*SNAP*The world is now under anarchy, how do you keep it?You tell me, how would the following occur:>equal distribution for the masses and unequal distribution in special scenarios (for instance a program such as NASA)>How do you prevent peop

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File: 1434077698572.png (1.13 MB, 747x794, 747:794, youDontSay.png)

Anon 06/12/15 (Fri) 02:54:58 f2d3a4 No.8941

*SNAP*

The world is now under anarchy, how do you keep it?

You tell me, how would the following occur:

>equal distribution for the masses and unequal distribution in special scenarios (for instance a program such as NASA)

>How do you prevent people promising shelter from forming a state with the power of their loyal people

>Can these societys properly function on large scale or will they have to be broken up

>Technological advancements occur, what is to prevent slow adaption and production

>How do you keep at least the majority of people doing work other then the minimum for resources to live (working in factories and such, someones gotta do it)

Anon 06/12/15 (Fri) 04:25:49 1a3f4a No.8942

>equal distribution for the masses and unequal distribution in special scenarios (for instance a program such as NASA)

http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secI4.html#seci416

>How do you prevent people promising shelter from forming a state with the power of their loyal people

http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secI5.html#seci511

>Can these societys properly function on large scale or will they have to be broken up

http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secI3.html#seci38

>Technological advancements occur, what is to prevent slow adaption and production

http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secI4.html#seci49

>How do you keep at least the majority of people doing work other then the minimum for resources to live (working in factories and such, someones gotta do it)

http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secI4.html#seci413

Anon 06/13/15 (Sat) 01:57:55 375992 No.8959

>>8942

>>How do you prevent people promising shelter from forming a state with the power of their loyal people

Not OP. Read that section, leaves a lot to be desired. According to it, it would be impossible for power hungry people from using brute force to obtain power because everyone just happened to agree beforehand to not let them.

Am I missing something here?

Anon 06/13/15 (Sat) 08:03:31 664a06 No.8966

>>8959

>brute force

OP never mentioned brute force. His concern was the possibility of someone getting other people in their side in exchange for shelter (something everyone would have in anarchism) so they could form a state.

If you really did read the section (and I doubt it), you would see that the section regarding defence from brute force is: http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secH2.html#sech21

Anon 06/16/15 (Tue) 02:02:40 375992 No.8984

>>8966

By brute force I mean using big-stick diplomacy, not putting a gun to someones head and demanding things out of them.

>I know you need this thing that I have, but I want this thing that you have

That's all it takes. Also I am getting really fucking tired of all these people just linking back to this same source for literally every single point instead of having an actual discussion. It's a board for discussing a topic, say your own shit instead of citing the same long-winded text over and over again.

Anon 06/16/15 (Tue) 03:37:15 d962a0 No.8987

File: 1434425835526.png (573.25 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, brice of gommunism.png)

>>8984

>I know you need this thing that I have, but I want this thing that you have

As in barter? How does that work in a socialized economy?

By the way, I can't talk for anyone else, but personally I'm bored of answering the same old questions all over again. That's exactly the kind of issue a FAQ is supposed to address.

Anon 06/17/15 (Wed) 05:28:56 f6cecc No.9008

To answer your third question, they have to be broken up. Regionalism is incredibly important if an anarchist society is going to work. One group of people does not have the right to govern other groups of people. Just as one person does not have the right to govern another.

Anon 06/17/15 (Wed) 05:37:04 cb8c42 No.9009

File: 1434519424665.png (130.94 KB, 631x494, 631:494, 2spooky4stirner.png)

>>9008

Are you going to break up society until you are all by yourself, just to make sure that no other person is governing you?

That's ridiculous. If you want to assure your independence, that's what federalism and right to secession is for. Pre-emptively shattering society is retarded.

Besides, anarchist societies can work on large and should to maximize efficiency.

Anon 06/18/15 (Thu) 00:28:38 7634ae No.9013

>equal distribution for the masses and unequal distribution in special scenarios (for instance a program such as NASA)

well I'm not a marxist so distribution is not a problem for me, only the wage system

>How do you prevent people promising shelter from forming a state with the power of their loyal people

there's no shortage of shelter, there are more abandoned houses in the US than homeless people and thats not counting vacant apartments

>Can these societys properly function on large scale or will they have to be broken up

a stateless world could function

>Technological advancements occur, what is to prevent slow adaption and production

with or without patents everpony wants to make the next big thing, or the next OK thing really

>How do you keep at least the majority of people doing work other then the minimum for resources to live (working in factories and such, someones gotta do it)

again, not a marxist