/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

And there still people wondering why anonymity is a good thing. Just look at all these attention whores caring how the world sees them and making a fuzz over it, this kind of thing doesn't happen around chans, excluding trips, of course, since we lack identity we focus on the theme.

Anywhere there's some kind of user related reputation system, this will happen and this off-topic bullshit corrodes its community from within, leaving an empty shell. On the surface, it's full of comments, but there's no content whatsoever, since the subject are the users themselves.

What are they whinging about?

There's a topic for this you know? We have enough SJW cancer topics already.

>>15561

the mods on girlsindiapers layed down the law and said no trannies allowed.

Trannies got pissed off and said it discrimination blablabla.

Trannies argued that nowhere in the rules did it say that the subreddit pertained to CIS-girls anyway.

>>15562

we don't have anything interesting to talk about ourselves apparently

"Yes it is transphobic. Transgender women are women. Segregating them is the definition of transphobic."

How can this social justice cancer be permanently removed?

>m-muh pronouns

When will these dickweeds get it? Posting pictures of yourself in a board for porn is NOT A RIGHT. There are set restrictions for gender, and trans people don't fit the profile. Sorry that people don't want to jack off to pictures of you but that doesn't make them "transphobic".

I'm also saging because I think this doesn't deserve it's own thread but what I think they should do, and some of the SJWs are actually calling for it themselves, is put it to a vote.

I'm fairly certain that the vote will be overwhelmingly in favor of not allowing trans girls on the sub, the only reason that more people aren't speaking up, is because they don't want their username to be blasted by SJW cunts.

I don't even really have a problem with trans girls, but if they really want to show off like this, why not just make their own sub?

>>15592

I literally can't even.

You are literally fading me with your oppression.

REMEMBER THE 6 GORILLION

>>15567

>>15584

I don't think anyone's demanding you jack off to them. If pictures of some landwhale can be posted on that sub, it's hard to argue against allowing a trap (cute or otherwise) to post.

From my point of view (evil cis-het male oppressor) neither side are really being reasonable here, but it's easier to ignore a post which you don't like than it is to find something which was never posted. I think a lot of the people getting upset in this thread are the same people who throw a fit about "muh pronouns" whenever someone dares to use a trans person's preferred pronouns when talking about them on 8chan. It's rather hypocritical for those people to complain about SJWs.

tl;dr: Everybody should just chill out and give fewer fucks.

>>15564

I'm a fan of lawyering, so I side with the trannies on this one.

>>15577

By using a system of voting to elevate the cutest girls and bury the uncute ones. In this, only the convincing trannies will be seen, just as it should be and just as it is with the attractive real girls.

>>15603

>pictures of some landwhale can be posted on that sub

It's not a matter of them being ugly, they're not female. They don't belong in a sub called girlsin diapers. This is pornography, not some social justice bullshit. All porn is classified as specifically as people want. Just look at /d/ and /aco/.

You guys are being retarded. This is a cut and dry issue. That board is meant for girls in diapers. Trannies are NOT included, and the mod has begun enforcing that, probably because trannies tend to be a nuisance. They can start their own board, or sub, and they should since the tranny board on diaperchan no longer exists.

>>15621

Why not start your own cisgirlsindiapers board? Trannies and cis women look pretty similar. They have the same secondary sex characteristics, people are attracted to them for the same reasons. There's no difference unless you have a chromosome fetish.

>>15629

There already is one, you dumb fuck. It's called girlsindiapers. A tiny minority of faggots, is a tiny minority of fagots, and they can post somewhere else Nobody is obligated in anyway to appease these people.

also

>using the word "cis"

>putting sage in the name field

kys

>>15629

you will never be a girl you disgusting piece of shit

>>15639

>you will never be a girl you disgusting piece of shit

Not in any way attached to this thread's topic, but the irony of this statement coming from someone who likes diapers of all things is hilarious

8/10

>>15641

Just a /co/mrade browsing front page boards. But hey, whatever makes you feel better pants shitter <3

>>15640

at least im not cutting off my bodyparts, anon

>>15640

There's nothing ironic about it. Diapers are just an underwear fetish, while trannies are basically the sissy equivalent of otherkin.

>>15621

Somehow I think people would be less furious if it was just a matter of dictionary definitions. I doubt you'd get responses like >>15639 in a debate over whether tomatoes should be posted in the "pics_of_fruit" subreddit. It's really quite a mystery to me why this particular issue evokes such strong emotions in people.

>>15645

To be fair, you're only talking about the DL side of AB/DL. a lot of people on this sub would jump at the chance to physically (and possibly mentally) become a little baby again. There's an entire thread dedicated to discussion of how to un-learn one's bladder control, which in my opinion is a far more serious and life-altering form of self-harm since it involves helplessly pissing yourself in public and is difficult and time consuming to undo.

It seems awfully stupid to throw stones in such a fragile glass house.

>>15647

So wait, there's two groups here? One likes pretending to be babies and one just likes diapers? Is it like, a 50/50 split of babies and diaper people? Or a mix?

I'll be honest, the answer doesn't really to matter me. I am curious, but when it comes down to it, it's a lot easier for me to understand why someone would want to be the opposite gender than it is why someone would want to piss or shit on themselves. I'm sure there's reasons why you like it, but at first glance it's just straight-up absurd. Nothing against the fetish though, seriously. A lot of people, myself included, like some fucked up shit so it's nbd. A freak calling a freak a freak just struck me as pretty damn funny.

>>15649

There's abs(adult babies or ageplayers) who enjoy roleplaying as a younger age.

There's dls(diaper lovers) who enjoy wearing diapers

Then there's abdls who enjoy roleplaying as a younger age AND wearing diapers

I'm not sure about the actual breakdown, but from my perspective as an abdl, dls definitely seem to be the smallest group. This is probably because in the progression of fetish exploration most dls become abdls eventually.

ab and abdl seem to be about equal, but it's really splitting hairs on things like whether wearing pullups counts as diapers and whether little girls in DD/lg count as ageplayers

>>15642

>/co/mrade

Your autism is showing.

>>15655

you know what i'm just gonna go ahead and sagebomb this thread just to get 15666

Because Volvo.

>>15659

Ahhhhhh.

Now I see. SJWs are closeted pedophiles trying to make their degeneracy socially acceptable.

I have no sympathy. You need to be gassed

>>15603

> I don't think anyone's demanding you jack off to them.

No that's the demand. This is why I absolutely can not fucking stand trannies. They legitimately bitch and complain straight dudes will not date or fuck them. They claim it's transphobic if someone stops being attracted to them once it's revealed they have a dick.

