>>2306
>Have the SJWs banned buyfag and waifu threads as it was expected?
No.
>Do SJWs doing it for free still ban people for being "hetshits" and for being shitlords that use mean offensive words like "fag" or "nigger"?
No, in fact, they are way more tolerant of /pol/-tier stuff than our /a/ is.
>Do Hotpockets still ban people for calling them out in their moderation?
Dunno, but in what type of context do you mean?
>Do relevant threads still get deleted because some janitor's friend complained in IRC over people liking stuff she doesn't like?
Don't think so. Not on 4/a/ at least.
>Is Naruto and bleached still hamfisted in your /a/nus because you have to tolerate the normalfags bringing shekels to their rightful Gawker overlords?
Yes, but I don't think that had anything to do with Gawker or SJW's, since it happened a long time ago.
The SJW boogeyman shit has proven itself to be false regarding 4/a/'s moderation at least. That's why I asked people to refrain themselves from making those type of comments about it.
>>2311
>>2312
Yeah, I think that rule is retarded too. They should only ban people who use emotions or type liek dis, like 4/a/ already does.