is actually a great example of SM.
No.15205
>>15202
Suuposing your caretaker wants to do something you're really uncomfortable with, like put you in embarrassing clothing and bring you to the store.
I would be really uncomfortable with that and would probably call the safeword on anything that makes it obvious what's going on. Not just because of the embarrassment, but also because you're forcing everyone you meet in public to take part in your fetish and while a frilly dress that exposes the diaper a bit isn't quite 'blackpool tower', it's still a shitty thing to do to as regards the non-consenting members of the public.
No.15207
>>15205
>Blackpool Tower
Is this a Britfag thing? I have no idea what you are talking about other than the knockoff Eiffel and in the context of what was said makes little sense.
No.15214
>>15205
Okay, so while I agree you shouldn't expose your diaper in public. Your reasoning is dumb as shit and the same reasoning behind stare rape.
You don't do it because in order to be a functioning member of society you need to be able to separate private matters from public ones, or accept there are social consequences for your actions.
No.15216
>>15214
"you shouldn't expose your diaper in public"
you guys are fucking stupid, women wear thongs all the time and men show off their boxers when their pants are too low. No one is going to give a shit if a bit of plastic wasitband pokes out for fucks sake.
No.15219
>>15216
What the heck are you on? Neither of your described behaviors are fully accepted, at least within the civilized part of society. Even when someone is exposing himself in this manner, at least he or she is using something an adult would use, if people see a diaper, what would they think? Better case scenario is "He may have incontinence." and do I have to say the worst?
Just don't do this, don't be stupid to force everyone else to acept something that isn't natural. Diapers aren't natural, they're related to babies and old people (and now to perverts too).
No.15220
>>15219
Just ignore >>15216, I think he's b8ing.
No.15221
>>15216
I actually agree with your example. If you're showing off a bit of the waistband, who gives a fuck. You run the risk of getting caught and more embarrassing consequences, but that risk assessment is up to the individual. I was referring more to full on prancing around in only a diaper, but I'll revise.
The reason you shouldn't show off your diaper would be for self preservation, not because of other people.
My main objection is to the other anons comment about twisting the notion of what consent means. The idea that the public is a "safe space" where people have a right not to see something something freaky, weird, perverted, or disgusting is a load of crap. And by being weird and creepy, you are not "violating others consent". You consent to the risk of seeing weird shit by going out in to public. There is no safe space rights.
> buh yer sexual feelerings mean you're using other peepull to get off, so it's like rape
No, rape is rape. You demean the very concepts of consent and rape with your SJW bullshit. Say a girl wears a set scanty dress in public, and gets off on it. No one is violated. Some may have their sensibilities offended, but engaging with the public always runs the risk of seeing shit you don't like. So fuck off.
Don't do this shit in public for your safety and sanity, not because someone may pop a monacle.
>>15219
Also this. If you're being a weirdo, don't expect others to see you as anything but a weirdo.
No.15224
>>15207
>implying other countries can't have towers
Off to /his/ with you, plebian
If I remember right, the Blackpool Tower incident the anon's referring to is an episode where the author of the comic went full retard and went out in public in a clearly visible diaper while her Daddy pushed her in a stroller. And I do mean full retard. People legit mistook her for a special needs patient.
No.15225
>>15204
>pacifier gags
Yknow sometimes I wonder what people do for safewords when they're gagged.
I'd just flip off my partner and hope they take the hint
No.15226
>>15225
It can definitely be a gesture XD The most common one I've heard of being used with gags has been a notable series of hums, like humming the opening of yellow submarine or some shit.
No.15230
>>15110
do you think Star will let Manda change her/get her dressed?
No.15232
No.15239
>>15216
>>15214
Except in the context of what you're doing it's like walking around town in a latex suit or rope, not just standard underwear.
No.15240
>>15221
public indecency laws state that yes, people do indeed have a right to not see someone in their freaky fetwear.
Stop being a shit about it, your kind make the rest of us look bad.
No.15242
>>15240
Obviously fetishists shouldn't be too blatant with their activities, but you're forgetting that there are also disabled people who need to wear diapers for medical reasons. If people can't handle seeing a bit of diaper in public, then that's their problem. Diapers pale in comparison to all of the obnoxious shit I've seen people do in public.
No.15243
Ask yourselves, what would /pol/ do?
No.15244
>>15242
I think the message may have gotten muddled.
in >>15205 I was referring to the infantile/sissy outfit with the diaper showing. Not just the diaper showing part.
No.15245
>>15224
Pics or didn't happen
No.15246
No.15247
>>15245
>>15224
http://toddlergirl.deviantart.com/art/Outing-199854491
Honestly I'm not too embarrassed that she did this. In some ways if she was pretending to be a baby/special needs, it's better because it's not like anyone would have thought it was odd or sexual. She wasn't in some frilly pink dress with her diaper exposed and pooping it.
And also it's not as though she's on welfare or anything. She and her husband make a modest living from what I understand.
I'm sure some of you will disagree but just my 2 cents
No.15251
>>15240
> public indecency laws state that yes, people do indeed have a right to not see someone in their freaky fetwear.
As long as junk is covered, then it doesn't violate decency laws.
However…
> Stop being a shit about it, your kind make the rest of us look bad.
You're living in a fucking fantasy world if you think that ABDL will have not look bad in the mainstream. Though I call bullshit on your faux concern for the "ABDL Community", YOU don't want to look bad.
No.15252
>>15240
>>15251
I really don't get why anybody gives a single fuck about what other people in this fetish do. Other peoples opinions of who you are will always be decided primarily by how strongly they feel about you. If you don't have enough clout or social tact to explain that what other people with the same fetish do doesn't apply to you as well, that shit's your fault. Not the degenerate ABDLs.
Add on to that, the crazies who go out in full-on baby clothes or diapers + sissy dresses aren't even the ones who give the community a "bad name", really. Who irl has anyone ever talked to that's legitimately brought up someone like this? It's only the people that go on national TV that get brought up by normies.
No.15256
>>15252
I'>>15252
>Who irl has anyone ever talked to that's legitimately brought up someone like this?
Pamperchu gets brought up by my vanilla friends every now and then.
Stefonknee or however you spell it was also a topic of ridicule.
Naturally they don't know about my ab side, since they're not part of the scene and otherwise have no reason to know, but on the off chance they find out I'd rather not have an uphill battle in explaining exactly what's going on.
No.15259
>>15257
stefonknee went to the media by his own accord. He sold what little dignity he had for attention. He wanted to be popularized by the media.
No.15260
>>15256
Pamperchu is absolutely one of the exceptions that proves the rule (though there also used to be that guy that lived his life as a baby girl down in AZ, iirc), but Stefonknee is a perfect example of someone popularized by media.
And dude, unless said friends are perfectly accepting of you as you (which are usually the best people to hold as friends regardless), you're kidding yourself if you think it's not going to be an uphill battle anyways. What we do is weird, gross, and difficult to accept for the vast majority of the rest of the world, without even speaking to the common misconceptions with pedos. Randos who go out dressed in onesies and shortalls while sucking a pacifier are the least of your worries.
No.15261
>>15259
So is virtually everyone else that's done it. Stanley, Riley Kilo, Matty, etc. And that's the exact point I'm making. The people that are actually putting themselves out there for mass-media attention are the only ones that have any actual effect on popular opinion.
No.15262
I love the banter that these threads make. It inspires me to start my own comic and post it here and see if it gets the same amount of trash talking.