>>15645

> diapers are just an underwear fetish

You're a delusional idiot if you think diapers are more tame then traps.

Trannies should fuck off to their own board though.

>>15662

If you want to test that hypothesis, go on /r/shitredditsays and ask them how they feel about pedophilia. I'll give you $1 for each second which goes by before you're banned.

The stormfags actually have a lot more in common with most SJWs on that front.

Something which a few of the SJWs on there are talking about, is that the reason they're so adamantly against a seperate sub for tranneis or a tagging system for trannies, is because they want to be able to blend in and have everyone assume they're girls.

But if that's the case, then why don't they just do that?

Why don't they just try to blend in?

If they had a separate account specifically reserved for ABDL stuff and then just posted pictures of themselves wearing diapers, then no one would be able to tell the difference anyway right? So isn't that exactly what they wanted? I mean even if they're pre-op they're wearing a diaper right?

The answer is, of course, that most of them actually can't pass at all and so for them to post pictures of themselves wouldn't fly unless everyone was forced to accept it.

The other answer is that they're actually not interested in having everyone think they're women and passing, but more interested in causing victimhood drama and forcing their status down everyone's throats.

I mean if your goal is to have everyone think you're a woman, and not trans, then why don't you just act like a woman and not tell everyone you're trans?

It makes no sense.

>>15659

>normalfags

Okay, faggot. Go to tumblr if that's how you feel. No "normalfags" there.

>>15669

>"being against pedophilia=stormfront"

No, it's just a normal human thing

>>15672

We're talking about a porn forum, not society in some abstract concept. It is very clear that they're deluded and want to cause trouble.

>>15629

>Trannies and cis women look pretty similar

are you blind or something?

>>15672

their problem is that 99.9 of the time it is pretty clear that someone is a tranny. it is not too hard to spot a guy with fake boobs and a chopped off cock. then they get mad and drama ensues.

I cant help it but i feel totally disgusted by trannies

>>15679

What's worse is they actually don't WANT to accept being like any other average girl. They want to be accepted and viewed as beautiful sexy women, everyone who's attracted to women MUST find them attractive too.

No. People are allowed to have sexual preferences, turn offs and turn ons. There are very few women whom are widely viewed as attractive by majority of society. Most fall in where some guys will find them attractive and a lot will not.

>>15649

>it's a lot easier for me to understand why someone would want to be the opposite gender than it is why someone would want to piss or shit on themselves

Good for you. Not sure what that has to do with people who enjoy thick fluffy underwear, though.

>>15668

Diapers and crossdressing fetishes are about the same, since both are clothing fetishes. Trannies have that particular brand of delusion, exhibitionism and dramawhoring that makes them as insufferable as furfags, though.

>>15690

furry isn't a lifestyle

>>15690

Dude, if you think any large amount of us are only attracted to diapers for their thickness, not using them, you're as delusional as the you're claiming trannies are. Just based on observations from forums and chats, the vast majority wet, maybe 25-50% mess. Stop trying to make us seem more normal than we are just to protect your own ego.

>>15701

>what is sarcasm

the faggot i was responding to is the cancer killing 8chan

>>15690

>Diapers

>Crossdressing

>The same

As delusional as the trannies.

>>15705

Both dress as something innapropriate, both want to be seen as cute, both play a role… there's a big overlap too.

I think many ABDL's claiming to be trans just take it too far.

>>15708

I think the problem here is that people are talking about ABDLs (and trans people) as if they were a monolithic, homogeneous group.

There are undeniably many ABDLs who enjoy using their diapers and would leap at the opportunity to be little kids again. There are also some who just enjoy the feel of clean diapers, and plenty who lie somewhere between those two extremes.

>I think many ABDL's claiming to be trans just take it too far.

In other words, the line where it goes from "normal" to "too far" is exactly where it stops being arousing to you? How very convenient.

>>15702

Your post certainly seemed to suggest that you seem to think that 8chan should be a safe space for normal people.

>>15696

It's definitely a lot closer to 25%, if not less. Hardly as widespread as our detractors would like to believe.

>>15704

Because of the ignorant notion that diapers are inherently scat, pedophilia or whatever. Thing is, though, that's nothing but a kneejerk reaction with no basis in reality, and so opinions like that can hardly be said to be reasonable or to matter.

>>15721

>being this far in denial

Well, time to watch this faggot shit up another thread.

> Because of the ignorant notion

Yes, diapers would be perfectly fine to wear in public 24/7 if the public just wasn't ignorant and checked their privilege. No wonder you're still flipping out over the fetlife thread, you really ARE exactly like Stefonee.

itt: diaper fetish weirdos try to rationalize their transphobia and fail

>>15737

FUCKING USE SAGE, RETARD! Cancer threads like this are the reason /abdl/ is pure shit.

>>15738

fuck you and fuck this board

>>15738

sage isn't a downvote, reddit

>>15737

> trannies crying that hetero guys don't want to masturbate to them

>>15738

You can always tell who's new by how many rules they think there is, and trying to act as board police.

>>15727

>time to watch this faggot shit up another thread.

You? Funny how you brought up Fetlife out of nowhere, by the way. Maybe you should stay there.

>>15727

>Yes, diapers would be perfectly fine to wear in public 24/7

Well, they kind of are already, aren't they? Providing they're worn the way they should be, as underwear. The same doesn't go for blatant crossdressing, so in that aspect, diapers would be more acceptable than it. Just saying.

>>15753

Someone's desperate but you forgot

>>15670

> but that's totally not me!

Oh sure maybe not. Probably is, but you did already have this exact same argument in that thread. And everyone told you last time you're a delusional autistic retard with you "logical and tame diaper fetish, everyone else is just persecuting me!

>>7459

> A perfectly tame underwear fetish

>>7606

> it really is tame if you look at it from an objective rational perspective

There's more but I'm far too lazy to scroll through your 6 months of aspergers. I'm just so delighted we get to play in yet another thread. Tag, you're it!

>>15753

I'm sure you'll be a great ABDL rights activist, fighting against the unfair discrimination just like your hero Stefonee. Makes a lot of sense why you got so butthurt over being banned now.

>>15754

>Not content with shitting up one thread with his drama and wild accusations, the shitposter then resorted to spreading it to other threads

Pretty sure "everyone" isn't quite as obsessed with your Stefonee as you are.

>>15755

>Not content with samefagging in one thread, he starts the same argument of his logical and rational diaper fetish in another. Anyone who disagrees isn't enlightened and is just ignorant to his superior intellect.

