This is just some advice that I'd like to share that I've thought about in regards to Detroit and the (No) State Project. Both of these communities share an opportunity for radical freedom, but they would be quite different from one another.
>Advice for Detroit
If you're going with Detroit I'd say keep to a social anarchist set of tactics. Be as broad as can be. One can not only focus on the working class in this case, since the working class is actually smaller than the unemployed class in Detroit. In this regard, regular worker's unions are not enough, one need to broaden the scope. I think the best would be to to gradually introduce a sense of community unionism through actions on the streets (important: OUTSIDE of the town square). Examples can be setting up so-called 'freeboxes' where people can leave materials that they no longer need at specific locations, free for others to take without cost. In situations like Detroit tactics like Food Not Bombs aren't sustainable, since the need-to-materials ratio is way off. What one should aim to do instead would be to empower the individuals to self-emancipation. One needs to trigger a vibrant sense of co-operative action amongst the people themselves. Therefore setting up community gardens would be a much better strategy for improvement. When neighboring people who maybe previously have never uttered a word to one another are given the chance to work side-by-side for a common goal, morale and communal strength skyrockets.
If/when 'smaller' efforts like these have been established (one must always keep in mind the gradual nature of developments like these) it would maybe be time to help establish decentralized, bio-regional halls for community unionism. My idea here is basically to find larger, abandoned restaurants perhaps and enable it to dual-function as both lax social centers on the regular (something alike a larger neighborhood cafeteria with ping-pong tables, sofas and so on) but also to take the form of the local gathering hall for community organizing when needed. To keep the community updated on these larger gatherings or smaller projects (like the local gardens) one would put up information via pin-boards (set up evenly throughout neighborhoods).
Anyway, that was my brainstorm on Detroit. In short, libertarian communism - go for it.
>Advice for New Hampshire
New Hampshire on the other hand is a completely different beast which requires a completely different set of strategies. Instead of social anarchist direct action you should focus on individualist anarchist action. What exactly do I mean by this? I mean re-introducing these clueless 'radical' capitalists to some actual liberty. Bringing mutualism to the mix. Mutual banks and/or credit unions. I've seen that they've already got Bitcoin rolling, having set up actual Bitcoin ATMs and shit, which is pretty rad, but hardly useful for your average day-to-day transactions. Why not introduce more alt-currencies, a local one, perhaps LETs?
The strategy here would be to simply bridge the gap between these 'radical' capitalists with the smorgasbord of actual anarchist alternatives which were developed by the American mutualists like Tucker. From here, propagandizing about the benefits of co-operatives would flow a lot more naturally (once they've been introduced to actually decentralized ways of doing business), maybe (big maybe) radical labor unions could eventually be introduced from here on, and with this one could finally signal for the social anarchists to come on over, effectively radicalizing an entire state.
One step at a time, though.
One has got to start somewhere, right?