[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/alpha/ - Self-Improvement and Motivation

Catalog

Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1423280133598.jpg (1.54 MB, 2105x1600, 421:320, the-persistence-of-memory-….jpg)

 No.275

An interesting thing I've noticed is that twenty minutes is an ideal time for me to do practice and training-type activities.

I'm talking about things like lifting, walking, meditating, etc. Anything that you just have to set aside some time to do daily or every other day, but there's nobody or anything there to push you.

This feels like an optimal amount of time because it's not too long nor too short. It's long enough to feel like you put in some effort but not so long you start to get bored.

Twenty minutes is my sweet spot. What's yours?

 No.276

File: 1423326007116.jpg (208.54 KB, 1280x854, 640:427, egg-timer-173516_1280.jpg)

The Pomodoro Technique uses periods of fifteen to thirty minutes, and the traditional period they'd use was twenty-five minutes.

http://pomodorotechnique.com/

I notice that when I'm doing housework and I time the bursts of activity, they usually end up being more than twenty-four but shy of twenty-five minutes.

I came up with a method similar to The Pomodoro Technique that's somewhat inverted: I try to work on something for at least twenty-five minutes without getting distracted or even looking at the timer. If I'm pretty confident that I've worked for at least that long, I go back to the timer and check. If I fell short of twenty-five minutes, I reset it and try it again immediately. You then have an incentive to stay focused for that long and not be distracted and you may find you've done more work than twenty-five minutes (it's not uncommon to get almost thirty-five while you think you've done twenty-five).

I had a few influences in coming up with this system: The Now Habit by Neil Fiore, where he tells you to keep track of how long you spend on tasks on which you typically procrastinate to track your progress, but tells you not to count them unless they exceed some set period you decide (I think his is between fifteen and thirty minutes) in order to keep you focused. I was also influenced by a study that I saw about the 10,000 steps program, where it noted that people walked more steps if they had a step counter with a cover on it to keep them from looking at it throughout the day (but I can't remember if they were told not to look at it, or if just using one with a cover made people less likely to look at it). Nonetheless I find I tend to work longer stretches if i "gamify" this effort.

 No.300

>>276
I tried Pomodoro. It's effective, but not for me. It's about as effective as drafting out a plan and sticking to it with some goal in mind.
For example, with books, I count out all the exercises and pages and have a set goal per day to finish it within a set time. If I were to do it with exercise, I would do some energy intake and expenditure calculations.

 No.301

>>276
I've been using the pomodoro technique and generally use periods of about 20 minutes.

 No.302

Lately I have been worried about the effects of chronic sitting so I set an alarm on my laptop to go off every 15 or 20 minutes. Then I take a 1 or 2 minute walk. It seems to work pretty well.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]