File: 1456498517991.png (848.72 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1456495728.babystar_pg128s.png)
No.17006
>ethcal questions about public play intensify.
No.17007
Link to old thread >>15008
No.17009
>>17006
The next page is inside the toy store, and Sammy is selling spots to have your character be either an adult or a cub. I wonder how many special snowflakes end up in the next page. And I'm gonna guess there'll be another big baby like Lure in it as well because you know babyfurs.
https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/7403565/
Also, Teca's doing that fucking face again.
No.17011
>>17009
What face am I supposed to be seeing? It's just a cheeky smile.
No.17015
>>17011
The Dreamworks face
No.17016
Why have we still not established where Star recognizes Teca from?
I hope it's because she was one of the chatroom freaks hitting on her really early in
No.17019
>>17016
>first time Star goes to meet Manda and Lure at their house
>Teca was leaving as Star walks up the drive
come on now, anon, keep up
No.17023
>>17009
> hating capitalism this much
Kill yourself you dirty commie
No.17024
>>17019
I thought she recognized her as Teca was leaving the house, like she'd seen her before then. (Perhaps she was at the bar near the start?…I'm going back to re-read that part to make sure.)
No.17025
>>17024
Nope, nowhere at all besides just that one page where she calls her "kitten" huh….
No.17027
>>17023
>accepting money under the agreement that this would fund the comic
>selling cameos in the comic
This is pretty much equivalent to ads in paid streaming services
No.17029
>>17027
>take cash from patreon patrons
>don't offer them cameo spots for having already given money
>don't even offer patreon discount
>don't even have cameo spots as charity auction so at least it' not pure profit to the already-paid artist
No.17031
>>17029
>expecting something for money you already chose to donate freely
No.17036
>>17027
> wah wah, I hate people making money
Exactly you hate capitalism. Go cry to Bernie filthy liberal faggot
No.17037
>>17036
Berniefag here. There is nothing wrong with an artist earning income from their works.
No.17038
>>17037
>Berniefag here
Get the fuck ou… actually, this is the right board for you, carry on.
No.17040
>>17036
I'd love to hear you try and describe what socialism actually is.
Various studies have shown that Americans hate the word "socialism", but actually support many policies which could be described as socialist.
No.17042
>>17040
sanders isn't even socialist, he's democratic socialist.
No.17043
>>17006
>adult babies in public and not pretending to be retarded
>no one bats an eye
Furry world is weird.
No.17044
>>17043
to be fair we can't actually see reactions, or people.
There might be some but teca is shielding manda from seeing them.
And lure just might not care.
No.17047
>>17040
Who cares about socialism. The anti-capitalist morons butthurt about someone got giving something away for free… they're obviously brain dead Bern outs.
Value is decided by someone else's willingness to pay for it. Doesn't matter why, or what. It'd be stupid NOT to maximize profit by selling off irrelevant cameos.
No.17048
>arguing about capitalism
Am I on /pol/ right now?
No.17049
this is a board for people who like to piss themselves for fun why the fuck are we talking about economics
also economics major here
No.17050
>>17048
>>17049
Yeah, /abdl/ has become the new /pol/
Deal with it, all *chans are cancer anyway.
No.17051
>>17048
I've noticed a lot of diaperfags like to talk about politics / economics like anything they say matters..it's pretty dumb.
I come here to fap and talk diapers keep that shit out of here and in your diapers.
No.17064
>>17047
>The anti-capitalist morons butthurt about someone got giving something away for free… they're obviously brain dead Bern outs.
This is probably the most retarded thing I've ever read.
No.17065
File: 1456673643770.png (978.69 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1456663201.babystar_pg129s.png)
More pages means more arguing
No.17067
>>17065
>scene
>pointless dialog
>end off page
wew, at least it's a double page week
No.17068
>>17065
Well, since furaffinity has a dropbox link to the full res, may as well post it.
And that comment section. I actually like it. Because it holds true for my personal opinions and experience.
Ageplayers tend to actually hate babies. Scared of them, annoyed by them, something like that. Small children are fine if they can think. But teenagers are horrid same as babies.
No.17075
Why are we getting no femdom comic?
No.17076
File: 1456687138461.png (518.03 KB, 805x1000, 161:200, 1448159540.babystar_luka1.png)
>>17075
Cottontail is gonna have aspects of femdom in it, seeing as it's about strong independent females turning guys into widdle sissies to fight the evil oppressive patriarchy and make a profit while doing it.
No.17081
>>17075
apparently it's because the pages we have so far are what was planned for this month.
>>17076
do they also play video games?
No.17082
>>17068
>Star's PTSD is triggered by groups and lots of noise
>She starts to shake and collapses in the toystore
>Manda and Teca carry her back to the car where she's wet
>Discover panties
>???
>Profit
No.17083
>>17082
I'm sure Star hasn't seen combat and I'm the artist is saving Star's panties for the time Star meets a daddy.
No.17084
>>17083
That long huh? You think she's going to find a daddy at the party or would that be after the party? Maybe she meets someone and then they stay in contact. I'm fine with her staying with Manda and Teca though.
She hasn't used the bathroom since last night! So eventually those panties are going to have to come off, even if she changes herself and it's never discovered by anyone else. Which would be a waste of a perfectly good plot point.
No.17085
>>17076
femdom is incredibly boring. Why deny half the population from one role and the other half from the other role?
No.17086
>>17085
>Why deny half the population from one role and the other half from the other role?
No.17087
>>17086
femdom specifically refers to a woman dominating and emasculating a man.
This means that it excludes non-female doms and non-male subs, even though there's no physical limitation in either role that demands a specific gender.
Honestly I'll play with anyone, but two types of people I find creepy are males that refuse to play with anyone who isn't female, and females that refuse to play with anyone who isn't male.
No.17090
>>17087
I see what you mean.
This reminds me of the guys who just shove their femdom fetish on any waifu thread and my issue is how they aren't actually kinky they just want to be dominated without substance.
No.17095
>>17084
I bet Manda wont care about a paid of wet panties. Teca might but they'll just break it down into " more diaper time for star then".
No.17097
Why is everyone getting all bent out of shape over public play, This whole comic is an extreme fantasy, unless the comic makes it a big deal why care just relax and fap.
No.17103
>>17085
Uh… I don't think you understand how fetished work.
