No.22
Do my political views fit with any type of anarchism?
>Not everyone is created equal, but that does not mean you cannot make yourself equal.
>State should not exist
>What you create from nature and make valuable is yours to own
>Ownership of weapons is a right
>Reputation is what dictates society
>Discipline against children is fine, if the child feels it is abuse then the child should leave/runaway/contact an arbitrator/attempt to ruin the parent's reputation
>Abuse of pets/animals are allowed, but you should expect the repercussions of such actions.
>Abuse of humans are immoral/vile, but you should expect the repercussions of such actions(lose of reputation, violence).
>Any group that believes they can rule with only violence will be outcast and annihilated
>Weapons that kill innocent people besides their intended recipient are seen as vile, and would heavily effect the aggressor's reputation.
>Slave labor is seen as vile, as there should be just compensation for the laborer, and if he cannot get compensation, then he should contact an arbitrator/ruin their reputation/refuse their services/take violent action(but should expect violence redirected at him).
>Everyone must fend for themselves, as "Arbeit macht frei"(work makes you free,equal), survival of the best fitted.
>You can do whatever you want, but if you violate other people or their property you should expect a reaction of violence.
>loss of reputation means you lose opportunities, you must convenience others to fix what you have done wrong.
This is just ideals. Is there anything inherently wrong with my beliefs?
I'd like to make it as realistic as possible.
>pic unrelated
No.26
yes, Anarcho Capitalism
No.33
This.
No.45
>morality is subjectve
>survival of the fittest
>might has a big say in what makes right
>every human is equal or has the capacity to become equal to one another (IE no person is inherently better or worse than someone else)
>failure is not bad
>everything people do, they do in self-interest (this is not a bad thing)
>the world is overpopulated
Hit me, /anarchy/. What would you say I am?
I've personally always considered myself a Stirnerist.
No.46
>>45Textbook Social Darwinist.
Next.
No.47
>>46>The individual has always had to struggle to be above the tribe>The individual should always come before the collective No.53
>>46Social Darwinism isn't a political ideology though.
No.55
>>47Could be any number of things, but capitalism most notably.
>>53How not?
No.56
>>45Drop
>failure is not badand you can become a fascist.
No.57
>>56Now this caught my interest. Would you mind to elaborate?
No.59
>>55Would you really describe Nietzsche as a "capitalist" ?
No.63
>>59Nietzsche is an existentialist, there is no point in analyzing his ideas from an economical perspective.
His values, however, are well aligned to those held up by capitalism.
No.69
>>59As far as I know, he is not a economy anything.
He was a philosopher.