>>111
>in another view, "how does marching help" answered with "anarchy lives", she's saying a lot more than just the surface.
I share this sentiment. Superficially, it appears as a catchphrase, but this appearance is mostly enhanced by the way anarchism is packaged and refied by the media.
Conceptually, marching relays anarchistic/populist resistance by collective physical exertion and holistic locomotive decisiveness. The idea, "anarchy lives", is expressed by those people who dance, sing and walk in its path.
Public marches were once strongly effective. A march would inspire people, riots, geopolitical conflict.
Nowadays, their publicity are little more than showcases for entertainment, with inserted sound bits, flashy quips, paraded fashionable statements and artificial personality cages. The system has learned that the best way to channel resistance is by creating a controllable chaos, an open field of limited possibilities, all the while in possession of a vastly greater technological and monetary supremacy than its resistance cells.
The irony of this controlled exhibition is that anarchism evolves into a generational procession. Anarchy becomes trans-generational, exhibiting itself more subtly and more immersive as the years and stages of available social mobility expand. At that point, the answer to the question, "how does this help us," truly becomes "Anarchy lives".