Hey guys, im a teen in the 213 area (los Angeles) and was wondering how I can get involved. Things like libertarian organizations or protests. Do you guys know anything of that sort? I already google searched it but came up with nothing.<tinyboard flag>us

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File: 1425406785061.png (5.22 KB, 450x300, 3:2, Ancap_flag.png)

Anonymous 03/03/15 (Tue) 18:19:45 No.354

Hey guys, im a teen in the 213 area (los Angeles) and was wondering how I can get involved. Things like libertarian organizations or protests. Do you guys know anything of that sort? I already google searched it but came up with nothing.

Anonymous 03/04/15 (Wed) 01:35:09 No.355

File: 1425432909360.jpg (152.53 KB, 900x900, 1:1, anarchy-symbol-political-t….jpg)

The best advice I could come up with would be to try and either find or create a group on Meetup or something for your area. I'm in 818 and there's not much out here. I still have yet to meet a fellow AnCap in person.
It may just come with the territory. For an AnCap/Agorist, getting "involved" is mostly a matter of becoming uninvolved with mainstream economics. It would certainly be helpful if we could form more communities of cooperative, like-minded individuals, much like this board was supposed to be.

Anonymous 03/04/15 (Wed) 15:41:18 No.356

>>355
Well, what about libertarian groups? I dont see an ancap revolution, I see it as a transition.

Anonymous 03/05/15 (Thu) 01:48:40 No.357

File: 1425520120071.jpg (73.26 KB, 768x945, 256:315, voting7.jpg)

>>356
>Well, what about libertarian groups?
What about them? If you want to hang out with people who vote, that's fine, but it has nothing to do with AnCap.

>I dont see an ancap revolution, I see it as a transition.
That's an accurate assessment.

Anonymous 03/17/15 (Tue) 05:29:42 No.359

>>354

I'm from a much smaller Met. area and there's a pretty good meetup group going on. If you're really serious, it's worth the expense to set up a meetup group because it gets good turnout.

Anonymous 03/24/15 (Tue) 11:40:56 No.362

Maybe try asking in reddit's an-cap or libertarian board, or on www.liberty.me.

You could look for LA (online) forums, even though LA has driven out most of its libertarians through excessive regulations and such, with 30 mil people there should be some people of like minds…

As for sources of learning, let me suggest Stefan Molyneux (www.youtube.com/stefbot), Tom Woods (https://www.youtube.com/user/TomWoodsTV) and the people that they interview to learn more.

Anonymous 04/04/15 (Sat) 05:54:50 No.392

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

> trying to raise popular societal consciousness while in California

The first thing to do is to leave California. It's a shithole, a boiling frog situation. Feinstein and co. have a literal senatorial dictatorship going down, and most Californians are dead asleep at the wheel.

Just check out the stuff from San Diego- it's nonstop cringes.

On a more practical note, I would suggest that you begin raising social awareness for the absolute need of individual privacy. Begin getting involved within anti-NDAA activism, put up fliers upon nearby poles relating towards libertarian propaganda, drop leaflets downtown and spread them around.

A simple anarchy symbol won't do, that throws most people off. You'll need catchphrases, buzzwords, subtle hints; you should begin looking and reading books upon propaganda, start reading early on books relating to social manipulation. If you truly want the message to get out, you must be willing to challenge all static frameworks, including your own hesitations.

Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 11:30:04 No.443

>>354

Here you go padwan.

http://www.meetup.com/TOTAL-ANARCHY/

Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 11:30:46 No.444

>>443

Also guaranteed there's probably a fed in the group, there's nothing that freaks government out like peaceful non-compliance.

Crown Prince Of Rock is here 04/07/15 (Tue) 15:23:12 No.446

You're already involved by using the US dollar. The Fed is the largest operation in America and it's essentially enforcing an anarchy also known as "liberty".

What do you think Anarchy is? No organized power structures? That's an unrealistic goal, we already are in an Anarchist state, one maintained through a convenient form of extortion and preserved by a military industrial complex. Unless you're working for the states you're part of the anarchy.

Crown Prince Of Rock is here 04/07/15 (Tue) 15:35:27 No.447

>>392
>On a more practical note, I would suggest that you begin raising social awareness for the absolute need of individual privacy.
Enforcing privacy protection would increase the integrity of the state, it would necessitate legislating the state to have the power to protect your privacy, even if it's protecting you from itself. In a proper anarchy the state would be disempowered and wouldn't be capable of doing anything similar to "protecting privacy", any empowered government agent would be able to violate your privacy with no legal repercussion just like they can today, the CIA would know that the US is basically a superpowered anarchy dominated by a handful of "business conglomerates", the most notorious one being the executive "Fed".

You anarchists wanting "libertarianism" is actually further than anarchy than reality is now.

Crown Prince Of Rock is here 04/07/15 (Tue) 15:40:30 No.448

If you really want to be an anarchist start by not getting a drivers license, avoiding public school systems, renting to avoid property taxes, keeping your finances up with straight cash and you're there, you're basically part of the anarchy. Capital gains taxes are part of the anarchy.

Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 23:34:31 No.453

>>447

I don't think I suggested the political enforcement of privacy. It is entirely possible to have personal security without needing a centralized monopoly.

That being said, I agree with you. Anarchy is NOW. The state is just a mere illusion, existing mostly within our head, brutally exercising its conceptual existence through absolute regulatory enforcement.

>>448

This. This so much.

I really think agorism holds an understated importance.

Anonymous 04/18/15 (Sat) 22:51:41 No.474

>>448
>renting to avoid property taxes
Rent goes to pay for the property tax of the landlord though

Anonymous 04/21/15 (Tue) 14:49:18 No.480

>>474

OP here, I was thinking of putting up posters or flyers representing ancap beliefs (on government property of course) do you guys have any high quality pictures for that idea?

Anonymous 04/30/15 (Thu) 04:59:55 No.487

>>446

>The Fed is the largest operation in America and it's essentially enforcing an anarchy also known as "liberty".

>The Fed

>enforcing anarchy

>>447

>Enforcing privacy protection … would necessitate legislating the state to have the power to protect your privacy

How do you you figure? How does that begin to make sense?

>In a proper anarchy the state would be disempowered

In a proper anarchy, by definition, the state does not exist.

>the US is basically a superpowered anarchy dominated by a handful of "business conglomerates", the most notorious one being the executive "Fed".

I can't even begin to imagine how you figure that the largest, most intrusive state in the world is in any way equivalent to the absence of a state.

I'm trying desperately to be polite here, but I'm utterly stumped as to how you come to such glaringly paradoxical conclusions. Is this some kind of comedy that I don't understand?