/ameta/ - /a/ Meta Discussion

>>3784

3DPD discussion isn't allowed on /a/

I didn't make the thread calling the volunteers out on this (). I wanted to respond but the thread was deleted before I could post, so I'll post here (where no one will read it) and maybe post it again on /a/ later (better be on guard, hotpocketeers). Here's the thread's text in its entirety, first:

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 18:38:54 No.308956[Watch Thread]>>308998

What the fuck are these Troid-tier bans I saw on /ameta/ just now? Can you explain yourselves, mods? I didn't escape that shithole to face the same problems regarding the moderation's policies here.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 18:49:17 No.308963

Also, if you aren't going to respond here because of the stupid rule which should be removed by now, then at least respond to the thread about it on /ameta/.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 18:55:50 No.308966>>308970

Why are you still so upset, I thought you hated this board? I mean, we're "cancerous shits" who "never have anything interesting to say", after all.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 18:56:48 No.308969>>308970

Because you were shitposting and being a faggot it's not that hard to understand you autistic cunt.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 18:59:09 No.308970>>308973 >>308986

>>308966

I'm not the guy who got banned. I said I just saw the images on /ameta/.

>>308969

>shitposting = any opinion I don't like

Back to cuckchan, Troid.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:01:09 No.308973>>308977

>>308970

>implying I care about your opinion

>implying I wasn't refering to the 90% of you go to half chan part.

>implying you aren't baiting right now

I hope the meidos ban you again so you'll actually leave.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:02:12 No.308974>>308977

Enjoy your ban.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:04:49 No.308977>>308990

>>308973

>>308974

>lacking reading comprehension this much

Kill yourself, my man.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:08:56 No.308986

>>308970

>I'm not the guy who got banned.

Let's pretend that's true for a moment.

He was shitposting, read the archive. Throwing a multi-post meta temper tantrum after your trash /pol/ post gets deleted should net you a ban. Don't come here if you have thin skin and can't deal with a temporary lapse in posting privileges for doing dumb shit. You're more than welcome to make your own board if you disagree.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:11:10 No.308990

>>308977

Dude was banned for bringing in 3DPD into a conversation about cartoon 2D traps. It does not fucking matter what the context was. Then he came back to shitpost about why 3D should be allowed which breaks the other rule of bringing in meta garbage.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:32:22 No.308998

File (hide): 1440199942318.png (128.76 KB, 625x626, 625:626, 1418264255010.png)

>>308956 (OP)

I'm with OP on this one. The first one is hardly shitposting. If you think it is, maybe you should spend some more time on other boards. His post was on topic even if you don't like what he was saying. Hardly shitposting worthy of a ban.

Second one is even worse. Banning someone because of /ameta/ issue? Banning someone because they didn't capitalize a word? If anything give them a warning or just delete their post, but even a 24 hour ban is a little overdoing it. Looks like someone just didn't like the poster and decided to deal out some internet "justice"

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:35:28 No.308999

>A thread I made as a little fun is now causing drama.

Sorry meidos…

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:40:56 No.309002

The whole thread in question deserved to be purged, honestly. It wasn't even a good manga, had a vague OP that drew in a bunch of people who had no actual interest in the subject, and inspired a bunch of ridiculous shitposting on both sides, with one group of faggots whining about the tumblr boogeyman and the other whining about the /pol/ boogeyman.

Nothing of value would have been lost if meido just banned the whole thread.

▶Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 19:46:05 No.309006

/a/ has some pretty horrible moderation occasionally.

Honestly just seems like meidos get bored and banhammer just for shits and giggles.

(thread deleted)

>>3786

forgot the thread link (now deleted): >>>/a/308956

>>3784

You should've listened after your first post got deleted. Having a single, short post get deleted isn't the end of the world, learn from your mistakes and move on. After your little tirade where you decided to go full tilt sour grapes and generalize the board as cancer, I can't say I have any sympathy for you.

>>3788

>You should've listened after your first post got deleted.

>I can't say I have any sympathy for you.

I was expecting to be banned, I don't care about that (I could easily "ban evade" if I really gave a shit). The board died for me the second that post was deleted and both the volunteers and users tried to defend them for it. That's the exact kind of behavior that bothered me most during the later years of 4chan, far more than any shitposter or cancer.

>After your little tirade where you decided to go full tilt sour grapes and generalize the board as cancer

All I said was that most of you fags were probably visiting 4/a/ on the side, because I was one of the few people that even posted in threads about currently airing shows.

And seeing as how numerous 8chan users I've spoken to on and off of 8chan have confessed to going back for 4/a/, I don't think that's a stretch.

>>3789

oh, and before anyone points it out, it seems that the archive is working better these days, and actually archived most of my posts before they were deleted.

https://8archive.moe/a/thread/307756

https://8archive.moe/a/thread/308956

>>3790

>The board died for me the second that post was deleted and both the volunteers and users tried to defend them for it.

>volunteers

There's one volunteer and the owner, last I checked. You can talk with both of them on irc.rizon.net #8/a/.