Oh my dear baitable friend.

>>15756

Yes, yes, everyone is a Stefoknee and Pamperchu redpiller. We get it.

>>15757

> Quick, time to sage that my samefaggotry was discovered! If that doesn't fail I'll just call everyone else a samefag for questioning my enlightened status!

>>15760

Not sure you know what samefagging entails. You're quite easy to identify, though.

>>15761

As are you my friend. Tag!

Now, make a post about autism to deflect people calling you an autist for your persecuted stance on having the most superior of logical tame fetishes that everyone should accept, and the only reason they don't is irrational!

>>15762

I don't think there's any need for that.

>>15763

There's no real need for any of this. Though I'm not sure there's much hope in saving a thread that should have been posted in the general cringe thread anyways.

>>15727

Anon, you're an idiot.

I'm one of the people arguing against the dumbfuck who posted >>15721, and I'm also opposed to the bigoted and simpleminded sticky on fetlife.

>>15765

>I am totally different man poster! Honest! Please acknowledge my honest intellectual fetish of regular underwear that is totally normal and logical.

Why the fuck is the BO not having a iron fist against all these gender and/or b8 threads?

Or at least enabling IDs, the samefagging is fucking real sometimes.

>>15776

Freedom of speech? SJWs always demanding censorship. Just hide the threads you don't like.

>>15772

I think you'll find that most people do so here, considering it's a board devoted to it.

>>15716

With too far, I mean a fetish taken to an extreme where it consumes a personality, rendering a person a one dimensional being that is purely subject to the fetish. It's a self-destructive incremental binge, leading to the utter ruin of the tragic cases known as lolcows.

>>15779

I like diapers and I'm not delusional enough to think they're normal. I'm just happy not being normal.

You're on your own with that stupid shit.

>>15781

Who said anything about being normal? It's a fetish, of course it can't be entirely normal. It's just not necessarily as extreme of a fetish as some people presume it to be.

When there are people that unironically believe us to be child molesters of all things, it goes without saying that society's impression of us is pretty divorced from reality. Taking assessments like that with a pinch of salt is hardly delusional, since studies invariably show that's not what we're like.

>>15772

Yes, yes. I know you think that everyone who disagrees with you is the same person.

>>15780

>rendering a person a one dimensional being that is purely subject to the fetish

I don't believe that's possible. Your perception of someone might be one dimensional, and they might do a very good job of hiding their inner world, but nobody is a simple caricature. Even lolcows have complexities, although you'd never hear them discussed.

>>15784

>It's just not necessarily as extreme of a fetish as some people presume it to be.

Have a read through the only cyclic thread on this board, then come back and try saying that again.

>>15784

>It's just not necessarily as extreme of a fetish as some people presume it to be.

The extremity of a fetish is decided by perception. You personally thinking it's tame, doesn't make it tame. Assuming that people only think it's weird because of associations with child molesters and scat is really short sighted. We're still considered extreme among the BDSM and fetish crowds who know exactly what we do.

You're not a special snowflake, your personal feelings are not what decides such things.

>>15788

>The extremity of a fetish is decided by perception.

Except that makes zero sense when those perceptions don't even match the general extent of what's going on. You're pretty much saying reality is decided by nothing but group consensus, even if the group imagines a strawman that's not actually there.

>Assuming that people only think it's weird because of associations with child molesters and scat is really short sighted.

Ask just about anyone about why they dislike diapers, and you'll get an answer related not to the inherent nature of diapers, but things that they happen to associate them with even though they're not a necessary part of being into diapers. Last time I checked, people don't dislike diapers simply because they prefer the tactile sensation of panties or anything like that. It also differs from the dislike for things like guro and scat in that it's not an instinctual dislike (as diapers aren't a natural object), but one that's learned.

>We're still considered extreme among the BDSM and fetish crowds who know exactly what we do.

They don't, actually.

>your personal feelings are not what decides such things.

And that goes for everyone else too, even if lots of people feel a particular way. The facts are what decide it, and those happen to be on our side.

>>15790

The extremity of something isn't an objective measure, it's cultural dipshit. We are considered extreme among the fetish community, no matter how much you try to deny reality. People who are not in to diapers, do not consider it a tame fetish. Everyone else here is pretty comfortable knowing we have a weird fetish, even among fetishes. You're just delusional trying to seek validation for your normality.

It's also not just because nobody understands you and your little persecution complex. People can understand our fetish perfectly well, and most still consider it extreme and weird.

>>15793

>The extremity of something isn't an objective measure, it's cultural

And if those are not synonymous, the obvious conclusion is that there is an irrationality to the culture that it needs to overcome.

>no matter how much you try to deny reality

I'm the one looking at the facts, though. Denying reality would be more like adamantly insisting that liking diapers is akin to pedophilia or scat, despite common knowledge within the ABDL community as well as professional studies showing that those are hardly common reasons to be attracted to diapers.

>People who are not in to diapers, do not consider it a tame fetish.

People who are not part of/for X, may consider X to be negative thing Y. That doesn't mean there's an absolute correlation between X and Y, though. A majority can make misinformed judgments.

>Everyone else here is pretty comfortable knowing we have a weird fetish, even among fetishes

So you're comfortable with being baselessly accused of mental illness, pedophilia, coprophagia and such? Because face it, that's the kind of things people who dislike diapers say. If those things apply to you, that's on you, but I think most of us would rather avoid being told things like that for being into diapers.

>You're just delusional trying to seek validation for your normality.

Wait a second…

>>7492

Yup, confirmed for the "redpill!" guy.

>>15794

You're not convincing anyone, and your meltdown on this thread doesn't look like you're convincing yourself either.

I don't give a shit what others think of me. I'm not so pathetically insecure as yourself. You've been butthurt over a ban for 6 months, and once again resorted to just calling everyone a samefag there. Looks like we have the same thing here.

Tag, you're it! The game continues my easily baitable friend.

>>15794

>So you're comfortable with being baselessly accused of mental illness

Kind of like the trannies eh? You're just so persecuted like them. Would you like a safe space crafted for you?

>>15796

Sorry, but your wording gave it away right there.

>Tag, you're it!

And yup, to the surprise of nobody, the "redpill" guy and the "tag" guy were the same all along.

>>15797

>baselessly

>>15798

You keep beating that drum of calling everyone who's ever called you a retard for your 6 month shitfit as a samefag, while samefagging your support their friend.

It's just fun because I know you can never stop compulsively responding. I've got you on a string forever. Tag, you're it!