No.15263
>>15262
Do. More content is always welcome. Even if it's shit we can have fun talking about how shit it is
No.15270
>>15256
Then don't get caught. You getting caught is your problem, not anyone elses. With reasonable precaution, majority of people are able to conceal this fetish pretty easily.
>>15260
This.
We do what we do because WE enjoy it, not because it'll ever get approval from the outside world. It's not needed, and delusional to think mainstream acceptance should even be a goal.
>>15262
Do it.
No.15273
>>15262
Make it about a babyfur nazi, then it'll fit right in here
No.15282
Guys if she wants to do this let her damn. Its her fucking life you dont live her life for her. Me and My fiance go and play together and have picnics outside in are onesies and shortalls who the freak cares what you do. If you wanna do it go do it. It does not cause backlash on this community. We are ABDL that means adult babys/ diaper lovers. Im an adult baby who loves to be a baby every were I go.
No.15283
>>15282
Go back to reddit, the shit you do is not acceptable, stop pretending there is anything good in what you do.
No.15285
No.15292
>>15283
>>15285
I'm with her on this one. I wouldn't do it myself, but if I had to pick sides between someone who wants to have some harmless fun in public and the "OH MY GOD THAT'S OFFENSIVE" crowd, I'd side with the person having fun. The world would be a better place if everyone was less judgemental.
No.15299
>>15288
why is that image so fuckign big. it only needs to be like 600x400 or something, tops
No.15308
>>15292
> I'm with her on this one. I wouldn't do it myself, but if I had to pick sides between someone who wants to have some harmless fun in public and the "OH MY GOD THAT'S OFFENSIVE" crowd, I'd side with the person having fun. The world would be a better place if everyone was less judgemental.
Same. I don't approve of it for myself personally, but I don't care what other people do. Notions that we all have to be representatives for the community that shouldn't be a part of the mainstream anyways is stupid. But considering all the fucked up things people do to their bodies, or wear, or whatever that shocks the socially conservative minded; as long as no one is whipping out their dick or shitting themselves in a crowded area they'll be nothing more then a weird thing people say that day.
>>15299
It's REALLY big bait?
No.15335
>>15282
You deserve to be holocausted
No.15365
>>15299
You have seen nothing.
No.15392
just got done marathoning "Found" in one sitting and didn't realize it was also by the same artist (just stumbled across it on FA after finding out this comic was good I just searched for other similar stuff)
Was actually a pleasant surprise to find out it's the same artist.
No.15395
File: 1453272281630.png (273.75 KB, 706x1000, 353:500, 1452864865.babystar_hugss.png)
>This is Star's daddy
>He's part wolf part gerbil….dont ask.
Hey guys… Is Teca really all that edgy after all?
No.15413
New CTN
>>15395
That daddy will be a character on a different comic.
The daddy based on her real husband is a bear and still hasn't shown up.
No.15415
>>15413
Damn, I wish I had aspirin that worked that fast
No.15416
>>15413
If aspirin makes your head feel smaller, why did the otter's head shrink so much in the last panel and not the cat's?
No.15445
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>15413
>Daddy Character is based on a Bear
>A Bear
Bear huh? I have the urge to sing now.
No.15479
File: 1453408245934.png (948.62 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1453401317.babystar_pg124s.png)
>Manda doesn't notice Star's panties when she pulls the waistband
>Star has to go out in babyish shortalls with crotch snaps.
>God knows what Teca is making Lure wear. I have to wait another week to find out.
Do you know what this comic is like?
You know that move in bondage videos where the dom grabs the sub's cock while jerking it off and rubs the tip with their other hand in a circular motion? And the sub is either moaning or screaming in his gag from the sensation overload?
This is what this comic is exactly like. A slow tortuous rough handjob.
Also fun story from the Furaffinity submission page:
>true story: back when I was 27 I was asked for ID to prove i was old enough to buy a pair of scissors LOL. You have to be over 16 to buy scissors. I didnt have ID on me so they wouldnt let me buy them. I needed them to cut my passport photo out in order to send my passport application.
No.15480
>>15479
>when I was 27 I was asked for ID to prove i was old enough to buy a pair of scissors LOL. You have to be over 16 to buy scissors.
>You have to be over 16 to buy scissors.
>over 16
>to buy scissors
is like scissors slang for marijuana and you wanted to be high in your passport photo?
No.15482
>>15480
Star lives in britbong land, and because of the nanny state and "protecting the dear children" you have to be 18 to buy anything with a sharp blade. Most retailers will card you if you look under 25 when you make your purchase. And Star is a social retard so she was probably not quite dressed for her age so they carded her.
No.15487
>>15479
See, I can appreciate this comic being slow if things like this are happening.
>God knows what Teca is making Lure wear
this is the perfect time for sissification since it's Teca is in charge of getting Lure dressed
No.15490
>>15415
Aspirin may not. But LSD does, even in tiny doses. Sublingual caffeine powder too, to some degree. But only for headaches, with promise of them coming back harder later.
Such things are useful to have around. Obviously not on you 24/7 due to legality and morality, but whatever.
No.15496
>>15491
>no diaper in frame
Lame
No.15506
>>15479
Now watch the author use this and the following strips as a platform to demonstrate that parading outside dressed like a baby is perfectly okay despite the obvious fact that she has complete control over how society responds.
They could continue their days in complete apathy of Star, they could even cheer her on. They could grab her and kick her for being weird.
They could tie her down, gang-fuck her, lock her in short chains so she has to crawl, put a catheter tube in her and snip it so short that she can't remove it and make her irreparably incontinent
No.15510
>>15506
I like your version better. Can we make your version canon? How do we tell Star it needs to be sexier?
No.15518
>>15487
Please please please have Lure in a floofy dress~
It'll keep my dock diamonds until something happens.
No.15519
>>15518
If it was up to me that is exactly what would happen
No.15530
No.15539
>>15532
Where you been, bro? Manda's been padded since her first appearance. I'm not sure if she's appeared unpadded yet
No.15540
>Manda's driving the party out to go shopping
>Star's left in the backseat with Teca
>"Now just so there's no misunderstandings here, if I'm gonna be your caretaker at this picnic, there WILL be sex. That's just how I play this game."
>Teca leans over, puts a hand on Star's leg, grinning
>"If that's not okay with you though…"
>Teca shoves a paci into Star's mouth
>"- feel free to speak up, okay?"
No.15550
>>15479
In before they're shopping, Star asks Teca to go to the bathroom, Teca says no.
No.15553
>>15550
>>15540
it's probably going to continue as anti-climactic fluff but we can dream
No.15563
>>15141
>>15110
And autistic as fuck to yell in public. This is exactly the reason I don't do BDSM or public play.
No.15576
>>15563
Uh, yeah, genuine autist here. I know perfectly well not to do cringeworthy stuff in public, thank you very much.
No.15580
File: 1453638021057.png (512.73 KB, 628x480, 157:120, [Broodroostertje is not am….png)
>>15576
lel @ >genuine autist
You obviously don't know what you're saying.
No.15581
>>15580
Refusing to accept things that don't align with your understanding of the world is, ironically, a signifier of autism.
No.15582
>>15581
Wow, color me surprised.
No.15583
>>15553
If you are expecting fap material here I think we are all going to become blueballed.
No.15598
>>15563
You do realize that people can communicate with more then just yelling, don't you?
Not sure you should be throwing around those accusations, coming off pretty spectrumed yourself.
No.15695
>>15413
>pouring someone a cup of coffee in their own office without asking
Rude
No.15725
>>15550
>>15540
Not happening guys, if you're looking for kinky stuff with Star, stick to the commissions that Gem gets with her in it.