>>17087
> I find creepy are males that refuse to play with anyone who isn't female, and females that refuse to play with anyone who isn't male
That's called being heterosexual.
No.17104
>>17103
I bet you're the kind of guy that zeroes-in on the one un-paired woman on the other side of the room when told to pick partners at kink workshops.
No.17105
>>17104
You have absolutely no backup for that statement. You sound like you're just trying to start an argument for the sake of arguing.
No.17106
>>17105
breh, do you really thing fetish play is less about the social dynamic and more about the physical anatomy?
Also,
>You sound like you're just trying to start an argument for the sake of arguing.
Where do you think we are?
No.17110
>>17068
>>17082
>>Star's PTSD is triggered by kids in a toy store
>>next strip shows her in Furganistan in full combat gear about to storm a building with high value targets inside.
>> she throws a grenade inside the window
>> explosion is shown from EVA point of view, windows are all blown out.
>>nobodycouldsurvivethat.jpg
>> Star walks inside the building and sees what is left of a children's home.
>> the disembodied head of a teddy bear stares accusingly at her.
>> turns out she was supposed to take out the building across the street.
>> The high value targets are now alerted to the raid
>> Targets come out gunning
>> Star's squad comes under heavy fire
>> Air support is avaliable, but FurSA is busy making sure this mission never existed and cant help.
>> Everyone under Star's command is killed in the following firefight
>> Star only survives by using the bodies of her fallen comrades as meat shields.
>> Star returns to FurSA and is given a desk job for the rest of her life.
No.17111
>>17110
This comic is set in Britain, you know that, right?
No.17112
>>17110
that would probably speed up Star and Teca/Mands's relationships. I mean if Star has a breakdown and explains something even remotely like that they're going to be super nurturing. Plus Sammy has already foreshadowed some pretty dark shit in Star's past
>>17111
you do know that burgerland isn't the only military to do shady shit right?
you do know this is a fiction where the main character is an arthro lynx, right?
No.17114
>>17110
>FurSA
You mean Furnited Kingdom?
No.17118
>>17104
No, I'm the kind of guy who sucks dick and takes it up the ass. But this
> I find creepy are males that refuse to play with anyone who isn't female, and females that refuse to play with anyone who isn't male
is being creeped out by straight people. That's fucking stupid.
>>17106
Do you really think that because you like both sexes, that everyone does?
No.17132
>>17118
I'm alluding to people who aren't able to separate sex From roleplay and other activities. It would be like a straight person refusing to share a double-bed with a member of the same sex.
To give an example, one time I was at a playdate with another little and her daddy and he refused to change me, instead having her do it, then acted like a jealous ass towards both of us for weeks afterwards over it.
No.17133
>>17006
>toyshop having closing down sale over business turndown from abdls making parents uncomfortable with bringing their children to the store.
No.17143
>>17111
>Subject
I do now
>>17112
Yeah, just didnt know this was UK. I saw military and assumed USA.
>>17114
much better
No.17144
>>17132
Sure he was going to be jealous, changing a diaper is a very intimous activity.
No.17148
>>17132
So yeah, you're literally a tumblrina pissed off about straight people. So a straight guy didn't want to see you naked or touch your dick, and was upset HIS girlfriend did on top of it.
Sounds like you were a little shit.
No.17151
>>17148
He was the one that invited me to play with his little.
He was the one that told her to change me after he decided he was unwilling(ie. he forced her out of little headspace to act as a carer because he didn't want to follow through with something he previously said he was okay with and then decided afterwards that he wasn't even okay with that.)
No.17153
>>17148
I don't even get this anymore.
No.17176
This thread is why I stay out of the abdl community. Drama over nothing.
No.17178
>>17132
You obviously saw he was uncomfortable with it.
why did you then expect to still be changed by someone, and when she was told to not offer to do it yourself? 90% of the time people gonna get jelly, instead you create a situation that is now uncomfortable for everyone. Roleplay or not there are times you just gotta be the better person.
the way I see it, youre just upset because you being selfish made someone mad at you.
No.17179
>>17178
Okay, just to be perfectly clear with the chain of events
>He came over and asked if we needed to be changed
>He changed her
>He then told her to change me, we both complied with his order.
>The playdate then continued on as normal for about an hour
>He then decided it was time to pack up and seemed to be acting normal
>After I left I started getting harassing messages from him
To add to all of this he was the one who organised the whole thing and was fully aware he would be the only 'big' and agreed that changing was fine so long as no messes were involved(which I'm honestly not into anyway, so that was moot)
No.17180
No.17182
No.17183
>>17182
no, she said because of being sick, then suddenly busy at work, then away for a trip she's missing the deadline. She's also going to nordic fuzzcon this Friday, so don't expect March's pages to start until next week.
No.17242
>>17179
>>17132
Ill give it to u that he was flip flopping but personally I cant really dig wanting to tie up a dude whos gonna get sexually aroused by it, it weirds me out
no reason to hate on someone for having specific boundaries
No.17348
>>17087
>I find exclusive heterosexuals creepy
" Creepy" is a great word. It instantly lets me know that the person using it is probably a bigot from tumblr.
No.17351
>>17242
I would agree with you if it wasn't for the fact that the couple were looking exclusively for a male play partner(according to the couple)
>>17348
nope, tumblr is a gender-obsessed cesspit.
We're talking about roles where gender is entirely moot.
No.17355
>>17348
Cool, by that logic we can't find homosexuals or transfags creepy.
Seems YOU are the tumblrautist.
No.17411
>>17351
No. It's not moot. And it's not creepy to have gender preferences for play partners whether the play is explicitly sexual or not.
What's actually creepy is implying it's wrong for people to have boundaries and preferences that may not include you.
No.17412
>>17183
She sure is sick often, probably a result of being so out of shape.
No.17413
>>17064
>>The anti-capitalist morons butthurt about someone got giving something away for free… they're obviously brain dead Bern outs.
quoting migf in a diaper thread???
No.17414
>>17412
She's also very needy and clingy at times.
Also, >come june i think ill be taking some kind of step back or sabbatical
Then you better stop taking money from Patreon for that month widdle Sammy, because you're not fooling me.