>>15629

What if one gets off on imaging impregnating them but, when one finds out it is impossible finds themselves sick to their stomach?

>I got false-porn raped

>>15801

That's very true. By attempting to pass themselves off as cisgirls, they are violating the sexual consent of the male engaging in ministrations.

Frankly this is tranny rape, they should be in prison. With large black males. Also a live feed.

>>15721

Easy way to clear this up a little: http://strawpoll.me/6652026

Why do these problems always originate in America, never anywhere else?

>>15800

>6 months

You do realize that there wasn't a single new post in that thread for about 5 months, right? If we start counting from the OP in July (since you're so convinced the OP of it is the only person disagreeing with you), that would make for about 2-3 months at most. Whoops, that's over half the time pulled out of your ass!

>>15816

July was 6 months ago, and "totally not you" has continued to throw a shit fit over being banned for that 6 months. As you'll continue to get butthurt in this thread and our game will continue.

>>15818

>July was 6 months ago

Yes, you did get that right, at least.

>>15824

See, there you go again. Our little dance will always continue. Tag, you're it!

Keep it going, watching you two retards fight for no reason is great.

>>15564

>Trannies argued that nowhere in the rules did it say that the subreddit pertained to CIS-girls anyway.

But they should respect the opinions of people who do not view trannies as girls. Or women.

Personally, what most people call a 'transwoman' I would view as a transman. Somewhere between a man and a woman but definitely closer to a man.

Thats just my viewpoint based on the biology. I dont have any bad feelings towards these groups. Except when they want everyone's lives to revolve around them.

>>15829

I know right?

>>15832

It's trannies getting butthurt that people will not forget that they weren't born with vaginas. I'm perfectly willing to call them by a regular pronoun, and whatever. Him/Her I don't care, it doesn't really affect me and if it makes them less crazy then sure.

But this is an instance where the obvious intent is cis-girls. Them crazy trannies can be girls, but there's still categories of porn that we separate them in to.

>>15803

At the very least, this shows that the majority are definitely into pissing their diapers. The commonness of pee being involved pushes our little kink into extreme territory for the average person. Let alone all of us who mess as well. I'm sure this won't convince our enlightened guest of sophisticated mature and logical diaper wearing though. Everything is a conspiracy out to get them and besmears the tame, upstanding, and rational fetish of diapers.

>>15838

>pee

>extreme

Check out this retard. Also, you're still wearing the diaper even when not actively wetting/messing it, and enjoying how it looks/feels, so unless you're claiming that diaper fetishists don't like the diapers themselves at all and just put them on to go in them, the point still stands. The wetting/messing would be the issue, not the diapers themselves.

>>15839

Yes, the average person considers anything sexual involving piss as extreme. But thank you for showing how desperate you are, and how detached you are from any sort of normal relationship.

No matter how much you try to deny reality, most of us in fact do like diapers for pissing in, and a significant portion like shitting in them. Both of these groups alone or together outnumber those wearing diapers "just for the looks and feel". You're just wrong and delusional.

>>15840

>Yes, the average person considers anything sexual involving piss as extreme.

So… as long as one doesn't piss in them, it's not extreme.

>a significant portion like shitting in them

Actually, that's still a much smaller portion than what many would believe.

>Both of these groups alone or together outnumber those wearing diapers "just for the looks and feel".

But do the groups who wear just to piss or shit for fetish reasons outnumber those who enjoy the looks and/or feel? If not, then the fact still remains that it's mainly a fetish for the diapers themselves.

>You're just wrong and delusional.

Turns out that isn't the case, though.

Fight, fight, fight!

>>15841

Man you're desperate. Of course you'll never accept any sample size. You'll just call rigging if it were bigger. But majority of ABDLs are into pissing their diapers, and I'm willing to bet there's more into pissing and shitting them then just wearing them and doing nothing.

You can try to make all these distinctions about how you're a special snowflake, and how the average person shouldn't lump you in with everyone else because you're pure and don't piss your pampers. But that's not how reality works. No matter how much you cry and scream, diapers are placed pretty deeply into what are considered extreme fetishes.

But your retarded ass backwards logic, cock vore is even more tame then diapers as those who enjoy it can never live out their fetish.

>>15844

>You'll just call rigging if it were bigger.

Interesting how you brought up that all of a sudden.

>But majority of ABDLs are into pissing their diapers, and I'm willing to bet there's more into pissing and shitting them then just wearing them and doing nothing.

But are they completely uninterested in the diapers themselves? Hardly, and so your point falls apart.

>diapers are placed pretty deeply into what are considered extreme fetishes.

Wet/messy diapers, yeah.

>But your retarded ass backwards logic, cock vore is even more tame then diapers

Good thing it isn't "retarded ass backwards", then.

>>15846

> But are they completely uninterested in the diapers themselves? Hardly, and so your point falls apart.

You can keep crafting strawmen, but anyone can see how stupid the argument you're trying to make is.

>All those people who poop and pee their diapers don't count because a diaper fetish only covers the diapers.

You're just trying to craft yourself out as a special little snowflake who is more pure and normal, and shouldn't be discriminated against by being lumped in with others.

But sorry dumbshit, that's not how it works. When the majority of ABDLs are in to watersports inside their diapers at the least. It's a fair association to make, and it's an understandable thing that even kinksters consider us more extreme.

>Good thing it isn't "retarded ass backwards", then.

So you believe cock vore is a more tame fetish then diapers?

>>15847

>You can keep crafting strawmen

No thanks, you seem to be on that already.

>You're just trying to craft yourself out as a special little snowflake who is more pure and normal

Now this is a strawman. I could be into wetting and messing as well for all you know, but looking at things objectively, those clearly aren't inherent nor the main aspects of the fetish. They obviously have some overlap, but that doesn't make them outright synonymous. Aren't you just getting yourself into a tizzy because you think you're being looked down on for liking to use them?

>it's an understandable thing that even kinksters consider us more extreme.

No, it kind of isn't. If they have an issue with watersports and wet diapers, that's one thing, but that doesn't warrant the same reaction against any diaper, since at the bottom of it, what they have an issue with is the watersports.

>So you believe cock vore is a more tame fetish then diapers?

No, that seems to be what you're claiming.

>>15849

You can't separate a fetish from the practices majority of those fetishists are engaging in. Which is what you're trying to do, which isn't objective at all. If majority of diaper fetishists are in to pissing their diapers, it's a completely fair, rational, and objective association to make.

You're trying to craft a special snowflake reality where most ABDLs aren't in to using their diapers. Thus the stigma around diapers being unfair.