If you're into the whole forced diapers in public thing, then this one is gonna be faptastic if you don't mind five other dudes being in it.
No.15799
>>15725
some of her stories are really hot but only if you like forced regression, wrongful imprisonment, etc.
I really dig her 3 part story "Promotion".
No.15813
>>15799
Can you link the stories? I did a search but couldn't find them.
No.15814
>>15725
Care to post the complete pic?
No.15830
ive never thought of myself as a furry or babyfur or ab before but i cant stop reading this comic
i never should have clicked on this board fml
No.15831
>>15830
What brough you here on the first place? Have you read the comic from the first page?
No.15833
No.15837
>>15830
Were you just a diaper lover?
As for the comic, you don't have to be furry to enjoy it. There's a lot of relatable feelings that Star has that I think people enjoy. And well, embarrassment fetish just off the charts.
No.15870
>>15814
It's not done yet, but here's a rough sketch and assets.
There being paraded around in public as part of a Community Punishment Program where offenders are publicly humiliated. If you read the newspaper it's implied that the whole thing is heavily corrupt. Also the diapers and straight jackets are gonna be pink.
Once again, faptastic.
No.15876
NEW CTN, nothing has happen
>>15870
You're Musoko? I saw the auction, seems the pic is going fine.
No.15883
>>15876
Nope, i'm in the picture though. Not gonna specify who but I have white in my fur.
Here's lines and flat coloring with the characters in the background. Now I had heard everything was gonna be pink, but this is a lot of pink. Almost too much pink to handle. And if you've been following the comic and commissions you'd know that Star hates the color pink. Must be why she's so pissed.
No.15890
>>15883
is that a male version of Star? or is the nursery also going to house females? i was under the impression that this was a sissy oriented thing, but i'm glad if it isn't going to be
No.15891
>>15883
that is way too much pink, the diapers shouldn't be pink
No.15894
>>15883
This fucking pic ruined the entire topic for me.
No.15897
File: 1454029465828.jpg (238.44 KB, 933x1024, 933:1024, 15079550498_774818b8e3_b.jpg)
>>15891
clearly you've never met the DC Amor
No.15898
>>15897
yeah, but that has a cut design and isn't in cartoon form
No.15910
>>15480
In the UK you need to be 18 to buy a teaspoon and anyone who looks under 25 will be carded at all major stores. This is not a joke, there are news stories about kids and adults being denied spoons at Tesco.
England. Not even once.
No.15913
>>15813
http://toddlergirl.deviantart.com/gallery/25679516/My-Writings
my favorite stories written by her with forced regression:
Promoted (best one IMHO)
Stranded (it's not all that great, but its readable)
Pacifying Perfection.
No.15914
>>15890
I see boobs, so I'm assuming not.
No.15919
>>15876
Impossible fantasy scenario:
>her clothes explode into the most babyish outfit imaginable and she loses the ability to talk/walk while wetting and messing herself, the other two begin talking down to her as a baby too.
Realistic scenario:
>The spray is intended to impede her ability to talk
No.15920
>>15913
I've read those stories years ago and I really enjoyed them, except for one thing:
It's mostly involuntary, permanent regression. This is far too close to dementia, which is a fate worse than death. I know its fiction but still, even though altered reality and mental regression are well up there for me, I still feel guilty for enjoying it.
No.15923
>>15898
Okay so the front design is one thing but
>isn't in cartoon form
are you here to fap to a comic or not?
No.15928
>>15831
yeah, after reading a few in the thread I went and read through the whole thing. what brought me on here, idk, I have a thing for wetting and ageplay, I definitely have a "little girl" side but not THAT little… although tbh I think it's something that I just repress a bit since my bf/daddy is decidedly not into the really infantile stuff… pacis, diapers, bottles etc. and I feel really embarrassed that I am. I have a lot of internal conflict about it obviously..
>>15837
yeah, it's the embarrassment part that really gets to me. I do relate a lot to Star in wanting to engage with the AB side but feeling way too embarrassed/needing to feel "forced' into it by a sternish CG like Manda.
No.15929
>>15890
>>15914
No she's female. It was originally a YCH where only the first three on the left were to be visible and in the middle. (Marauder, Star, and Kai) The bids got high enough that Musuko added the other three prisoner slots (Boliver, Maron, and Argi.) If no one was gonna buy the sixth slot, Musuko would've added a prison guard but Argi bought the slot. About a week after the YCH ended, Seti stepped in and paid to be featured as a guard. And that's where we are today. This is the finished version.
>>15891
The whole "everyone's in pink" idea only came when Musuko sent out the sketch. It wasn't in the YCH description so it was a surprise to me. I'm not really a big fan of my character being in pink, but it fits here.
>>15894
Sammy is going through a cold right now so I don't know when the next page will come out. I paid $60 for a slot in this, I'm gonna fucking post it wherever I want asshole.
No.15932
>>15929
Ignore the idiots complaining about babyfur shit in the thread specifically set aside for babyfur shit. However autistic things get, that's pretty much always going to be more autistic.
No.15942
>>15923
I'm saying that having stylistic diapers doesn't look good in 2D
No.15945
>>15929
>>15932
The samefagging is fucking real.
Also, got triggered because I said that >>15883's pic is autistic as fuck?
Get the fuck back to FurAffinity, faggot.
No.15960
>>15945
Not as triggered as you apparently were to discover more than one person disagrees with you.
No.15965
File: 1454179112471.png (793.63 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1454176305.babystar_pg125s.png)
Alright, let's get this thread back on track.
I bet no one saw this coming huh?
Lure in a dress isn't going to happen unless his girlfriend says so.
So don't get your hopes up.
No.15970
>>15965
I just realised they have inverted colour schemes. Star is brown(-ish) with yellow and pink hair, and Lure is yellow and pink(ish) with brown hair.
No.15974
>>15970
Fuck, they do look like siblings
No.15980
>>15965
>Lure in a dress isn't going to happen unless his girlfriend says so.
someone can and should edit Lure in a dress
>>15970
>>15974
the plot thickens
No.15983
>>15965
I need a JoJo's edit of that last panel, please.
No.15998
>>15479
>>true story: back when I was 27 I was asked for ID to prove i was old enough to buy a pair of scissors LOL. You have to be over 16 to buy scissors. I didnt have ID on me so they wouldnt let me buy them. I needed them to cut my passport photo out in order to send my passport application.
Yesterday I walked into a sporting goods store and bought a rifle and ammunition because it was on sale. Fuck but I do like America sometimes.
No.16011
>>15965
Lure is the fonz confirmed.
No.16016
>>15920
Yeah, I've always thought of that stuff a fate worse then death. Though, I always view myself in the victim's place never the captors so it's fine. I'd rather suffer the fate of Promotion then be strapped onto a log and put into like a saw mill. Though, it ends up being the same fate more or less.
No.16025
>>15998
right?
A lot of people (americans ) complain about america being shit but honestly, its not bad in comparison.
England: super nanny, and lots of restrictions
Japan:terrible justice system
France:all of it
No.16027
No.16041
Feel free to ask some questions of me if you have any and I will set aside some time to answer them tomorrow.
Few rules. No Shine spoilers and no RP'ing. I don't do that.
No.16043
>>16041
>Few rules. No Shine spoilers and no RP'ing. I don't do that.
You don't make rules on someone else's board you fucking normalfag.
No.16045
>>16043
… They're saying they won't answer spoilers or roleplay for people as shit they won't be answering. Fuckin autism.