No.17418
>>17412
If she is actually sick that's most likely the cause
>>17414
>"im just petrified of not living up to expectations"
>all that other shit about how hard her life is because she's popular
>"come june i think ill be taking a sabbatical"
>sabbatical
Holy shit, either treat this like the job that you've made it out to be, or don't and treat it like a silly hobby. This bitch has plenty of people paying her for deadlines that she sets herself, expectations that SHE sets. She wants to be a serious artist who gets paid? Then be that. But you can't be getting paid and act like a baby about having these responsibilities. It's stupid and selfish.
No.17420
>>17111
…You do know Brits have deployed too right?
No.17427
>>17418
Just curious, how many anons here are actually voluntarily donating money to her via patreon? Because you lot make it sound pretty personal.
No.17441
>>17427
For about six months last year, I gave her $10 each month. In return, I got sporadic high-res comic pages, a few alternate text versions, and a slot in a Patreon group YCH. I used to get WiPs, but after someone posted a WiP to halfchan and she found out, she shut that down.
I wanna say the first few months were good, she posted a good number of times and she always posted high-res comic pages when she posted a page to FA. But after she went to Rainfurrest and NYC in August, she started to slide into "barely posting anything territory". November and December was scarce, she only uploaded a few things at the end of the month. So I decided to cancel my pledge and support artists that won't just take my money and fuck off to their hugbox journals.
To this day, I regret that I supported her, let alone commissioned her for a piece as well. She's so fucking whiny and spoiled, but she tries to act like she isn't and puts on an innocent facade. And Gemma, if you and your fucking spies in this thread find out who I am and spread shit about me, I'll report you to the NHS for fraud.
No.17448
>>17445
What's so badass about reporting some faggot for NHS fraud?
No.17449
>>17427
It's personal in the sense that i get really rustled when i see spoiled brats complain about their lives, especially when their "problems" are self induced.
>>17441
we're responding to a spy
>>17445
FA spy confirmed
No.17450
File: 1457658906329.png (317.69 KB, 678x900, 113:150, 1457649205.babystar_cantto….png)
he knows we talking shit about him!
No.17453
>>17450
*she
>this and 3 pages of Found
BRAVO STAR
No.17454
No.17455
>>17454
mmm, Lynx tears
fuck off, Star
No.17467
>>17453
>3 pages of found
what? I only see that pic in the gallery.
No.17470
>>17454
y'all are whinier than folks on tumblr, it's hilarious
No.17471
>>17467
Found is her other comic on her babyfur account
No.17477
Daily reminder that >>17050 exists.
No.17482
File: 1457720388358.png (866.71 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1457719434.babystar_pg130s.png)
Firewood for the flamewars
No.17483
>>17482
>missing the point entirely
The issue isn't that people will think you're a paedophile, the issue is that you're doing sexual roleplay next to and around children.
No.17484
>>17483
You're missing the point. It's about what she thinks. And it's probably true that many first fear that other people assume you're a pedophile.
No.17485
No.17486
>>17482
i don't really care about any of this other whiny shit, but why in the fuck is pedo shit even being mentioned in this comic? all possibility of this being erotic anymore has been destroyed
No.17488
>>17482
This shit pisses me off. Not because of any of this argument over fetishes in public, but because of the way Manda is so gloriously missing the fucking point with her speechifying here.
>You should feel confident in yourself, who you are and what you like… and if you don't, I'm gonna spank the shit out of you!
Pic fucking related.
No.17489
IF YOU ARE ALWAYS TRYING TO BE NORMAL, YOU WILL NEVER KNOW HOW AMAZING YOU CAN BE.
No.17490
God fucking damn it >>17482, someone get >>>/cow/ or >>>/cringe/ on the line for this. this is not a furfag comic anymore, it's borderline pedoshit.
No.17493
File: 1457729601334.png (1.19 MB, 1109x1144, 1109:1144, 1413652932.wen_fababygirls.png)
>>17482
>Years and years ago some haters accused me of being a pedophile due to people just wrongly associating ageplay with pedophilia but truthfully it hasnt happened to me within the last 7-8 years. I think generally the masses are becoming more aware of different fetishes and suchlike and most understand the difference between being sexually attracted to children and wanting to BE a child. The two are very very very different things. But there are some pretty ignorant and dumb folk out there, when you hear of stories of lynch mobs beating up pediatricians and things like that you cant help but despair a little.
Sure Gem, you're perfectly normal. But don't worry about the scary world full of trolls and meanies out there, your daddy and your hugbox will accept you and give you plenty of nuzzles and love.
No.17496
>>17494
>>17493
Almost wanted to say samefag but >>17493 is making fun of Gem's faggotry.
Also, get the fuck out Star, we know you're mad because we called YOU out on your faggotry in public.
No.17498
>>17482
WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO THIS COMIC ABOUT BIPEDAL ANIMALS SHITTING IN PLASTIC UNDERWEAR.
fuck star, this kind of think is retarded, going into a kids toy store dressed as a child is weird and fucking creepy. Its fine if you have a exhibitionist fetish but you shouldn't really think it's okay to garner sexual arousal from acting like a kid around kids. Just do it at abdl conventions you sick fuck
No.17500
I'm now noticing how everyone thought >16705 that he was nuts, but now everyone is like "holy shit is she a pedo or some shit"
I don't even get *chans anymore.
No.17501
>>17500
checkem+I fucked up the post, I obviously ment >>16705
No.17504
>>17485
>article published in 2011
>41-year old sex offender
>convicted in 1987
>2011-1987 = 24
>41-24 = 17
Not defending what he did, but I still kind of feel bad that his life is still fucked over something he did when he was a child.
No.17508
I've really started enjoying this comic more viewing manda as kinda a sociopath who is forcing star to do some things that are highly immoral. Better than reading it the other way were they are all too retarded to understand public exhibitionism in front of kids is wrong.
No.17509
No.17510
>>17493
>this picture
why are animals going to see other animals at a zoo?
No.17513
>>17508
>Force into further compromising public situations
>Friends and family begin to distance themselves
>Eventually loses job due to on base exhibitionism
>Total breakdown, life in shambles
>Manda to the rescue
>Becomes totally reliant on Manda
what a twist
No.17514
File: 1457752978270.png (706.02 KB, 1000x961, 1000:961, 1426732555.babystar_bdgirl.png)
>>17510
I know right, everyone is screaming and that is the ONE THING THAT IS BUGGING ME!
eh, something from star's furaffinity pretty okey.
No.17516
>>17482
I'm laughing so hard because this bitch drew this just to convince herself she isn't some sick pervert.
Meanwhile, all anyone wants is the smut, which it seems we will never get.
