>>159
>an ancap society would be cool
You know what's really cool about anarcho-capitalism(aka voluntaryism)? It's backwards compatible with all other forms of anarchy. Want to start an Anarcho-syndicalist/communist/mutualist/whatever society, you can. You just can't force me into it and I can leave if I so choose.
>>160
It doesn't matter if they're for or against intellectual property, you cannot suppress information once it is widely known. Without a state to enforce it, it simply cannot exist.
Private property is a physical good. By definition a good has scarcity. If it's not scarce, it's not a good. Something that's infinitely replicable is not scarce.
e.g. two people can't use the same spoon to mix cake batter at once, but can both use the same recipe.
"Intellectual property" doesn't even exist, it has no market value. Even under state enforcement, It's value always falls to zero(e.g. piracy, open source, ect.) albeit delayed by patents.
>>181
If you're interested, I made a thread over at >>>/anarcho/5297 to try and bridge the gaps between ancoms and ancaps so both could come to a better understanding of each others ideologies instead of the constant shitslinging which leads nowhere.
Feel free to jump in, friend.