No.16046
>>16041
If we can't get Shine spoilers then what are we sopposed to ask?
>>16045
I don't know who is trolling who anymore.
No.16049
>>16041
Settle a debate between Daddy and myself, the dress in >>15110
Is it something that you're more likely to be wearing, or something Lure is more likely to be wearing, whether willingly or unwillingly?
No.16051
>>16041
Public exhibitionism(like what's about to happen in the comic) forces people to be involved in your kink roleplay without the opportunity to provide informed consent. You do know this, right?
We all know that Sammy has done something like that before(though she has apologised for it), but have you ever exploited members of the public in your roleplay?
No.16052
>>16051
No we do not all "know" or agree with that statement, don't speak for us all fucking normalfag.
No.16053
>>16052
You're not a stefonknee/etc. supporter, are you?
It's no different from any other public sexual act and you might as well be a trenchcoat flasher, the only difference being that people don't know straight away that you're getting off to their reaction.
No.16055
>>16041
Do you celebrate shrove/pancake tuesday in Scandinavia? Or, if not pancakes, do you mark that day with some other food item?
No.16057
>>16051
It's a fictional comic. You do know this, right?
No.16060
>>16057
Yes, I'm aware it's fiction and that having a fantasy is fine. My post is about doing it for real.
No.16061
>>16052
>normalfag
Do you think you're on /r9k/ or some shit? It wouldn't even make sense in that case. Why do you keep saying this in every thread? Stop trying to have superiority on a porn board.
No.16062
>>16061
Normalfags loom over us. Star, Lure and Manda are normals, can't you see?
No.16066
>>16041
Favourite diaper brands?
No.16068
>>15929
>>15945
i like the pic ._.
No.16069
>>16062
What exactly is your definition of normalfag?
No.16072
>>16051
Observation is not participation. Your twisted definition of consent is what justifies SJWs crying stare rape.
No.16073
>>16062
8ch is not a super secret clubhouse anymore then 4chan was. It's casuals like you whom are obsessed with proving their elitest status that ruin the board as much as that faggot who's always crying about being completely normal and misunderstood.
No.16074
>>16073
>8chan is not a super secret clubhouse
Stopped reading there. If you think *chans aren't a sekrit klub, you are cancer.
No.16075
>>16072
The whole point of the exercise is that you're getting off at people observing you. They are a core part of your roleplay and are therefore participants.
Not only that, since this is in public there's no guarantee that all observers will be adults.
No.16076
>>16073
Wow, you didn't pick up on that sarcasm? Not one bit?
No.16080
>>16046
Math problems
>>16049
I am not big on wearing those myself, but I do love putting Lure in them. He is not to fond of it though haha. That said, I do on very rare occasions wear them ;)
>>16051
Yes
>>16055
Not to my knowledge :)
>>16062
We are? But I like it weird..
>>16066
ABCushies for myself, but Fabines on Lure because I just love that bulk they make. I have seen this new one called crinklz I believe. Will probably give those a go some day
That all you guys had? I expected more :)
No.16081
>>16080
>>16069
Normies are all persons who are not bitter hermits.
No.16082
>>16080
Crinklz have been out for a long while. if you're only aware of them now I'm going to assume you're referring to the redesigned ones.
Also, how can you not be aware of annual cultural events?
Are yourself and Lure 'that' kind of couple that doesn't participate in society(outside the abdl/furry scenes)?
Anyway, Sammy is definitely going to make a post this day next week about all the pancakes she's allowed have over it being Shrove/Pancake Tuesday (while also talking about her diet progress). Why don't you celebrate the day too, even if it's not normal for people in your area?
No.16083
>>16080
Being a 'normalfag' just means you're able to muster up enough tact to not alienate yourself from others by being a massive social retard.
eg. I've met toddlergirl and had no problem interacting with her and paul. I didn't have an indignant fit about any potential grievances and I absolutely didn't act the way people act on this website.
Therefore, I'm a 'normalfag', even if I spent the rest of the day at an ageplay party, folllowed by an evening of bdsm and pup play
No.16085
>>16075
Is someone's dick whipped out? No? Then no one was violated. The public is not a safe space where you have a right not to see something that freaks you out. They'll have to deal with the consequences socially from their decisions. But the idea that it's wrong because of an SJW definition of consent is fucking stupid.
Get your tumblr shit right the fuck out of here.
No.16087
>>16085
If you think it's okay to be a diaperfag in public you are a faggot and should consider suicide, tumblr has nothing to do with being a retard that wears diapers in public.
Oh well, Americunts are great at making drama anyway.
No.16088
>>16087
Wearing diapers discreetly is fine though, since then the goal of the outing does not involve being seen.
No.16089
>>16087
> If you think it's okay to be a diaperfag in public
Never said that captain edgelord. The logic of "violating consent" by someone seeing something they personally don't like is completely tumblr. That's not the reason not to wear diapers in public, nor is cries to think of the children. People can do whatever the fuck they want in public as long as it isn't violating decency laws.
They don't have the right to do so and not face social repercussions.
>>16088
> If you're getting sexual gratification from secretly being diapered around other people, you're violating their consent.
See how stupid that logic is? It's comes from the same insanity that talks about the "male gaze".
Observation is not participation, it's observation. People always have the option to look away from something they don't like in public. They also have the option to deride and be disgusted.
No.16090
>>16089
>> If you're getting sexual gratification from secretly being diapered around other people, you're violating their consent.
Except, as I stated clearly, you're getting sexual gratification from being observed. If you're wearing discreetly you're making an active effort to avoid anyone observing you.
No.16092
>>16082
Shrove tuesday would be Fastelavn in norway, hence the confusion
No.16094
>>16041
>>16080
What's a day-in-the-life of Manda and Lure like?
No.16096
>>16090
You're using the public to discreetly gain sexual gratification and violated their consent. Please report to President Bernie Sanders Senitivity Training Camp.
No.16102
File: 1454457725120.jpg (68.77 KB, 900x506, 450:253, rootie-tooty-point-and-sho….jpg)
>>15491
>>15496
Canadacuck here, I've got you fam
No.16107
>>16102
the bullets say "sorry!"
No.16118
>>16107
Well yeah, they're Canadian.
No.16122
>>16092
Yes, we have Fastelavn. It's buns with cream or vanilla cream
>>16094
Depends on the day. We do lead normal lives besides being kinky diaper butts ;)
We work, we eat, we relax and have some fun together. Some days we go to the movies, visit friends, family or just have some kinky fun.
I do occasionally have Lure diapered for 24/7, but that's only once in awhile. I do enjoy watching his diaper butt though, so I do put him in one a few times a week minimum.
>>16107
Those two are bad ass
No.16123
>>16122
Events outside of UK/Scandinavia aside, do you ever make your way over to Britain for furry/abdl events or to visit Sammy, or is it mainly her coming to visit you?
Also, Norway's outside of the EU, so how does that effect travel around Europe, compared with what Teca experiences?
No.16126
>>16096
I think you mean the Hillary Clinton Sensitivity Training Camp.
Bernie is much more interested in reducing economic inequality and ending corruption in politics. SJWs generally dislike him because he doesn't pay much lip-service to their feels.
No.16128
>>16126
Hide yo power levels!
No.16132
Okay, this. This shit right here. Scares the crap out of me.
Not being able to talk correctly? Terrifying. The fact that it tightens your vocal cords and paralyses your tongue? Terrifying. The fact that these harpies are laughing about it and they actively do this to guys against their will? Absolutely terrifying.
And the fact that it needs an antidote to cure you and that Sammy put in the description "She hopes the antidote works." is fucking nightmare inducing.
