/ancap/ - Anarcho-Capitalism

>synthesist postanarchist

>synthesis

what do you mean?

Teach free market economic to the Nazis.

they would be eable to buy penile prosthesis and even prosthesis of custom-made parts of body

i ment phalloplasty

i do not visit /pol/

Try /politics/, it's like good old /pol/

>>>/politics/

is pol dominated by alt-right? what political stance dominates on /politics/?

>>854

They try to keep it neutral.

>>25

>talking poorly about queers is going to turn off huge swaths of the population from wanting to hear the stuff that actually matters, etc.

I don't want any of those degenerates in my ancap private kingdom, thank you very much. Those are lefties anyway, let them go and focus on attracting conservatives.

You didn't get the memo? Many ancaps will vote for Trump.

You have to remember that our enemy is not the people we fight, but the ideas which control them. A cop is still human, they're slaves like everyone else. They just think theyre helping.

>>803

This is a really healthy response. I feel like a lot of anarchists hate ANY cop. It's not hating the institution anymore but the specific people and the logic to go so far as that should mean you simply hate everyone that is pro government. They forget that they've all been tricked and that it's their job to educate them. I mostly see this sentiment on the webs but it does make me wonder if many anarchists just want to hate everything to steep in their own bile. Nothings going to change that way. You have to understand them before you can begin to release them from their bondage to the state.

As for conservatives and cops, I think a lot of it comes down to the fact that they don't often have to deal with cops and just see them bringing justice to all the criminal "niggers" because that's what they see on Fox. The one or two incidents where a cop shoots a kid or whatever doesn't seem so bad when you think they're also keeping you from getting robbed every second of the day and you hardly see them.

>>808

Or the incidents where they arrest the wrong guy. And they also generally don't see how so many of the laws they enforce pretty much assume guilt.

>>803

>>808

"There is a war in heaven"

Is a good comparable concept.

Your enemy is not the one your fighting, but rather the concept which pushes him to oppose you.

Cops are supposed to enforce the laws without questioning them. Politicians are the ones who make the laws.

>>666

Information sharing. I think it's necessary to faciliate auxiliaries of knowledge and so I focus my organization around that aspect.

>>666

Being rich, crazy, and aloof.

shilling on /pol/. I was banned for 24 hours :)

OK can someone explain to me who the fuck are these Koch Brothers chucklefucks are and how exactly does supporting the libertarian movement benefit them and how is that exactly a bad thing?

>>655

You know how /pol/ thinks everyone posting against their ideology is from the JDF? The Koch Brothers happen to fund Cato/Hoover/etc.. So people think we're shills.

s/JDF/Koch Brothers basically

>>655

>Who are the Koch Bros?

They're the boogy-man of the American new left, the embodiment of all things wicked, and are often used as a distorted example of how all libertarian thinkers must be. They're extremely rich people who were involved with Rothbard until his disagreement with them https://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/david-gordon/why-the-koch-brothers-went-after-murray-rothbard/ , and who had a strong hand in developing varying think tanks.

>Supporting libertarianism supports the koch brothers

This borders on many fallacies, some of which are guilty-by-association and hasty generalizations. It's no different than saying, Alexander Berkman was a violent anarchist, therefore all anarchists purport a land of reactive violence. We can also rephrase it as this: This person donated money to this place, therefore all people who donate money are just like this person. Importantly, it ignores the actual politicized infighting which went on- and presumably still goes on- in between the upper echelons of Cato and the Kochs. https://archive.is/y9VYf

>why is this a bad thing

I'm not an expert on the Koch Bros but I do know they're wealthy libertarians that finance think tanks which promote philosophical variances ranging from paleo-conservatism to American libertarianism. However, according to Cato:

>Cato is not associated with any political organization or party — Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, or other.

>Cato is a think tank, dedicated to increasing and enhancing the understanding of key public policies and to realistically analyzing their impact — positive, adverse, and other — on the tenets Cato is dedicated to protecting — individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace.

> Why did you become ancaps

Because any amount of statist government is too commie for me.

> why haven't you joined the commie side?

See above.

First, if you are in America, vote for Trump to kick the socialist Mexicans out. Then, while the left is busy poo-pooing President Trump, promote the idea that free trade is compatible with restricted immigration (as Hoppe explained), and that jobs are going to China because China is buying US treasury debt. Trump already proposed to audit the Fed, push the idea that the Fed should be dismantled and America should go back to the gold standard. Then you have basically a minarchy, which is a great start. Then promote private security firms as an alternative to save money spent on the police. Then promote the universal right to secession, down to towns, cities and even individual homes. And there's your ancap America.

