[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/anarcho/ - Anarchism Board

Anti-Capitalist & Anti-State

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Revolt. Agitate. Organize. Educate. Board Guidelines

File: 1435169097469.jpg (872.23 KB, 1002x648, 167:108, ranarchismcopypasta.jpg)

170775 No.9094

What do you think about it?

2c53a4 No.9095

File: 1435171039753.png (489.92 KB, 500x473, 500:473, waaaaaaaaaaat.png)

>>9094

>dat pic

I wish it was true.


ff84ff No.9098

File: 1435196249892.png (39.9 KB, 625x626, 625:626, fuckitbait.png)

I wish it were true, but they really are just corrupt fucks. I know for a fact one person controls multiple accounts to rig votes in the meta, they all had the same IP.

At this point im pretty sure its all done on purpose to dis allude any actual anarchist thinking to be taken seriously from people that would be interested. One serious look at the sub will easily turn most people off, even serious anarchists.

Its a good example of how even the most well intentioned people when given power are very easily corrupted.


238025 No.9108

>I know for a fact one person controls multiple accounts to rig votes in the meta, they all had the same IP.

Any proof of this?

For most things these days, votes hardly matter. The mod clique just decided that they would start banning people and deleting posts however they liked.

With about 15 people you can dictate that sub however you like.


8ecaa2 No.9109

>constant mod drama

>ban-happiest mods of reddit

>even had a coup

You can't take that place seriously.


ff84ff No.9113

>>9108

When i frequented the place, i decided to try and fight the extreme corruption that was taking place. I tried, and failed. The system is set up in a way that is totaly un-anarchists. I was even told, by fucking mods, that the sub was not meant to be shaped as an anarchist model because it was ineffective on reddit and people needed to control it. A mod, on an anarchist subreddit told me this.

At the time i was looking into this, one user, volcanoclosto , had about 7 confirmed sock accounts that i knew of, and continued to make more an more everyday. I brought this to the mods attention, involving even the admins of the site to check if the users had the same IP, they did and they were eventually banned, but they kept making socks, so when i brought this to the attention of the mods they basically ended up saying "well if they made a new account, it was the old account that was banned, not the person" which is absolute bullshit. That user had a "cult following" and had previous accounts banned over and over, many of which were shadow banned by the admins, she was the metiforical queen of the SJW's on the sub, every person with a "Person of color" or "anarcha-feminists" banner basicly flocked to her support (many of which were made for one month, active in the sub once, and then only active again in the meta threads, most of which were obviously socks, they didn't even bother to change the names all that much and one person could get as many votes as they wanted on pretty much any issue for the most part, and the mods were fine this this).

All the evidence i once had i deleted in frustration when i saw it had absolutely no effect, the system in-place was rotten to the core and and i saw no further point in trying to effect it legitimately, an i refused to turn to there tactics to achieve my goals.


722fe9 No.9117

>>9094

>Laurelei was a mod

No wonder it's shit.


34390b No.9119

>>9113

I can sympathize with you. Sometimes I wonder if the moderators and their clique are genuine or not because their logic is so batshit insane.

It kinda goes like this

A:you're a reactionary

B:What No I'm not

A: Ahh denying it now, what a surprise

B: But I'm not a reactionary I was just saying tha.

A: Banned

C: come on I think you're taking this too far A,

A: Oh you sound like a reactionary defender, maybe you should be next,

it's LITERALLY like that.

I also heard one of them say that the reason Emma Goldman was for free speech was because of the time she lived in and now we don't need free speech.

check it out though, shitstorm incoming

/metanarchism/comments/3bddap/uagnosticnixie_needs_to_have_moderator_status/

Amazingly one of the moderators apologised for deleting stuff.

As for Volc, they really are a special case. I think it got to the stage where even the other members of the clique were asking her to tone it down a notch. Like there is something really wrong with her.

They are now posting on anarchism under the name of lillit.


e3b830 No.9174

>>9113

>>9098

I don't even think its corruption, theres a core of 10 or so posters (all basically some flavour of antifa or lgbt/tranarchists or both) who post all day everyday and so their content dominates.

I use the board because its way faster than here and isn't filled with brilliant non-anarchist minds constantly repeating the same absoloutely brilliant anti-anarchist argumens (i.e. what about human nature?) but leddit is shit. There are quite alot of people who frequent it who seems to be against what appears to be the majority viewpoint but they seem not to comment or post but just up/downvote.

If posters here hurried over there it could improve.


a3140a No.9182

File: 1436599157249.jpg (197.77 KB, 1129x1672, 1129:1672, 1433360741026.jpg)

Reddit died years ago, SRS brought the whole damn thing down.


a7a05a No.9183

File: 1436623286856.jpg (25.27 KB, 335x478, 335:478, 1346418254223.jpg)

>>9182

Is this fucking serious? If that is the case most of the fellow anarchists will be looking for a new home after getting fed up. I say we redirekt them here


8ecaa2 No.9184

>>9183

It's serious but also old.


a3140a No.9185

File: 1436755181752.png (1000.94 KB, 864x2718, 48:151, r_a_l_p__by_rednblacksalam….png)

>>9184

Since then it only got worse. Feminism is for the mentally handicapped.


5352aa No.9203

>>9183

except they didn't. There are people there now who are fully on board with the 'only reactionaries support free speech" idea.

They don't seem to realise that the opposite of free speech is censorship and censorship is literally a hierarchy imposing power.

Free speech means you can still punch someone who's saying shit things if you want, but you can't do it on behalf of others and you take personal responsibility.

They've managed to shout down everyone who was against them in /r/anarchism by accusing them of supporting reactionaries.


594cf9 No.9212

>>9183

I was on /r/anarchism once and saw a post that said

"i think that people are just afraid that if the jihadists take over that theyd start treating women better"




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]