You being in to wetting and/or messing yourself just makes you a hypocrite on top of being a fucking special snowflake moron.

A lot of kinky people think ABDL is creepy and extreme for mixing innocence and childish things in with sexual ones. Completely separate from any associations with pedophilia. It's what separates us in the BDSM community from other roleplaying based d/s games like puppy play or pony play to them. The addition of adding in watersports with wet diapers, and the commonness of scat just ads to their uncomfortableness with it.

And they're perfectly entitled to feel uncomfortable about it. You trying to educate other ABDLs into how not extreme we are is just idiotic, and really obvious you're just dealing with some personal emotional issues.

There's nothing wrong with having an extreme fetish as long as you keep it in check. Trying to convince everyone else it isn't extreme just makes you look like a moron.

Not the guy who you are arguing with, but I wouldn't say it's extreme. Creepy, weird, and gross sure, but I do think "extreme" is more commonly reserved for really hardcore bondage and like blood and stuff. I do agree that it's stupid to argue that it's not weird and generally considered disgusting, and that it's no more weird to the general public than crossdressing, feet, etc. but I'm not sure extreme is the right word for it.

>>15854

>inb4 ABs don't count either. Nobody counts but enlightened rational diaper wearers

>>15855

Diapers are definitely considered more weird then feet or crossdressing. Feet are a tame fetish for sure. It's a well known joke that Tarantino has a huge foot fetish. Crossdressing used to be considered more bizarre, but really has entered the mainstream.

When I say extreme, I don't mean dangerous or risky. It's just considered extreme behaviour or one of the more fringe and weird fetishes out there. Which we definitely are considered weird, even among other fetishists.

>>15857

I know, I was saying that it's definitely weirder than crossdressing, bondage, feet, and all the other things out there. That said, I think most people think of things like vore when they say extreme. It's really a semantics argument though, since I'd definitely say diapers are a fetish most people would consider very weird and gross.

>>15864

Meant to say "all the common things out there"

There are definitely odder things too.

>>15864

Oh yeah, that's not what's being said. Saying diapers aren't a tame fetish, isn't the same as saying diapers are the worst fetish. Our special snowflake is claiming that with his superior logic and knowledge that means everyone else is wrong and misunderstanding his perfectly normal and tame kink.

>>15853

>You being in to wetting and/or messing yourself just makes you a hypocrite

No, that would be called being able to see past your own perspective and think about things objectively. Something you could stand to do.

>>15854

>A lot of kinky people think ABDL is creepy and extreme for mixing innocence and childish things in with sexual ones.

To which it should be said "You're into hurting people, who the fuck are you kidding?". Really, trying to call us extreme for being loving instead of violent is about as ridiculous as it gets.

>The addition of adding in watersports with wet diapers, and the commonness of scat just ads to their uncomfortableness with it.

Good thing it's not obligatory, eh? Watersports and scat are watersports and scat.

>And they're perfectly entitled to feel uncomfortable about it.

Just like we're entitled to call them out on how they're no better than us.

>You trying to educate other ABDLs into how not extreme we are is just idiotic, and really obvious you're just dealing with some personal emotional issues.

No, what's idiotic is putting down your own fetish on a board for it. What next, will you be petitioning for this board to be shut down because "well, many people say this is pedophilia, so clearly it has to be!"?

>>15864

>I'd definitely say diapers are a fetish most people would consider very weird and gross.

Due to things they assume about them, and not due to anything that's actually inherent to diapers.

>>15867

>Saying diapers aren't a tame fetish, isn't the same as saying diapers are the worst fetish.

Funny, considering you were going on about how we're oh so hated by all the other kinksters.

>claiming that with his superior logic and knowledge that means everyone else is wrong and misunderstanding his perfectly normal and tame kink.

Let's see… are many people making uninformed assumptions about our fetish that lead them to believe it's worse than it really is? Such as that it's pedophilia and such? Why, yes. Does basic knowledge of our community and some simple thinking lead one to the conclusion that no, it's not pedophilia, and therefore not nearly as bad as many assume? Indeed, and so the answer is that yes, knowledge and logic shows that many are misunderstanding a kink that can definitely be quite tame.

Not all transgender people are this insane. I apologize.

>>15886

Well technically both are a mental illness, it is just diaper fetish can be dealt with pretty easily, being a tranny requires psychiatric help, but it is too normal for that.

>>15905

The more you go in to denial the funnier it gets our little special snowflake. Sorry snookums, it doesn't matter how much you stomp, scream, and demand that everyone bow to your enlightened perspective.

Trying to deny that the overwhelming majority of us do engage in watersports by wetting our diapers is laughable. Crying that nobody understands you, not even other ABDLs. The amount of autistic ego it takes. Beautiful. We're going to play for so very long. Tag, you're it!

>>15905

Why do you even want to be seen as tame and normal?

Diapers being taboo only makes it more fun.

>>15921

Because a diaper in itself really isn't anything to freak out over.

>>15909

>Strawman: The post

No wonder you scream and cry so much about others being "enlightened" when you're this bad at comprehending what people say.

>>15921

They're extremely insecure with themselves, and being in to something undeniably weird.

>>15925

> I am also different poster man, and I agree with that guy nobody agrees with.

>>15931

Being able to defend what you like rather than branding yourself with the accusations of others sounds pretty secure, actually.

>>15940

Feeling a need to justify your weird fetish and defend yourself instead of living your life regardless of what other think is pretty insecure imo

>>15943

>living your life regardless of what other think

That's exactly what we should do, yes. After all, what others think doesn't have to be the truth, as we can see when it comes to this.

>>15943

Oh it gets worse. This guy is a special brand of insecure retard.

On top of the sixth month shit fit over his ban from a fetlife group; where he tried to get us as a personal army on a misunderstood post. He ran off to the trans-agers on fetlife, the people like stefonknee who actually believe they're toddlers in adult bodies, to be his personal army on the thread.

He's autistic and compulsively can not help but respond. Getting more and more desperate with each post. This thread will never die and we'll only see it devolve into more and more hilarious ways as he keeps going.

>>15950

Oh hell, he'll probably start trying to bring the trannies crying over on reddit here.

>>15907

>both are a mental illness

is a fetish actually a "illness"? I really dont know but I wouldnt deny that a sexualization of certain objects or stances of power are outside the norm but isnt an illness usually detrimental in some sense or something that acts a individuals well being

>>15924

"Freak out over" takes some stylistic libertities, but it is highly off-putting for most people, even among those whose are kinky. You can throw it all on "they're all bigots who were taught by society to hate us" but that just doesn't explain why ABDL has that extra taboo factor for people, it probably has something to do with diapers being seen as the ultimate opposite of sexy, and all children being learned that they shouldn't wear them.