>users

Look at how you were acting, "you fucks never have anything meaningful to say", "I bet 90% of you cancerous shits still go back to 4/a/"? Yeah, I get you're frustrated and lashing out, but what kind of response did you think you were going to get with comments like that?

I still think your first post was deleted because the mods were trying to keep that thread from becoming like the godawful storytime thread, and eventually they just gave up because it got derailed anyway. Don't take it so personally.

>>3794

>And banning people just for criticizing a moderation decision is fucking NeoGAF-esque. Everyone here should understand that "no meta" means "lets not turn this place into fucking /q/" not "you are not allowed to ever question the mods"

You forgot about cuckchan's famous rule number 8:

>Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.

>>3795

The sad thing is, maybe my memory is fading, but even on 4chan you could usually get away with that for most of its life. Maybe it was just moderator oversight, but apart from the gamergate fiasco and /jp/'s sad history (maybe /pol/ and /sp/ too, but I never used them. also I haven't been back since September so maybe things are worse now) you could at least criticize the janitors when you saw someone get banned or have their posts deleted for some dumb shit. You'd usually just have your posts deleted, if they even saw it. In this way 8/a/ is literally worse than 4chan.

>inb4 some wannabee oldfag pretends he was actually around for the days of snacks and /b/ jokebans

>>3794

Why not cut out the middleman and talk to the mods face to face in #8/a/? Claud changed his nick not that long ago, he's around.

>>3797

What's the point? If they want to talk with me (which I somehow doubt) they can do it here and not in an IRC circlejerk. I don't care what they have to say, I don't want to "talk it out," and I certainly don't want to beg for forgiveness, I just want people to be aware of this bullshit.

>>3798

Sounds to me like you didn't even like visiting 8/a/ if you're willing to call it quits so easily.

>IRC circlejerk

It's hardly #janiteam.

>>3799

>Sounds to me like you didn't even like visiting 8/a/ if you're willing to call it quits so easily.

I've been in "maybe if I keep posting, it'll help keep the board alive long enough for traffic to pick up" mode for months now. I happily do that for some smaller boards with decent owners, but I'm not gonna bother to satisfy this guy's ego.

>It's hardly #janiteam.

Whatever you say, Claud random IRC circlejerker.

>>3802

I guess we know who ID: b7c5d1 is, at least.

For reference,

https://8archive.moe/a/thread/299554#307138

https://8archive.moe/a/thread/299554#307149

>>3801

>>3803

I'm not Claud. He's Azaghal on IRC if you want to talk to him, though. I'll leave you two to circlejerk in peace, sorry for trying to mediate.

>>3802

No, I received no reports. As I am continually pleading with everyone it is critical that anons report stuff instead of just assuming someone else will (like you did).

At any rate, I make no apologies for any of this, OP sat there trying to drive up meta drama because a post dragging 3DPD crap into a trap thread was deleted. Rule 6 is not a suggestion, especially where traps are involved, or the thread invariably devolves into /pol/-tier shitposting.

>>3806

See that second ban message? All of those posts referencing the "3DPD" side of traps are still there. You must have seen them, because 1. you had to have read the post I made linking to them to ban me, and 2. because I reported them on my phone hours beforehand, just to see if you'd do anything. Which you didn't.

Not that I even think any of them should be deleted. The rule is ridiculous, I just wanted to point out your hypocrisy. You don't receive reports about this kind of stuff because no one cares but you.

There's "blogshit" in the Wakako-zake thread approaching 2 weeks old, too, if you want to "do your job" (i.e. further alienate everyone)

And to continue, /a/ doesn't even have a shitposter problem; even that storytime thread was pretty tame in comparison to what goes on every day on much healthier boards. It'd be a much better and more active board if you had stayed hands off like Mark does with /v/. This is not a 100+ PPH board, literally all you are needed for is deleting spam.

>Rule 6 is not a suggestion, especially where traps are involved, or the thread invariably devolves into /pol/-tier shitposting.

There's that /pol/ boogeyman again. Are you going to wordfilter trap to "otokonoko" like Danbooru because it's offensive towards transwomen?

>>3808

That guy is worse though I got banned once for being a "shill"

Reminder /intl/ is currently raiding /a/ and they have a thread up for this exact purpose

That is all. Carry on.

Also, that's a strawman to say "/a/ is not a free speech zone", since he is the one calling for more moderation also, he wants you to delete vapid trapshit posts. And that is more similar to the current state of 4chan /a/, not that 4chan /a/ is something we should strive to be similar too, in fact it probably shouldn't, but when most people hear of

"/a/ culture" that is what they will think of.

>>3814

Except the thread you're mentioning has no vapid trapfag shit.

All the posts in that thread could be taken as referencing 2D, or are shitting on the mentions of 3D.

For fucks sake this shit doesn't and shouldn't need written fucking rules.

3D is PD. End of story.

>>3818

Randomly attacking his show is unncessary, its only annoying when you act like that guy who used the monogatari pictues.

>>3819

I'm not taking shit from a raildexfag, fuck off.

>>3810

This just means /a/-/v/ won't reveal themselves on /a/ in the near future. The people who whine about degeneracy wherever they can are neo-/pol/. Hammer these as hard as can.

whoops forgot to bump