[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/anarchism/ - Anarchist Debate

a variety of theories holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)

You may buy ads now for any board, betakey is removed. Please contact ads@8ch.net for information or help with this service.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Renzo Novatore: "It is the free one who dances on high admist the phosphorescence of the sun.”
Linked Boards: /ancap/ /anarcho/

File: 1439517719773.jpg (400.1 KB, 1920x1200, 8:5, 190029128412048124.jpg)

 No.109

Could computers take over the boardroom?

Sure Sure. You want to say that all work that produces physical objects is "easy" and that computers are naturally superior to man at software if they gain any level of "intelligence".

Okay.

Computers from the ground up were originally built as information and control systems. Management.

So why are workers replaceable but management would not be?

Executives, bankers, and "charismatic" CEOs are far more replaceable than skilled workers.

''iCEO, a software prototype designed to test whether high-level management can be automated, was launched recently with encouraging initial results. In a 2015 article in Harvard Business Review, Devin Fidler of the non-profit group Institute for the Future outlined what iCEO can teach us about the future of the job world, and specifically, the future of the management structure in the corporate world.

On a base level, the virtual management system automates complex work by dividing it up and assigning out small individual tasks. The creators of the program decided to run experiments to see how far the software could be pushed into traditionally human territory. In the first real test of the software program’s higher-level abilities, iCEO oversaw the completion of a 124-page report in just weeks, when it would have taken months via a traditional management-employee structure.

The quality of iCEO’s work was as impressive as its speed, and the computer program required little human intervention to get the job done.

READ MORE AT >>>/midpol/

“A truly expressive human face as the new ‘interface’ for technology has a broad range of applications where humans need to or benefit from interacting with technology or other humans currently. The highest benefit will be in applications where understanding authentic human behavior is important for technology to better serve people.

Areas where we believe we can make a 100 times impact include healthcare, education and consumer care. Humanoid robots would be ideal for life companions for the elderly, especially those suffering from Alzheimer’s or dementia as well as social training for autistic children. Our robots aim to offer high-fidelity human expression to demonstrate empathy and care while also providing the consistency, repeatability, scalability and reliability necessary satisfy these sorts of necessary services where demand far outstrips qualified human supply and budget today.

Another large opportunity would be in customer/client services such as hotel front desks, bank teller windows, office/airport information desks and government services windows.

To address these opportunities, we are moving forward with two robot ‘classes.’ One is a full-sized human robot production line where very human service robots can be hired to work 24 hours per day, which would be very cost-effective. The other potentially even more exciting product line is our personal robot range which will be sold at exceptionally low prices and powered in whole, or in part, by smartphones.”

https://archive.is/OOLnk

Down with the old order.

Technology can be made useful to our ends. Let every man live from his labour not as a parasite to others.

 No.112

File: 1440393411287.jpg (28.59 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Sybilsystem.jpg)

>Technology can be made useful to our ends. Let every man live from his labour not as a parasite to others

I completely agree. Technology is growing more rapidly by the day. It's not too far of a stretch to envision robotic maintenance over paperwork strategies.

I'm uneasy with the idea of robot bosses. Ultimately, we should have tech serve our needs, rather than us serve them. An AI that fully determines workplace strategies sounds similar to the Sybil system.


 No.113

Automated structuralization by an artificial intelligence appears like a solid idea but I have certain hesitations against it.

A computer doesn't recognize the validity of human interests and the necessity of engaging morale, but that which is pre-programmed into it and catalogued as requiring. I wonder at how effective its learning processors would be, and whether or not it would be the introductory initialization of a roboticized society from a hierarchical standpoint.


 No.120

>>112

>>113

most executives have your welfar and prefences at the bottom of the list of priorities

and that is only if it affects the net profit




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]