Point being, you can't say that diapers are "logically and objectively" tame, since those concepts don't apply here, they're just positive adjectives.

>>15955

It doesn't have to be that way.. there are many mentally ill people who say they have no problem at all with their disorder, so the ground for something to be ruled as disorder is not the judgement of the person with the disorder. When something is sexual, it can't be a mental illness under current ideology, so even though transsexuals have much more complications and objective grounds for it to be labeled a disorder than ADHD and bipolar disorder have (which don't even exist), it is not classified as that because it has been picked as an identity by SJW's.

>>15963

>"they're all bigots who were taught by society to hate us"

>all children being learned that they shouldn't wear them.

Exactly. It's not an instinctual revulsion like the one for things like scat (as feces is a major health hazard), vore (no animal wants to be eaten), or gore (obvious), but one that is learned.

Therefore, our situation isn't one that can't be helped, but one that will improve (and already is slowly but surely improving) as parenting methods during potty training grow less and less abusive, leading less people to develop that intense phobia for wearing diapers that leads them to lash out at anyone still wearing them in order to make themselves feel better and more mature (this behavior manifests very clearly among toddlers, for example).

>you can't say that diapers are "logically and objectively" tame, since those concepts don't apply here, they're just positive adjectives

They're pretty neutral adjectives, actually. As for why they're that way, it's simple. At its root, a diaper fetish is an underwear fetish, even if it lends itself to being combined with other fetishes, and underwear fetishes happen to be some of the most understandable and common fetishes. Therefore, the same obviously goes for diapers as well, as long as one can get over that learned revulsion and the assumptions that come with it. The AB part is no stranger, as it has very clear parallels to S&M, another quite accepted fetish. In short, it's not that liking diapers is extreme, as it clearly is related to non-extreme fetishes and has clear reasons to be sexually appealing, but rather that there's an extreme hatred for diapers (regardless of whether they're worn for pleasure or need), founded in arbitrary and irrational double standards.

tl/dr:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOqb_UzJSUQ

>>15966

> tumblrina in denial honestly thinks he's going to educate people in to accepting diapers

>>15966

It seems you don't understand where the root of a fetish lies, it doesn't lie in underwear. Something happened in early childhood, a delay, a hinder, something that psycho-analysts can endlessly speculate over. It isn't understandable or common, it's a different spectrum that isn't even fully on the kink map. We don't suffer "oppression" in the non-tumblr sense of the word, and while there are trolls who are spending hours on ABDL's because they are miserable lolcows themselves, that's not phobia either, and they're beyond education.

You're trying to build a logical case based on the semantics of the term "diaper fetish" , and classifying them as tame because diapers are underwear. This isn't up for logic, and even then it is faulty logic because it argues from definition and category. I'll give you an example: A cutting fetish is seen as extreme, but cutting itself is not extreme because there is nothing extreme with cutting vegetables, a cutting fetish is therefor not extreme.

>>15969

>It seems you don't understand where the root of a fetish lies, it doesn't lie in underwear.

>missing the point this hard

Underwear is commonly fetishized due to them being worn over the crotch, generally leading to either titillating people who want to see what's under it, or deriving pleasure from how it feels to have its fabric rubbing up against one's crotch (diaper fetishists generally belonging to the latter category). While fetishes have their root in childhood experiences (with some seeming to have a incredibly specific common origin, such as "blueberry" fetishists), underwear fetishes are among the most likely for one to get, due to their proximity to sexual organs and just about everyone wearing them. With this in mind, it's no wonder there are people who develop diaper fetishes, since most people wear them for some time of their lives.

>"oppression"

Who are you quoting?

>they're beyond education.

So in other words… the hatred is irrational. Good to see you agree.

>This isn't up for logic

Actually, yes it is.

> I'll give you an example: A cutting fetish is seen as extreme, but cutting itself is not extreme because there is nothing extreme with cutting vegetables, a cutting fetish is therefor not extreme.

Yes, that's faulty logic, because that has nothing to do with what we're talking about. Try harder.

>>15967

>linking a Neil Cicierega video

>in THE CURRENT YEAR

That guy's an asshole, dude.

>>15973

>>linking a Neil Cicierega video

>>in THE CURRENT YEAR

>That guy's an asshole, dude.

Who? His wikipedia page looks pretty bare and he doesn't even have an ED entry

>>15977

wait, wikipedia said he married a slant. probably a mistake on his part

Where did the autists go? This thread has been a great source of entertainment.

Well the good thing is that they voted and traps and trannie are banned now

>>15995

>Well the good thing is that they voted and traps and trannie are banned now

aw maaaan, come on. what's a little cock between friends?

>>15971

Oh you've been crying about oppression for months. No matter how much you try to rationalize it, you can't change the reality of how most people feel. The extremeness of a kink is decided by culture, and majority of society thinks diapers are beyond tame, and that they're really weird. Without any of the other stuff, diapers themselves are weird to people.

No matter how much you cry about being a misunderstood snowflake that nobody understands. They understand as much as they need to. You like diapers, and diapers are a really weird thing to like as an adult.

>>16002

>No matter how much you try to rationalize it, you can't change the reality of how most people feel

No matter how most people feel about it, they can't change the reality that diapers aren't anything "extreme".

>Without any of the other stuff, diapers themselves are weird

>"You're into thick, fluffy underwear?! That's so extreme!"

Yeah, because that totally happens.

>They understand as much as they need to

That's why people accuse ABs of being pedophiles even though they're the literal polar opposite of them, right? But go ahead, keep trying to avoid the facts by screaming buzzwords and calling everyone Fetlife users. Maybe you'll get a laugh or two from somebody.

>>16009

Yes of course. Everyone on the whole planet is just wrong and misunderstands. You couldn't possibly just be a fucking retard. Why can't everyone be enlightened and logical like our crusading tumblrina?

>>16009

>That's why people accuse ABs of being pedophiles even though they're the literal polar opposite of them, right? But go ahead, keep trying to avoid the facts by screaming buzzwords and calling everyone Fetlife users. Maybe you'll get a laugh or two from somebody.

There have been a fair few ab/dl pedos though. Remember Deeker?

>>15996

>what's a little cock between friends?

gay, that's what it is

>>16018

There were a couple guys on this board who admitted to being pedophiles as well.

It sucks but there's no denying that there are a few in the community.

Realistically, it's easier to understand why people would associate this with pedophilia.

