3c0d28 No.8023
Why is this board only active and engaging when it comes to shitting on feminism and other social movements?
Why can't you spend more energy on more productive discussion?
Why is this board such a giant echo chamber?
24832f No.8024
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>butthurt feminist
Feminism has produced the very SJWs that took over halfchan, and 420chan, as well as plebbit, it wasn't enough that they project all over tumblr, and now they come here and expect anything less than a 'fuck off'? What else would you expect when they continuously and erroneously attach themselves to us, claim to represent us, and make us look like the sexists that they are? Have you not heard of the reputation of /r/anarchism and the slur 'manarchist'? College-level spoiled brats who want to shit on everything they touch, they are reverse fascists who want to demonize white males in order to white knight everyone else, they are the cancer that killed Occupy, or maybe they proved that Occupy was cancerous from the start. Productive conversations happen more often outside the internet, seeing as this place is no doubt monitored and 'productive conversation' consists of illegal activities. Anarchists shitting on feminists is like a breath of fresh air, compared to what's being said elsewhere on more mainstream places on the internet.
24832f No.8025
shit thread
3098ea No.8028
>you guys have shit threads so i'm going to create a shit^3 thread
4486d2 No.8030
One idiot who don't know what feminism/associates anything with the word feminism to mean "We want matriarchy!!1" is doesn't constitute the whole board being against social movements.
Its one person, and there have been plenty people top show up and tell them they're full of shit.
also, sage for making shit thread.
24832f No.8032
>>8030>thinks that feminism is actually about equalityThink about social movements that focus on group of people as creating unnecessary divisions between people, this is turn creates a kind of antagonism between the groups.
>women's rights doesn't mean we hate men, it just means they aren't our concern 3c0d28 No.8035
>thread about feminism and social movements gets 5 replies in a few hours
>meanwhile quality threads are ignored and drowned in oblivion
You've just proved me right.
24832f No.8039
>>8035>meanwhile quality threads are ignored and drowned in oblivion>ironically bumps this thread to address this pointOn the contrary, you've just proved that they are on this board and a legit problem that stifles discussion, if you hadn't bumped this thread, then the other threads that are being bumped would remain up.
50a1af No.8042
>>8024what the fuck was that video. Holy shit.
>fat or ugly women butthurt and want attention>pretty ones are just fine and sitting without disturbing the conference
>WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED>WE WILL NOT LET U SPEK>WE WILL NOT SPEK EITHER>XDD 3c0d28 No.8043
>>8039What fucking difference does it make to bump this thread?
You faggots already bumped all the threads there were about feminism etc.
Tell me one quality thread that has engaged in lively, productive discussion in the past month.
Hey, at least this thread attempts to address a problem with the board. It's not even about feminism itself, it's the fact that the board has no content or identity other than being rabidly anti-feminist. When was the last time we seriously engaged in an analysis of our current situation, or discussed the merits of various anarchist thinkers, or planned a viable method for sparking the revolution?
We have nothing, this board was killed when the ayncraps came and the only people who remained were the ones who had no spirit other than tirelessly going against everything they disagree with, without a deep, appropriate analysis.
The cancer is killing the board. Maybe it's already dead and we don't even know it.
50a1af No.8044
>>8043The fucking anarcho wiki.
4486d2 No.8047
>>8032>thinks that feminism is actually about equalityPlease, tell me more about how ALL FEMINISTS don't actually want to be treated the same socially, culturally, and economically in our society and just want to establish a matriarchy so they can farm balls for various testicle centered dishes.
Really, why the hell do you hate feminism so much? Its not like they are actually destroying the planet with there combined vaginal powers.
"Oh its divisive" OK, how? Are there any LEGITIMATE feminist organizations, in the real world, that have actively caused a divide in the anarchist community?
>Think about social movements that focus on group of people as creating unnecessary divisions between people.
>Guys, you know that civil rights march? I don't think we should go to it, all they want is equal rights for blacks, don't you think its divisive toward blacks and whites?
>Hey guys, we shouldn't be divisive, were all part of the lower class, let the cops and neo-nazis march with us!
>Guys, lets not be divisive, were all anti-capitalists here, lets let the Stalinist s march with us!Lumping all feminists into the "SJW" category is just as wrong as dumping all anarchists in with an-caps. Judging a group, based solely on its loudest and most misinformed minority of that group is idiotic.
All feminists are not femanazis, all anarchists are not ayncraps, all Jews don't have secret shekel stashes.
3c0d28 No.8048
>>8044The fucking /anarcho/ wiki which has received exactly zero contributions from all of you lazy fucks, except for board owner, wiki owner and FUCKING MYSELF?
50a1af No.8049
>>8048I am the fucking "wiki owner".
2d787f No.8050
>>8047>all Jews don't have secret shekel stasheslehappymerchant.jpg
3c0d28 No.8051
>>8049Point being?
Literally three people are actively engaged in the wiki, most of all myself, the board itself are lazy fucks who don't care about it and just limit themselves to complaining about feminism a lot.
That's literally what this board has been reduced to.
If you want to prove me wrong, go ahead people, make decent contributions to the wiki. Of course, that would take ACTUAL EFFORT.
24832f No.8052
>>8043>What fucking difference does it make to bump this thread?Because it's a shit thread?
>The cancer is killing the board.You are clearly apart of the cancer faggot.
>rabidly anti-feministI wouldn't say that, we just aren't feminists because that's pointless, we already believe in equality between genders, no egalitarian needs feminism.
>>8047>"Oh its divisive" OK, how?>>8024
>All feminists are not femanazis
>muh truescotsman
>all anarchists are not ayncraps,No anarchist is ayncrap, neither are we anfems, or anarcho-queers, we are just anarchists and there is no need to get all butthurt because we won't acknowledge your exclusive and completely self-defeating ideology. Stay mad, and fuck right off, we don't need you to bump shit threads in order to prove that the board needs improvement because that is just stupid.