No.16134
>>16132
I imagined this'll work by irritating your troath and making it narrower, it must be super painful for it to work so fast.
No.16135
>>16132
It would be fun with consenting and informed adults, otherwise this shit should stay fantasy.
Also completely called it in >>15919
No.16136
>>16134
It's probably an anaesthetic too, given what it seems to be doing to the rest of the mouth. Though that would also make it very likely for the victim to accidentally bite their tongue
No.16139
>>16132
>nightmare
a nightmare is just a dream you're not prepared for
No.16143
>>16136
Well, what do you think pacifiers are for silly?
No.16144
>>16132
I can see why it can be terrifying. But I do like the fantasy of forced regression but only if fictional. I'd volunteer for this spray though, if the antidote had a good chance of working or if they effects wear off within a week.
Like Star/ToddlerGirl this stuff also pushes some buttons for me.
No.16147
>>16136
Biting the tongue is the least of their worries. If the anaesthetic property is that strong and it manages to affect the respiratory system directly, that could easily be fatal. As a spray, I'd say that shit is fucking dangerous.
No.16148
>>16147
>Spray intended to make the victim more babyish
>causes cot death
No.16150
No.16181
>>16148
>tfw wanted to regress but got sids instead
No.16187
File: 1454774017701.png (234.63 KB, 1000x565, 200:113, 1454772504.babystar_bang1.png)
Heh, any of you freaks got some money to burn?
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/19014299/
No.16195
>>16187
>you are not allowed to view this image
No.16196
>>16195
Change your age restriction settings
No.16197
>>16196
>create FA account because apparently i'm missing something
>realize i've missed out on so much top tier art
>spend a couple hours combing through a bunch of accounts
god damnit i'm not even a furry
these comics are like meth, i feel dirty
No.16198
>>16197
>god damnit i'm not even a furry
Son, I've got some bad news for you
No.16199
>>16197
Care to post that pic of 'Manda from the album's previews?
>>16198
You're not a furry unless you have a fursona and ejoy seeing art of your fursona.
No.16200
>>16198
all other furry art is boner killing
>>16199
i got you, fam
No.16202
>>16200
Personally I find that furry art doesn't do much for me unless I actually like the characters portrayed.
Unfortunately that's only ever happened maybe twice, and Shine isn't one of those instances.
No.16222
>>16200
Just, post the whole album.
Might as well make this the furfaggot thread
No.16233
>>16187
I really dislike the idea of paying that much for what's essentially an impersonal reskin that a dozen or more other people are also going to have. It's to art what McDonald's is to restaurant dining, except It also costs as much as the highest tier($40) on her commission sheet, despite the example being something that should cost $30(flat-colour($20), simple background($0) +extra character($10)).
No.16234
>>16200
Those faces are nightmare fuel, especially Manda.
I would hope that manda/lure didn't have to pay too much for this, but it's okayokayokok so they almost definitely got ripped off.
No.16236
File: 1454877223326.png (774.8 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1454876733.babystar_pg126s.png)
No.16237
>>16236
>trying to rationalize the previous discretion concern as part of her comic.
Yeah, people showed up to the pre-meet for ABC in less obvious clothing and caused a scene a couple of months ago.
It is noticeable, they'll see what's going on, maybe some won't understand its fetish roleplay and will try to rationalize it as something they can more easily process, like an outing of of disabled people and their caretakers, don't pretend otherwise.
No.16240
>>16237
Calm down, it's just a comic.
Have you forgotten how she even met Manda and Lure the first time?
No.16241
>>16240
A comic about real people. There are enough people out there that will take this as moral advice for real-life.
No.16242
>>16237
>>16236
I kinda agree that this is some ham-fisted attempt to rationalize this, but she's right. Nobody gives a shit. I've seen people at Wal-Mart in footie pajamas acting stupid. Even if you were actually out in public with an obvious diaper, a paci, being pushed around in a stroller, most people are just going to ignore it. People try their hardest to avoid confrontation. But in this case, going to a store in a weird overall thing, no one cares. People probably won't even notice. Some people dress loud and stupid without a fetish attached to it.
Also, it has been established in this comic that the public are not burning ABs at the stake. Pic related
>>16240
>>16240
It is a comic featuring real people expressing real situations. But, we have to remember that these are furries, and they like to fictionalize and pretend.
>There are enough people out there that will take this as moral advice for real-life.
Yeah, and those people act stupid regardless of what Sammy writes. I think this is just some stupid pat-on-the-back kind of shit. I don't think it's intended to be advice to wear in public.
No.16245
>>16241
And? So what if some autistic people do something autistic.
No.16248
>>16245
They make everyone look bad by association.
And don't say that's not true. You need only look at pokemon, sonic, feminism, gamergate, tumblr, 4chan, reddit, furries, the police, and many more groups to see the effects that a minority within a group can have on the image of the whole. ageplay is no exception.
Hell, look at rainfurrest. how many babyfurs do you think were involved in killing that event? Who got the blame afterwards, the individuals or the entire subculture?
No.16249
>>16248
What kind of autism is this? If you're legit worried about what people think of you, maybe you should just drop the babyfur fetish, you fucking moron.
No.16250
>>16249
99% of the people I've met have been discreet in public and I'm not going to deprive myself just because some autist might make me look bad, but I'd still rather not have to explain "no, I'm not like stanley/pamperchu/stefonknee/those people from that 15 stone baby documentary, they are pariahs even among abs" any time someone finds out what I'm into.
If I cut out a hobby/interest every time some social retard did something socially retarded in the context of it, I'd probably be stuck staring at a blank wall all day.
No.16257
>>16248
> They make everyone look bad by association.
Are you seriously under the impression that ABDL ever looks good to the vanilla public? Have you ever seen any depiction ever of ABDLs by mainstream?
We already look bad.
> And don't say that's not true. You need only look at pokemon, sonic, feminism, gamergate, tumblr, 4chan, reddit, furries, the police, and many more groups to see the effects that a minority within a group can have on the image of the whole. ageplay is no exception.
Yeah seriously… you are aware that we look weirder then pretty much all of those without anyone going out in to public, right?
You might as well off yourself if you honestly think the difference between acceptance and rejection is some weirdo waddling around in a diapers and overalls.
>>16250
> any time someone finds out what I'm into.
Some being a fucking idiot and getting caught then. But thanks for confirming this isn't some faux concern for the "abdl community", it's about entirely about you and your insecurities.
No.16258
>>16257
I was never caught, I've just felt like being honest with people I was intimate with.
And most people, don't care what people do in private, they do care about when it's done in public though. Not to mention when television tells them to gawk at the lastest freakshow 'documentary' featuring footage cut to make the cringiest members of the community look even cringier.
The ultimate form they can take is when they start talking about discrimination, rights, and acceptance as if the fetish is an entire orientation on par with the rest of lgbt.
No.16259
>>16250
Why are you telling people that you're into this? This isn't a fucking hobby, it's a fetish.
No.16260
>>16259
technically fetishes are kind of 'fucking hobbies'.
And you do know what the word 'intimate' means, right?
If I'm sticking my dick in someone I think they should know what gets me off.
No.16261
>>16260
In the fantasy land where you're getting laid, they're still going to be disgusted with you diaper fetish, regardless of what Sammy does.
No.16262
>>16258
Hate to break it to you anon, but you're just as cringy behind closed doors. You're deluding yourself.
> The ultimate form they can take is when they start talking about discrimination, rights, and acceptance as if the fetish is an entire orientation on par with the rest of lgbt.
