c2138a No.6582
Question. As an anarchist, should i work against the state by helping in whatever ways i can to improve the lives of the people around me?
I ask because ive been thinking, should we actually be helping? Lets be real about this for a moment, whatever help an anarchist gives to a society will generally be ignored by the general population, as the general population is usually unaware of anarchist activities.
I think, instead, we should exacerbate the problems that plague us. I think we should make the problems the system creates bigger, worse, and really just fucking disastrous. I say we do this, because i truly believe that unless their is some sort of economic collapse that would naturally occur, nothings going to change, so i say we help make these problems worse and worse and worse, until they are un-ignorable to the general population, and then we give them the solution, the anarchist solution.
Anarchists, i think, at their core (Most ideologies really), is really about helping the world at the end of the day, and in order for things to get better, things must first get much much worse.
Thought?
a0eee4 No.9286
this is not needed, there would be death and poverty and inequality, there would be the dumbing down of the general population, they would be sheep for the rich people to exploit, the rich will "let" the poor work for them and they would be grateful. way i see it, we are in a hole with a small amount of rope to get out, we go too deep, no matter how much it makes us want to get out more, we will eventually run out of rope. "rope" being the intelligence or realization of anarchy, and the "hole" being the situation.