Anarco-capitalists reject the idea of "the society" dealing with things. Individuals will act, generally in cooperation to the extent that their goals align. "Society" is merely the aggregation of these actions, rather than the directed actions of a unified collective.

As for unemployment, I might suggest that you may be putting the cart before the horse, so to speak. The goal is not to work, but rather to pursue happiness, which generally requires the consumption of resources. Employment is what happens when people have needs which are not met; the work to produce so that they can consume. Trade enables them to consume things which they do not produce without being a net drain.

Viewed this way, it is clear that without interference in a free market, there cannot be any such thing as involuntary unemployment, excepting perhaps rare extreme cases of persons who cannot move or act in any way. Such people are sufficiently rare to be handled by private charity, but that is a discussion for another time. For the rest, though, those who hunger need not seek permission to work; they need only commence working. With no licenses, permits, or intellectual property, there is very little to stop someone from going into various kinds of business all by themselves. The classic example of a lemonade stand is a good example of a business with a low initial investment which is easy to set up. Even those without capital can enter the service industry through babysitting, giving massages, performance art, prostitution, or even (and this is actually a thing which happens) just getting paid to stand around and look a certain way.

Anarcho-Capitalists solve the unemployment problem by removing the barriers to employment. And while many may decry "sweatshops" due to their poor working conditions, consider that people willingly leave farms to work in them. They may not be pretty, but in poor communities they are often better than the other available alternatives and provide a valuable opportunity for people to work their way out of desperation.

>>485

>9000

>>484

Taxation is a massive source of unemployment and poverty. Taxation plus unrealistic work regulations leads to mass unemployment and system collapse followed by socialism (the govt provides all jobs, yes, just like in North Korea). Taxation without work regulations perpetuates sweatshops. Remove taxation and work regulations and you'll have prosperity. For the few who can't work, recover the traditional role of the family (and friends) in providing welfare and social cohesion. The very few who can't work and have no family or friends would be a negligible burden for private charity.

>>798

Maybe as a political stance, but its a central part of the human psyche

>>813

>but its a central part of the human psyche

[citation needed]

>>811

Why won't you disgusting monoracials listen when we tell you racemixing should be considered a crime against humanity?

I agree. Are you a fellow Hoppean ancap?

>>374

>Violence is an option. A segment of the populace will leverage violence to empower itself. The groups which may best leverage violence will have an advantage over those which refuse to utilize violence as a tool. Inevitably the trends of power-accumulation will favor the groups leveraging violence to such a degree they master the groups which refused to use violence.

>recreating the state, but this time, it's totally not the state…

> system

No

>>460

>History attests more men fight from the compulsion of a higher authority than volunteerism.

Hoppean ancap here.

If you really think a draft is necessary, you can always, in times of peace, propose a "draft contract". It would be something like:

"when/if an enemy attacks, I agree to join the fight iff all the other signers also do it, or else I agree to face the firing squad. All war-related activities will be decided by a general, elected by such and such method (for instance, democratically). Missions will be classified according to risk in such and such manner, and foot soldiers will be assigned to missions by lottery. This contract will expire when the imminent risk of invasion is averted, according to such and such criteria".

Everyone who does NOT sign the contract would be excluded from protection. For instance, a protective wall (but not a spite wall) would be built around his property, giving him access to the outside of the community (for instance, through a tunnel or a walled lane), but also giving the enemy access to his property, without endangering other inhabitants.

Things would be much simpler if the defense strategy is built into the covenant of the gated community. For instance, those who at some point decide they don't like this community any more can, in times of peace, emigrate with full compensation (in gold) for their land and other assets.

>>473

any proofs?

You've managed to pack so many anti-market memes in one shitpost it's amazing.

>Ayncaps

Funny how the first word you write makes the whole thing discardable (that's a word right).

Lol this retard…

Even in the earliest proto-socialist thought, it was always a group of slaves doing all the work so the rest could live in equitable luxury.. Socialist governments take more of the produce of labor of supposedly free men than southern slave holders tool from their slaves. The idea that working without reward for your labor other than food, shelter, and other small necessities is anything other than slavery shows a level of retardation that rivals a Hillary supporter.