No.17517
>>17500
Because there was plausible deniability and it could have just been a story element or coincidental. However, these characters are heavily based on them. They are the mouthpiece of the creator. And to go off on a wall of text rant about why it's fine to live your fetish around kids is absolutely ridiculous.
I'm a trap, but I would never be a trap where kids would be, mostly because I do it for the fetish aspect. Meanwhile, people like her shit themselves in public and want to go to toy stores because it's part of a fetish.
What she does is pretend to be retarded to get off in public. And around kids no less.
No.17519
>>17517
I thought that the 'Toy Shop' would be exclusively ABDL focused considering that a couple of the more successful online manufacturers have brick and mortar stores.
Instead, actual fucking children. Nice.
No.17520
>>17519
>I thought that the 'Toy Shop' would be exclusively ABDL focused considering that a couple of the more successful online manufacturers have brick and mortar stores.
I'm pretty sure everyone thought this. Shit, I was expecting to laugh at all the people who expected pedo stuff. Nope, I was wrong.
No.17528
>>17513
So basically what happened to her in real life, except with one 'family' doing the first part and paul doing the second?
No.17531
>>17513
that's how she got Lure
Manda is slowly forming a harem
No.17534
File: 1457789820866.png (Spoiler Image, 168.79 KB, 500x626, 250:313, 42028326_p0.png)
>>17498
Chill out, they're only drawings.
No.17537
>>>17482 >>17516 >>17517
Hope people don't start actively encouraging this type of "nothing wrong" attitude that she is shoving down readers throats. If anything it's clear that she is using the comic for her own preaching more than ever now. Wonder what else she will try and explain away next?
No.17538
There is nothing inethical about wearing baby clothes/diapers in public, or acting like a baby in public, whether you get off on it or not. Observation is not participation. Directly involving others in your play is wrong; i. e., pissing your diaper and going around asking randos to change you is fucked up and wrong. But just wearing clothes (however fucking weird they are) is not inethical.
Seriously, the argument you people are making is the same old people make about tattoos, piercings, and public displays of affection.
"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!?"
Stfu, that is fucking stupid. "Daddy, Mommy, why is that grown-up dressed like a baby?"
"Because when you're a grown-up you get to decide how you live your life and who you want to be, honey."
THAT IS SO HARD TO EXPLAIN GODDAM, WE'D NEVER WANT OUR CHILDREN TO BE CONFIDENT IN THEIR SELF IDENTITIES IN THE FACE OF MASS PROPAGANDA AND TRIBAL SOCIETAL INFLUENCES TRYING TO DESTROY THEIR SELF-ESTEEM. FUCK.
The amount of shame so many of you people here to seem to carry around about your fetish is really a bummer. I hope one day y'all have the strength to overcome your societal brainwashing and realize that there is no such thing as normal, that there is a difference between ethics and morality, and that you are beautiful and wonderful and there is nothing about your fetish or sexuality you have to be ashamed of (in ways that are not fun).
No.17539
^same anon as above
Seriously these arguments are going to look so fucking stupid in fifty-hundred years when people are uploading their consciousnesses into clouds of nanobots and literal cows and shit. What are you people going to do then, just let your brains meltdown from incompatible worldview?
No.17542
>>17538
Well it's like everyone here completely forgot about last thread where we decided them wearing whatever they wanted and going about their day as normal was fine (it's also a fucking comic and not some brainwashing propaganda stop giving people so much control over your pathetic lives.)
90% of people don't give a fuck what you're wearing as long as you don't act all retarded with it and as >>17538
said drag them into it by asking for changes and dumb shit like that.
>>17519
Also, everyone with half a brain KNEW they were going to the gahtdayumed toystore for kids, she showed it in the first pages of the comic, stop trying to say otherwise to put yourself on some form of higher moral ground. I remember last time we had this type of discussion there was that fucking austic namefag that we all laughed out of the thread because he was so triggered by children being in a comic and people wearing stuff that makes them comfy in public. Do and act however the fuck you want, enjoy the comic for what the smut it is (or trying to be)
instead of trying to read deeper into shit.
No.17546
>>17542
That is my favorite ABDL pic ever goddam. Also I like your observations let's make out.
No.17547
>>17542
>Well it's like everyone here completely forgot about last thread where we decided them wearing whatever they wanted and going about their day as normal was fine
That is fine. but that's not what's happening here. They're doing their roleplay around children, that's not 'going about their day as normal'.
No.17548
>>17547
It is them going about their day as normal wearing what makes them comfortable. They aren't openly role playing, they aren't crawling around pissing or shitting themselves or talking in baby talk, they aren't even using paci's in the store or anything of that nature. They're just 4 people who decided they wanted to go to a store to buy some toys before they went where it would be acceptable to piss and shit themselves and act as little babies.
>>17546
It is a pretty good one, I got loads more too. So long as diapers are being worn I'd be down for some action…depending on gender we'd see how far that action went.
No.17549
>>17548
(Anon in above post)
Sorry, they aren't people, they're animals…my fault. Animals in a fictional comic made by an artist who likes to draw animals in diapers.
No.17551
>>17542
Cool, this pedofag is trying to convince us it's okay to go out in public dressed in AB clothing and shit.
Get fucking >>>/gaschamber/ already, you really don't seem to know how this world works.
No.17553
>>17551
Works just fine for me thanks! I openly wear abdl clothes in public semi-regularly and wear diapers 24/7. I also have a perfectly functional social life outside of abdl shit, have a career, and have a life partner. I am thirty and all of those things have been true for ten years. Most people in my life know about this side of me and give zero shits because most people are not in fact massive douchebags, contrary to popular belief. Also because when you are t filled with toxic shame other people don't try and help you feel that way.
No.17554
>>17553
>I openly wear abdl clothes in public semi-regularly
b8
No.17556
>>17538
Seems more like a common courtesy issue more than anything, even if there isn't direct participation, everyone else in that store is indirectly participating in the roleplay whether they or their children are even aware or not. Most people, especially some of us taking issue with the comments the author/artist is making in terms of excusing involuntary and indirect participation in someones fetish.
> WE'D NEVER WANT OUR CHILDREN TO BE CONFIDENT IN THEIR SELF IDENTITIES IN THE FACE OF MASS PROPAGANDA AND TRIBAL SOCIETAL INFLUENCES TRYING TO DESTROY THEIR SELF-ESTEEM. FUCK.
