/ancap/ - Anarcho-Capitalism

>>93
anarchism is the abolition of hierarchy, not necessarily state or capitalism.

>>91
If I can refuse to participate in the contract without imposed consequence, then I'm fine with it.
If children are born into the state, how do you establish the legitimacy of consent? After all, contractual statism basically amounts to "sign this contract or your life as you know it is over".
If I can keep my home and refuse to participate in the state contract, then it's not a state, and you are free to organize your life in this way if you like. It's not very efficient, but it would be your right.

>>95
That depends of the parents of the child. Once grown up, the child chooses.

>>95
But then once in our territory, you may have to depend on the goodwill of the people to let you be.

>>97
Sounds like a vaguely tolerable version of AnSoc, in that it involves the voluntary collectivization of property. Of course, that relies on the ruling persons remaining within the legal constraints of their contractual powers, and we all know how well that tends to turn out.
I wish you luck if you choose to live this way.

>>98

Actually, capitalism is preffered. Slavery and intellectual property rights are also allowed.

ancaps:0
ancommies:0
anstatists:1

>>99
>Slavery and intellectual property rights are also allowed

But that's not capitalism. Capitalism involves the universal recognition of property rights. That means that there can't be involuntary slaves because that would involve infringing upon the individual's self-ownership, though indentured servitude is of course still possible. Intellectual property involves preventing people from producing particular goods and services by government force; it gives persons the power to prohibit others from using their property in that particular way in order to enforce a monopoly, which is decidedly anti-capitalist.

Of course, statism is absolutely antithetical to anarchism. What you're talking about is strict constitutionalism, which has never successfully limited its resulting state.

>>100
Once you give me a product, it's mine, you can't tell me what I can or can't do with it. Because ownership has been transferred to me.

Is this what minarchists are calling themselves now? Because I like the name change.

>>110
No, the voluntaryist state can be as big as the people want.