After all, we may not like children sexually, but all of the trappings of childhood are sexually arousing for us.

>>15977

>Who? His wikipedia page looks pretty bare and he doesn't even have an ED entry

Sorry to repeat myself but please tell me, what makes this guy notable, in any way. I'm kinda interested now.

>>16013

>m-muh ad populum+hominem!

Good to see you have nothing to come with.

>>16026

>It sucks but there's no denying that there are a few in the community.

Just like in any other community, yes.

>we may not like children sexually, but all of the trappings of childhood are sexually arousing for us

Thing is, though, with the same kind of reasoning, being into petplay would be zoophilia, and fans of BDSM would be slavery supporters, not to mention that would only apply to ABs. Considering the existence of adult diapers, diaper fetishism has pretty much nothing to do with babies.

Compare it to leather, which while being something commonly worn and enjoyed within BDSM, isn't S&M or pain-related by itself, and has lots of people fetishizing wearing it simply for how it looks and feels,

>>16036

I'd be willing to bet there are some ignorant people out there who would associate petplay with zoophilia, BDSM with slavery, etc.

I like the comparison to leather though, as it's really common for vanilla people to find it sexy.

>>16036

There's nothing left to discuss. You're just on a loop of crying "nuh uh" and repeating how by being objectively logical about how the perception majority of people have while understanding exactly what we do. You're just desperate to rationalize that you're somehow above the stereotype, not realizing that what you think is tame looks just as creepy.

Deal with is special snowflake. But like, internally.

>>16037

Sure there are vanillas that assume petplay is related to zoophilia. BDSM community generally accepts them. And especially accepts them more then the ABDL community, who are generally still viewed as weird and kinda creepy.

It's how people feel. Doesn't mean we have to stop liking it though. Autists just can't handle that people can just not like something they love, convincing themselves everyone just misunderstands them.

>>16042

You're right, there really is nothing to discuss, because all you ever had to come with was strawmen and ad populum.

>>16044

>especially accepts them more then the ABDL community, who are generally still viewed as weird and kinda creepy.

Because of ignorant misconceptions.

>Doesn't mean we have to stop liking it though.

Nor does it mean that it's "extreme".

>convincing themselves everyone just misunderstands them.

If you haven't noticed that people misunderstand us, you're new as fuck.

>>16064

You keep telling yourself that, we'll all keep mocking your desperation and delusions. Everyone else is wrong and just doesn't understand your poor poor persecution. And your autism keeps you locked in forever. Tag, you're it.

>>16071

Nah, it's literally just you getting butthurt that people point out how there are many misconceptions regarding ABDL. Nobody else gets this triggered by simple observations and reasoning.

>>16079

> people

Only you there friend. You're just so naive and stupid you think other ABDLs are unaware of said misconceptions. Then you're so far up your own ass you think that the ONLY reason other people look down on ABDL is because they don't understand it.

You're not deep and complex. You're complete transparent. Tag, you're it.

>>16084

>you think other ABDLs are unaware

Nope, just you.

This thread is shit

>>16095

>I know you are but what am I?

Tag, you're it

Man, I just lurk this board but I fucking love it. I fucking love the candid, anonymous, chan atmosphere. No fucking hugbox bullshit, no fucking karma reputation, no fucking follower counts or whatever else. Just say what you mean. Fucking beautiful.

I'm pretty progressive socially but I voted against allowing transgenders/sissys to post. Everybody took it so personally, like this was some big shit about a societal definition of gender and all that shit but at the end of the day it was a matter of what a bunch of guys wanted to jack off to. Tolerant as I may be for gender, and I can and do respect trans women as women, my sexuality deems women as a culmination of sex and gender, the same way, mind you, that any trans person planning on surgery would hope to view themselves. Plain flat and simple, my sexuality and the sexuality of the majority of that board, is not attracted to men or male features. Like someone earlier in this thread said, if you don't look like a man, if you're truly "passable" then you should pass unnoticed. Those that don't "pass" are either delusional of their own body image or trying to cause trouble.

Sexuality is not something you can change through social justice.

>>15672

Autists literally look up their posting history to see if they've posted anything having to do with trannies, they're that insecure and paranoid that they'll feel gay if they find out someone they were attracted to is a tranny.

Having to make a separate account just to post in a sub-reddit without getting shitposting and whining is ridiculous and probably wouldn't even stop autists from obsessively tracking them down.

>>16165

If someone is trying to get by unnoticed, don't be so fucking stupid as to make yourself easy to catch. Someone thinks a girl is hot, they'll typically look for other pictures. Have a second account like any other sane person has, or accept that you don't get to post on a porn board in which you are not the subject of.

It's really plain and simple, it's obvious what the board is intended for.

>>16156

Nice blog queerfag

>>16168

Look out guys, have an edgelord over here. Better not mess with him, he's bad news.

I didn't really have a problem with trannies before this shitstorm. I was also well aware that occasionally some decently passable trannies made it through on that sub.

But after all this bullshit?

Fuck 'em.

If they think social justice is forcing guys to jerk off to them, then they're idiots and shouldn't be allowed to post anywhere.

Who the fuck thinks being a Sissy is the same as being trans? I just wanna be cute and/or hot in dresses once in a blue moon. I'm usually in charge as a daddy, but once in a while I like to get my freak on. But its sure as fuck "Freak", or are people argung this shit?

>>16018

Please theres no pedophile ab/dl's. Oh wait.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/collin-county/headlines/20110816-former-teachers-sex-abuse-trial-opens-with-bizarre-accusations-defense.ece

I just found this story too. i was googling for some other story about some 20-30 year old guy who lured a mexican teen across the bored, enrolled him in a elementry school and made him pretend to be 11 years old, while sending him to school in diapers and keeping the teen in diapers. The DA/police think he was trying to use the teen to lure school kids over to his house. In that case AB/DL was actually admitted.

but god, the article linked there is just… Wow.

>>16210

Just a update on this, the got a 52 and 10 year sentence. Not sure how they proved he did touch the kids wrongly, but the jury decided to convict and his appeal was overturned in 2013.

>>16209

I hope not. It does concern me the high amount of trans people into ABDL, but it really could be a combination of sissies who rationalize as trans and transfolk who want to experience babyhood as the opposite sex.

>>16210

Not fucking surprising. I have no fucking clue where TBDLs are hanging out now with forums falling out of fashion. But hell if I wasn't approached by pedos on a regular basis when I was one. The name Anthony Lucent is forever stuck in my head. It's probably tumblr, and now they all have decent quality cameras with men willing to promise them their darkest sexual fantasies. Fuck.

