Debate, discussion and educational agitation. Those are my methods of engaging anarchist discourse.
I would consider myself an anarchistic postmodern synthesist, as I believe that fluidity and pluralism are auxiliaries which effectively manifest the ever-shifting heterogeneous movements concerned with, of, and for independence. I firmly do not believe any singular modus operandi of anarchist ethics or politics necessarily leads towards an anarchistic society, especially given the nature of individual unionization. Instead, I believe that evolving diversity is the conduit by which anarchism is most efficiently achieved and that independence is a transcendent struggle against space and meaning.