"An Anarchist FAQ" was written by authoritarian maoists and it's a massive fucking distortion.
It pretends to have the answer to every anarchism-related question, or the "anarchist answer" to every topic.
Fucking trash. Fucking authoritarians.
>A.1 What is anarchism?
> A.1.1 What does "anarchy" mean?
> A.1.2 What does "anarchism" mean?
> A.1.3 Why is anarchism also called libertarian socialism?
> A.1.4 Are anarchists socialists?
> A.1.5 Where does anarchism come from?
>A.2 What does anarchism stand for?
> A.2.1 What is the essence of anarchism?
…
>A.2.15 What about Human Nature?
…
Only anarchists that exist are either "social" or "capitalist individualists"?
Section A.3 "What types of anarchism are there?":
>It is within this general context that anarchists disagree. The main differences are between "individualist" and "social" anarchists, although the economic arrangements each desire are not mutually exclusive. Of the two, social anarchists (communist-anarchists, anarcho-syndicalists and so on) have always been the vast majority, with individualist anarchism being restricted mostly to the United States.
Section A.3.1 "What are the differences between individualist and social anarchists?"
>The major differences are twofold.
>The first is in regard to the means of action in the here and now (and so the manner in which anarchy will come about). Individualists generally prefer education and the creation of alternative institutions, such as mutual banks, unions, communes, etc. They usually support strikes and other non-violent forms of social protest
What the fucking hell, fucking politicians. They say that individualism is "libertarian capitalism," they don't say there's other tendencies which don't fit well into ACTUAL individualism or their "social" umbrella, they don't say some anarchists don't like being pigeonholed into a tendency.