/action/ - Conservative Operations

>>10
Name other candidates then who have a chance.

As if to directly contradict me, the Cromnibus fiasco made me pessimistic again regarding American politics. I have faith we'll deal with the traitors though.

Another keeper:

>Jeff Sessions: Congress Must Deny Funding For Obama’s Illegal Amnesty And Work Authorization

>“The Chairman of the Republican Party made a promise to America on executive amnesty: ‘We can’t allow it to happen and we won’t let it happen… everything we can do to stop it we will.’

>Unfortunately, the plan now being circulated in the House fails to meet that test. The executive amnesty language is substantially weaker than the language the House adopted this summer, and does not reject the central tenets of the President’s plan: work permits, Social Security, and Medicare to 5 million illegal immigrants—reducing wages, jobs, and benefits for Americans.

>Congress considered and rejected these changes to immigration law in 2006, 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2014. The President’s action erases the laws Congress has passed in order to implement laws Congress has refused to pass.

>Now the President demands Congress fund his imperial decree and declare its own irrelevance.

>That is why Congress must respond to the President’s unlawful action by funding the government but not funding illegal amnesty. This is a perfectly sound and routine application of congressional authority. In fact, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service reports that last year’s omnibus spending bill included 16 such funding restrictions on fee-based programs.

>Such a plan would put the focus where it belongs: on Senate Democrats. They are the ones who should be made to choose sides—save Obama’s amnesty or save Americans’ jobs and borders.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3
I'm starting to like Jim Webb and if he gets the nomination I might just support him (not even a Democrat either).
However, I'll be looking for guys like these in both parties.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/23/opinion/the-real-threat-to-hillary-clinton-jim-webb.html

>This is why it isn’t really the Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren who should worry the Clinton camp. It’s the former Virginia senator Jim Webb, a Vietnam War hero, former secretary of the Navy in the Reagan administration, novelist and opponent of endless wars in the Middle East. Late last month, Mr. Webb formed an exploratory committee. “He’s a very long shot,” Leslie H. Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, told me. “He has to become a serious candidate. At that point she would find him much more complex than dealing with liberals. He’s not a liberal, but a lot of what he says might appeal to liberals. He does not get carried away by humanitarian intervention.”

>Mr. Webb’s attacks on free trade and economic elites, coupled with a call for America to come home again, might well prove a potent combination in the early primaries, attracting antiwar progressives as well as conservative-minded Southern white men whom he believes the party can win back. His credo is as simple as it is persuasive: Rather than squander its power and resources abroad, America should rebuild.

Limited suffrage would wrap up those three most likely.

If only tax paying white men could vote those wouldn't be issues but common sense.

But I guess the genie is out of that bottle.

>>5
Yeah there's no way that's happening.

Obviously it would solve most of these problems, but we should emphasize pragmatic solutions as opposed to /pol/'s "gas the kikes". That comes after we win.

Libertarians believe a country’s borders are magical lines one need only walk across. They believe these same people need only read magical books by Ayn Rand. Say magical phrases like: “all people are equal”. Believe in magical documents like the constitution. They must also believe in the magical concept known as capitalism. Then learn to speak a magical language known as English. And everyone that does these things will POOF ….magically become an American.

Imagine if China became libertarian and believed in the same Magic. One need only walk across the magical line into China. Then learn to speak a new magical language known as Chinese. Then of course read magical books by Ayn Rand. And let’s not forget recite magical phrases such as “all people are equal”. Believe in magical founding documents and magical concepts like Capitalism. Then POOF you will Magically be Chinese. Of course, readers would laugh at this notion. Right this minute China is 90% Han Chinese. And that is not going to change anytime soon. In 1965, American was 90% White. America is now going broke. And the reason is quite simple……there is NO such thing as magic.

The elite at the top - The White anti-White traitors and the anti-White hebes keep on pushing for as you listed Immigration, Gun rights, Net neutrality etc all with an end result in mind. The removal of the original founding stock of the country. The biggest weapon against our enemy has always been White flight. It would be much easier to live out, say the NWF plan and financially support multiple Detroits than to try to tape the USA back together.

The next economic collapse and you leave the leaders of the US with exactly what they want - A non-White America. Meanwhile your living it up in an all White, racial community. Screw the US, you should be as loyal to America as it is to your race. You start a community with White flighters (especially White Africans) and you won't have problems like Immigration, Gun rights, Net neutrality etc.

>>13
That's valid, but I don't think we're past the point of no return. More and more people are speaking up and against multiculturalism.

Organizing in real life certainly will help, a la
>>>/meadhall/

I think we can change things politically as well. We tend to forget because we don't have a mainstream voice, but most Americans AGREE with us. Democratic means are the best chance we have to actually affect serious change. We're not even close to extremists, and resorting to that would be a loss for us since we were basically baited into it.

People want to resort to extremism because it feels like no one shares their beliefs. If we got people to "come out" and be open about their beliefs, we could change the tide in a generation.

To do this we need to break the stranglehold PC has on public discourse. We need to hold open borders traitors accountable (through elections). We need to live our own lives virtuously and network with like-minded people, online and offline.

There are many ways to go about this, and everyone on the "alt right" is capable of doing something to help. Even blogging. The "manosphere", the "dark enlightenment", the HBD groups. They seem to be going mainstream now because they became so influential online. We need to keep pushing in any area we can to get our voice heard. Once people see that others agree with them, they'll feel more emboldened.

Nice info. I was thinking of including stuff like this within the framework of /action/ though. I think because of the super specific nature of ideological subversion it would be better to be a part of a bigger board. The most successful campaigns were always those started on /pol/.

An idea I had for one was to make "cocksucker" a non-PC phrase. We can call it homophobic or sexist and get a bunch of SJWs to willingly defend their cock sucking. It would be hilarious.

"cocksuckerandproud" would be the hashtag. Unless you have a better idea.

Good idea, I'll do that before I go to bed.