Agreed. However anon, there is no "saving" the image of ABDLs. If someone is going to think it's creepy, they're going to be creeped out regardless.
No.16265
>>16262
only puritans care what happens behind closed doors with consenting adults.
I'm on about the perception that people who are into this are more likely to be exhibitionist or force the inclusion of their fetish into other groups(eg. posting diapered adventure time characters on an adventure time board/etc. and calling discrimination when it gets disliked/deleted).
No.16279
The latest page of Shine is relevant here. "Everyone is too busy with their own lives to worry much about yours."
All this talk of concern that normal people are going to see someone in a diaper and be offended, belligerant, or upset, is plain ridiculous. Most people simply aren't even going to notice. And of those who do notice, very few are going to give it more than a second's thought.
But let's think about those very few who do get upset by seeing someone wearing a diaper in public. The argument I'm seeing here is that it's unfair for them to be forced to observe someone else's sexually-motivated clothing.
Okay…I can understand that thinking.
But what about revealing clothes? Should people be forced to see a woman's cleavage in public? That's a damn sight more sexual than a peek of diaper.
Tell you what, to save anyone being upset or offended by what other people are wearing, let's all wear burkas. Just to be sure.
No.16280
No.16285
>>16279
There's a difference between wearing slightly revealing clothes for comfort reasons and wearing fet gear for fet reasons. One is about emotional or physical comfort, the other is about discomfort for sexual excitement.
This is the same reason why nudism wouldn't be considered sexual. Context is king.
No.16287
>>16280
>>16279
Nice samefag there, nigger.
BO when are you fucking enabling IDs?
No.16288
>>16279
>Should people be forced to see a woman's cleavage in public?
And there's the fallacy. Cleavage isn't inherently sexual.
Wearing a diaper isn't inherently sexual.
If wearing revealing clothing isn't "asking for it", then this notion of accidental fetish participation via observation is just as ridiculous.
No.16289
>>16285
While I am a sexual ageplayer/diaper fetishist, I mostly wear for comfort reasons. I have no reason t believe it is different for most people.
I agree that wearing a diaper in public for your own sexual gratification is icky. But I have no problem with people wearing them and not being super careful if other people notice, because hey, if it makes them comfortable, why shouldn't they feel this type of clothing?
The majority of us probably agrees that your behaviour in the outside world is the primary factor when considering how socially acceptable it should be to wear in public. Someone not making a scene and wearing a non-humongous diaper with some pants over them? Who cares. Someone loudly play-acting in public with a pacifier around their neck in toddler clothes? Please don't speak to me and piss off.
No.16290
>>16289
>Someone not making a scene and wearing a non-humongous diaper with some pants over them? Who cares. Someone loudly play-acting in public with a pacifier around their neck in toddler clothes? Please don't speak to me and piss off.
Yup, that's pretty much how I feel. Wearing diapers as if they were underwear(ie. making sure they're not exposed in public) is perfectly fine.
No.16292
>>16236
The jeep is being driven by Sgt. Marellis. He's going to blackmail Star into being his little girl or face public ridicule and dishonorable discharge
No.16293
>>16292
>The jeep is being driven by Sgt. Marellis. He's going to blackmail Star into being his little girl or face public ridicule and dishonorable discharge
That is way hotter than anything Star is really planning.
No.16294
>>16265
So now you think the difference between a person accepting and rejecting ABDL is centred on whether or not they've seen someone shitposting diaper art.
You keep getting dumber with every post.
No.16297
>>16294
I never said it was centred on that, but it is a contributory factor. Just like it is with every other community, be it fetish-related or otherwise. Don't pretend your actions are without consequence.
No.16301
>>16297
They think we're weird because we do weird shit like wear diapers and many of us dress-up/act like babies. If you've convinced yourself that most people wouldn't find that creepy if not for pamperchu, then you're super fucking dumb.
No.16304
>>16301
Weird and creepy are not the same thing. The difference being that creepy is when you're weird where you shouldn't be, like wearing overtly babyish clothing and openly roleplaying in public.
I have no problem with people thinking I'm weird. Most people are weird in some way and people who aren't weird are boring.
No.16331
>>16285
>is king
Absolutely off topic here. But isn't it 'is key' referring to a seemingly small, important thing as a solution; or 'holds king' referring to chess? I don't believe 'is king' can really hold such meaning.
No.16332
>>16331
'Is King' is a perfectly acceptable phrase. More prominent uses of it would be 'Content is King' and 'Cash is King'.
http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/something-is-king
I could have used 'is key' and had pretty much the same meaning though. Basically the point being that context holds an important position of influence in how a situation should be interpreted.
No.16338
>>16304
One is a personal perception and the other is a visceral reaction.
> The difference being that creepy is when you're weird where you shouldn't be
This is pulled out of your ass. You don't get to make up your own definitions.
No.16394
NEW CTN
I kind of hate scandinavians.
No.16397
>>16394
The way she writes the accent makes me think german more than scandinavian
No.16399
>>16394
i like the reindeer so far, that classic nanny vibe is full of good feels
>>16397
imagine her with a softer voice
No.16403
>>16399
>classic nanny
must be different cultures but I've never experienced/witnessed any person, child carer or otherwise, acting like that outside of a joke in cartoons.
No.16406
>>16403
Stereotypes don't have to be that grounded in reality, just repeated often enough to gain enough collected acceptance to be "adopted" into reality
No.16407
>>16406
Maybe, but when someone acts like that it pushes me right out of little mode and I kind of feel bad about that since they're probably only doing it because they think they're being accommodating(which, to be fair, they probably are for a sizeable portion of littles).
No.16408
>>16403
i wasn't exactly referring to reality
No.16413
>>16407
Different strokes for different folks
No.16417
>>16399
the norwegian, and kinda swedish accent doesnt have something as harsh as "vat"
No.16418
>>16407
I've always felt weird about that too, no matter which side I'm playing. As I little I feel like an outcast sometimes since my favorite activities are video games, reading, and telling people what I've learned without having to conceal how excited I am. The whole Disney, coloring books, baby blocks, and shitty chicken nuggets paradigm that everyone seems to follow has never been fun for me.
When it comes to being a caregiver, it always makes me sad how little agency most seem to give their littles. I guess it's part of the power dynamic of the situation, but empowering your little to explore their feelings without imposing stereotypes upon them seems like the ideal to strive for. Relieving them of their potty responsibilities along with all of their other adult worries is enough of a power trip, in my opinion.
Man, typing all of that made me feel incredibly lonely. Maybe I should've just posted this in the Feels Thread…
No.16419
>>16418
>telling someone you learned stuff
oh man.
that's just the best shit, no joke.
I'd really dig disney and coloring books if I got the chance, but not so much toys/food same as you, but being super hyped explaining fun stuff is just the -best-. Especially if it's something from a really good book.
No.16420
>>16418
>>16419
Factoids are the best conversation subject.
No.16422
>>16419
>>16420
I can just imagine the conversation with a caregiver about my latest historical readings.
>So…so then Denmark got beat really really bad, and they had'ta give Norway to Sweden since they were bein' meanies. That wasn' fair though, so Sweden had to give Denmark Pomerania; you know, like the doggy!
I think my aversion to Disney is mostly rooted in old Disney, since I never liked that stuff much as a kid anyway. Coloring books might be fun though. I think I'd rather just have a bunch of colored pencils and paper so I could draw whatever. It was fun to make fantasy stuff when I had an imagination and wasn't scared of what other people thought.
