[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/ancap/ - Anarcho-Capitalism

Free-Market Anarchism

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Welcome to the 8chan /ancap/ board, a platform dedicated towards anarcho-capitalist theory and praxis.
Linked Boards: /anarchism/ /anarcho/

File: 1439517684637.jpg (161.6 KB, 1131x707, 1131:707, 1920139214782.jpg)

 No.598

Could computers take over the boardroom?

Sure Sure. You want to say that all work that produces physical objects is "easy" and that computers are naturally superior to man at software if they gain any level of "intelligence".

Okay.

Computers from the ground up were originally built as information and control systems. Management.

So why are workers replaceable but management would not be?

Executives, bankers, and "charismatic" CEOs are far more replaceable than skilled workers.

''iCEO, a software prototype designed to test whether high-level management can be automated, was launched recently with encouraging initial results. In a 2015 article in Harvard Business Review, Devin Fidler of the non-profit group Institute for the Future outlined what iCEO can teach us about the future of the job world, and specifically, the future of the management structure in the corporate world.

On a base level, the virtual management system automates complex work by dividing it up and assigning out small individual tasks. The creators of the program decided to run experiments to see how far the software could be pushed into traditionally human territory. In the first real test of the software program’s higher-level abilities, iCEO oversaw the completion of a 124-page report in just weeks, when it would have taken months via a traditional management-employee structure.

The quality of iCEO’s work was as impressive as its speed, and the computer program required little human intervention to get the job done.

READ MORE AT >>>/midpol/

“A truly expressive human face as the new ‘interface’ for technology has a broad range of applications where humans need to or benefit from interacting with technology or other humans currently. The highest benefit will be in applications where understanding authentic human behavior is important for technology to better serve people.

Areas where we believe we can make a 100 times impact include healthcare, education and consumer care. Humanoid robots would be ideal for life companions for the elderly, especially those suffering from Alzheimer’s or dementia as well as social training for autistic children. Our robots aim to offer high-fidelity human expression to demonstrate empathy and care while also providing the consistency, repeatability, scalability and reliability necessary satisfy these sorts of necessary services where demand far outstrips qualified human supply and budget today.

Another large opportunity would be in customer/client services such as hotel front desks, bank teller windows, office/airport information desks and government services windows.

To address these opportunities, we are moving forward with two robot ‘classes.’ One is a full-sized human robot production line where very human service robots can be hired to work 24 hours per day, which would be very cost-effective. The other potentially even more exciting product line is our personal robot range which will be sold at exceptionally low prices and powered in whole, or in part, by smartphones.”

https://archive.is/OOLnk

Down with the old order.

Technology can be made useful to our ends. Let every man live from his labour not as a parasite to others.

 No.608

They could, yeah.

Technology has become so widely used. 20 years ago, we needed a recorder, pen, notepad, walkie talkie, phone, pager, newspaper, and portable radio. Now, all my phone does all of those things and acts as a way to do those things.

It seems like its only a matter of time until technology is everywhere, on an even larger scale than now.


 No.613

Personally, I think a cybernetic future is the next step to having total freedom. The more tech we've got, the more things which we can do. For a free future, we're going to need extreme tech.

Let's build automating machines for release from crude works. By doing this, we're getting rid of our dependency on more subtle repression, such as education, the economy, and static tech.


 No.616

>>598

As fascinated and excited as I am by this technology, I feel it important to point out that describing company executives as parasites bespeaks a considerable misapprehension with regard to the economic relationships in which they participate.

If CEOs were parasites, there would be no need to replace them with artificial intelligence.


 No.647

Until we have highly advanced, life-like artificial intelligence, I doubt it. There's a lot more to board rooms and CEOs than meets the eye, and everything needs to be accounted for, but can't. Until our AI can account for those decisions in terms of what will be most profitable, I doubt business owners or investors will let it happen.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]