1e3187 No.4699
What is your opinion of Marxists? Are they allies of the revolution, or authoritarian would-be bourgeoisie?
As an Anarchist, what distinctions do you draw between different schools of Marxism? What about the doctrines of their leaders? Marx, Engels, Kautsky, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, Mao, Hoxha, Castro?
We can make this a Marxism general to discuss how the Anarchist movements could, or should, associate with Marxists.
e347a5 No.4700
Well, if history is any indicator, anarchists should not ally themselves with marxists.
Fuck em.
d9d28c No.4706
>>4699Marxism provides a great critical basis on which to build. Marxism hits the nail on the head when it comes to problems of Capitalism and that's why it shouldn't be discounted so quickly.
>Taking all this into account, and still more the practical aspects of the question as to how private property might become common property, most of the anarchists maintain that the very next step to be made by society, as soon as the present regime of property undergoes a modification, will be in a communist sense. We are communists. But our communism is not that of the authoritarian school: it is anarchist communism, communism without government, free communism. It is a synthesis of the two chief aims pursued by humanity since the dawn of its history — economic freedom and political freedom. – Peter Kropotkin
Read the rest of it here:
http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-anarchist-communism-its-basis-and-principles 17c3ab No.4725
>>4706In a true anarchist society you can follow multiple economic systems. The problem with communism is that it requires way too many people to follow it.
However, if say all the breadmakers refuse to follow communism, the communists will just label them as capitalist and takeover. The problem is, that communism would fail otherwise.
d9d28c No.4729
>>4725>In a true anarchist society you can follow multiple economic systems. If they're compatible systems, such as socialism, communism, syndicalism, etc.
You can't have capitalists in an anarchist society.
>The problem with communism is that it requires way too many people to follow it.That's the "problem" of any ideology. You don't see it as a problem of capitalism because capitalists hire goons to force everyone to follow it.
>However, if say all the breadmakers refuse to follow communism, the communists will just label them as capitalist and takeover.I don't see a problem with this.
>The problem is, that communism would fail otherwise.So would any other system.
17c3ab No.4744
>>4729Anarcho-syndicalism and anarcho-individualism can thrive without a large number of people supporting it. Many anarcho-syndicalist systems already exist within capitalism and socialism.
d33240 No.7715
Does /anarcho/ think that libertarian marxists are acceptable allies?
8c33c4 No.7717
>>7715More so than regular Marxists.
628b8b No.7759
765348 No.7795
Marxism: Good observations, terrible ideas.
ba5381 No.7869
d7ef2d No.7888
>>7715Spartacists?
Yea, all anti capitalists should join forces to destroy the bourgeois state but on the next day they are enemies.
27b063 No.7971
>>4699b-but muh kronstadt!
ee4214 No.8006
>>7715>>7717What is the difference between libertarian marxists and regular marxists?
27b063 No.8007
File: 1426250868542.jpg (39.62 KB, 399x317, 399:317, 6278fba5624133bda9993fc371….jpg)
>>8006Guess by "regular marxists" he means Leninists, and by libertarian marxists those Orthodox Marxists who rejects the Leninist additions like totalitarianism and stuff?