No.16425
>>16422
I'm fed up with disney because I love animation above the averange. I love to share obscure animation with my little and I'll be very dissapoint if my little is an animation pleb.
No.16427
>>16394
I just hate when accents are portrayed in dialog. Such characters themselves are fine. But when it gets shoved where I'm trying to read it's simply irritating.
No.16428
>>16427
God, no kidding. I wanted to like Fleur Delacour as a character, but that fucking accent… Why, Rowling?
No.16434
>>16418
>telling people what I've learned without having to conceal how excited I am.
That's my favorite part. Don't get to do it much, but it's so much fun to talk about mythological creatures and such when that floodgate is opened.
No.16439
>>16418
I could never get into the typical ab-ish activities.
>>16419
>>16422
>>16434
>tfw remembering the best parts of childhood
No.16477
>>16428
I've actually once stopped and simply pirated a movie because the subtitles on the disc had written accents muddling much of it up. Even on subtitles that's unacceptable. On the pirate copy, they had been either fixed manually, fansubbed, or obtained from another region.
Don't even remember what the movie was now, since it was like a decade ago and I no longer own any video discs. But damn that shit was annoying.
Really, really hope it doesn't continue here.
No.16478
The only time written accents have ever been done well was by Redwall, where the moles and the Flitchaye Tribe spoke with such strong accents that THE OTHER CHARACTERS had trouble understanding them.
Mind you, the moles' odd accent precluded them from ever being the main character of a book, so maybe it was ultimately bad.
No.16608
>>16478
Lol, I remember reading those books and it was always such a mindfuck.
>"Is this really hard to read or am I just retarded?"
I think they were just hard to read.
No.16609
>>16478
The accents in Redwall were fantastic.
No.16676
>>16478
Couldn't Jaques have just wrote a book from the perspective of their society and switched it up so the others had the accent?
No.16695
File: 1455914107660.png (988.05 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1455913795.babystar_pg127s.png)
No.16697
>>16695
More rationalizing about flaunting your sexual fetish in front of kids - oh boy!!!
No.16698
>>16697
Like anyone would be able to tell they're doing some fetish stuff at a toy store full of kids.
No.16699
>>16695
>adult baby carseat
Over the line!
No.16704
>>16695
If it isn't obvious already, Bella sounds like a maker of custom baby clothes. And Lure is probably gonna get a very pretty looking sissy dress from the way the dialogue sounds.
>dontcha know
Fuck the Scottish and any backwards Wisconsinite who says that kinda shit.
No.16705
>>16697
>>16699
>More rationalizing about flaunting your sexual fetish in front of kids
OVER THE LINE!
I find this more fucked up than the car seat. I have a fanfic that has this in it too, except that the car of the daddy who drives both ABs in that fanfic has blinded windows. and was a Volvo XC70 for that matter, which are 10/10 cars for carrying children in
tl;dr: You fucking don't incorporate children in fetishes.
No.16707
>>16705
What's wrong with the car seat? I want one at some point, I bet they make you feel safe and warm. (it's like have a 4 point harness for your car I bet.)
So let me get this straight, you guys would never go to a park or something to just play around or go into any toy store where kids just so happen to MAYBE be while padded?
No.16709
>>16707
It's one thing to go padded and wear adult clothing, and entirely another to wear AB fetish rompers.
No.16711
File: 1455918245420.png (512.73 KB, 628x480, 157:120, [Broodroostertje is not am….png)
>>16707
Read again:
>I find this more fucked up than the car seat
No.16712
>>16711
That implies you have a problem with a car seat or find it fucked up in some way, so I'm trying to understand what is wrong with having a car seat.
>>16709
I bet people wear clothes with snaps all the time and you never even notice them even being around you. So long as they aren't acting like complete asses what should their choice of fashion matter to you?
No.16713
>>16707
Adult car seats aren't a real thing as far as I know.
No.16714
>>16712
Jesus christ is this b8 or are you THIS autistic?
Read >>16705 a few times, faggot. I don't have a real issue with the seat but I do have a issue with pulling children into your fetish.
No.16715
>>16713
Mentally challenged people grow up, I'm sure they'd have a car seat for those people.
>>16714
How are you bringing children into your fetish when they have no idea what it is and won't even notice you 9/10 times? I think you're being the autistic one by freaking out so much over what some people choose to wear. They aren't running around in full latex or naked, they're fully clothed and in appropriate attire.
No.16719
>>16713
You don't know far enough then.
No.16720
>>16719
>>16715
Not same guy, but I just did a quick search, and I can't find anything that's not made for children with special needs. Nothing really adult size.
Could either of you post something that says for adults or something?
No.16721
>>16720
oh, nevermind. I found some.
>they're all around 1k-3k
>strollers are all on the higher side of price
jesus christ, I'd rather buy a car for that carseat.
No.16722
So be honest folks. Would you rather have a page you won't argue about, or a page you can't wank it to?
I'm asking for a friend
No.16723
>>16722
I think if we get a page we can wank to…we won't argue as much? (One hand typing ya know?)
No.16726
>>16723
Oh I'm sure you brats will figure something out
No.16727
>>16726
hmph…I'm not a brat….
It's these other meanies around here.
No.16728
>>16722
As the only person whose opinion matters, I literally do not care about wank material. If it's relevant to the story and also fappable that's fine, if it's a sidetrack where star's masturbating again that's kind of boring.
Ignore anyone who thinks we won't argue as much. We will find a topic of argument or make one.
No.16729
>>16728
We just don't want to be on/in Namek/Dressrosa anymore…
No.16731
>>16729
>next 50 pages are panel after panel of Star yelling "AAAAAAAAAHHHHH" followed by a single panel of her wetting her diaper
No.16732
>>16726
Haha, I'm being impersonated, must mean I'm finally famous
No.16733
>>16697
It's a fucking comic dude where people touch themselves to embarassing situations involving diapers and babyplay. Do you cry about murder during horror movies? Autistic as fuck.
No.16734
>>16732
Well, we have been pretty much the most erotic thing about this comic since Manda's bare tits.
No.16735
No.16736
>>16713
And humanized animals who put eachother in diapers is the pinnacle of realism.
>>16714
Seriously… you're throwing out accusations of autism, and you're crying like the comic is real. There are no children. It's a drawing you dumb fuck.
>>16722
At this point the dude complaining is rather inbred retarded beyond reason thinking a comic about furries is real, or just trolling like a faggot.
No.16737
>>16704
Pleeeeeeeeeease be a pretty dress for Lure!
No.16739
>>16736
I'm not >>16714 but I gotta disagree on this point, at least partially. On the surface, the logic that violent video games won't make you a murderer should apply to an ABDL comic doing morally questionable things won't make you go out and traumatize some kids, but here's the thing. To furfags, furry IS real. You gotta understand how heavily the worst of them blur the line between furfaggotry and reality.
No.16740
>>16733
It's more like crying about US imperialism during American Sniper
No.16741
>>16740
bonus: just like the movie/book American Sniper, the events of this comic are loosely based on real shit that was alleged to have really happened by the author
No.16744
>>16726
>>16732
But how do we know which one is the real Teca!??!? Now I don't know who to trust in this world anymore.
No.16746
>>16744
It's easy, I'm the real one
No.16747
>>16746
I don't believe you! You're not a real Aunty….
No.16748
No.16749
>>16744
Yknow, it could be that neither of us are the real deal
No.16750
>>16739
But it isn't real though. We know that. The kids in the toystore are mostly likely going to be cameos and shit from other babyfurs ffs, and faceless background nonsense.