It's not too hard to see the point you are trying to make, but you are painting anyone with even a slightly opposing opinion as some kind of "Tribal" or "Savage". It would be understandable however if a parent didn't want to have to explain the situation to their child at that moment (maybe too young or not mature enough to grasp the concepts presented). Though I would say it would be a bit overkill to call the roleplayers pedophiles and alert the authorities (which would be a bit of a dated reaction that kind of situation).
It all boils down to the core concepts of respecting those around you, being courteous enough to observe that not everyone has the same opinions and feelings as you do about this type of situation. Nobody is trying to hurt anyone with their opinions on the matter, and you should take care to not hurt others based on your own.
No.17558
>>17551
Isn't being called a pedo one of the biggest misconceptions about this fetish in the first place? Why do you use it in such a hurtful manner against your own kind anon?
I know exactly how this world works friend, most people don't give a damn what you wear as it'll probably be the only time they see you. As long as you don't do something terrible or go out of your way to act retarded nobody will care. (Heck I bet you could act retarded and they still wouldn't remember you / care)
>>17556
Ah an anon with somewhat of a cool head and some sense of rationality appears.
You make good points, I just don't see how you're putting others in a situation just by choosing to wear something that goes against what is popular to wear at the time / in this reality.
I also really doubt that any child would be concerned with what you were wearing or even distinguish that it is some form of clothing worn by babies in the short time you'd pass by them. So no parent would have to explain anything to their child.
No.17559
>>17558
There is definitely no situation created by just choosing to wear something that is against what most people wear, even if it is something like a fully authentic AB outfit, honestly as long as intimate parts are covered there is no real issue for the most part. (Worked at a Walmart some time ago, so I may be a bit desensitized to the whole 'weird' clothes thing). Even to go as far as to say that having another person playing the accompanying role of an adult wouldn't really pose much of an issue as long as it remains pretty PG. You wont be able to avoid the curious eye, but it goes without saying that people will still notice, but not necessarily do anything. I guess it's just more about courtesy in terms of dressing appropriately, and keeping public conversations somewhat decent.
>That's ENOUGH! No more talk like that or I WILL put you over my knee right here and now.
Is the point where I feel it could be a tad bit more likely to cause a situation, as discipline and spanking seem to be somewhat common things that turn AB's on, that combined with the fact that it is out in the open adds a whole other layer with humiliation. At that point you are definitely putting people into a situation that involves an AB getting bent over and paddled, and that would most certainly gain the attention of just about everyone, (especially if there happens to be any of those knee jerk anti-spanking folks around).
>I also really doubt that any child would be concerned with what you were wearing-
As for the children not noticing or being concerned, can't say an AB wouldn't go unnoticed by a child, since odds are at least one child will notice the AB. I guess the size, age, clothing, and voice could all play a part in how noticeable an AB is by children. Currently nobody will really know for sure just how many will notice and how many wont, so it would be fair to say there is a 50% chance of getting noticed. How they react though, is almost immeasurable, though it could be easily assumed most reactions would include asking their parents about the AB to some degree or even just drawing the parents attention. One reaction that could cause more stigma, or even problems for AB's is if the child confronts the AB to pose their questions or simply talk to the giant kid, which would look like to someone who is either overprotective or unaware could look incredibly suspicious at a glance.
Basically, it's hard to judge the reactions of children and parents to an AB and Caretaker in a children's toy store as reactions can span a broad spectrum. You can honestly assume nothing bad can come of it, or take extreme caution and avoid any behavior that could be misunderstood. Just respect peoples boundaries and always have common courtesy in mind with your decisions and behavior.
No.17560
>>17559
>That's ENOUGH! No more talk like that or I WILL put you over my knee right here and now.
This is a empty threat from that character to another and has a high probability of not even occuring.
I could see that happening in a RL scenario causing a problem, but that is no longer going about your day as normal and has reached into BDSM / Role play.
>How they react though, is almost immeasurable, though it could be easily assumed most reactions would include asking their parents about the AB to some degree…
I still don't see any child asking about the AB in the first place, they'd all be too interested in their own little world of toy shopping or being dragged by their parents somewhere. They wouldn't even give the big kid a second thought unless an action by the AB was out of the ordinary and drew their attention.
Everything so far has been hypothetical anyway you're right there's no real way to gauge the reactions of the others in the store and you have to just assume either the worst or best or some variation in between. That shouldn't stop one from going out and doing what makes them happy however. Nobody is being hurt by the situation and if you act like you're doing nothing wrong (because if you have a bit of sense on how to act in public then you're not) then others should treat you as such and allow you to be.
No.17562
No.17566
>>17538
>>17539
>>17542
>>17548
>>17553
>>17558
>>17560
Fuck off with your moral apathy, tumblr. Something that you only believe when it's convenient for you. You wouldn't defend someone wearing a shirt that said "FUCK NIGGERS", would you? No, you wouldn't. Nobody would, because other people have to see you and deal with you and your behavior. We live in a society where we live together. The world is not your personal playland where other people are just an inconvenience.
I think we also need to have a conversation regarding some of you people treating AB/DL as a lifestyle. This is a fetish, it's something you jack off to. It isn't something that you need to incorporate into your everyday life. BabyStar doesn't even do this. She has a job and responsibilities. She might wear 24/7 like some other people, that is not a hindrance on her regular life, though it's a bit extreme. Your actions do not exist in a vacuum. The things you do in life have consequences on you and the people around you. Being regressed like Lure is 24/7 is not healthy, that shit is reserved exclusively for crazy people and literal pedophiles who becomes their mommy/daddy. That's the reality of this. But we're reading a comic. So let's stop pretending that what is happening in the comic is somehow okay in real life.
The whole point here is that Sammy is expressing a very unrealistic view of the world through this comic, and applying a very unrealistic set of morals coming from a fictional universe to the real world.
>>17562
it probably is, wouldn't surprise me if he found us since everyone else can apparently
No.17572
>>17566
Give this guy a award, finally someone with a fucking moral code unlike the other faggots ITT that think it's okay to do shit that happens in this comic in real life/public.
No.17573
>>17566
Give me a break. A shirt that says "Fuck Niggers" isn't comparable at all. That is a statement that causes actual measurable harm. Wearing weird clothes isn't that. Wearing baby clothes never got anyone lynched. Fuck off with your false dichotomies and learn to morality, would-be moralfag.
