>>91I think the problems lie in the words themselves. They are way too loaded. We won't move forward with a sense of unity if we continue to use them. Socialism rings bells of Lenin and Stalin and extreme authoritarianism and Capitalism rings bells of fat businessmen pissing on the bodies of the starving poor.
Market Anarchism:
>"I'm a market anarchist <of the mutualist/georgist/rothbardian orientation>Social Anarchist:
>"I'm a social anarchist <of the communist/collectivist/syndicalist orientation>"This would solve the problem for good. Informal terms, understandable by anyone, lack of historical and statist baggage. This is how we save anarchism from it currently destructive schisms.
>>98That image barely makes any sense. (Nice graphical design though).
Green-, transhumanist-, LGBTQ- and pacifist-anarchism are just identity jargon. Surely important to some, though hardly related to actual economic theories, which are that of the rest.
Agorism is just a revolutionary tactic for market anarchists (actually specifically for rothbardians, though mutualists could easily configure them to their liking) so having a separate icon for that is redundant and makes no sense.
The primitivists would fight the anarchists after the revolution. They are not on our side and have never claimed to be. They would burn our communities when given the chance. To force some phony alliance with them could mean the end to unknowing, gullible groups of anarchists who got a bit too inspired by this exact picture. If they lead with a bit more rationality over feelings, maybe that could be avoided.
Peace.