No.16751
>>16749
You bring up a good point..but that just raises even more questions though!
>>16748
You're not even a pretend Aunty either!
No.16753
>>16741
>loosely
So anon, what's your end goal? Are you demanding we all stop reading because of your moral crusading? Are you demanding the author change what she's writing to appease your special snowflake demands? Are you just being a colossal faggot hoping the artist see's your trolling, quits the comic, and causes a bunch of drama?
Here's the kicker, nobody cares. Touch yourself, or stop reading.
No.16756
>>16722
I never fapped to this comic on the first place and now I mostly come for the trash talking of these theads.
It's like talking with your friends while watching a movie, I love it.
No.16766
>>16750
Real or not that doesn't matter, you fucking don't bring children in your fetish, end of story.
I know you're baiting.
No.16767
>>16753
I just want a disclaimer to make sure the readers understand it's fantasy and not advice on how they should go about their fetish. I've met enough people to know that this disclaimer is necessary.
No.16776
>>16732
Does 8ch not have trips? I know we hate on tripfags most of the time, but i think it's mandatory for these type of threads where creators or related come in to chat every once in a while.
No.16777
>>16776
What's a chan without tripfags?
No.16778
>>16777
Shit, I scored trips.
No.16779
>>16766
It isn't bait, you're just spazzing out and letting your autism get the better of you. Get off your moral high horse.
There is nothing wrong with going places dressed in a way that makes you feel comfortable so long as you ain't got your bits hanging out. They aren't interacting with little kids or approaching them in a way that would "drag them into the fetish" They're going shopping, nobody is even going to notice what they're wearing (much like in real life..nobody gives a fuck what you're doing as long as you don't directly approach them and involve them in it.)
No.16781
>>16776
Seems unnecessary, plus I can always prove I'm me in other ways if needed
No.16782
>>16779
>this faggot is saying it's okay to go out in public as a AB
Huff propane until unconcious, please.
No.16783
File: 1455990697914.png (237.44 KB, 590x319, 590:319, you talk like a fag and yo….png)
>>16782
>namefag
>stupid name
>tripfag
>edgy casual suicide suggestions
You're actually more annoying and pathetic than the people who dress AB in public.
No.16784
>>16782
>oh no this guy is disagrees with me, I better tell him to go kill himself and call him a faggot!
Establish a decent reason why people can't be who they want to be while they aren't hurting anyone else, instead of simply being a meme spouter and maybe I'll take you more seriously.
Oh I bet you think it'd be fine if they ran in the store dressed in a full body spandex suit yelling "it's just a prank bro!" But someone going about their daily lives dressed in clothes with snaps in the crotch is too much.
No.16785
>>16783
>>16784
I´m not even gonna bother responding to you faggots anymore.
Also samefag.
No.16786
>>16785
>responding to say you're not responding
>calling posts posted within 13 seconds of eachother samefag
>saging an autosaging thread
No.16787
I am not into whatever most people here are into, but I have been linked to this thread twice now, because turns out even diaper fetishists are unable to have a casual discussion on anything their fetishes.
I am fine with you people being into your stuff, but you are genuinely stupid if you discuss your things like this. If someone is shitposting repeatedly, do not respond. That's how chans work. If the person seems to be able to respond properly, talk to them without resorting to greentext bullshit.
It is completely fine to go out with diapers on if they are not visible, and even if there is something visible, what's the worst that can happen? A child will get into diapers later on? Who the fuck cares, it's just a fetish. It is like saying that gay people shouldn't adopt because the children will grow up gay.
If they are doing something with kids, being all creepy and stuff, then they are being stupid and should go to jail depending on what they have done. But in that case, the crime isn't diapers in public, it's something else entirely, so that doesn't make it bad.
Just let people do whatever they want, as long as nobody is directly affected, who cares?
No.16788
>>16787
So nice to see a well thought out post on this sea of shitposts good job sir. Have a picture.
>>16783
>>16784 (You)
>samefagging
No.16789
>>16787
I like how everyone took my post as if it was bait (which it isn't), while I was just saying that it's NOT okay to get children into your fetish, direct or indirectly.
Oh well, PIDF never learns.
No.16797
>>16242
I feel bad just going to wal-mart or target on a bike. There's no airflow on my back due to a heavy duty backpack so I can feel it being sweaty. Thankfully the stores have no issues with me wearing the backpack as I look around/shop. Though i'd still rather wear discreetly at such places then shop all sweaty n stuff.
No.16798
>>16242
I feel bad just going to wal-mart or target on a bike. There's no airflow on my back due to a heavy duty backpack so I can feel it being sweaty. Thankfully the stores have no issues with me wearing the backpack as I look around/shop. Though i'd still rather wear discreetly at such places then shop all sweaty n stuff. >>16704
Bravo, fucking hated that bitch in Fargo.
No.16799
>>16736
Don't know about anyone else but I can easily look past the furry stuff of the comic and recognize them as more human then not.
(And i'm apparently a furfag I suppose?)
No.16825
>>16766
It's not end of story, it's incredibly autistic to not be able to tell the difference between real people and animal cartoon characters in diapers.
>>16767
It's a comic about furfags. It's fantasy.
>>16789
There are no children, it isn't real sperglord. It's pathetic this even has to be explained to you. It can't indirectly involve the non-existence of something.
No.16832
>>16825
It's a setting based on the real world and is imparting moral advice. Just because it's a fantasy doesn't mean it can't have a message.
No.16845
Holy shit, shut the fuck up
You're an idiot if you're trying to relate any of the content of this comic to the real world. At most, this is just some pat-on-the-back bullshit. This comic isn't encouraging certain behaviors.
And you're also an idiot for arguing with back and forth, regardless of what your opinion is. You're not a hero for shitting on someone you disagree with. Blowing up a thread with your spastic responses is way worse than just ignoring it in the first place. I know it's not more than 2 or 3 of you faggots doing this. I wish we had thread tags so we could identify you for the absolute morons you are.
No.16854
>>16845
THREAD POLICE, FUCK!
I really want IDs on this board but yeah fuck the BO, he's a kike faggot who doesn't want to enable them.
No.16858
>>16854
IDs are fucking retarded, on a chan board. The one person who was already trying to tripfag got laughed out of the thread and went back to being anon and hasn't posted anything too laughable lately. It's you people who keep giving them attention that ruin the board…just saying.
No.16860
chan "culture" is annoying and dumb. most of its users are as well.
No.16862
>>16832
It's a furry comic you touch yourself to not an afterschool special trying to teach people to fuck children. It's a drawing, that most of us are frustratingly trying to masturbait too. That's it.
No.16865
>>16845
> this is just some pat-on-the-back bullshit.
>This comic isn't encouraging certain behaviours.
pick one.
>>16854
Yes, we really need IDs.
No.16884
jesus still no new page, god you guys are bitching about semantics of a fucking fury comic you're pathetic.
I liked it when we shat on the artstyle
No.16885
No.16886
I'd love IDs purely on the basis that it would totally shut down retards who throw a tantrum and declare people samefags when more than one person disagres with them.
No.16924
>>16886
I'd agree with you, but someone will claim we're samefagging too. :P
No.16986
>>16924
But the absolute saltiest was this guy: >>16788
How buttblasted do you have to be to do something like that?
No.17157
>>16865
He just means that if you like going outside in your diapers (or as a baby), you may feel good after reading the comic but, no one is going to start going outside in there diapers because of it, similarly to violent persons watching violent media.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/09391122151/video-games-do-not-cause-violence-according-to-former-fbi-profiler.shtml