>>4162
Lemme guess, UK? You guys always get the best designs on your Pamps; especially now that KC has nixed the Diego-print Easy-Ups in the US in favor of Thomas the Tank Engine.
>>8121
>posts girls designs
>not infinitely superior boys pants with MOTHERFUCKING JAKE on them
>doesn't even have the courtesy to post the Doc McStuffins and Mickey Mouse designs
Unacceptable.
>>8124
Agreed. Pampers stretch better (which probably explains why we see them more often), but Huggies have the better prints by far. Even if they're branded with the evil corporate mouse, there's something about Mickey and co. that really hits that "little" nerve. Hell, even their swim diapers have great prints.
>>8122
Thick padding is tops, but most AB diaper companies haven't really nailed making cutesy, modern-style all-over prints with characters on them (see: Rearz's upcoming jungle print and Crinklz for good efforts, Snuggies for something really close). Of course, no company would be insane enough to license their characters for adult diaper prints, so this is the next best thing. Personally, I use them with the tutorial linked here >>2132 to turn cheap generic briefs into something with cute prints and halfway decent capacity.
My current favorites are the ones in the last pic. "Baby Sens" is the brand name. Mexico-exclusive subsidiary of the company that makes Libero and Drypers for Yurop. Used to be available at Dollar Tree locations in the US for 3/$1, but they seem to have stopped stocking them. Real pity, since they're about twice as thick as 'Murrican diaps, absorb/swell a good amount, and have an adorable mascot character that resembles some kind of fusion of Barney, Spike, and Spyro.
I really should check out some of the Mexican supermarkets around town to see if there's any place that stocks them. The only other option is to import them, and I'm not crazy enough to do that. Yet. Plus, I hear there are a few Mexican brands that still crank 'em out with plastic backings, and I'd love to get my hands on some of those.