50a1af No.8054
>>8051Maybe we need to put up some guidelines. What is a image board about anarchism anyway? is it to post links about anarchist news and discuss it?
Is it to organize a anarchist movement?(I tried one with the anarchist collective thread, didn't really work so well).
Anyway, I'm going to do a few more things to the wiki, including the intro section….what i'd like to know is what are we to do here on this board?
50a1af No.8055
>>8052>No anarchist is ayncrap, neither are we anfems, or anarcho-queers, we are just anarchists/thread
3c0d28 No.8056
>>8054
>what is an anarchism board about?It can be literally anything that can be engaging and useful.
I am more and more convinced that the problem with this board is the lifestylist cancer. Virgins on /v/ spend their life playing vidya and weebs on /a/ do likewise for anime. They have lots to discuss because they know shit.
I am almost entirely convinced that the general population of this board isn't informed enough about actual anarchism to discuss it consistently. They just kind of feel alienated and identify with anarchist ideals but they don't know the anarchist program or methods beyond a very superficial measure.
I was kinda hoping the book club could incentive people to do the reading but anons on this board are just too much of a bunch of lazy faggots. Which also explains why everyone wanted the wiki but now it's completely abandoned: most people here don't have the knowledge or inclination to actually contribute to it.
I mean, fuck, this board is everything that is wrong with the anarchist movement. There are so many lifestylists on this board that we form this general idea that anarchism is about being ideologically pure, disorganized, small, and ineffective.
Fuck that, you people are fucking anarchism over.
24832f No.8057
File: 1426364713454.png (1000.94 KB, 864x2718, 48:151, r_a_l_p__by_rednblacksalam….png)
>>8056>I am almost entirely convinced that the general population of this board isn't informed enough about actual anarchism to discuss it consistently.Do you smell your own farts? Jesus.
>this board is everything that is wrong with the anarchist movement>says the person bumping this cancerous thread
>you people are fucking anarchism overLol, you are going full retard.
3c0d28 No.8058
>>8057You are cancer and the only reason you hate it is because it is trying to expunge the cancer.
How much do you know about actual anarchist theory or practice? Honest question.
4486d2 No.8061
>>8052>All feminists are not femanazis>muh truescotsmanThen we have
>No anarchist is ayncrapI know, i was pointing out that its wrong of people to lump them up with anarchists. Just like it is wrong of people to lump Feminists and Femanazis together. But your to fucking thick to see that arnt you?
>When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim ("no Scotsman would do such a thing"), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective ruleGet your logical fallacies correct.
24832f No.8064
>>8061>still bumping this thread cause you want to prove how cancerous feminists are to everything they touch
>it is wrong of people to lump Feminists and Femanazis togetherFeminazi is just another, more accurate term for feminist. You could say that Feminazi is when feminists level up.
2d787f No.8066
>>8061>Feminazis arent feministsbut they seem to believe in the same thing, one just happens to be batshit insane. Do feminazi beliefs contradict what feminism is about?
>Ayncraps are not anarchistsbecause ayncraps believe in private property and seem to wish to simply rule their own nanostates. Their beliefs contradict what anarchism is.
7faf23 No.8068
You guys really need to spend more time at
>>>/kind/ :c
4486d2 No.8069
>>8066I consider myself a feminist and an anarchist, i want the equal rights of men and women (socially, culturally, and economically), i don't want to establish a matriarchy, i don't hate men (As i am one), i recognize that our society and many others are patriarchal in nature.
Feminism in egalitarianism with a focus on disseminating the systems in place that suppress both men and women in our society..
Femanazis are your stereotypical tumbler SJW, they hate men, don't want equality, they want dominance over men. They hold the basic feminist principals then take them all the the most extreme and usually never intended meaning with a healthy handful of bullshit.
Lemme put it this way, ancraps are the anarchist equivalent of a femanazi, they aren't actual feminists, have no connection to actual feminists, and give the rest of the feminists a bad name.
24832f No.8070
>>8068>>>/reddit/>>8069What you are talking isn't feminism retard, that's egalitarianism.
4486d2 No.8071
>>8070>that's egalitarianism.Dont tell me what i am because it doesn't fit your definition of what you think "feminism" is. I am a Feminist, in not a crazy fucking SJW screaming "Mah patriarchy" and "Gib meh mah male tears"
Egalitarianism isn't a movement, its a principal, and as a principal alone it has accomplished jack shit in the real world, where as feminists, who are egalitarian and hold egalitarian principals have actually accomplished things in the real world, and continue to do so around the world.
Now, you can keep strawmaning the feminist position and lumping them all together as femanazi's, but im done with your bullshit.
24832f No.8073
>>8071lol, you sound mad. Feminism is about women, egalitarianism is about men and women, now pick one FAGGORT
2d787f No.8074
>>8069> they aren't actual feminists, have no connection to actual feministsbut you just said
>hey hold the basic feminist principals then take them all the the most extreme 24832f No.8075
>>8074Remember to sage shit threads, in case you are a newfag: type sage in the email.
4486d2 No.8076
>>8074Ok, lets go back to the ayncrap/anarchist example.
ayncraps hold the basic anarchist principles and most anarchist, and from those basic standpoints they take them and twist them into something completely different from anarchism. Thats what femanazis have done with feminism, they've taken the basics and twisted them and gone to such extremes that it is no long recognizable as feminism.
24832f No.8077
>>8076>muh true scotsman againSexist shitbag.
2d787f No.8078
>>8076Who started with anarchists principles? Rand sure as fuck didn't