>>16210

Found another.

http://www.wtsp.com/story/news/2015/12/12/former-high-school-basketball-coach-arrested-pinellas/77206482/

> Lowe disciplined the boy. Detectives say the "discipline" included making the boy urinate in the diaper. Investigators then say Lowe would change his diaper "like a baby."

Then there was that kid in Ontario with a diaper fetish that met a pedo in a shopper's drugmart bathroom before smarting the fuck up when shit got real and getting the dude charged.

>>16218

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2014/07/traverse_city_man_with_diaper.html

> A Traverse City man with a diaper fetish was sentenced Tuesday, July 15, to 30 years in federal prison for sexually assaulting two girls… He allegedly talked about having sex with a daughter and sent a video of himself masturbating into a diaper.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-university-student-nappy-fetish-3364353

>A UNIVERSITY student whose bizarre sexual “fantasies” involved wearing nappies was caught distributing obscene photographs and films of child abuse… In interview, Alhassen admitted searching for images of boys of all ages. He claimed he had tried to stop and deleted images, but returned to his sordid activities. He insisted the conversation about abusing a very young boy was a “fantasy”.

http://www.seacoastonline.com/article/20131011/News/310110341

> A 25-year-old convicted of attempting to expose himself to in-home caregivers by faking a brain injury and asking them to change his diaper was sentenced to two-to-four years in state prison for violating the terms of his parole last week.

http://www.gadsdentimes.com/article/20110422/NEWS/110429913?tc=ar

>

The 6-foot 1-inch man was wearing one-piece footed pajamas — light blue with bright yellow ducks — when he answered the police officer's knock at his door just before dark… The man is a 41-year-old convicted sex offender, required to register his address with law enforcement officers.

>>16219

>>16218

>>16210

What are you trying to prove here? Even if a higher proportion of pedophiles are into ABDL than the general population, it does not mean that a higher proportion of ABDLs are pedophiles than the general population.

>>16218

>Investigators also found a cage where Garbarini said he slept in diapers because the cage door was controlled by someone on the Internet, she said.

Fuck. I can see this going badly if you piss off that person.

>>16238

> cage door was controlled by someone on the Internet

Where do you even get something like that?

>>16244

It would be easy enough to make if you had some basic programming skills, a cage, and an electronic lock.

>>16235

Someone's sensitive. Wasn't trying to "prove" anything. Decided to have a look at how many cases turned up and had a boatload.

> Even if a higher proportion of pedophiles are into ABDL than the general population, it does not mean that a higher proportion of ABDLs are pedophiles than the general population.

Did you even read what you typed? If a higher portion of ABDLs are pedos, that doesn't mean that a higher portion of ABDLs are pedos? Fuck you're dumb.

>>16238

Worst part is… kinda sounds like fun.

>>16219

Fuckin grade A work gumshoes. :D

>>16213

I was a regular for a bit in AOL online chatroom Diapers. the joke being AOL would say " you are in *room name*" there was at least one pedophile there who would consistently try to court me. I was anywhere from like 13 to 17 during that stint.

>>16235

I wasn't trying to prove anything other then there are a few pedophiles who happen to be into AB/DL. Just be thankfully as I am that these fucked up cases aren't used as ammo against AB/DL's as a whole.

>>16254

Pedo here. It's good to see that people are continuing to ignore the difference between having a sexual attraction to something and raping it. It certainly would be a damn shame if anyone started using "ABDL" synonymously with "evil rapist", wouldn't it?

>>16275

Go cry to NAMBLA faggot

>>16275

Seek treatment. If not a psychologist to fix your brain, a surgeon to solve the problem by physical means.

>>16298

Yeah if I was a pedo chemical castration is a thing i'd gladly do.

>>16275

PIDF pls GTHO.

>>16302

Or just use the rope.

>>16298

>>16302

How many times have you found a woman attractive and been unable to resist raping her?

8chan is full of kissless virgins, so if a lack of consensual sex was sufficient to make someone turn to rape, then everyone here should be castrated "just to be safe".

Pedophilia is really no different in that I can think a girl looks cute, and then choose not to rape her. It's an amazing ability, I know.

Chemical/surgical castration would make no more sense than pre-emptively chopping my hands off to make sure I don't lose control and commit armed robbery.

As far as "fixing" my brain goes, even leaving aside the obvious ethical issues, we lack the technological sophistication to do that. Attempts to "cure" pedophilia are generally no more successful than attempts to "cure" homosexuality. The current best mental health treatments involve finding non-harmful outlets (ie. loli art) and standard therapy to deal with depression.

I got a boner looking at some of the pics early itt, then scrolled slowly through the rest of it.

Thanks 4 the blue balls

>>16309

Yeah, /abdl/ really has an amazing amount of drama for a niche fetish board. If you're looking to fap, it's generally a good idea to stick to the non-drama threads.

>>16307

>wah wah plz except my degeneracy!

Fuck off pedo and die.

>>16339

>>16307 is PIDF at work anon, just ignore such faggots.

>>16341

It might interest you to know that I really don't want a future where it's legal to fuck kids. Pedophilia (the attraction) will become accepted in the future, but relationships will involve consensual sex (and diaper play) with adult humans or AIs who have the physical appearance of children. There are enough people on this board alone who would leap at the opportunity to be temporarily rejuvenated to a younger age and wear diapers.

In the immediate future, the only thing I'd like is for loli drawings to be legal in my country.

Oh, and for hypocrites to stop complaining about ABDLs being associated with pedophiles while simultaneously insinuating that all pedophiles want to fuck kids, but that really falls under freedom of expression.

Also, you people should really learn to use sage. This thread doesn't need to be on the front page.

>>16307

Im not into either sex and my only kink is AB/DL.

>>16349

I just barely know how to use 8ch and you're wanting me to "sage". At least post like some guide.

>>16354

either put the word 'sage' in the email feed or select 'do not bump' in post options

>>16355

field*

>>16360

Fuck off srhbutts/PIDF.

>>16360

The goal of sage isn't to kill a thread - if you want a thread to drop off the board it's best to not reply at all.

The goal is to continue the discussion without constantly bumping the thread to the top of the catalog. The discussion is barely even related to ABDL at this point.

>>16368

It's a slow board. If you don't like a thread, hide it. I'll just bump to piss you off for your board police autism.

>>16370

>board police autism

Get the fuck back to >>>>/younglove/ pedoshit

>>16370

>>16371

You people are fucking idiots.

Bump :^)

>>16372

that is why we post here