>>932Under new management now, and I agree con threads have got to go. As of now they are purge on sight as far as I'm concerned. They were being left up in order to respect decisions made in the past, but I think it's been long enough to justify a policy change at this point.
Also seconding
>>931 we rely heavily on reports to gauge community consensus, if nobody reports a thread we will assume everyone is fine with it (and likely feel depressed about that as a result). Please do report liberally, in general we will likely be as tolerant or strict as those who put in the effort to actually report things, we cannot be everywhere on the board at all times and absolutely rely on anons bringing things to our attention. /a/ will be as good or as shit as the community's ability to file reports, this cannot be overstated.
I should add that attaching helpful reasons in borderline cases helps us immensely in grasping why a given post was reported, it's sometimes not immediately obvious what the reporter was thinking, especially when the maid reading is tired/drunk/fapping or something, a good reason for those grey-area cases makes it easier to mechanically issue bans/deletions.