The rest of your post is more reasonable and while I don't agree with it, I appreciate how well stated it is and think it is at least as reasonable as my own position.
No.17574
>>17566
Give me a break. A shirt that says "Fuck Niggers" isn't comparable at all. That is a statement that causes actual measurable harm. Wearing weird clothes isn't that. Wearing baby clothes never got anyone lynched. Fuck off with your false dichotomies and learn to morality, would-be moralfag.
The rest of your post is more reasonable and while I don't agree with it, I appreciate how well stated it is and think it is at least as reasonable as my own position.
No.17575
>>17574
>>17573
Sry for doublepost, 8chan is shit.
No.17577
>>17573
How isn't it comparable? It's just a shirt.
In the same sense that wearing that shirt causes lynchings, wearing babyish clothing and diapers causes pedophilia. It's sexualizing children. This is a sexual fetish, there's no getting away from that fact.
No.17583
>>17577
Ugh, moralfags are horrible and shit up everything whether they're SJWs or /pol/ convenient moral outrage.
No one cares. So let's say some autistic fucks ARE inspired by this comic. Just like in your bullshit wild fantasy. And? They'll be socially ostracized yadda yadda probably end up rotting alone like that popular mechanics heir manbaby. Why does that matter?
No.17585
>>17583
We're talking about the comic which has for the past several pages been expressing a particular moral outlook and message. Don't act like this is some irrelevant shitposting.
and stop using terms like "moralfag". We get it, you're a cool imageboard user. I'm sure all of your Facebook friends are very impressed with these edgy terms from from 2011.
No.17586
>>17573
>That is a statement that causes actual measurable harm.
Explain how one would measure it.
No.17590
No.17599
>>17577
>wearing babyish clothing and diapers causes pedophilia
No. Just No. That's not how things work at all.
No.17602
>>17585
This isn't a philosophical study. It's about cartoon animals who piss themselves in diapers. And retards are crying that it's going to inspire inbred autistic faggots to show up at a toy store in diapers… so? If they're that fucked in the head already, you bitching on 8chan isn't going to stop it. So why are you on such a asinine crusade?
> We get it, you're a cool imageboard user. I'm sure all of your Facebook friends are very impressed with these edgy terms from from 2011.
Somebody's projecting hard.
No.17607
>>17602
>you bitching on 8chan isn't going to stop it
Take your own advice.
No.17608
>>17602
The author is touting this as real life moral advice not just on furaffinity, but fetlife and probably twitter as well.
No.17610
>>17608
You're up your own autistic ass with delusion, but you still didn't answer the question. And? So what? Are you so far up your own ass you think your crusading is going to save people? Fuck off with your moralfag bullshit.
No.17627
I've been conversing with Star, and I think her recent bitchfit is our fault. Apparently she's very upset that people are questioning her morals and previous actions. This is the only place where that kind of stuff goes over. So she must have read through this thread and the last one. Which isn't surprising, she's been here before and I imagine it's hard to resist looking when you know people are talking shit about you.
I'd share screenshots but i don't want her to block me on FA
i want her daddy to get on camera and tell us that the consequences never be the same
>>17610
>you think your crusading is going to save people?
Buddy, you're the only one making that suggesting.
No.17628
>>17627
Aww shit
I understand she's angry but surprisingly she's also missing the point.
I'm so sad for her now.
No.17630
Guys this isn't fun anymore, when I posted this comic on diaperchan for the first time I didn't want the threads to end like this.
I don't want Star to feel bad or be harm.
We all should stay away from each other
No.17631
>>17627
>I've been conversing with Star, and I think her recent bitchfit is our fault.
>our fault
Seriously if she can't handle popular opinion from other diaper wearing autists that wanting to live out your fetish around children is pretty gross, then she can make like Tim Buckley after Loss and become obscure and irrelevant again.
>>17628
>>17630
Gee this doesn't look staged at all. Star please go.
No.17636
Can we have one fucking thread without some stupid ass drama flaring up for no god-damned reason? Holy fucking SHIT. What is so hard about just posting porn without arguing?
The bottom end of every single thread on this board is just filled with drama and fights! Even furry isn't this full of bullshit, what is it about abdl that makes us so full of mad? Jesus.
No.17639
>>17636
it's been like 2 months since this comic been even slightly pornographic
No.17640
>>17636
>Can we have one fucking thread without some stupid ass drama flaring up for no god-damned reason?
Sir, do you know where you are?
No.17643
>>17636
>What is so hard about just posting porn without arguing?
Where's the porn? We've been on ABDL Namek for months and now we're getting preaching about how getting horny shitting yourself around kids who don't understand what the fuck is going on is not indicative of a fucked up individual.
She probably condones shit like pic related, who leave their wife and kids and to live their fetish around other kids.
No.17659
>>17636
The problem is 3DPD. /abdl/ is one of the few boards on 8chan which focuses on 3D porn and 3D fetishes. It's full of the same sort of people who post on tumblr and fetlife, and they're all fucking cancer. They have no concept of the difference between fantasy and reality.
By far the best content and least bullshit can be found in diaper-related threads on other boards. Only come to /abdl/ if you want to laugh at the judgemental normies arguing over every little thing.
No.17664
>>17659
>They have no concept of the difference between fantasy and reality.
You do realize the woman who draws this comic has her husband push herself around in public in a diaper in a massive stroller, right? The reality isn't far from fantasy for her.
No.17673
>>17630
>>17627
>Recognizable member of ABDL community
>Makes $1,404.01 a month making 3-4 pages per month
>"Guys this isn't fun anymore, when I posted this comic on diaperchan for the first time I didn't want the threads to end like this."
Please stop blaming and lashing out at the community for discussing the content of Star's comic with some level of scrutiny and voicing their own opinions. Stop assuming that content will always be received in a positive light, nobody is immune to criticism, no matter how fragile they try to portray themselves. More importantly, nobody is protected from having their morals and actions called into question, it happens to just about everyone and doesn't warrant the meltdown.
No.17677
>>17659
what other boards have diaper content?
No.17687
>>17664
I really don't care about what people do in the 3D world. This is a thread about a comic. The fact that you keep dragging 3DPD bullshit into it makes you the cancer.
>>17677
There's definitely a thread on >>>/loli/, I think there's usually one on >>>/furry/, and there have been occasional threads on >>>/co/. Sometimes it gets discussed on /a/, but it isn't very popular there so the threads tend to die quickly.
No.17696
>>17687
>The fact that you keep dragging 3DPD bullshit into it makes you the cancer.
>keep
I actually was laughing at the bullshit until the recent comic's lecture on it being okay to do such a thing. That recent page changed my mind. It's completely unwarranted.
No.17698
>>17687
>I really don't care about what people do in the 3D world
then fuck off, your opinion is not necessary
>The fact that you keep dragging 3DPD bullshit into it makes you
What comic are you reading? We're picking up what Star is putting down. This has a very clear message. I guess you're just too autistic to recognize this. Which would make sense since you /a/ and /co/.
There's no other thing to discuss here other than the social commentary. If you don't want to be apart of this discussion, don't. This isn't Facebook, Reddit, FA, or Deviant Art, you're not getting social points for signalling how much you don't care about something, or how tolerant and accepting you are
No.17701
>>17698
The message is its hot to have your boundaries pushed and be in an embarassing situation, like dressed like a baby in a toy store.
> but that's not MY fetish! Why isn't she drawing what turns MEEEE OOOOON
Is what half of you sound like.
No.17702
>>17701
You're projecting your own humiliation fetish onto this. The whole point of the last panel was Star NOT feeling humiliated. Mandy isn't trying to humiliate Star.
Nice try tho
No.17708
>>17701
>The message is its hot to have your boundaries pushed
There is a difference between pushing soft limits and hard limits. Mandy is forcing star to be pushed through a hard limit.
That boundary is that of person to person morality involving this fetish around children, and star even made it clear that it was a hard limit that she had.
> but that's not MY fetish! Why isn't she drawing what turns MEEEE OOOOON
Nice way of missing the point, it's not that we aren't turned on by the comic (up until the most recent pages), but that it crossed a hard limit (either or morally or ethically) for quite a lot of readers. Adding the pretense that the author has stated her moral standings prior, only adds to the fact that the community is upset as criticism is subjugated to personal attacks on the author, allowing her to further lash out at the community for "hurting" her. Essentially allowing her to escape addressing criticism in a mature and professional manner.
No.17710
>>17708
>it's not that we aren't turned on by the comic (up until the most recent pages), but that it crossed a hard limit
Really? I'm annoyed that the comic has come to a grinding halt from being an erotic fiction to preach about the writer's morality regarding exhibition and bringing up pedo shit. Personally i'm fine with the characters doing what they're doing though maybe not around kids, that's kinda boner killing but I just don't want to hear about this obvious plea for social validation from Sammy.
No.17712
>>>17708
>>17710
Absolutely, I guess I should have included that I meant the endless amounts of exposition pages in the "Recent pages" portion. It's a shame that Sammy can't up their output a little so we can get some more of the erotic bits, just as long as it isn't around kids. She may even get more patreon supporters if she shows her commitment to putting out this comic.
No.17733
So, does anyone know who this fox dude is? Sammy's new daddy? Uncle? Fuckbuddy?
If he's the artist of the other pic, then he's worse than Sammy in the art department. His faces are nightmarish, his body work is subpar, and his dialogue is cringeworthy. And he fucked up the changing table.
No.17734
File: 1458170512888.png (505.07 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1458167521.babystar_kitten….png)
>>17733
And it fucked up uploading the other pic, here's Gem's part of the trade.
No.17735
>>17733
How did you see the pic without seeing his profile?
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/airwolf1987
It's just a guy who did an art trade, Paul is still Sammy's daddy and he doesn't art.
No.17736
>>17702
Yes they are. She's trying to let her enjoy having her boundaries pushed, while still feeling safe and not hating herself for those feelings. Your stupid ass just hasn't been paying attention to the things she's been fantasizing about.
>>17708
> There is a difference between pushing soft limits and hard limits. Mandy is forcing star to be pushed through a hard limit.
It's not real, it's a story. Star asked to have her boundaries pushed, and now they are.
> That boundary is that of person to person morality involving this fetish around children, and star even made it clear that it was a hard limit that she had.
It's a story about cartoon animals that piss themselves in diapers, not a story of philosophy and morality. Fuck you people are dumb.
No.17737
> Nice way of missing the point, it's not that we aren't turned on by the comic (up until the most recent pages), but that it crossed a hard limit (either or morally or ethically) for quite a lot of readers.
Exactly. It's not YOUR fetish, and not you're throwing a tantrum. Well what YOUR personal limits are isn't the same as other people, and since this is a fictional comic about cartoon animals, we don't exactly have to worry about their feelings being hurt. That's SJW tier shit to start crying about the consent of fictional characters.
>>17710
And how is this different from the hundred other times Star freaked out as a character and monologues the inner termoil and insecurities with their fetish?
For fuck sakes people, it's a story.
No.17757
>>17737
How is Sammy manipulating the story for her public service announcement different from Star the character talking to herself in the context of the story? Are you really asking that?
You're a fucking moron if you think the last couple pages have anything to do with erotic writing. Stop projecting yourself onto this and maybe you would see that.
No.17764
>>17757
Are you really that stupid you've missed it? You're blaming everyone else because you're too autistic to follow such a simple plot line and haven't picked up that Star gets off to the humiliation and having boundaries pushed, which isn't even subtle she stated it outright a few pages back.
It's a comic, about cartoon animals, pissing themselves. Not a moral guide to life.
No.17771
>>17764
The author of the comic claims it's a moral guide to life. and has even highlighted the last page and explicitly told people to follow the advice therein. There is no debate, sammy really thinks that sexual roleplay in public and around children is perfectly acceptable and even to be encouraged.
No.17781
>>17764
>People understand it's a comic
>No clearly wet diapers for about 70 pages or around a year.
>Plot line has had too much build up with no real pay off.
>Missing the whole reason this discussion is being had.
>>17771
Thank goodness someone pointed this out for people who can't grasp the core cause for the discussion.
She's also mentioned with several journal posts that she has noticed her overly preachy and opinionated stuff as of recently.
No.17801
>>17764
>accusing other people of being autistic
>projecting this hard
Sammy, the writer, is saying things through this comic on a moral social level, and they are not subtle. The main character is based on her FFS. Sammy loves to shove her current feels into her art. Do you even follow her on FA? She does this shit constantly. The reason we're talking about this right now is it's in this comic and is an egregious example of moral signalling on her part, and on a more important note, the blatancy of this along with the mentioning of pedo shit is entirely boner killing and brings the whole comic down
>>17781
>She's also mentioned with several journal posts that she has noticed her overly preachy and opinionated stuff as of recently.
Yup. Even she understands this was stupid, at least on some level.
No.17816
What does this arguing actually achieve?
Like seriously I'm a diagnosed autist and you are all acting infinitely more autistic than the most socially awkward handflicky moments of my life.
No.17819
>>17816
Your on a Imageboard, what do you expect? if you want to talk to your hug box.
>>//out//
>>//tumblr//
No.17825
>>17819
yikes, you're having a meltdown dude
No.17858
This thread is a shitnado.
Sammy is getting preachy and it's bringing the comic down. It is weird and creepy to dress in AB clothes around real kids.
No.17890
>>17771
> The author of the comic claims it's a moral guide to life. and has even highlighted the last page and explicitly told people to follow the advice therein.
[citation needed]
> There is no debate,
There's tons of debate sperglord
>sammy really thinks that sexual roleplay in public and around children is perfectly acceptable and even to be encouraged.
Wearing diapers and a romper isn't the same as fucking kids. You'd think after hanging around porn so much you'd understand what is and isn't sex.
>>17757
Again, the issue is that a couple really retarded people without any clue how to follow a story haven't yet noticed this is an ongoing story and was never a 24/7 fap a thon. It goes between more erotic scenes built on humiliation and pushing comfort zones to expressing feelings about being an ABDL. The new pages are no different then the previous pages.
Moral crusaders crying to "think of the children" in a fictional furry comic is fucking pathetic though. No different then people crying over mah misogyny for fictional female characters. THEY AREN'T REAL. Geez.
No.17894
I have an in with someone who sorta knows Star irl, and this is just this one person's opinion, but it sounds like Star is getting bored with FA and is "treating her art like a chore". So that's something to take into consideration, and is probably why we're not going to see weekly pages again anytime soon.
>>17890
Give it a rest, faggot. Even Sammy has said offhandedly that the last page of Shine was heavy handed and preachy.
>"hurr hurr hurr it jus a comic!"
yeah it is, that's why we're annoyed with how it's been preachy about AB/DL in public
No.17897
File: 1458415425650.png (904.34 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1458412903.babystar_q131s.png)
MOVING ON…
People don't forget.
No.17898
>>17897
and the Namek arc continues
In proportion, how far along do you think we are?
have we even gotten to the Ginyu force yet?
No.17899
>>17897
aww, this made me smile.
i hope we're done with the moral preaching, Star. Keep this kind of thing up
No.17901
>>17898
Teca, or whatever the fuck her name is, is Ginyu Force.
No.17902
>>17899
Yeah while I'm still kind of freaked out by the children being there, I accept it because it's a weird furry world. But the moment the author starts preaching about shit that she thinks applies to the real world, it gets bad. Keep comic world in comic world and the real world separate.
No.17904
No.17907
No.17931
File: 1458496352507.png (894.86 KB, 904x1280, 113:160, 1458485797.babystar_q132s.png)
>I am ALL about soft little jingle noises.
She knows what's up.
No.17932
>>17931
This page is pretty cute.
No.17933
>>17068
>>17482
>>17897
How old are the kids in these pages supposed to be? It looks like they're all wearing diapers too.
>>17931
>Star regressing again
It begins?
No.17934
>>17931
Well…my dick is diamonds.
No.17935
>>17934
EXCUSE ME! There are children on that page, so that means you're a pedophile. Sick. Just absolutely disgusting you freak. This comic should only contain 100% preapproved fetishes that don't promote a deviant lifestyle.
No.17936
>>17934
>>17934
EXCUSE ME! There are children on that page, so that means you're a pedophile. Sick. Just absolutely disgusting you freak. This comic should only contain 100% preapproved fetishes that don't promote a deviant lifestyle.
No.17937
>>17936
But, that's just the mental version of star (to show how she feels when she's with "Bob")
All these people arguing about children should be thrown up against the wall (Pink Floyd)
No.17938
>>17937
>trying to excuse pedophilia
It's a child, and you have an erection. That means your a pedo. Plus it's in public, so you're also a rape supporter for violating everyone's consent.
No.17939
>>17938
Awww man, well I guess you got me there. What's it called when you just get erections over extremely cute things?
No.17940
>>17936
>This comic should only contain 100% preapproved fetishes that don't promote a deviant lifestyle.
You crack me up, anon
No.17941
>>17933
>>17934
I will take back everything bad I ever said about Sammy if she draws a scene where Teca has sex with a regressed Star.
No.17943
>>17941
No you won't…You'll say it's her promoting her pedo lifestyle on the masses and using it as propaganda for younglove.
No.17944
>>17943
I said I'd take back all the -bad- things.
No.17949
>>17897
>>17931
Thanks star. More like this please.
No.17952
>>17931
10/10 page
>>17938
>>17943
So in spite of the people who were shitposting before, you're going to shitpost?
fucking hell
No.17954
>>17952
Ummm…you're not very good at reading sarcasm are you anon? >>17938 and >>17943
are clearly joking in their post.
it is a very well done page indeed though.
No.17956
>>17954
Yes, moron, we can all see that. The point is he's shitting up the thread regardless.
No.17957
>>17956
and this pointless banter between us is any better?
Just enjoy the comic and let people talk about things that make them entertained.
No.17959
>>17956
So in spite of the spitposters shitposting sarcasm to spite the spiteful shitposters, you're spitefully shitposting to the shitpost shitposters to stop shitposting to the spiteful shitposting shitposters.
No.17960
>>17931
GINYU FORCE RULES
GINYU FORCE RULES
That was adorable by the way. I don't mind being mid Namek saga if there's more. More like this please, less preaching.
No.17963
>you'll never have an Aunty take you through a toystore to buy your long lost platyplush and make you feel small.
No.17968
>>17938
>>17935
>>17936
I know you're trying to elicit a response, so here you go.
No.17970
>>17963
Maybe, but I got to be a guy's 'big bro' and do essentially that. It was very enjoyable, and there were no kids around(mainly due to the time/day we had our outing), so that moral issue was avoided.
>>17931 is definitely one of my favourite pages of Shine. I'll need to re-read it, but Found is still probably my favourite of the two